Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ABEO vs RARE vs BMRN vs KRYS vs RCKT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ABEO
Abeona Therapeutics Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$318M
5Y Perf.-93.0%
RARE
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.57B
5Y Perf.-61.8%
BMRN
BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$10.41B
5Y Perf.-49.2%
KRYS
Krystal Biotech, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$8.75B
5Y Perf.+477.1%
RCKT
Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$398M
5Y Perf.-80.5%

ABEO vs RARE vs BMRN vs KRYS vs RCKT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ABEO logoABEO
RARE logoRARE
BMRN logoBMRN
KRYS logoKRYS
RCKT logoRCKT
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$318M$2.57B$10.41B$8.75B$398M
Revenue (TTM)$6M$669M$3.24B$417M$0.00
Net Income (TTM)$71M$-609M$269M$225M$-223M
Gross Margin26.3%83.6%75.9%92.8%
Operating Margin-15.4%-83.9%13.8%42.8%
Forward P/E5.7x12.6x39.3x
Total Debt$25M$1.28B$643M$9M$25M
Cash & Equiv.$78M$434M$1.31B$496M$78M

ABEO vs RARE vs BMRN vs KRYS vs RCKTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ABEO
RARE
BMRN
KRYS
RCKT
StockMay 20May 26Return
Abeona Therapeutics… (ABEO)1007.0-93.0%
Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE)10038.2-61.8%
BioMarin Pharmaceut… (BMRN)10050.8-49.2%
Krystal Biotech, In… (KRYS)100577.1+477.1%
Rocket Pharmaceutic… (RCKT)10019.5-80.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ABEO vs RARE vs BMRN vs KRYS vs RCKT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ABEO leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. KRYS also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ABEO
Abeona Therapeutics Inc.
The Income Pick

ABEO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.34
  • 222.9% revenue growth vs RCKT's 10.5%
  • Better valuation composite
  • 12.2% margin vs RARE's -91.0%
Best for: income & stability
RARE
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
The Growth Angle

RARE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
BMRN
BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.
The Defensive Choice

BMRN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability is your priority.

  • Beta 0.65 vs RARE's 1.42
Best for: stability
KRYS
Krystal Biotech, Inc.
The Growth Play

KRYS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 33.9%, EPS growth 128.0%
  • 26.9% 10Y total return vs BMRN's -35.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.12, Low D/E 0.8%, current ratio 9.95x
  • Beta 1.12, current ratio 9.95x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
RCKT
Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, RCKT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthABEO logoABEO222.9% revenue growth vs RCKT's 10.5%
ValueABEO logoABEOBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsABEO logoABEO12.2% margin vs RARE's -91.0%
Stability / SafetyBMRN logoBMRNBeta 0.65 vs RARE's 1.42
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)KRYS logoKRYS+116.9% vs RCKT's -45.2%
Efficiency (ROA)ABEO logoABEO35.8% ROA vs RCKT's -67.5%, ROIC -89.8% vs -63.2%

ABEO vs RARE vs BMRN vs KRYS vs RCKT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ABEOAbeona Therapeutics Inc.
FY 2025
License
58.4%$3M
Product
41.6%$2M
RAREUltragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
FY 2025
Product
54.8%$369M
Royalty
45.2%$304M
BMRNBioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.
FY 2025
Product
98.3%$3.2B
Royalty And Other
1.7%$53M
KRYSKrystal Biotech, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

RCKTRocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ABEO vs RARE vs BMRN vs KRYS vs RCKT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKRYSLAGGINGRCKT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KRYS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

BMRN and RCKT operate at a comparable scale, with $3.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. ABEO is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RARE's -91.0%. On growth, KRYS holds the edge at +31.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricABEO logoABEOAbeona Therapeuti…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…BMRN logoBMRNBioMarin Pharmace…KRYS logoKRYSKrystal Biotech, …RCKT logoRCKTRocket Pharmaceut…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$6M$669M$3.2B$417M$0
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$86M-$536M$521M$185M-$232M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$71M-$609M$269M$225M-$223M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$84M-$487M$767M$237M-$190M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+26.3%+83.6%+75.9%+92.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-15.4%-83.9%+13.8%+42.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+12.2%-91.0%+8.3%+53.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-14.5%-72.8%+23.7%+56.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-2.4%+2.8%+31.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-56.5%-17.2%-43.2%+52.5%+38.7%
KRYS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BMRN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 5.7x trailing earnings, ABEO trades at a 87% valuation discount to KRYS's 43.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BMRN's 15.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KRYS's 49.2x.

MetricABEO logoABEOAbeona Therapeuti…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…BMRN logoBMRNBioMarin Pharmace…KRYS logoKRYSKrystal Biotech, …RCKT logoRCKTRocket Pharmaceut…
Market CapShares × price$318M$2.6B$10.4B$8.7B$398M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$264M$3.4B$9.7B$8.3B$345M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS5.71x-4.48x30.07x43.38x-1.83x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.60x39.33x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple15.89x49.21x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue54.57x3.82x3.23x22.48x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.40x1.75x7.29x1.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF14.36x46.30x
BMRN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — ABEO and KRYS each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

ABEO delivers a 53.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $53 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. KRYS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ABEO's 0.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ABEO scores 6/9 vs RCKT's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricABEO logoABEOAbeona Therapeuti…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…BMRN logoBMRNBioMarin Pharmace…KRYS logoKRYSKrystal Biotech, …RCKT logoRCKTRocket Pharmaceut…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+53.2%-6.1%+4.4%+19.3%-80.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+35.8%-45.8%+3.4%+17.6%-67.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-89.8%-89.4%+7.4%+18.0%-63.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-63.4%-46.4%+8.1%+14.8%-58.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–964551
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.16x0.11x0.01x0.09x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$53M$842M-$669M-$487M-$53M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$78M$434M$1.3B$496M$78M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$25M$1.3B$643M$9M$25M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense19.23x-14.49x16.96x
Evenly matched — ABEO and KRYS each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

KRYS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in KRYS five years ago would be worth $41,919 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $838 for RCKT. Over the past 12 months, KRYS leads with a +116.9% total return vs RCKT's -45.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KRYS at 50.1% vs RCKT's -44.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricABEO logoABEOAbeona Therapeuti…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…BMRN logoBMRNBioMarin Pharmace…KRYS logoKRYSKrystal Biotech, …RCKT logoRCKTRocket Pharmaceut…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+8.7%+10.7%-9.0%+20.2%+6.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+9.5%-21.8%-8.8%+116.9%-45.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+84.3%-44.5%-43.6%+238.5%-82.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-85.0%-77.2%-30.4%+319.2%-91.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-90.7%-59.4%-35.6%+2688.5%-91.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+22.6%-17.8%-17.4%+50.1%-44.4%
KRYS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BMRN and KRYS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

BMRN is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RARE's 1.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KRYS currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs RCKT's 49.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricABEO logoABEOAbeona Therapeuti…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…BMRN logoBMRNBioMarin Pharmace…KRYS logoKRYSKrystal Biotech, …RCKT logoRCKTRocket Pharmaceut…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.34x1.42x0.65x1.12x1.31x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$7.54$42.37$66.28$303.00$7.39
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$4.00$18.29$50.76$122.80$2.19
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+76.5%+61.7%+81.7%+97.9%+49.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10069.466.648.764.354.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.2M1.8M1.8M264K3.5M
Evenly matched — BMRN and KRYS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: ABEO as "Buy", RARE as "Buy", BMRN as "Buy", KRYS as "Buy", RCKT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 194.6% upside for ABEO (target: $17) vs 12.2% for KRYS (target: $333).

MetricABEO logoABEOAbeona Therapeuti…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…BMRN logoBMRNBioMarin Pharmace…KRYS logoKRYSKrystal Biotech, …RCKT logoRCKTRocket Pharmaceut…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$17.00$51.50$89.64$332.75$5.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts933411719
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises11
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

KRYS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). BMRN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallKrystal Biotech, Inc. (KRYS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ABEO vs RARE vs BMRN vs KRYS vs RCKT: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ABEO or RARE or BMRN or KRYS or RCKT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Krystal Biotech, Inc.

(KRYS) is the stronger pick with 33. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 9% for BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. (BMRN). Abeona Therapeutics Inc. (ABEO) offers the better valuation at 5. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Abeona Therapeutics Inc. (ABEO) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ABEO or RARE or BMRN or KRYS or RCKT?

On trailing P/E, Abeona Therapeutics Inc.

(ABEO) is the cheapest at 5. 7x versus Krystal Biotech, Inc. at 43. 4x. On forward P/E, BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ABEO or RARE or BMRN or KRYS or RCKT?

Over the past 5 years, Krystal Biotech, Inc.

(KRYS) delivered a total return of +319. 2%, compared to -91. 6% for Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RCKT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KRYS returned +26. 9% versus RCKT's -91. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ABEO or RARE or BMRN or KRYS or RCKT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.

(BMRN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. 's 1. 42β — meaning RARE is approximately 118% more volatile than BMRN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Krystal Biotech, Inc. (KRYS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 16% for Abeona Therapeutics Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ABEO or RARE or BMRN or KRYS or RCKT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Krystal Biotech, Inc.

(KRYS) is pulling ahead at 33. 9% versus 12. 9% for BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. (BMRN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Abeona Therapeutics Inc. grew EPS 165. 2% year-over-year, compared to -18. 6% for BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ABEO leads at 60. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ABEO or RARE or BMRN or KRYS or RCKT?

Abeona Therapeutics Inc.

(ABEO) is the more profitable company, earning 1223% net margin versus -85. 4% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. — meaning it keeps 1223% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KRYS leads at 41. 5% versus -1536. 9% for ABEO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KRYS leads at 92. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ABEO or RARE or BMRN or KRYS or RCKT more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.

(BMRN) trades at 12. 6x forward P/E versus 39. 3x for Krystal Biotech, Inc. — 26. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ABEO: 194. 6% to $17. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ABEO or RARE or BMRN or KRYS or RCKT?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is ABEO or RARE or BMRN or KRYS or RCKT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.

(BMRN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 65)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BMRN: -35. 6%, RARE: -59. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ABEO and RARE and BMRN and KRYS and RCKT?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ABEO is a small-cap deep-value stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock; BMRN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KRYS is a small-cap high-growth stock; RCKT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ABEO

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 733%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RARE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 50%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BMRN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KRYS

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 15%
  • Net Margin > 32%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RCKT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.