Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ABUS vs REPL vs ASMB vs ALNY vs BMY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
ABUS vs REPL vs ASMB vs ALNY vs BMY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $838M | $266M | $492M | $39.48B | $114.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $14M | $0.00 | $63M | $4.29B | $48.48B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-34M | $-315M | $-6M | $577M | $7.28B |
| Gross Margin | 2.8% | — | 74.3% | 80.9% | 68.7% |
| Operating Margin | -271.0% | — | -21.5% | 17.5% | 25.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 44.2x | 8.9x |
| Total Debt | $746K | $76M | $3M | $1.28B | $47.14B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $18M | $111M | $58M | $1.66B | $10.21B |
ABUS vs REPL vs ASMB vs ALNY vs BMY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arbutus Biopharma C… (ABUS) | 100 | 200.5 | +100.5% |
| Replimune Group, In… (REPL) | 100 | 17.8 | -82.2% |
| Assembly Bioscience… (ASMB) | 100 | 13.2 | -86.8% |
| Alnylam Pharmaceuti… (ALNY) | 100 | 218.8 | +118.8% |
| Bristol-Myers Squib… (BMY) | 100 | 94.2 | -5.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ABUS vs REPL vs ASMB vs ALNY vs BMY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ABUS is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.39, Low D/E 1.0%, current ratio 15.73x
REPL is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.83, current ratio 7.95x
ASMB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 153.5% revenue growth vs REPL's -39.7%
- +149.2% vs REPL's -53.4%
ALNY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 65.2%, EPS growth 206.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 53.0%
- 411.9% 10Y total return vs BMY's 6.7%
- 11.8% ROA vs REPL's -94.4%, ROIC 33.4% vs -51.9%
BMY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.50, yield 4.4%
- Lower P/E (8.9x vs 44.2x)
- 15.0% margin vs ABUS's -237.9%
- Beta 0.50 vs ASMB's 1.67
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 153.5% revenue growth vs REPL's -39.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.9x vs 44.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.0% margin vs ABUS's -237.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs ASMB's 1.67 | |
| Dividends | 4.4% yield; 6-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +149.2% vs REPL's -53.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.8% ROA vs REPL's -94.4%, ROIC 33.4% vs -51.9% |
ABUS vs REPL vs ASMB vs ALNY vs BMY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ABUS vs REPL vs ASMB vs ALNY vs BMY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BMY leads in 3 of 6 categories
ALNY leads 1 • ASMB leads 1 • ABUS leads 0 • REPL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ALNY and BMY each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BMY and REPL operate at a comparable scale, with $48.5B and $0 in trailing revenue. BMY is the more profitable business, keeping 15.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ABUS's -2.4%. On growth, ALNY holds the edge at +96.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $14M | $0 | $63M | $4.3B | $48.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$37M | -$323M | -$13M | $677M | $15.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$34M | -$315M | -$6M | $577M | $7.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$40M | -$283M | -$40M | $641M | $11.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | — | +74.3% | +80.9% | +68.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.7% | — | -21.5% | +17.5% | +25.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | — | -10.2% | +13.5% | +15.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.8% | — | -63.3% | +15.0% | +24.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -33.2% | — | -100.0% | +96.4% | +2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +80.6% | +2.5% | +53.8% | +4.4% | +9.2% |
Valuation Metrics
BMY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.3x trailing earnings, BMY trades at a 87% valuation discount to ALNY's 127.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BMY's 9.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALNY's 70.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $838M | $266M | $492M | $39.5B | $114.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $820M | $231M | $436M | $39.1B | $151.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -25.59x | -1.09x | -56.24x | 127.00x | 16.30x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 44.18x | 8.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 70.17x | 9.17x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 59.47x | — | 6.80x | 10.63x | 2.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 10.88x | 0.65x | 1.68x | 50.50x | 6.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 84.84x | 8.94x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALNY leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALNY delivers a 98.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $98 in annual profit, vs $-150 for REPL. ABUS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BMY's 2.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BMY scores 8/9 vs REPL's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -42.4% | -149.5% | -4.2% | +98.3% | +39.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -32.5% | -94.4% | -3.1% | +11.8% | +7.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -47.1% | -51.9% | -12.2% | +33.4% | +16.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -37.3% | -55.9% | -8.7% | +15.3% | +18.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.18x | 0.01x | 1.62x | 2.55x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$17M | -$35M | -$56M | -$379M | $36.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18M | $111M | $58M | $1.7B | $10.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $746,000 | $76M | $3M | $1.3B | $47.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -129.55x | -48.62x | — | 2.02x | 10.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ASMB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALNY five years ago would be worth $22,537 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $932 for REPL. Over the past 12 months, ASMB leads with a +149.2% total return vs REPL's -53.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASMB at 35.3% vs REPL's -43.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.8% | -62.5% | -8.4% | -26.1% | +7.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.2% | -53.4% | +149.2% | +7.0% | +23.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.7% | -81.5% | +147.8% | +40.9% | -7.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +54.8% | -90.7% | -36.5% | +125.4% | +5.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.4% | -78.0% | -47.8% | +411.9% | +6.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.6% | -43.0% | +35.3% | +12.1% | -2.4% |
Risk & Volatility
BMY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BMY is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ASMB's 1.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BMY currently trades 89.4% from its 52-week high vs REPL's 25.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.39x | 0.83x | 1.67x | 0.71x | 0.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.10 | $13.24 | $39.71 | $495.55 | $62.89 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.94 | $1.50 | $11.64 | $245.96 | $42.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.3% | +25.2% | +77.9% | +59.7% | +89.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.6 | 46.3 | 64.5 | 43.8 | 41.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.3M | 5.6M | 103K | 1.1M | 10.3M |
Analyst Outlook
BMY leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ABUS as "Buy", REPL as "Buy", ASMB as "Buy", ALNY as "Buy", BMY as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 274.3% upside for REPL (target: $13) vs 10.2% for BMY (target: $62). BMY is the only dividend payer here at 4.39% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.50 | $12.50 | $40.00 | $445.67 | $62.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 15 | 11 | 52 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +4.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | — | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $2.47 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BMY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). ALNY leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
ABUS vs REPL vs ASMB vs ALNY vs BMY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ABUS or REPL or ASMB or ALNY or BMY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Assembly Biosciences, Inc.
(ASMB) is the stronger pick with 153. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 2% for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY). Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) offers the better valuation at 16. 3x trailing P/E (8. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Arbutus Biopharma Corporation (ABUS) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ABUS or REPL or ASMB or ALNY or BMY?
On trailing P/E, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) is the cheapest at 16.
3x versus Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 127. 0x. On forward P/E, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company is actually cheaper at 8. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ABUS or REPL or ASMB or ALNY or BMY?
Over the past 5 years, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) delivered a total return of +125. 4%, compared to -90. 7% for Replimune Group, Inc. (REPL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALNY returned +411. 9% versus REPL's -78. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ABUS or REPL or ASMB or ALNY or BMY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
50β versus Assembly Biosciences, Inc. 's 1. 67β — meaning ASMB is approximately 232% more volatile than BMY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arbutus Biopharma Corporation (ABUS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ABUS or REPL or ASMB or ALNY or BMY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Assembly Biosciences, Inc.
(ASMB) is pulling ahead at 153. 5% versus -0. 2% for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 206. 9% year-over-year, compared to 5. 2% for Replimune Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALNY leads at 53. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ABUS or REPL or ASMB or ALNY or BMY?
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) is the more profitable company, earning 14.
6% net margin versus -237. 9% for Arbutus Biopharma Corporation — meaning it keeps 14. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BMY leads at 26. 3% versus -271. 0% for ABUS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASMB leads at 99. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ABUS or REPL or ASMB or ALNY or BMY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) trades at 8.
9x forward P/E versus 44. 2x for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 35. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for REPL: 274. 3% to $12. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — ABUS or REPL or ASMB or ALNY or BMY?
In this comparison, BMY (4.
4% yield) pays a dividend. ABUS, REPL, ASMB, ALNY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ABUS or REPL or ASMB or ALNY or BMY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
50), 4. 4% yield). Assembly Biosciences, Inc. (ASMB) carries a higher beta of 1. 67 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BMY: +6. 7%, ASMB: -47. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ABUS and REPL and ASMB and ALNY and BMY?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ABUS is a small-cap high-growth stock; REPL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ASMB is a small-cap high-growth stock; ALNY is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BMY is a mid-cap deep-value stock. BMY pays a dividend while ABUS, REPL, ASMB, ALNY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.