Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
QNST vs MTCH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
QNST vs MTCH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $753M | $8.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.18B | $3.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-30M | $663M |
| Gross Margin | 10.5% | 73.8% |
| Operating Margin | 1.7% | 26.6% |
| Forward P/E | 10.4x | 13.9x |
| Total Debt | $10M | $3.97B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $101M | $1.03B |
QNST vs MTCH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| QuinStreet, Inc. (QNST) | 100 | 130.3 | +30.3% |
| Match Group, Inc. (MTCH) | 100 | 41.5 | -58.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: QNST vs MTCH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
QNST is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 78.3%, EPS growth 114.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.4%
- 284.0% 10Y total return vs MTCH's 204.1%
- 78.3% revenue growth vs MTCH's 0.2%
MTCH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.10, yield 1.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.10, current ratio 1.42x
- Beta 1.10, yield 1.9%, current ratio 1.42x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 78.3% revenue growth vs MTCH's 0.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.4x vs 13.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.8% margin vs QNST's -2.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.10 vs QNST's 1.23 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.3% vs QNST's -15.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.3% ROA vs QNST's -5.9%, ROIC 23.7% vs 2.8% |
QNST vs MTCH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
QNST vs MTCH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MTCH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MTCH is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.5B annually — 3.0x QNST's $1.2B. MTCH is the more profitable business, keeping 18.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to QNST's -2.6%. On growth, QNST holds the edge at +28.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $3.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $26M | $1.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$30M | $663M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $99M | $1.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +10.5% | +73.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | +26.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | +18.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | +29.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +28.3% | +3.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +59.4% | +45.5% |
Valuation Metrics
MTCH leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.5x trailing earnings, MTCH trades at a 91% valuation discount to QNST's 163.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MTCH's 11.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than QNST's 21.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $753M | $8.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $662M | $11.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 163.69x | 15.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.40x | 13.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.53x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.56x | 11.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.69x | 2.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.16x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.08x | 8.40x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MTCH leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), QNST scores 8/9 vs MTCH's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -11.1% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.9% | +15.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.8% | +23.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.4% | +23.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$91M | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $101M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.64x | 6.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
QNST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in QNST five years ago would be worth $7,413 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,687 for MTCH. Over the past 12 months, MTCH leads with a +37.3% total return vs QNST's -15.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors QNST at 21.4% vs MTCH's 5.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.2% | +17.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -15.5% | +37.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +79.0% | +17.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.9% | -73.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +284.0% | +204.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.4% | +5.5% |
Risk & Volatility
MTCH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MTCH is the less volatile stock with a 1.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than QNST's 1.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MTCH currently trades 94.3% from its 52-week high vs QNST's 77.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.23x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.13 | $39.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.29 | $26.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.1% | +94.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.7 | 52.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 689K | 4.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates QNST as "Buy" and MTCH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.6% upside for QNST (target: $15) vs 11.3% for MTCH (target: $41). MTCH is the only dividend payer here at 1.92% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.00 | $41.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +9.2% |
MTCH leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). QNST leads in 1 (Total Returns).
QNST vs MTCH: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is QNST or MTCH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, QuinStreet, Inc.
(QNST) is the stronger pick with 78. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 2% for Match Group, Inc. (MTCH). Match Group, Inc. (MTCH) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (13. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate QuinStreet, Inc. (QNST) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — QNST or MTCH?
On trailing P/E, Match Group, Inc.
(MTCH) is the cheapest at 15. 5x versus QuinStreet, Inc. at 163. 7x. On forward P/E, QuinStreet, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — QNST or MTCH?
Over the past 5 years, QuinStreet, Inc.
(QNST) delivered a total return of -25. 9%, compared to -73. 1% for Match Group, Inc. (MTCH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: QNST returned +284. 0% versus MTCH's +204. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — QNST or MTCH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Match Group, Inc.
(MTCH) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 10β versus QuinStreet, Inc. 's 1. 23β — meaning QNST is approximately 12% more volatile than MTCH relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — QNST or MTCH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), QuinStreet, Inc.
(QNST) is pulling ahead at 78. 3% versus 0. 2% for Match Group, Inc. (MTCH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: QuinStreet, Inc. grew EPS 114. 2% year-over-year, compared to 17. 8% for Match Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, QNST leads at 23. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — QNST or MTCH?
Match Group, Inc.
(MTCH) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 6% net margin versus 0. 4% for QuinStreet, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MTCH leads at 25. 0% versus 0. 6% for QNST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MTCH leads at 72. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is QNST or MTCH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, QuinStreet, Inc.
(QNST) trades at 10. 4x forward P/E versus 13. 9x for Match Group, Inc. — 3. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for QNST: 13. 6% to $15. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — QNST or MTCH?
In this comparison, MTCH (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. QNST does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is QNST or MTCH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Match Group, Inc.
(MTCH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 10), 1. 9% yield, +204. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MTCH: +204. 1%, QNST: +284. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between QNST and MTCH?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: QNST is a small-cap high-growth stock; MTCH is a small-cap deep-value stock. MTCH pays a dividend while QNST does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 11%
- Dividend Yield > 0.7%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.