Financial - Mortgages
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BETR vs UWMC vs GHLD vs PFSI vs RKT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Mortgages
Financial - Mortgages
Financial - Mortgages
Financial - Mortgages
BETR vs UWMC vs GHLD vs PFSI vs RKT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Mortgages | Financial - Mortgages | Financial - Mortgages | Financial - Mortgages | Financial - Mortgages |
| Market Cap | $656M | $543M | $439M | $4.54B | $2.07B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $191M | $3.16B | $1.17B | $4.36B | $5.40B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-166M | $27M | $126M | $507M | $-102M |
| Gross Margin | 77.7% | 85.6% | 90.6% | 91.4% | 91.3% |
| Operating Margin | -64.3% | 58.0% | 10.1% | 34.6% | 12.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 8.3x | 10.2x | 7.0x | 20.0x |
| Total Debt | $615M | $14.44B | $3.03B | $23.06B | $13.98B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $117M | $503M | $118M | $302M | $1.27B |
BETR vs UWMC vs GHLD vs PFSI vs RKT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Better Home & Finan… (BETR) | 100 | 8.7 | -91.3% |
| UWM Holdings Corpor… (UWMC) | 100 | 39.3 | -60.7% |
| Guild Holdings Comp… (GHLD) | 100 | 126.6 | +26.6% |
| PennyMac Financial … (PFSI) | 100 | 138.9 | +38.9% |
| Rocket Companies, I… (RKT) | 100 | 82.7 | -17.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BETR vs UWMC vs GHLD vs PFSI vs RKT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BETR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for bank quality.
- NIM 1.2% vs UWMC's 0.0%
- +218.6% vs PFSI's -8.0%
UWMC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.50, yield 97.1%
- Beta 1.50, yield 97.1%, current ratio 0.67x
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BETR's 1.4% (lower = leaner)
- 97.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PFSI's 1.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
GHLD is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.04, current ratio 0.09x
- Beta 0.04 vs BETR's 1.93, lower leverage
PFSI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 173.8%, EPS growth 59.2%
- 6.2% 10Y total return vs GHLD's 58.4%
- 173.8% NII/revenue growth vs RKT's 34.8%
- Lower P/E (7.0x vs 10.2x)
Among these 5 stocks, RKT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 173.8% NII/revenue growth vs RKT's 34.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.0x vs 10.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BETR's 1.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.04 vs BETR's 1.93, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 97.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PFSI's 1.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +218.6% vs PFSI's -8.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BETR's 1.4% |
BETR vs UWMC vs GHLD vs PFSI vs RKT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BETR vs UWMC vs GHLD vs PFSI vs RKT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
UWMC leads in 2 of 6 categories
PFSI leads 1 • GHLD leads 1 • BETR leads 0 • RKT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PFSI leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RKT is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.4B annually — 28.2x BETR's $191M. PFSI is the more profitable business, keeping 11.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BETR's -86.7%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $191M | $3.2B | $1.2B | $4.4B | $5.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$115M | $695M | $199M | $1.0B | $682M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$166M | $27M | $126M | $507M | -$102M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$225M | -$2.7B | $25M | -$3.8B | -$1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +77.7% | +85.6% | +90.6% | +91.4% | +91.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -64.3% | +58.0% | +10.1% | +34.6% | +12.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -86.7% | +0.9% | +8.3% | +11.5% | +0.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -121.9% | -86.1% | -56.9% | -32.4% | -63.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +34.9% | — | +148.6% | +7.7% | -4.3% |
Valuation Metrics
UWMC leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.3x trailing earnings, PFSI trades at a 87% valuation discount to RKT's 69.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, UWMC's 7.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GHLD's 21.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $656M | $543M | $439M | $4.5B | $2.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $14.5B | $3.4B | $27.3B | $14.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.95x | 29.08x | 12.83x | 9.35x | 69.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.27x | 10.23x | 7.04x | 20.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.17x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.69x | 21.40x | 18.05x | 18.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.43x | 0.17x | 0.37x | 1.04x | 0.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 17.61x | 0.46x | 0.99x | 1.09x | 0.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
UWMC leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PFSI delivers a 12.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-11 for BETR. RKT carries lower financial leverage with a 1.55x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BETR's 16.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UWMC scores 5/9 vs GHLD's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.6% | +1.7% | +10.3% | +12.0% | -1.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.9% | +0.2% | +2.6% | +1.8% | -0.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -13.5% | +8.9% | +2.4% | +4.4% | +2.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -15.7% | +19.0% | +5.2% | +10.4% | +4.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 16.55x | 9.06x | 2.42x | 5.35x | 1.55x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $499M | $13.9B | $2.9B | $22.8B | $12.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $117M | $503M | $118M | $302M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $615M | $14.4B | $3.0B | $23.1B | $14.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.54x | 0.75x | 1.47x | 0.96x | 0.87x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — BETR and GHLD and PFSI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PFSI five years ago would be worth $15,907 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $813 for BETR. Over the past 12 months, BETR leads with a +218.6% total return vs PFSI's -8.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GHLD at 30.4% vs BETR's -56.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.9% | -18.6% | — | -33.7% | -26.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +218.6% | -4.4% | +63.3% | -8.0% | +27.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.6% | -19.8% | +121.6% | +56.3% | +83.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.9% | -23.6% | +58.4% | +59.1% | -13.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.5% | -39.9% | +58.4% | +624.6% | -18.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -56.2% | -7.1% | +30.4% | +16.0% | +22.4% |
Risk & Volatility
GHLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GHLD is the less volatile stock with a 0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BETR's 1.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GHLD currently trades 84.9% from its 52-week high vs BETR's 45.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.93x | 1.50x | 0.04x | 0.93x | 1.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $94.06 | $7.14 | $23.57 | $160.36 | $24.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.81 | $3.38 | $11.99 | $82.67 | $11.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +45.4% | +48.9% | +84.9% | +54.2% | +60.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.7 | 39.2 | 43.7 | 41.5 | 39.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 499K | 16.4M | 152K | 609K | 25.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — UWMC and PFSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BETR as "Hold", UWMC as "Hold", GHLD as "Hold", PFSI as "Buy", RKT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 71.3% upside for UWMC (target: $6) vs -11.9% for GHLD (target: $18). For income investors, UWMC offers the higher dividend yield at 97.12% vs PFSI's 1.34%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $40.00 | $5.98 | $17.63 | $143.00 | $21.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 13 | 6 | 20 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +97.1% | +2.5% | +1.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.39 | $0.49 | $1.16 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.3% | +0.1% | 0.0% |
UWMC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). PFSI leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
BETR vs UWMC vs GHLD vs PFSI vs RKT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BETR or UWMC or GHLD or PFSI or RKT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) is the stronger pick with 173. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 34. 8% for Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT). PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI) offers the better valuation at 9. 3x trailing P/E (7. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BETR or UWMC or GHLD or PFSI or RKT?
On trailing P/E, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) is the cheapest at 9. 3x versus Rocket Companies, Inc. at 69. 8x. On forward P/E, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BETR or UWMC or GHLD or PFSI or RKT?
Over the past 5 years, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) delivered a total return of +59. 1%, compared to -91. 9% for Better Home & Finance Holding Company (BETR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PFSI returned +624. 6% versus BETR's -91. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BETR or UWMC or GHLD or PFSI or RKT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Guild Holdings Company (GHLD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
04β versus Better Home & Finance Holding Company's 1. 93β — meaning BETR is approximately 4498% more volatile than GHLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 155% versus 17% for Better Home & Finance Holding Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BETR or UWMC or GHLD or PFSI or RKT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) is pulling ahead at 173. 8% versus 34. 8% for Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Guild Holdings Company grew EPS 343. 8% year-over-year, compared to -7. 7% for UWM Holdings Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BETR or UWMC or GHLD or PFSI or RKT?
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 5% net margin versus -86. 7% for Better Home & Finance Holding Company — meaning it keeps 11. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UWMC leads at 58. 0% versus -64. 3% for BETR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PFSI leads at 91. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BETR or UWMC or GHLD or PFSI or RKT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) trades at 7. 0x forward P/E versus 20. 0x for Rocket Companies, Inc. — 13. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UWMC: 71. 3% to $5. 98.
08Which pays a better dividend — BETR or UWMC or GHLD or PFSI or RKT?
In this comparison, UWMC (97.
1% yield), GHLD (2. 5% yield), PFSI (1. 3% yield) pay a dividend. BETR, RKT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BETR or UWMC or GHLD or PFSI or RKT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Guild Holdings Company (GHLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
04), 2. 5% yield). Better Home & Finance Holding Company (BETR) carries a higher beta of 1. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GHLD: +58. 4%, BETR: -91. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BETR and UWMC and GHLD and PFSI and RKT?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
UWMC, GHLD, PFSI pay a dividend while BETR, RKT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.