Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AGM vs RC vs AGNC vs ACRE vs NLY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
AGM vs RC vs AGNC vs ACRE vs NLY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $1.99B | $357M | $9.62B | $280M | $16.08B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.32B | $499M | $3.46B | $55M | $6.70B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $210M | $-229M | $838M | $-20M | $2.03B |
| Gross Margin | 29.5% | -0.0% | 100.0% | 46.3% | 99.2% |
| Operating Margin | 19.4% | -50.5% | 107.1% | 44.6% | 102.6% |
| Forward P/E | 9.7x | — | 6.9x | 16.3x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $30.82B | $5.86B | $64M | $1.05B | $111.86B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $931M | $248M | $505M | $29M | $2.04B |
AGM vs RC vs AGNC vs ACRE vs NLY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Federal Agricultura… (AGM) | 100 | 285.0 | +185.0% |
| Ready Capital Corpo… (RC) | 100 | 36.8 | -63.2% |
| AGNC Investment Cor… (AGNC) | 100 | 82.8 | -17.2% |
| Ares Commercial Rea… (ACRE) | 100 | 67.8 | -32.2% |
| Annaly Capital Mana… (NLY) | 100 | 90.9 | -9.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AGM vs RC vs AGNC vs ACRE vs NLY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AGM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 423.4% 10Y total return vs AGNC's 46.9%
- 4.4% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs RC's 31.4%
RC is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.17, yield 31.4%, current ratio 1.04x
- 17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs AGM's -18.9%
AGNC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 384.7%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.4%
- Lower P/E (6.9x vs 7.5x)
- +39.4% vs RC's -44.9%
Among these 5 stocks, ACRE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NLY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.64, yield 13.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.64, current ratio 0.03x
- 30.3% margin vs RC's -45.8%
- Beta 0.64 vs RC's 1.17
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs AGM's -18.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.9x vs 7.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.3% margin vs RC's -45.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.64 vs RC's 1.17 | |
| Dividends | 4.4% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs RC's 31.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.4% vs RC's -44.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.7% ROA vs RC's -2.6%, ROIC 6.4% vs 1.2% |
AGM vs RC vs AGNC vs ACRE vs NLY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
AGM vs RC vs AGNC vs ACRE vs NLY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AGNC leads in 1 of 6 categories
NLY leads 1 • AGM leads 0 • RC leads 0 • ACRE leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AGNC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NLY is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.7B annually — 122.4x ACRE's $55M. NLY is the more profitable business, keeping 30.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RC's -45.8%. On growth, RC holds the edge at +8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $499M | $3.5B | $55M | $6.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $193M | -$249M | $3.7B | $31M | $6.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $210M | -$229M | $838M | -$20M | $2.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $222M | $303M | $604M | -$44M | -$222M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.5% | -0.0% | +100.0% | +46.3% | +99.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | -50.5% | +107.1% | +44.6% | +102.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.7% | -45.8% | +24.2% | -36.3% | +30.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | +60.6% | +17.5% | -80.3% | -3.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +8.7% | +2.5% | -10.0% | -8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | +24.9% | +84.6% | -2.0% | +79.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — RC and AGNC and ACRE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.7x trailing earnings, NLY trades at a 33% valuation discount to AGNC's 11.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AGNC's 2.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AGM's 124.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.0B | $357M | $9.6B | $280M | $16.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $31.9B | $6.0B | $9.2B | $1.3B | $125.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.00x | -1.50x | 11.53x | -307.93x | 7.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.68x | — | 6.87x | 16.34x | 7.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.73x | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 124.68x | 48.25x | 2.42x | 18.49x | 18.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.51x | 0.71x | 1.97x | 3.28x | 2.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.17x | 0.22x | 0.86x | 0.54x | 0.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 24.88x | — | 111.86x | 14.18x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — AGNC and NLY each lead in 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NLY delivers a 14.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-12 for RC. AGNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AGM's 17.93x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RC scores 5/9 vs AGM's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.6% | -12.2% | +7.3% | -3.9% | +14.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.6% | -2.6% | +0.8% | -1.3% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.6% | +1.2% | +34.0% | +2.9% | +6.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.1% | +1.4% | +4.9% | +5.8% | +19.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 17.93x | 3.55x | 0.01x | 2.06x | 6.92x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $29.9B | $5.6B | -$441M | $1.0B | $109.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $931M | $248M | $505M | $29M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $30.8B | $5.9B | $64M | $1.0B | $111.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.17x | 0.41x | 1.32x | 0.95x | 1.42x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — AGM and NLY each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AGM five years ago would be worth $20,219 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,564 for RC. Over the past 12 months, AGNC leads with a +39.4% total return vs RC's -44.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NLY at 17.0% vs RC's -23.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.5% | +1.4% | +2.5% | +9.9% | +0.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8.2% | -44.9% | +39.4% | +20.7% | +31.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +53.2% | -54.4% | +58.3% | -4.4% | +60.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +102.2% | -44.4% | -2.2% | -29.5% | +1.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +423.4% | +6.1% | +46.9% | +43.3% | +35.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.3% | -23.1% | +16.5% | -1.5% | +17.0% |
Risk & Volatility
NLY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NLY is the less volatile stock with a 0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RC's 1.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NLY currently trades 91.3% from its 52-week high vs RC's 45.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 1.17x | 0.74x | 0.99x | 0.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $210.64 | $4.75 | $12.19 | $5.89 | $24.52 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $136.57 | $1.51 | $8.65 | $4.05 | $18.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.8% | +45.5% | +87.9% | +85.7% | +91.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.1 | 64.1 | 52.1 | 53.4 | 52.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 102K | 2.1M | 18.2M | 396K | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AGM and RC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AGM as "Buy", RC as "Buy", AGNC as "Hold", ACRE as "Buy", NLY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 27.5% upside for AGM (target: $233) vs -1.0% for ACRE (target: $5). For income investors, RC offers the higher dividend yield at 31.37% vs AGM's 4.44%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $233.00 | $2.50 | $11.13 | $5.00 | $24.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 16 | 35 | 13 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.4% | +31.4% | +14.7% | +14.1% | +13.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $8.11 | $0.68 | $1.58 | $0.71 | $2.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +18.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% |
AGNC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). NLY leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 4 tied.
AGM vs RC vs AGNC vs ACRE vs NLY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AGM or RC or AGNC or ACRE or NLY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ready Capital Corporation (RC) is the stronger pick with 1726% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18.
9% for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM). Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY) offers the better valuation at 7. 7x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AGM or RC or AGNC or ACRE or NLY?
On trailing P/E, Annaly Capital Management, Inc.
(NLY) is the cheapest at 7. 7x versus AGNC Investment Corp. at 11. 5x. On forward P/E, AGNC Investment Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AGM or RC or AGNC or ACRE or NLY?
Over the past 5 years, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) delivered a total return of +102.
2%, compared to -44. 4% for Ready Capital Corporation (RC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AGM returned +423. 4% versus RC's +6. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AGM or RC or AGNC or ACRE or NLY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Annaly Capital Management, Inc.
(NLY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 64β versus Ready Capital Corporation's 1. 17β — meaning RC is approximately 83% more volatile than NLY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 18% for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AGM or RC or AGNC or ACRE or NLY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ready Capital Corporation (RC) is pulling ahead at 1726% versus -18.
9% for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AGNC Investment Corp. grew EPS 1760% year-over-year, compared to 1. 1% for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AGNC leads at 26. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AGM or RC or AGNC or ACRE or NLY?
Annaly Capital Management, Inc.
(NLY) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 3% net margin versus -45. 8% for Ready Capital Corporation — meaning it keeps 30. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NLY leads at 102. 6% versus 19. 4% for AGM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AGNC leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AGM or RC or AGNC or ACRE or NLY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, AGNC Investment Corp.
(AGNC) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 16. 3x for Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation — 9. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AGM: 27. 5% to $233. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AGM or RC or AGNC or ACRE or NLY?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Ready Capital Corporation (RC) offers the highest yield at 31. 4%, versus 4. 4% for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM).
09Is AGM or RC or AGNC or ACRE or NLY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
76), 4. 4% yield, +423. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AGM: +423. 4%, RC: +6. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AGM and RC and AGNC and ACRE and NLY?
These companies operate in different sectors (AGM (Financial Services) and RC (Real Estate) and AGNC (Real Estate) and ACRE (Real Estate) and NLY (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AGM is a small-cap deep-value stock; RC is a small-cap high-growth stock; AGNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACRE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NLY is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.