Media & Entertainment
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
CTCT vs CRM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
CTCT vs CRM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Media & Entertainment | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $1.02B | $135.86B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $362M | $42.83B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $20M | $8.02B |
| Gross Margin | 73.1% | 77.6% |
| Operating Margin | 7.6% | 21.9% |
| Forward P/E | 72.8x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $12M | $17.18B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $104M | $7.33B |
Quick Verdict: CTCT vs CRM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CTCT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 16.2%, EPS growth 91.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.7%
- Low D/E 4.6%, current ratio 3.17x
- current ratio 3.17x
CRM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (14.1x vs 72.8x)
- 18.7% margin vs CTCT's 5.5%
- 1.0% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.2% revenue growth vs CRM's 9.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.1x vs 72.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.7% margin vs CTCT's 5.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (4.6% vs 29.0%) | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.8% ROA vs CTCT's 5.7%, ROIC 10.1% vs 9.0% |
CTCT vs CRM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CTCT vs CRM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRM is the larger business by revenue, generating $42.8B annually — 118.4x CTCT's $362M. CRM is the more profitable business, keeping 18.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CTCT's 5.5%. On growth, CRM holds the edge at +13.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $362M | $42.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $52M | $12.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $20M | $8.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $38M | $14.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.1% | +77.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | +21.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | +18.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.4% | +34.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.0% | +13.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.8% | +52.2% |
Valuation Metrics
CRM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.3x trailing earnings, CRM trades at a 71% valuation discount to CTCT's 72.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CRM's 11.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CTCT's 21.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.0B | $135.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $929M | $145.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 72.75x | 21.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.74x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.26x | 11.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.08x | 3.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.98x | 2.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 30.89x | 9.43x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — CTCT and CRM each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CRM delivers a 14.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $7 for CTCT. CTCT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CRM's 0.29x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CTCT scores 8/9 vs CRM's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.1% | +14.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.7% | +7.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.0% | +10.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.9% | +11.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$92M | $9.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $104M | $7.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12M | $17.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 21.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | -34.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | — | -37.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -20.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -31.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +108.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | -7.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Risk & Volatility
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | — | 0.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | — | $276.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | — | $161.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | — | +59.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.6 | 38.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | — | 12.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
CRM is the only dividend payer here at 1.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $265.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 97 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.66 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | +9.3% |
CRM leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
CTCT vs CRM: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CTCT or CRM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Constant Contact, Inc.
(CTCT) is the stronger pick with 16. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 6% for Salesforce, Inc. (CRM). Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) offers the better valuation at 21. 3x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) a "Buy" — based on 97 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CTCT or CRM?
On trailing P/E, Salesforce, Inc.
(CRM) is the cheapest at 21. 3x versus Constant Contact, Inc. at 72. 8x.
03Which is safer — CTCT or CRM?
On balance sheet safety, Constant Contact, Inc.
(CTCT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 29% for Salesforce, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CTCT or CRM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Constant Contact, Inc.
(CTCT) is pulling ahead at 16. 2% versus 9. 6% for Salesforce, Inc. (CRM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Constant Contact, Inc. grew EPS 91. 3% year-over-year, compared to 22. 6% for Salesforce, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CTCT leads at 15. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CTCT or CRM?
Salesforce, Inc.
(CRM) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 0% net margin versus 4. 3% for Constant Contact, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CRM leads at 21. 5% versus 6. 0% for CTCT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRM leads at 77. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CTCT or CRM?
In this comparison, CRM (1.
0% yield) pays a dividend. CTCT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is CTCT or CRM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Salesforce, Inc.
(CRM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 64), 1. 0% yield, +108. 7% 10Y return). Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CTCT and CRM?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CTCT is a small-cap high-growth stock; CRM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. CRM pays a dividend while CTCT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.