Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ACEL vs LNW vs NCLH vs VICI vs GLPI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Travel Services
REIT - Diversified
REIT - Specialty
ACEL vs LNW vs NCLH vs VICI vs GLPI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Travel Services | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $925M | $8.13B | $7.91B | $30.78B | $13.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.36B | $3.22B | $10.03B | $4.05B | $1.56B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $52M | $399M | $568M | $3.10B | $892M |
| Gross Margin | 31.8% | 72.7% | 43.0% | 99.2% | 39.1% |
| Operating Margin | 8.0% | 23.9% | 15.9% | 98.7% | 82.0% |
| Forward P/E | 14.3x | 15.9x | 8.2x | 10.1x | 15.0x |
| Total Debt | $629M | $3.92B | $14.61B | $0.00 | $7.79B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $297M | $196M | $210M | $563M | $224M |
ACEL vs LNW vs NCLH vs VICI vs GLPI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accel Entertainment… (ACEL) | 100 | 112.0 | +12.0% |
| Light & Wonder, Inc. (LNW) | 100 | 655.4 | +555.4% |
| Norwegian Cruise Li… (NCLH) | 100 | 110.0 | +10.0% |
| VICI Properties Inc. (VICI) | 100 | 146.7 | +46.7% |
| Gaming and Leisure … (GLPI) | 100 | 138.8 | +38.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ACEL vs LNW vs NCLH vs VICI vs GLPI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ACEL lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
LNW ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 9.9%, EPS growth 110.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.0%
- 10.4% 10Y total return vs GLPI's 122.5%
- 9.9% revenue growth vs NCLH's 3.7%
Among these 5 stocks, NCLH doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
VICI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 1.21 vs GLPI's 2.97
- Lower P/E (10.1x vs 15.0x), PEG 1.21 vs 2.97
- 76.7% margin vs ACEL's 3.8%
GLPI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.19, yield 6.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.19, current ratio 9.56x
- Beta 0.19, yield 6.5%, current ratio 9.56x
- Beta 0.19 vs NCLH's 2.26, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.9% revenue growth vs NCLH's 3.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.1x vs 15.0x), PEG 1.21 vs 2.97 | |
| Quality / Margins | 76.7% margin vs ACEL's 3.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.19 vs NCLH's 2.26, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs VICI's 6.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +9.6% vs VICI's -3.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.9% ROA vs NCLH's 2.5%, ROIC 7.3% vs 7.5% |
ACEL vs LNW vs NCLH vs VICI vs GLPI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ACEL vs LNW vs NCLH vs VICI vs GLPI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VICI leads in 2 of 6 categories
LNW leads 1 • GLPI leads 1 • ACEL leads 0 • NCLH leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VICI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NCLH is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.0B annually — 7.4x ACEL's $1.4B. VICI is the more profitable business, keeping 76.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACEL's 3.8%. On growth, NCLH holds the edge at +9.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $3.2B | $10.0B | $4.0B | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $182M | $1.2B | $2.6B | $4.0B | $1.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $52M | $399M | $568M | $3.1B | $892M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $153M | $389M | -$949M | $2.5B | $585M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.8% | +72.7% | +43.0% | +99.2% | +39.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | +23.9% | +15.9% | +98.7% | +82.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.8% | +12.4% | +5.7% | +76.7% | +57.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | +12.1% | -9.5% | +63.0% | +37.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.5% | +2.9% | +9.6% | +3.5% | -9.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | +24.1% | +3.5% | +60.8% | +38.3% |
Valuation Metrics
VICI leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.0x trailing earnings, VICI trades at a 59% valuation discount to LNW's 26.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), VICI offers better value at 1.33x vs GLPI's 3.24x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $925M | $8.1B | $7.9B | $30.8B | $13.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $11.9B | $22.3B | $30.2B | $21.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.93x | 26.62x | 19.13x | 11.03x | 16.30x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.25x | 15.89x | 8.20x | 10.07x | 14.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.33x | 3.24x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.73x | 11.52x | 8.14x | 8.28x | 14.24x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.69x | 2.55x | 0.80x | 7.68x | 8.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.58x | 14.02x | 3.58x | 1.08x | 2.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.92x | 24.06x | — | 12.27x | 16.45x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — LNW and VICI each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LNW delivers a 55.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $55 in annual profit, vs $11 for VICI. GLPI carries lower financial leverage with a 1.56x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NCLH's 6.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACEL scores 7/9 vs VICI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.0% | +55.2% | +27.0% | +11.0% | +17.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.7% | +6.1% | +2.5% | +6.7% | +6.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.8% | +11.6% | +7.5% | +7.6% | +7.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.3% | +14.0% | +10.2% | +8.0% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.30x | 6.16x | 6.61x | — | 1.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $333M | $3.7B | $14.4B | -$563M | $7.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $297M | $196M | $210M | $563M | $224M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $629M | $3.9B | $14.6B | $0 | $7.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.23x | 2.67x | 1.60x | 4.45x | 3.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LNW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LNW five years ago would be worth $17,488 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,046 for NCLH. Over the past 12 months, GLPI leads with a +9.6% total return vs VICI's -3.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LNW at 18.3% vs VICI's 1.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.1% | -4.9% | -24.4% | +3.9% | +9.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -1.8% | +4.6% | -0.5% | -3.4% | +9.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.8% | +65.5% | +20.8% | +2.9% | +11.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -6.6% | +74.9% | -39.5% | +17.4% | +33.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.9% | +1035.2% | -65.0% | +118.9% | +122.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.0% | +18.3% | +6.5% | +1.0% | +3.5% |
Risk & Volatility
GLPI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GLPI is the less volatile stock with a 0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NCLH's 2.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GLPI currently trades 95.9% from its 52-week high vs NCLH's 63.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.84x | 1.04x | 2.26x | 0.22x | 0.19x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.31 | $122.65 | $27.18 | $34.01 | $49.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.55 | $69.56 | $16.87 | $26.55 | $41.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.3% | +79.9% | +63.4% | +84.7% | +95.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.0 | 41.3 | 42.5 | 53.5 | 58.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 386K | 88K | 21.8M | 7.6M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — VICI and GLPI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ACEL as "Buy", LNW as "Hold", NCLH as "Buy", VICI as "Buy", GLPI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 109.2% upside for LNW (target: $205) vs 6.8% for GLPI (target: $51). For income investors, GLPI offers the higher dividend yield at 6.50% vs VICI's 6.06%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.33 | $205.00 | $24.18 | $32.00 | $51.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 13 | 37 | 26 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +6.1% | +6.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 | — | 8 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.74 | $3.11 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.3% | +5.7% | +0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
VICI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). LNW leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
ACEL vs LNW vs NCLH vs VICI vs GLPI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ACEL or LNW or NCLH or VICI or GLPI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Light & Wonder, Inc.
(LNW) is the stronger pick with 9. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 7% for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH). VICI Properties Inc. (VICI) offers the better valuation at 11. 0x trailing P/E (10. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Accel Entertainment, Inc. (ACEL) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ACEL or LNW or NCLH or VICI or GLPI?
On trailing P/E, VICI Properties Inc.
(VICI) is the cheapest at 11. 0x versus Light & Wonder, Inc. at 26. 6x. On forward P/E, Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. is actually cheaper at 8. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: VICI Properties Inc. wins at 1. 21x versus Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. 's 2. 97x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ACEL or LNW or NCLH or VICI or GLPI?
Over the past 5 years, Light & Wonder, Inc.
(LNW) delivered a total return of +74. 9%, compared to -39. 5% for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LNW returned +1035% versus NCLH's -65. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ACEL or LNW or NCLH or VICI or GLPI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.
(GLPI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 19β versus Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. 's 2. 26β — meaning NCLH is approximately 1069% more volatile than GLPI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (GLPI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 156% versus 7% for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ACEL or LNW or NCLH or VICI or GLPI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Light & Wonder, Inc.
(LNW) is pulling ahead at 9. 9% versus 3. 7% for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Light & Wonder, Inc. grew EPS 110. 3% year-over-year, compared to -52. 4% for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NCLH leads at 26. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ACEL or LNW or NCLH or VICI or GLPI?
VICI Properties Inc.
(VICI) is the more profitable company, earning 69. 3% net margin versus 3. 9% for Accel Entertainment, Inc. — meaning it keeps 69. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VICI leads at 91. 1% versus 8. 2% for ACEL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VICI leads at 99. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ACEL or LNW or NCLH or VICI or GLPI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, VICI Properties Inc. (VICI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 21x versus Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. 's 2. 97x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH) trades at 8. 2x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for Light & Wonder, Inc. — 7. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LNW: 109. 2% to $205. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ACEL or LNW or NCLH or VICI or GLPI?
In this comparison, GLPI (6.
5% yield), VICI (6. 1% yield) pay a dividend. ACEL, LNW, NCLH do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ACEL or LNW or NCLH or VICI or GLPI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.
(GLPI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 19), 6. 5% yield, +122. 5% 10Y return). Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH) carries a higher beta of 2. 26 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GLPI: +122. 5%, NCLH: -65. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ACEL and LNW and NCLH and VICI and GLPI?
These companies operate in different sectors (ACEL (Consumer Cyclical) and LNW (Consumer Cyclical) and NCLH (Consumer Cyclical) and VICI (Real Estate) and GLPI (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ACEL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LNW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NCLH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VICI is a mid-cap deep-value stock; GLPI is a mid-cap deep-value stock. VICI, GLPI pay a dividend while ACEL, LNW, NCLH do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.