Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BCBP vs OCFC vs KRNY vs NBTB vs CTBI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
BCBP vs OCFC vs KRNY vs NBTB vs CTBI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $175M | $1.08B | $508M | $2.35B | $1.20B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $166M | $656M | $344M | $867M | $376M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-13M | $71M | $32M | $169M | $93M |
| Gross Margin | 26.7% | 54.5% | 44.1% | 72.1% | 63.2% |
| Operating Margin | -11.0% | 14.1% | 9.0% | 25.3% | 28.4% |
| Forward P/E | 9.2x | 9.9x | 13.1x | 10.8x | 10.9x |
| Total Debt | $300M | $1.63B | $1.26B | $327M | $320M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $135M | $167M | $185M | $370M |
BCBP vs OCFC vs KRNY vs NBTB vs CTBI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BCB Bancorp, Inc. (BCBP) | 100 | 105.4 | +5.4% |
| OceanFirst Financia… (OCFC) | 100 | 112.6 | +12.6% |
| Kearny Financial Co… (KRNY) | 100 | 95.2 | -4.8% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 145.6 | +45.6% |
| Community Trust Ban… (CTBI) | 100 | 201.9 | +101.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BCBP vs OCFC vs KRNY vs NBTB vs CTBI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BCBP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.85, yield 6.1%
- Beta 0.85, yield 6.1%, current ratio 255.40x
- Lower P/E (9.2x vs 10.9x)
- 6.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2%
OCFC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
KRNY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +37.9% vs NBTB's +9.0%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and bank quality.
- PEG 1.53 vs OCFC's 3.57
- NIM 3.1% vs KRNY's 1.7%
CTBI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.2%, EPS growth 5.7%
- 133.7% 10Y total return vs NBTB's 102.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, Low D/E 42.3%, current ratio 0.27x
- 15.2% NII/revenue growth vs BCBP's -15.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.2% NII/revenue growth vs BCBP's -15.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.2x vs 10.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs OCFC's 1.05, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.9% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
BCBP vs OCFC vs KRNY vs NBTB vs CTBI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BCBP vs OCFC vs KRNY vs NBTB vs CTBI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CTBI leads in 3 of 6 categories
BCBP leads 1 • OCFC leads 0 • KRNY leads 0 • NBTB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CTBI leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 5.2x BCBP's $166M. CTBI is the more profitable business, keeping 22.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BCBP's -7.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $166M | $656M | $344M | $867M | $376M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$18M | $103M | $43M | $241M | $127M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$13M | $71M | $32M | $169M | $93M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $34M | $80M | $40M | $225M | $104M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.7% | +54.5% | +44.1% | +72.1% | +63.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -11.0% | +14.1% | +9.0% | +25.3% | +28.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.5% | +10.8% | +7.6% | +19.5% | +22.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.9% | +12.1% | +6.2% | +25.2% | +25.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.6% | -36.1% | +50.0% | +39.5% | +7.3% |
Valuation Metrics
BCBP leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.5x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 30% valuation discount to KRNY's 19.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NBTB offers better value at 1.92x vs OCFC's 5.80x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $175M | $1.1B | $508M | $2.4B | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $462M | $2.6B | $1.6B | $2.5B | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -12.02x | 16.14x | 19.24x | 13.53x | 14.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.19x | 9.93x | 13.06x | 10.80x | 10.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 5.80x | — | 1.92x | 2.97x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 27.70x | 44.52x | 10.35x | 10.31x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.05x | 1.65x | 1.48x | 2.71x | 3.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.57x | 0.65x | 0.68x | 1.21x | 1.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.03x | 13.63x | 23.76x | 10.75x | 12.37x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — NBTB and CTBI each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CTBI delivers a 11.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-4 for BCBP. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KRNY's 1.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KRNY scores 7/9 vs BCBP's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.0% | +4.3% | +4.3% | +9.5% | +11.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.4% | +0.5% | +0.4% | +1.1% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.9% | +2.2% | +1.1% | +7.9% | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.9% | +2.7% | +1.5% | +2.4% | +12.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.99x | 0.98x | 1.68x | 0.17x | 0.42x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $287M | $1.5B | $1.1B | $142M | -$50M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $135M | $167M | $185M | $370M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $300M | $1.6B | $1.3B | $327M | $320M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.23x | 0.33x | 0.22x | 1.05x | 0.95x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CTBI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CTBI five years ago would be worth $16,608 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,946 for KRNY. Over the past 12 months, KRNY leads with a +37.9% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CTBI at 28.3% vs BCBP's 3.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +28.6% | +8.1% | +12.9% | +9.3% | +18.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.4% | +20.5% | +37.9% | +9.0% | +36.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.5% | +55.7% | +32.6% | +54.1% | +111.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.6% | +2.5% | -20.5% | +29.9% | +66.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.6% | +45.4% | -9.0% | +102.2% | +133.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.7% | +15.9% | +9.9% | +15.5% | +28.3% |
Risk & Volatility
CTBI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CTBI is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OCFC's 1.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CTBI currently trades 96.5% from its 52-week high vs OCFC's 91.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.83x | 1.03x | 0.82x | 0.88x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.47 | $20.61 | $8.50 | $46.92 | $68.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.31 | $16.09 | $5.76 | $39.20 | $49.61 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.5% | +91.6% | +95.1% | +96.1% | +96.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.5 | 53.8 | 55.8 | 57.3 | 58.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 93K | 662K | 298K | 236K | 92K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BCBP and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BCBP as "Hold", OCFC as "Hold", KRNY as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", CTBI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 17.6% upside for KRNY (target: $10) vs -10.9% for BCBP (target: $9). For income investors, BCBP offers the higher dividend yield at 6.12% vs CTBI's 2.80%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.00 | $19.67 | $9.50 | $46.00 | $61.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 8 | 5 | 10 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.1% | +4.5% | +5.5% | +3.2% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 10 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.62 | $0.84 | $0.44 | $1.43 | $1.86 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +7.6% | +0.1% | +0.4% | 0.0% |
CTBI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). BCBP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
BCBP vs OCFC vs KRNY vs NBTB vs CTBI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BCBP or OCFC or KRNY or NBTB or CTBI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.
(CTBI) is the stronger pick with 15. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 5% for BCB Bancorp, Inc. (BCBP). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BCB Bancorp, Inc. (BCBP) a "Hold" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BCBP or OCFC or KRNY or NBTB or CTBI?
On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the cheapest at 13. 5x versus Kearny Financial Corp. at 19. 2x. On forward P/E, BCB Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NBT Bancorp Inc. wins at 1. 53x versus OceanFirst Financial Corp. 's 3. 57x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BCBP or OCFC or KRNY or NBTB or CTBI?
Over the past 5 years, Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.
(CTBI) delivered a total return of +66. 1%, compared to -20. 5% for Kearny Financial Corp. (KRNY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CTBI returned +133. 7% versus KRNY's -8. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BCBP or OCFC or KRNY or NBTB or CTBI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.
(CTBI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus OceanFirst Financial Corp. 's 1. 03β — meaning OCFC is approximately 27% more volatile than CTBI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 168% for Kearny Financial Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BCBP or OCFC or KRNY or NBTB or CTBI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.
(CTBI) is pulling ahead at 15. 2% versus -15. 5% for BCB Bancorp, Inc. (BCBP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kearny Financial Corp. grew EPS 130. 2% year-over-year, compared to -184. 8% for BCB Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BCBP or OCFC or KRNY or NBTB or CTBI?
Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.
(CTBI) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 0% net margin versus -7. 5% for BCB Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CTBI leads at 28. 4% versus -11. 0% for BCBP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BCBP or OCFC or KRNY or NBTB or CTBI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 53x versus OceanFirst Financial Corp. 's 3. 57x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, BCB Bancorp, Inc. (BCBP) trades at 9. 2x forward P/E versus 13. 1x for Kearny Financial Corp. — 3. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KRNY: 17. 6% to $9. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — BCBP or OCFC or KRNY or NBTB or CTBI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
BCB Bancorp, Inc. (BCBP) offers the highest yield at 6. 1%, versus 2. 8% for Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. (CTBI).
09Is BCBP or OCFC or KRNY or NBTB or CTBI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.
(CTBI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 2. 8% yield, +133. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CTBI: +133. 7%, OCFC: +45. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BCBP and OCFC and KRNY and NBTB and CTBI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BCBP is a small-cap income-oriented stock; OCFC is a small-cap deep-value stock; KRNY is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CTBI is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.