Food Distribution
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AVO vs CVGW vs FRSH vs DOLE vs PFGC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Food Distribution
Software - Application
Agricultural Farm Products
Food Distribution
AVO vs CVGW vs FRSH vs DOLE vs PFGC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Food Distribution | Food Distribution | Software - Application | Agricultural Farm Products | Food Distribution |
| Market Cap | $968M | $501M | $2.67B | $1.41B | $13.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.34B | $616M | $871M | $9.17B | $65.77B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $33M | $18M | $180M | $51M | $345M |
| Gross Margin | 12.0% | 10.2% | 85.0% | 7.8% | 11.9% |
| Operating Margin | 4.8% | 2.1% | 1.8% | 2.5% | 1.3% |
| Forward P/E | 20.7x | 19.9x | 16.2x | 10.7x | 18.7x |
| Total Debt | $201M | $23M | $67M | $0.00 | $8.00B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $65M | $61M | $632M | $268M | $79M |
AVO vs CVGW vs FRSH vs DOLE vs PFGC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mission Produce, In… (AVO) | 100 | 74.0 | -26.0% |
| Calavo Growers, Inc. (CVGW) | 100 | 73.2 | -26.8% |
| Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) | 100 | 20.8 | -79.2% |
| Dole plc (DOLE) | 100 | 87.9 | -12.1% |
| Performance Food Gr… (PFGC) | 100 | 199.9 | +99.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AVO vs CVGW vs FRSH vs DOLE vs PFGC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AVO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +31.2% vs FRSH's -36.6%
CVGW is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.44, yield 2.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.44, Low D/E 11.3%, current ratio 2.47x
- Beta 0.44, yield 2.8%, current ratio 2.47x
- 2.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs DOLE's 2.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
FRSH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 16.4%, EPS growth 296.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.0%
- 16.4% revenue growth vs CVGW's -2.0%
- 20.7% margin vs PFGC's 0.5%
- 11.9% ROA vs DOLE's 1.2%, ROIC 2.0% vs 9.3%
DOLE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and stability is your priority.
- Lower P/E (10.7x vs 18.7x)
- Beta 0.11 vs FRSH's 1.15
PFGC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 217.6% 10Y total return vs DOLE's 12.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.4% revenue growth vs CVGW's -2.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.7x vs 18.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.7% margin vs PFGC's 0.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.11 vs FRSH's 1.15 | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs DOLE's 2.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +31.2% vs FRSH's -36.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.9% ROA vs DOLE's 1.2%, ROIC 2.0% vs 9.3% |
AVO vs CVGW vs FRSH vs DOLE vs PFGC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AVO vs CVGW vs FRSH vs DOLE vs PFGC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FRSH leads in 2 of 6 categories
DOLE leads 1 • PFGC leads 1 • AVO leads 0 • CVGW leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FRSH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PFGC is the larger business by revenue, generating $65.8B annually — 106.7x CVGW's $616M. FRSH is the more profitable business, keeping 20.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PFGC's 0.5%. On growth, FRSH holds the edge at +16.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $616M | $871M | $9.2B | $65.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $91M | $19M | $41M | $337M | $1.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $33M | $18M | $180M | $51M | $345M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $38M | $15M | $254M | -$31M | $793M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +12.0% | +10.2% | +85.0% | +7.8% | +11.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +2.1% | +1.8% | +2.5% | +1.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | +2.9% | +20.7% | +0.6% | +0.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | +2.4% | +29.2% | -0.3% | +1.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.6% | -20.8% | +16.5% | +9.2% | +5.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -118.2% | -84.0% | — | +93.2% | +44.4% |
Valuation Metrics
DOLE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.6x trailing earnings, FRSH trades at a 63% valuation discount to PFGC's 40.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DOLE's 3.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FRSH's 29.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $968M | $501M | $2.7B | $1.4B | $13.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $463M | $2.1B | $1.1B | $21.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.77x | 25.25x | 14.59x | 27.92x | 39.96x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.70x | 19.88x | 16.15x | 10.69x | 18.68x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.89x | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.40x | 17.10x | 29.64x | 3.44x | 14.01x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.70x | 0.77x | 3.19x | 0.15x | 0.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.57x | 2.41x | 2.61x | 1.02x | 3.05x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 26.01x | 25.84x | 10.91x | 823.06x | 19.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FRSH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FRSH delivers a 18.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $4 for DOLE. FRSH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PFGC's 1.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CVGW scores 7/9 vs PFGC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.5% | +8.5% | +18.5% | +3.7% | +7.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.3% | +5.8% | +11.9% | +1.2% | +1.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.2% | +8.6% | +2.0% | +9.3% | +5.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.6% | +8.5% | +1.2% | +7.8% | +7.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.32x | 0.11x | 0.06x | — | 1.79x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $136M | -$38M | -$566M | -$268M | $7.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $65M | $61M | $632M | $268M | $79M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $201M | $23M | $67M | $0 | $8.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.85x | 42.51x | — | 3.51x | 2.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PFGC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PFGC five years ago would be worth $16,047 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,933 for FRSH. Over the past 12 months, AVO leads with a +31.2% total return vs FRSH's -36.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PFGC at 12.0% vs FRSH's -11.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.0% | +31.3% | -20.8% | +1.7% | -1.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +31.2% | +7.2% | -36.6% | +3.8% | +5.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.8% | -3.6% | -30.0% | +30.3% | +40.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.3% | -60.1% | -80.7% | +12.1% | +60.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.0% | -35.0% | -80.7% | +12.1% | +217.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.0% | -1.2% | -11.2% | +9.2% | +12.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CVGW and DOLE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DOLE is the less volatile stock with a 0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FRSH's 1.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CVGW currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs FRSH's 56.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.32x | 0.44x | 1.15x | 0.11x | 0.60x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.53 | $28.98 | $16.14 | $16.57 | $109.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.00 | $18.40 | $6.79 | $12.52 | $77.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.0% | +96.7% | +56.9% | +89.3% | +79.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.5 | 53.9 | 61.7 | 54.1 | 45.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 906K | 278K | 7.4M | 694K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AVO and CVGW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AVO as "Buy", CVGW as "Buy", FRSH as "Buy", DOLE as "Buy", PFGC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 39.1% upside for AVO (target: $19) vs -3.7% for CVGW (target: $27). For income investors, CVGW offers the higher dividend yield at 2.85% vs DOLE's 2.22%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.00 | $27.00 | $11.43 | $16.67 | $111.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 10 | 18 | 8 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.8% | — | +2.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.80 | — | $0.33 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +0.0% | +14.4% | 0.0% | +0.6% |
FRSH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DOLE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
AVO vs CVGW vs FRSH vs DOLE vs PFGC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AVO or CVGW or FRSH or DOLE or PFGC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Freshworks Inc.
(FRSH) is the stronger pick with 16. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 0% for Calavo Growers, Inc. (CVGW). Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) offers the better valuation at 14. 6x trailing P/E (16. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mission Produce, Inc. (AVO) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AVO or CVGW or FRSH or DOLE or PFGC?
On trailing P/E, Freshworks Inc.
(FRSH) is the cheapest at 14. 6x versus Performance Food Group Company at 40. 0x. On forward P/E, Dole plc is actually cheaper at 10. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AVO or CVGW or FRSH or DOLE or PFGC?
Over the past 5 years, Performance Food Group Company (PFGC) delivered a total return of +60.
5%, compared to -80. 7% for Freshworks Inc. (FRSH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PFGC returned +217. 6% versus FRSH's -80. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AVO or CVGW or FRSH or DOLE or PFGC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Dole plc (DOLE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
11β versus Freshworks Inc. 's 1. 15β — meaning FRSH is approximately 938% more volatile than DOLE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 179% for Performance Food Group Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AVO or CVGW or FRSH or DOLE or PFGC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Freshworks Inc.
(FRSH) is pulling ahead at 16. 4% versus -2. 0% for Calavo Growers, Inc. (CVGW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Calavo Growers, Inc. grew EPS 1950% year-over-year, compared to -59. 5% for Dole plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, FRSH leads at 19. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AVO or CVGW or FRSH or DOLE or PFGC?
Freshworks Inc.
(FRSH) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 9% net margin versus 0. 5% for Performance Food Group Company — meaning it keeps 21. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AVO leads at 5. 1% versus 1. 3% for PFGC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FRSH leads at 85. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AVO or CVGW or FRSH or DOLE or PFGC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Dole plc (DOLE) trades at 10.
7x forward P/E versus 20. 7x for Mission Produce, Inc. — 10. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVO: 39. 1% to $19. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AVO or CVGW or FRSH or DOLE or PFGC?
In this comparison, CVGW (2.
8% yield), DOLE (2. 2% yield) pay a dividend. AVO, FRSH, PFGC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AVO or CVGW or FRSH or DOLE or PFGC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Dole plc (DOLE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
11), 2. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DOLE: +12. 1%, FRSH: -80. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AVO and CVGW and FRSH and DOLE and PFGC?
These companies operate in different sectors (AVO (Consumer Defensive) and CVGW (Consumer Defensive) and FRSH (Technology) and DOLE (Consumer Defensive) and PFGC (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AVO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CVGW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FRSH is a small-cap high-growth stock; DOLE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PFGC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. CVGW, DOLE pay a dividend while AVO, FRSH, PFGC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.