Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ATCH vs LPRO vs PFSI vs SOFI vs TREE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ATCH
AtlasClear Holdings, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyAMEX • US
Market Cap$2M
5Y Perf.-100.0%
LPRO
Open Lending Corporation

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$192M
5Y Perf.-95.4%
PFSI
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.

Financial - Mortgages

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.62B
5Y Perf.+32.6%
SOFI
SoFi Technologies, Inc.

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$20.40B
5Y Perf.-6.7%
TREE
LendingTree, Inc.

Financial - Conglomerates

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$552M
5Y Perf.-81.3%

ATCH vs LPRO vs PFSI vs SOFI vs TREE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ATCH logoATCH
LPRO logoLPRO
PFSI logoPFSI
SOFI logoSOFI
TREE logoTREE
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureFinancial - Credit ServicesFinancial - MortgagesFinancial - Credit ServicesFinancial - Conglomerates
Market Cap$2M$192M$4.62B$20.40B$552M
Revenue (TTM)$15M$93M$4.36B$4.77B$1.12B
Net Income (TTM)$2M$-5M$507M$481M$181M
Gross Margin54.8%75.5%91.4%75.1%94.3%
Operating Margin-42.1%6.4%34.6%11.0%7.3%
Forward P/E14.9x7.2x26.5x7.1x
Total Debt$1.00B$88M$23.06B$1.82B$435M
Cash & Equiv.$7.53B$177M$302M$4.93B$81M

ATCH vs LPRO vs PFSI vs SOFI vs TREELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ATCH
LPRO
PFSI
SOFI
TREE
StockMar 21May 26Return
AtlasClear Holdings… (ATCH)1000.0-100.0%
Open Lending Corpor… (LPRO)1004.6-95.4%
PennyMac Financial … (PFSI)100132.6+32.6%
SoFi Technologies, … (SOFI)10093.3-6.7%
LendingTree, Inc. (TREE)10018.7-81.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ATCH vs LPRO vs PFSI vs SOFI vs TREE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TREE leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. LPRO and SOFI also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ATCH
AtlasClear Holdings, Inc.
The Growth Angle

Among these 5 stocks, ATCH doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
LPRO
Open Lending Corporation
The Banking Pick

LPRO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 288.0%, EPS growth 96.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 2.27, current ratio 4.52x
  • Beta 2.27, current ratio 4.52x
  • 288.0% NII/revenue growth vs TREE's 24.1%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
PFSI
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
The Banking Pick

PFSI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.93, yield 1.3%
  • 6.0% 10Y total return vs SOFI's 52.7%
  • Beta 0.93 vs ATCH's 2.58
  • 1.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
SOFI
SoFi Technologies, Inc.
The Banking Pick

SOFI is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +23.0% vs PFSI's -8.0%
Best for: momentum
TREE
LendingTree, Inc.
The Banking Pick

TREE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.

  • Lower P/E (7.1x vs 26.5x)
  • 13.5% margin vs LPRO's -4.5%
  • 21.8% ROA vs LPRO's -2.0%, ROIC 9.0% vs 2.3%
Best for: value and quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLPRO logoLPRO288.0% NII/revenue growth vs TREE's 24.1%
ValueTREE logoTREELower P/E (7.1x vs 26.5x)
Quality / MarginsTREE logoTREE13.5% margin vs LPRO's -4.5%
Stability / SafetyPFSI logoPFSIBeta 0.93 vs ATCH's 2.58
DividendsPFSI logoPFSI1.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)SOFI logoSOFI+23.0% vs PFSI's -8.0%
Efficiency (ROA)TREE logoTREE21.8% ROA vs LPRO's -2.0%, ROIC 9.0% vs 2.3%

ATCH vs LPRO vs PFSI vs SOFI vs TREE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ATCHAtlasClear Holdings, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

LPROOpen Lending Corporation
FY 2025
Program Fee
64.9%$54M
Profit Share
35.1%$29M
PFSIPennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Mortgage banking Production
63.1%$1.3B
Mortgage banking Servicing
36.9%$737M
SOFISoFi Technologies, Inc.
FY 2025
Lending Segment
48.1%$1.8B
Financial Services Segment
40.1%$1.5B
Technology Platform Segment
11.7%$450M
TREELendingTree, Inc.
FY 2025
Other Products And Services
100.0%$310,000

ATCH vs LPRO vs PFSI vs SOFI vs TREE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTREELAGGINGPFSI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

TREE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

SOFI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.8B annually — 326.4x ATCH's $15M. TREE is the more profitable business, keeping 13.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LPRO's -4.5%.

MetricATCH logoATCHAtlasClear Holdin…LPRO logoLPROOpen Lending Corp…PFSI logoPFSIPennyMac Financia…SOFI logoSOFISoFi Technologies…TREE logoTREELendingTree, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$15M$93M$4.4B$4.8B$1.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$5M-$5M$1.0B$760M$120M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$2M-$5M$507M$481M$181M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$2M-$425,000-$3.8B-$2.6B$73M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+54.8%+75.5%+91.4%+75.1%+94.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-42.1%+6.4%+34.6%+11.0%+7.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+12.1%-4.5%+11.5%+10.1%+13.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-11.6%-3.5%-32.4%-83.5%+5.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+84.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.8%+7.7%-56.7%+2.3%
TREE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — ATCH and TREE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 3.7x trailing earnings, TREE trades at a 91% valuation discount to SOFI's 41.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TREE's 8.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SOFI's 22.8x.

MetricATCH logoATCHAtlasClear Holdin…LPRO logoLPROOpen Lending Corp…PFSI logoPFSIPennyMac Financia…SOFI logoSOFISoFi Technologies…TREE logoTREELendingTree, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$2M$192M$4.6B$20.4B$552M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$6.5B$103M$27.4B$17.3B$906M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.70x-45.38x9.53x41.03x3.69x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.92x7.17x26.45x7.11x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple12.25x18.11x22.75x8.73x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.15x2.05x1.06x4.28x0.49x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.56x1.11x1.91x1.95x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF1.02x9.09x
Evenly matched — ATCH and TREE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TREE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

TREE delivers a 86.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $86 in annual profit, vs $-7 for LPRO. SOFI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PFSI's 5.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ATCH scores 6/9 vs SOFI's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricATCH logoATCHAtlasClear Holdin…LPRO logoLPROOpen Lending Corp…PFSI logoPFSIPennyMac Financia…SOFI logoSOFISoFi Technologies…TREE logoTREELendingTree, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+8.1%-7.0%+12.0%+5.9%+86.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.3%-2.0%+1.8%+1.1%+21.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+2.3%+4.4%+3.6%+9.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-0.0%+2.7%+10.4%+1.2%+13.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–966436
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.17x5.35x0.17x1.52x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$6.5B-$89M$22.8B-$3.1B$354M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$7.5B$177M$302M$4.9B$81M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.0B$88M$23.1B$1.8B$435M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-0.07x-0.56x1.35x0.45x4.45x
TREE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SOFI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PFSI five years ago would be worth $16,366 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5 for ATCH. Over the past 12 months, SOFI leads with a +23.0% total return vs PFSI's -8.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SOFI at 43.0% vs ATCH's -92.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricATCH logoATCHAtlasClear Holdin…LPRO logoLPROOpen Lending Corp…PFSI logoPFSIPennyMac Financia…SOFI logoSOFISoFi Technologies…TREE logoTREELendingTree, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-4.0%+3.8%-32.4%-41.7%-22.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-6.2%+4.5%-8.0%+23.0%+6.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-78.2%+59.2%+192.5%+112.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-95.8%+63.7%-3.1%-78.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-83.2%+603.4%+52.7%-45.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-92.4%-39.8%+16.8%+43.0%+28.5%
SOFI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — LPRO and PFSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

PFSI is the less volatile stock with a 0.93 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ATCH's 2.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LPRO currently trades 60.0% from its 52-week high vs ATCH's 13.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricATCH logoATCHAtlasClear Holdin…LPRO logoLPROOpen Lending Corp…PFSI logoPFSIPennyMac Financia…SOFI logoSOFISoFi Technologies…TREE logoTREELendingTree, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.58x2.27x0.93x2.54x1.55x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$1.92$2.70$160.36$32.73$77.35
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.14$1.17$82.67$12.56$32.65
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+13.9%+60.0%+55.3%+48.9%+51.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10045.557.140.441.939.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded3.1M582K604K65.8M326K
Evenly matched — LPRO and PFSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — LPRO and PFSI each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: LPRO as "Hold", PFSI as "Buy", SOFI as "Hold", TREE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 146.9% upside for LPRO (target: $4) vs 30.6% for SOFI (target: $21). PFSI is the only dividend payer here at 1.31% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricATCH logoATCHAtlasClear Holdin…LPRO logoLPROOpen Lending Corp…PFSI logoPFSIPennyMac Financia…SOFI logoSOFISoFi Technologies…TREE logoTREELendingTree, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$4.00$143.00$20.89$69.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts12202723
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises12200
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.16
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+2.6%+0.1%+0.3%0.0%
Evenly matched — LPRO and PFSI each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

TREE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SOFI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.

Best OverallLendingTree, Inc. (TREE)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ATCH vs LPRO vs PFSI vs SOFI vs TREE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ATCH or LPRO or PFSI or SOFI or TREE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Open Lending Corporation (LPRO) is the stronger pick with 288.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 24. 1% for LendingTree, Inc. (TREE). LendingTree, Inc. (TREE) offers the better valuation at 3. 7x trailing P/E (7. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ATCH or LPRO or PFSI or SOFI or TREE?

On trailing P/E, LendingTree, Inc.

(TREE) is the cheapest at 3. 7x versus SoFi Technologies, Inc. at 41. 0x. On forward P/E, LendingTree, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ATCH or LPRO or PFSI or SOFI or TREE?

Over the past 5 years, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.

(PFSI) delivered a total return of +63. 7%, compared to -100. 0% for AtlasClear Holdings, Inc. (ATCH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PFSI returned +603. 4% versus ATCH's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ATCH or LPRO or PFSI or SOFI or TREE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.

(PFSI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 93β versus AtlasClear Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 58β — meaning ATCH is approximately 177% more volatile than PFSI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SoFi Technologies, Inc. (SOFI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 5% for PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ATCH or LPRO or PFSI or SOFI or TREE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Open Lending Corporation (LPRO) is pulling ahead at 288.

0% versus 24. 1% for LendingTree, Inc. (TREE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LendingTree, Inc. grew EPS 443. 3% year-over-year, compared to -670. 6% for AtlasClear Holdings, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ATCH or LPRO or PFSI or SOFI or TREE?

AtlasClear Holdings, Inc.

(ATCH) is the more profitable company, earning 53. 0% net margin versus -4. 5% for Open Lending Corporation — meaning it keeps 53. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PFSI leads at 34. 6% versus -45. 3% for ATCH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TREE leads at 94. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ATCH or LPRO or PFSI or SOFI or TREE more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, LendingTree, Inc.

(TREE) trades at 7. 1x forward P/E versus 26. 5x for SoFi Technologies, Inc. — 19. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LPRO: 146. 9% to $4. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ATCH or LPRO or PFSI or SOFI or TREE?

In this comparison, PFSI (1.

3% yield) pays a dividend. ATCH, LPRO, SOFI, TREE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is ATCH or LPRO or PFSI or SOFI or TREE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.

(PFSI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 93), 1. 3% yield, +603. 4% 10Y return). AtlasClear Holdings, Inc. (ATCH) carries a higher beta of 2. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PFSI: +603. 4%, ATCH: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ATCH and LPRO and PFSI and SOFI and TREE?

These companies operate in different sectors (ATCH (Technology) and LPRO (Financial Services) and PFSI (Financial Services) and SOFI (Financial Services) and TREE (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

PFSI pays a dividend while ATCH, LPRO, SOFI, TREE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ATCH

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 42%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LPRO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 144%
  • Gross Margin > 45%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PFSI

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 86%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SOFI

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TREE

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 12%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ATCH and LPRO and PFSI and SOFI and TREE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ATCH: 84.1% · LPRO: 288.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.