Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ANAB vs FOLD vs RARE vs KRYS vs ACAD

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ANAB
AnaptysBio, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.99B
5Y Perf.+445.0%
FOLD
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.55B
5Y Perf.+15.9%
RARE
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.57B
5Y Perf.-61.8%
KRYS
Krystal Biotech, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9.01B
5Y Perf.+494.7%
ACAD
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.84B
5Y Perf.-54.9%

ANAB vs FOLD vs RARE vs KRYS vs ACAD — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ANAB logoANAB
FOLD logoFOLD
RARE logoRARE
KRYS logoKRYS
ACAD logoACAD
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$2.99B$4.55B$2.57B$9.01B$3.84B
Revenue (TTM)$235M$634M$669M$417M$1.10B
Net Income (TTM)$-13M$-27M$-609M$225M$376M
Gross Margin99.0%87.9%83.6%92.8%91.5%
Operating Margin20.4%5.2%-83.9%42.8%7.4%
Forward P/E40.6x39.4x55.6x
Total Debt$14M$483M$1.28B$9M$52M
Cash & Equiv.$238M$214M$434M$496M$178M

ANAB vs FOLD vs RARE vs KRYS vs ACADLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ANAB
FOLD
RARE
KRYS
ACAD
StockMay 20May 26Return
AnaptysBio, Inc. (ANAB)100545.0+445.0%
Amicus Therapeutics… (FOLD)100115.9+15.9%
Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE)10038.2-61.8%
Krystal Biotech, In… (KRYS)100594.7+494.7%
ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD)10045.1-54.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ANAB vs FOLD vs RARE vs KRYS vs ACAD

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ANAB and KRYS are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Krystal Biotech, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. FOLD and ACAD also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ANAB
AnaptysBio, Inc.
The Growth Play

ANAB has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and defensive.

  • Rev growth 157.0%, EPS growth 91.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 183.6%
  • Beta 0.97, current ratio 9.07x
  • 157.0% revenue growth vs ACAD's 11.9%
  • +431.3% vs RARE's -27.4%
Best for: growth exposure and defensive
FOLD
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
The Income Pick

FOLD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.

  • beta 0.61
  • Beta 0.61 vs RARE's 1.36
Best for: income & stability
RARE
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
The Growth Angle

Among these 5 stocks, RARE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
KRYS
Krystal Biotech, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

KRYS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • 27.7% 10Y total return vs ANAB's 5.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.02, Low D/E 0.8%, current ratio 9.95x
  • Better valuation composite
  • 53.9% margin vs RARE's -91.0%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
ACAD
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
The Niche Pick

ACAD is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.

  • 26.2% ROA vs RARE's -45.8%, ROIC 10.0% vs -89.4%
Best for: efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthANAB logoANAB157.0% revenue growth vs ACAD's 11.9%
ValueKRYS logoKRYSBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsKRYS logoKRYS53.9% margin vs RARE's -91.0%
Stability / SafetyFOLD logoFOLDBeta 0.61 vs RARE's 1.36
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ANAB logoANAB+431.3% vs RARE's -27.4%
Efficiency (ROA)ACAD logoACAD26.2% ROA vs RARE's -45.8%, ROIC 10.0% vs -89.4%

ANAB vs FOLD vs RARE vs KRYS vs ACAD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ANABAnaptysBio, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

FOLDAmicus Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

RAREUltragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
FY 2025
Product
54.8%$369M
Royalty
45.2%$304M
KRYSKrystal Biotech, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ACADACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
FY 2018
Product
100.0%$224M

ANAB vs FOLD vs RARE vs KRYS vs ACAD — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLANABLAGGINGRARE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — ANAB and KRYS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

ACAD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 4.7x ANAB's $235M. KRYS is the more profitable business, keeping 53.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RARE's -91.0%. On growth, ANAB holds the edge at +151.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricANAB logoANABAnaptysBio, Inc.FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…KRYS logoKRYSKrystal Biotech, …ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$235M$634M$669M$417M$1.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$50M$40M-$536M$185M$96M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$13M-$27M-$609M$225M$376M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$20M$30M-$487M$237M$212M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+99.0%+87.9%+83.6%+92.8%+91.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+20.4%+5.2%-83.9%+42.8%+7.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-5.6%-4.3%-91.0%+53.9%+34.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+8.4%+4.7%-72.8%+56.9%+19.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+151.1%+23.7%-2.4%+31.9%+9.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+3.1%-89.0%-17.2%+52.5%-81.8%
Evenly matched — ANAB and KRYS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ACAD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 9.8x trailing earnings, ACAD trades at a 78% valuation discount to KRYS's 44.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ACAD's 26.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FOLD's 114.9x.

MetricANAB logoANABAnaptysBio, Inc.FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…KRYS logoKRYSKrystal Biotech, …ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…
Market CapShares × price$3.0B$4.5B$2.6B$9.0B$3.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.8B$4.8B$3.4B$8.5B$3.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-150.72x-164.85x-4.48x44.69x9.78x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.40.62x39.44x55.62x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple54.96x114.88x50.79x26.71x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue12.74x7.17x3.82x23.16x3.58x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share58.40x16.29x7.51x3.13x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF152.46x152.43x47.71x36.48x
ACAD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KRYS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. KRYS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FOLD's 1.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ANAB scores 6/9 vs RARE's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricANAB logoANABAnaptysBio, Inc.FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…KRYS logoKRYSKrystal Biotech, …ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-24.5%-12.0%-6.1%+19.3%+35.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-3.6%-3.2%-45.8%+17.6%+26.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+55.1%+5.3%-89.4%+18.0%+10.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+12.5%+5.1%-46.4%+14.8%+10.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–964456
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.38x1.76x0.01x0.04x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$224M$269M$842M-$487M-$126M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$238M$214M$434M$496M$178M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$14M$483M$1.3B$9M$52M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.81x1.00x-14.49x
KRYS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ANAB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in KRYS five years ago would be worth $46,397 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,391 for RARE. Over the past 12 months, ANAB leads with a +431.3% total return vs RARE's -27.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ANAB at 70.0% vs RARE's -17.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricANAB logoANABAnaptysBio, Inc.FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…KRYS logoKRYSKrystal Biotech, …ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+131.3%+1.5%+10.7%+23.8%-14.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+431.3%+138.3%-27.4%+122.9%+32.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+391.4%+19.0%-44.5%+248.8%+3.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+304.3%+54.3%-76.1%+364.0%+6.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+511.9%+119.2%-59.4%+2773.2%-23.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+70.0%+6.0%-17.8%+51.7%+1.3%
ANAB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

FOLD is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RARE's 1.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FOLD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs RARE's 61.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricANAB logoANABAnaptysBio, Inc.FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…KRYS logoKRYSKrystal Biotech, …ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.97x0.61x1.36x1.02x1.11x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$72.36$14.50$42.37$306.10$27.81
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$11.41$5.51$18.29$122.80$14.68
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+95.8%+99.9%+61.6%+99.9%+80.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10070.072.267.768.053.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded899K2.9M1.8M269K1.7M
FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: ANAB as "Buy", FOLD as "Buy", RARE as "Buy", KRYS as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 85.1% upside for RARE (target: $48) vs 0.1% for FOLD (target: $15).

MetricANAB logoANABAnaptysBio, Inc.FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…KRYS logoKRYSKrystal Biotech, …ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$73.88$14.50$48.36$326.20$34.78
# AnalystsCovering analysts2224331737
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.3%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ACAD leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). KRYS leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.

Best OverallAnaptysBio, Inc. (ANAB)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ANAB vs FOLD vs RARE vs KRYS vs ACAD: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ANAB or FOLD or RARE or KRYS or ACAD a better buy right now?

For growth investors, AnaptysBio, Inc.

(ANAB) is the stronger pick with 157. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 11. 9% for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD). ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E (55. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AnaptysBio, Inc. (ANAB) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ANAB or FOLD or RARE or KRYS or ACAD?

On trailing P/E, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(ACAD) is the cheapest at 9. 8x versus Krystal Biotech, Inc. at 44. 7x. On forward P/E, Krystal Biotech, Inc. is actually cheaper at 39. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ANAB or FOLD or RARE or KRYS or ACAD?

Over the past 5 years, Krystal Biotech, Inc.

(KRYS) delivered a total return of +364. 0%, compared to -76. 1% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KRYS returned +27. 7% versus RARE's -59. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ANAB or FOLD or RARE or KRYS or ACAD?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 61β versus Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. 's 1. 36β — meaning RARE is approximately 123% more volatile than FOLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Krystal Biotech, Inc. (KRYS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 176% for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ANAB or FOLD or RARE or KRYS or ACAD?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), AnaptysBio, Inc.

(ANAB) is pulling ahead at 157. 0% versus 11. 9% for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Krystal Biotech, Inc. grew EPS 128. 0% year-over-year, compared to 7. 3% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ANAB leads at 183. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ANAB or FOLD or RARE or KRYS or ACAD?

Krystal Biotech, Inc.

(KRYS) is the more profitable company, earning 52. 6% net margin versus -85. 4% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. — meaning it keeps 52. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KRYS leads at 41. 5% versus -79. 5% for RARE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ANAB leads at 99. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ANAB or FOLD or RARE or KRYS or ACAD more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Krystal Biotech, Inc.

(KRYS) trades at 39. 4x forward P/E versus 55. 6x for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. — 16. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RARE: 85. 1% to $48. 36.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ANAB or FOLD or RARE or KRYS or ACAD?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is ANAB or FOLD or RARE or KRYS or ACAD better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 61), +119. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FOLD: +119. 2%, RARE: -59. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ANAB and FOLD and RARE and KRYS and ACAD?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ANAB is a small-cap high-growth stock; FOLD is a small-cap high-growth stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock; KRYS is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ANAB

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 75%
  • Gross Margin > 59%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FOLD

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Gross Margin > 52%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RARE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 50%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KRYS

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 15%
  • Net Margin > 32%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ACAD

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ANAB and FOLD and RARE and KRYS and ACAD on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ANAB: 151.1% · FOLD: 23.7%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.