Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AVBH vs HTBK vs WAFD vs CVBF vs BANR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
AVBH vs HTBK vs WAFD vs CVBF vs BANR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $255M | $828M | $2.69B | $2.69B | $2.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $74M | $266M | $1.41B | $643M | $819M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $24M | $48M | $243M | $209M | $195M |
| Gross Margin | 34.8% | 72.6% | 50.9% | 79.9% | 79.0% |
| Operating Margin | -34.8% | 25.4% | 20.5% | 43.8% | 29.5% |
| Forward P/E | 8.6x | 13.3x | 10.8x | 13.8x | 10.3x |
| Total Debt | $22M | $40M | $1.82B | $991M | $373M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $22M | $657M | $108M | $183M |
AVBH vs HTBK vs WAFD vs CVBF vs BANR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heritage Commerce C… (HTBK) | 100 | 165.4 | +65.4% |
| WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) | 100 | 121.4 | +21.4% |
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 99.4 | -0.6% |
| Banner Corporation (BANR) | 100 | 161.6 | +61.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AVBH vs HTBK vs WAFD vs CVBF vs BANR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AVBH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.55, Low D/E 7.8%
- PEG 0.61 vs CVBF's 4.34
- Lower P/E (8.6x vs 13.8x), PEG 0.61 vs 4.34
- Beta 0.55 vs HTBK's 1.03
HTBK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 5.8%, EPS growth 18.2%
- Beta 1.03, yield 3.8%, current ratio 0.27x
- 5.8% NII/revenue growth vs AVBH's -3.8%
- +47.5% vs BANR's +1.7%
WAFD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs AVBH's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
- 3.0% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs CVBF's 4.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs AVBH's 0.7%
CVBF is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 4.1%
BANR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and bank quality.
- 98.4% 10Y total return vs HTBK's 74.6%
- NIM 3.6% vs AVBH's 1.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.8% NII/revenue growth vs AVBH's -3.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.6x vs 13.8x), PEG 0.61 vs 4.34 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs AVBH's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.55 vs HTBK's 1.03 | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs CVBF's 4.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +47.5% vs BANR's +1.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs AVBH's 0.7% |
AVBH vs HTBK vs WAFD vs CVBF vs BANR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
AVBH vs HTBK vs WAFD vs CVBF vs BANR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CVBF leads in 1 of 6 categories
AVBH leads 1 • BANR leads 1 • HTBK leads 1 • WAFD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVBF leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WAFD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 19.0x AVBH's $74M. CVBF is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WAFD's 16.0%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $74M | $266M | $1.4B | $643M | $819M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$26M | $71M | $277M | $294M | $253M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $24M | $48M | $243M | $209M | $195M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $19M | $61M | $226M | $217M | $248M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.8% | +72.6% | +50.9% | +79.9% | +79.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -34.8% | +25.4% | +20.5% | +43.8% | +29.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +32.3% | +18.0% | +16.0% | +32.5% | +23.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +22.8% | +14.8% | +33.8% | +30.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.1% | +47.1% | +46.3% | +11.1% | +11.2% |
Valuation Metrics
AVBH leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.4x trailing earnings, AVBH trades at a 45% valuation discount to HTBK's 17.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AVBH offers better value at 0.67x vs WAFD's 4.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $255M | $828M | $2.7B | $2.7B | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $269M | $847M | $3.8B | $3.6B | $2.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.41x | 17.24x | 13.37x | 13.05x | 11.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.57x | 13.32x | 10.77x | 13.78x | 10.32x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.67x | 3.00x | 4.34x | 4.11x | 0.99x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.89x | 12.86x | 12.70x | 9.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.43x | 3.11x | 1.91x | 4.19x | 2.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.80x | 1.17x | 0.93x | 1.17x | 1.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 13.63x | 12.91x | 12.39x | 8.81x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BANR leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BANR delivers a 10.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $7 for HTBK. HTBK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WAFD's 0.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HTBK scores 8/9 vs AVBH's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.0% | +6.8% | +8.0% | +9.3% | +10.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +0.9% | +1.0% | +1.4% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.5% | +6.9% | +3.9% | +6.8% | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.1% | +3.1% | +5.7% | +9.3% | +10.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 0.06x | 0.60x | 0.43x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $14M | $18M | $1.2B | $883M | $190M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $22M | $657M | $108M | $183M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $22M | $40M | $1.8B | $991M | $373M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.82x | 0.95x | 0.48x | 2.12x | 1.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HTBK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HTBK five years ago would be worth $13,948 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,129 for CVBF. Over the past 12 months, HTBK leads with a +47.5% total return vs BANR's +1.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HTBK at 28.4% vs AVBH's 10.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.7% | +13.7% | +10.3% | +7.3% | +4.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +34.8% | +47.5% | +21.2% | +3.5% | +1.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.8% | +111.7% | +51.4% | +100.0% | +66.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.8% | +39.5% | +24.2% | +11.3% | +32.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.8% | +74.6% | +80.5% | +62.7% | +98.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.5% | +28.4% | +14.8% | +26.0% | +18.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AVBH and HTBK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AVBH is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HTBK's 1.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HTBK currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs CVBF's 92.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.55x | 1.03x | 0.79x | 0.92x | 0.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.61 | $13.83 | $36.53 | $21.48 | $69.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.54 | $8.92 | $26.31 | $17.95 | $57.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.6% | +97.3% | +96.3% | +92.4% | +92.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.7 | 56.5 | 65.0 | 47.9 | 50.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 82K | 746K | 655K | 1.6M | 282K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WAFD and CVBF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AVBH as "Buy", HTBK as "Hold", WAFD as "Hold", CVBF as "Hold", BANR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 24.7% upside for CVBF (target: $25) vs -0.5% for WAFD (target: $35). For income investors, CVBF offers the higher dividend yield at 4.12% vs WAFD's 3.00%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $35.00 | $14.50 | $35.00 | $24.75 | $70.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 12 | 11 | 16 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.8% | +3.0% | +4.1% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.52 | $1.05 | $0.82 | $1.96 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.5% | +3.8% | +3.0% | +1.6% |
CVBF leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). AVBH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
AVBH vs HTBK vs WAFD vs CVBF vs BANR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AVBH or HTBK or WAFD or CVBF or BANR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Heritage Commerce Corp (HTBK) is the stronger pick with 5.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 8% for Avidbank Holdings, Inc. (AVBH). Avidbank Holdings, Inc. (AVBH) offers the better valuation at 9. 4x trailing P/E (8. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Avidbank Holdings, Inc. (AVBH) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AVBH or HTBK or WAFD or CVBF or BANR?
On trailing P/E, Avidbank Holdings, Inc.
(AVBH) is the cheapest at 9. 4x versus Heritage Commerce Corp at 17. 2x. On forward P/E, Avidbank Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Avidbank Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 61x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 34x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AVBH or HTBK or WAFD or CVBF or BANR?
Over the past 5 years, Heritage Commerce Corp (HTBK) delivered a total return of +39.
5%, compared to +11. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BANR returned +98. 4% versus AVBH's +34. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AVBH or HTBK or WAFD or CVBF or BANR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Avidbank Holdings, Inc.
(AVBH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 55β versus Heritage Commerce Corp's 1. 03β — meaning HTBK is approximately 89% more volatile than AVBH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Heritage Commerce Corp (HTBK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 60% for WaFd, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AVBH or HTBK or WAFD or CVBF or BANR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Heritage Commerce Corp (HTBK) is pulling ahead at 5.
8% versus -3. 8% for Avidbank Holdings, Inc. (AVBH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Heritage Commerce Corp grew EPS 18. 2% year-over-year, compared to 5. 2% for WaFd, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AVBH or HTBK or WAFD or CVBF or BANR?
CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 5% net margin versus 16. 0% for WaFd, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus -34. 8% for AVBH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVBF leads at 79. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AVBH or HTBK or WAFD or CVBF or BANR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Avidbank Holdings, Inc. (AVBH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 61x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 34x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Avidbank Holdings, Inc. (AVBH) trades at 8. 6x forward P/E versus 13. 8x for CVB Financial Corp. — 5. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CVBF: 24. 7% to $24. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — AVBH or HTBK or WAFD or CVBF or BANR?
In this comparison, CVBF (4.
1% yield), HTBK (3. 8% yield), BANR (3. 0% yield), WAFD (3. 0% yield) pay a dividend. AVBH does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AVBH or HTBK or WAFD or CVBF or BANR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
79), 3. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BANR: +98. 4%, AVBH: +34. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AVBH and HTBK and WAFD and CVBF and BANR?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
HTBK, WAFD, CVBF, BANR pay a dividend while AVBH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.