Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

API vs BAND vs TWLO vs LPSN vs ZM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
API
Agora, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$326M
5Y Perf.-90.3%
BAND
Bandwidth Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.60B
5Y Perf.-60.7%
TWLO
Twilio Inc.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$30.56B
5Y Perf.-8.1%
LPSN
LivePerson, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$30M
5Y Perf.-99.6%
ZM
Zoom Communications, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$33.56B
5Y Perf.-56.9%

API vs BAND vs TWLO vs LPSN vs ZM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
API logoAPI
BAND logoBAND
TWLO logoTWLO
LPSN logoLPSN
ZM logoZM
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationSoftware - InfrastructureInternet Content & InformationSoftware - ApplicationSoftware - Application
Market Cap$326M$1.60B$30.56B$30M$33.56B
Revenue (TTM)$137M$209.36B$5.30B$236M$4.87B
Net Income (TTM)$5M$4.11B$104M$-62M$1.90B
Gross Margin66.8%37.3%48.8%64.6%77.0%
Operating Margin-10.0%-2.2%4.7%-4.0%23.1%
Forward P/E23.5x27.7x35.4x18.6x
Total Debt$50M$701M$1.08B$392M$31M
Cash & Equiv.$27M$103M$682M$95M$1.27B

API vs BAND vs TWLO vs LPSN vs ZMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

API
BAND
TWLO
LPSN
ZM
StockJun 20May 26Return
Agora, Inc. (API)1009.7-90.3%
Bandwidth Inc. (BAND)10039.3-60.7%
Twilio Inc. (TWLO)10091.9-8.1%
LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN)1000.4-99.6%
Zoom Communications… (ZM)10043.1-56.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: API vs BAND vs TWLO vs LPSN vs ZM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ZM leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Bandwidth Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. TWLO also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
API
Agora, Inc.
The Technology Pick

API lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
BAND
Bandwidth Inc.
The Momentum Pick

BAND is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.

  • +260.0% vs LPSN's -80.1%
Best for: momentum
TWLO
Twilio Inc.
The Growth Play

TWLO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 13.7%, EPS growth 131.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.8%
  • 6.0% 10Y total return vs BAND's 149.5%
  • 13.7% revenue growth vs LPSN's -22.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
LPSN
LivePerson, Inc.
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, LPSN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
ZM
Zoom Communications, Inc.
The Income Pick

ZM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • beta 0.90
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.90, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 4.33x
  • Beta 0.90, current ratio 4.33x
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTWLO logoTWLO13.7% revenue growth vs LPSN's -22.0%
ValueZM logoZMBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsZM logoZM39.0% margin vs LPSN's -26.2%
Stability / SafetyZM logoZMBeta 0.90 vs LPSN's 1.94
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)BAND logoBAND+260.0% vs LPSN's -80.1%
Efficiency (ROA)ZM logoZM15.9% ROA vs LPSN's -12.2%, ROIC 10.4% vs -6.6%

API vs BAND vs TWLO vs LPSN vs ZM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

APIAgora, Inc.
FY 2024
Service
95.8%$128M
Product and Service, Other
4.2%$6M
BANDBandwidth Inc.
FY 2025
CPaaS, Usage-Based Fees
73.8%$415M
CPaaS, Service Fees
26.2%$147M
TWLOTwilio Inc.
FY 2025
Messaging
73.3%$2.9B
Other Communications
19.0%$747M
Segment
7.7%$303M
LPSNLivePerson, Inc.
FY 2025
Hosted Services - Business
85.2%$208M
Professional Services
14.8%$36M
ZMZoom Communications, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$4.7B

API vs BAND vs TWLO vs LPSN vs ZM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLZMLAGGINGLPSN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ZM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

BAND is the larger business by revenue, generating $209.4B annually — 1523.7x API's $137M. ZM is the more profitable business, keeping 39.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LPSN's -26.2%. On growth, BAND holds the edge at +1197.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricAPI logoAPIAgora, Inc.BAND logoBANDBandwidth Inc.TWLO logoTWLOTwilio Inc.LPSN logoLPSNLivePerson, Inc.ZM logoZMZoom Communicatio…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$137M$209.4B$5.3B$236M$4.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$6M-$4.6B$415M$13M$1.3B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$5M$4.1B$104M-$62M$1.9B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$18M$1.8B$1.0B-$29M$1.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+66.8%+37.3%+48.8%+64.6%+77.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-10.0%-2.2%+4.7%-4.0%+23.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+3.5%+2.0%+2.0%-26.2%+39.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-13.4%+0.8%+19.0%-12.2%+39.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.2%+1197.2%+20.0%-12.0%+5.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+110.8%+39.8%+3.8%+79.8%+91.4%
ZM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — BAND and ZM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 17.7x trailing earnings, ZM trades at a 98% valuation discount to TWLO's 960.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ZM's 25.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TWLO's 79.0x.

MetricAPI logoAPIAgora, Inc.BAND logoBANDBandwidth Inc.TWLO logoTWLOTwilio Inc.LPSN logoLPSNLivePerson, Inc.ZM logoZMZoom Communicatio…
Market CapShares × price$326M$1.6B$30.6B$30M$33.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$349M$2.2B$31.0B$327M$32.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-9.30x-116.02x960.48x-0.20x17.67x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.23.50x27.72x35.36x18.58x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.79x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple51.31x78.95x25.72x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.45x2.12x6.03x0.13x6.89x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.70x3.74x4.12x3.42x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF0.02x29.58x17.44x
Evenly matched — BAND and ZM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ZM leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

ZM delivers a 19.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $1 for API. ZM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BAND's 1.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TWLO scores 7/9 vs BAND's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricAPI logoAPIAgora, Inc.BAND logoBANDBandwidth Inc.TWLO logoTWLOTwilio Inc.LPSN logoLPSNLivePerson, Inc.ZM logoZMZoom Communicatio…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+0.8%+4.0%+1.3%+19.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.7%+1.7%+1.1%-12.2%+15.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital-6.8%-1.2%+1.6%-6.6%+10.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-8.5%-1.6%+1.9%-5.8%+11.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–953757
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.09x1.75x0.14x0.00x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$23M$598M$399M$297M-$1.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$27M$103M$682M$95M$1.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$50M$701M$1.1B$392M$31M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense208.58x-10.30x0.84x
ZM leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BAND leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TWLO five years ago would be worth $6,844 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $34 for LPSN. Over the past 12 months, BAND leads with a +260.0% total return vs LPSN's -80.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BAND at 64.1% vs LPSN's -66.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAPI logoAPIAgora, Inc.BAND logoBANDBandwidth Inc.TWLO logoTWLOTwilio Inc.LPSN logoLPSNLivePerson, Inc.ZM logoZMZoom Communicatio…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+5.9%+250.8%+45.8%-35.0%+31.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+23.0%+260.0%+91.7%-80.1%+36.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+26.3%+341.5%+267.8%-96.1%+73.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-89.5%-57.4%-31.6%-99.7%-62.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-91.5%+149.5%+600.6%-97.2%+76.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+8.1%+64.1%+54.4%-66.0%+20.2%
BAND leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BAND and ZM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ZM is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LPSN's 1.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BAND currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs LPSN's 11.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAPI logoAPIAgora, Inc.BAND logoBANDBandwidth Inc.TWLO logoTWLOTwilio Inc.LPSN logoLPSNLivePerson, Inc.ZM logoZMZoom Communicatio…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.22x1.83x1.47x1.94x0.90x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$5.15$50.00$203.71$21.60$109.50
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.14$12.57$91.84$2.37$69.15
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+83.1%+99.8%+99.0%+11.7%+99.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10058.091.379.947.574.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded356K675K2.2M148K4.2M
Evenly matched — BAND and ZM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: API as "Buy", BAND as "Buy", TWLO as "Buy", ZM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 76.9% upside for API (target: $8) vs -8.2% for TWLO (target: $185).

MetricAPI logoAPIAgora, Inc.BAND logoBANDBandwidth Inc.TWLO logoTWLOTwilio Inc.LPSN logoLPSNLivePerson, Inc.ZM logoZMZoom Communicatio…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$7.57$46.00$185.17$100.56
# AnalystsCovering analysts5155248
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+3.4%0.0%+2.8%0.0%+4.8%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ZM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BAND leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallZoom Communications, Inc. (ZM)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

API vs BAND vs TWLO vs LPSN vs ZM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is API or BAND or TWLO or LPSN or ZM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Twilio Inc.

(TWLO) is the stronger pick with 13. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 0% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). Zoom Communications, Inc. (ZM) offers the better valuation at 17. 7x trailing P/E (18. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Agora, Inc. (API) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — API or BAND or TWLO or LPSN or ZM?

On trailing P/E, Zoom Communications, Inc.

(ZM) is the cheapest at 17. 7x versus Twilio Inc. at 960. 5x. On forward P/E, Zoom Communications, Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 6x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — API or BAND or TWLO or LPSN or ZM?

Over the past 5 years, Twilio Inc.

(TWLO) delivered a total return of -31. 6%, compared to -99. 7% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TWLO returned +600. 6% versus LPSN's -97. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — API or BAND or TWLO or LPSN or ZM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Zoom Communications, Inc.

(ZM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 90β versus LivePerson, Inc. 's 1. 94β — meaning LPSN is approximately 116% more volatile than ZM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Zoom Communications, Inc. (ZM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 175% for Bandwidth Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — API or BAND or TWLO or LPSN or ZM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Twilio Inc.

(TWLO) is pulling ahead at 13. 7% versus -22. 0% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Twilio Inc. grew EPS 131. 8% year-over-year, compared to -79. 2% for Bandwidth Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TWLO leads at 9. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — API or BAND or TWLO or LPSN or ZM?

Zoom Communications, Inc.

(ZM) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 0% net margin versus -32. 1% for Agora, Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ZM leads at 23. 1% versus -40. 0% for API. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ZM leads at 77. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is API or BAND or TWLO or LPSN or ZM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Zoom Communications, Inc.

(ZM) trades at 18. 6x forward P/E versus 35. 4x for Twilio Inc. — 16. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for API: 76. 9% to $7. 57.

08

Which pays a better dividend — API or BAND or TWLO or LPSN or ZM?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is API or BAND or TWLO or LPSN or ZM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Zoom Communications, Inc.

(ZM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 90)). LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN) carries a higher beta of 1. 94 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ZM: +76. 1%, LPSN: -97. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between API and BAND and TWLO and LPSN and ZM?

These companies operate in different sectors (API (Technology) and BAND (Technology) and TWLO (Communication Services) and LPSN (Technology) and ZM (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: API is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BAND is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TWLO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; LPSN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ZM is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

API

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Gross Margin > 40%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BAND

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 59862%
  • Gross Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TWLO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Gross Margin > 29%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LPSN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 38%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ZM

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 23%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform API and BAND and TWLO and LPSN and ZM on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(API: 12.2% · BAND: 119724.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.