Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BETR vs UWMC vs GHLD vs PFSI vs RKT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BETR
Better Home & Finance Holding Company

Financial - Mortgages

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$656M
5Y Perf.-91.3%
UWMC
UWM Holdings Corporation

Financial - Mortgages

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$543M
5Y Perf.-60.7%
GHLD
Guild Holdings Company

Financial - Mortgages

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$439M
5Y Perf.+26.6%
PFSI
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.

Financial - Mortgages

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.54B
5Y Perf.+38.9%
RKT
Rocket Companies, Inc.

Financial - Mortgages

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.07B
5Y Perf.-17.3%

BETR vs UWMC vs GHLD vs PFSI vs RKT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BETR logoBETR
UWMC logoUWMC
GHLD logoGHLD
PFSI logoPFSI
RKT logoRKT
IndustryFinancial - MortgagesFinancial - MortgagesFinancial - MortgagesFinancial - MortgagesFinancial - Mortgages
Market Cap$656M$543M$439M$4.54B$2.07B
Revenue (TTM)$191M$3.16B$1.17B$4.36B$5.40B
Net Income (TTM)$-166M$27M$126M$507M$-102M
Gross Margin77.7%85.6%90.6%91.4%91.3%
Operating Margin-64.3%58.0%10.1%34.6%12.4%
Forward P/E8.3x10.2x7.0x20.0x
Total Debt$615M$14.44B$3.03B$23.06B$13.98B
Cash & Equiv.$117M$503M$118M$302M$1.27B

BETR vs UWMC vs GHLD vs PFSI vs RKTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BETR
UWMC
GHLD
PFSI
RKT
StockMay 21May 26Return
Better Home & Finan… (BETR)1008.7-91.3%
UWM Holdings Corpor… (UWMC)10039.3-60.7%
Guild Holdings Comp… (GHLD)100126.6+26.6%
PennyMac Financial … (PFSI)100138.9+38.9%
Rocket Companies, I… (RKT)10082.7-17.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BETR vs UWMC vs GHLD vs PFSI vs RKT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: UWMC leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. BETR and GHLD also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
BETR
Better Home & Finance Holding Company
The Banking Pick

BETR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for bank quality.

  • NIM 1.2% vs UWMC's 0.0%
  • +218.6% vs PFSI's -8.0%
Best for: bank quality
UWMC
UWM Holdings Corporation
The Banking Pick

UWMC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.50, yield 97.1%
  • Beta 1.50, yield 97.1%, current ratio 0.67x
  • Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BETR's 1.4% (lower = leaner)
  • 97.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PFSI's 1.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
GHLD
Guild Holdings Company
The Banking Pick

GHLD is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.04, current ratio 0.09x
  • Beta 0.04 vs BETR's 1.93, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
PFSI
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
The Banking Pick

PFSI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 173.8%, EPS growth 59.2%
  • 6.2% 10Y total return vs GHLD's 58.4%
  • 173.8% NII/revenue growth vs RKT's 34.8%
  • Lower P/E (7.0x vs 10.2x)
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
RKT
Rocket Companies, Inc.
The Financial Play

Among these 5 stocks, RKT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: financial services exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPFSI logoPFSI173.8% NII/revenue growth vs RKT's 34.8%
ValuePFSI logoPFSILower P/E (7.0x vs 10.2x)
Quality / MarginsUWMC logoUWMCEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs BETR's 1.4% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyGHLD logoGHLDBeta 0.04 vs BETR's 1.93, lower leverage
DividendsUWMC logoUWMC97.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PFSI's 1.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)BETR logoBETR+218.6% vs PFSI's -8.0%
Efficiency (ROA)UWMC logoUWMCEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs BETR's 1.4%

BETR vs UWMC vs GHLD vs PFSI vs RKT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BETRBetter Home & Finance Holding Company

Segment breakdown not available.

UWMCUWM Holdings Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

GHLDGuild Holdings Company
FY 2024
Origination
73.1%$780M
Servicing
26.9%$287M
PFSIPennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Mortgage banking Production
63.1%$1.3B
Mortgage banking Servicing
36.9%$737M
RKTRocket Companies, Inc.
FY 2024
Direct To Customer Segment
85.3%$3.9B
Partner Network Segment
14.7%$670M

BETR vs UWMC vs GHLD vs PFSI vs RKT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLUWMCLAGGINGRKT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

PFSI leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

RKT is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.4B annually — 28.2x BETR's $191M. PFSI is the more profitable business, keeping 11.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BETR's -86.7%.

MetricBETR logoBETRBetter Home & Fin…UWMC logoUWMCUWM Holdings Corp…GHLD logoGHLDGuild Holdings Co…PFSI logoPFSIPennyMac Financia…RKT logoRKTRocket Companies,…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$191M$3.2B$1.2B$4.4B$5.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$115M$695M$199M$1.0B$682M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$166M$27M$126M$507M-$102M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$225M-$2.7B$25M-$3.8B-$1.1B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+77.7%+85.6%+90.6%+91.4%+91.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-64.3%+58.0%+10.1%+34.6%+12.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-86.7%+0.9%+8.3%+11.5%+0.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-121.9%-86.1%-56.9%-32.4%-63.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+34.9%+148.6%+7.7%-4.3%
PFSI leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

UWMC leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 9.3x trailing earnings, PFSI trades at a 87% valuation discount to RKT's 69.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, UWMC's 7.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GHLD's 21.4x.

MetricBETR logoBETRBetter Home & Fin…UWMC logoUWMCUWM Holdings Corp…GHLD logoGHLDGuild Holdings Co…PFSI logoPFSIPennyMac Financia…RKT logoRKTRocket Companies,…
Market CapShares × price$656M$543M$439M$4.5B$2.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.2B$14.5B$3.4B$27.3B$14.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-3.95x29.08x12.83x9.35x69.76x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.27x10.23x7.04x20.01x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.17x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.69x21.40x18.05x18.91x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.43x0.17x0.37x1.04x0.38x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share17.61x0.46x0.99x1.09x0.23x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
UWMC leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

UWMC leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

PFSI delivers a 12.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-11 for BETR. RKT carries lower financial leverage with a 1.55x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BETR's 16.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UWMC scores 5/9 vs GHLD's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricBETR logoBETRBetter Home & Fin…UWMC logoUWMCUWM Holdings Corp…GHLD logoGHLDGuild Holdings Co…PFSI logoPFSIPennyMac Financia…RKT logoRKTRocket Companies,…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-10.6%+1.7%+10.3%+12.0%-1.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-12.9%+0.2%+2.6%+1.8%-0.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-13.5%+8.9%+2.4%+4.4%+2.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-15.7%+19.0%+5.2%+10.4%+4.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–935345
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage16.55x9.06x2.42x5.35x1.55x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$499M$13.9B$2.9B$22.8B$12.7B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$117M$503M$118M$302M$1.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$615M$14.4B$3.0B$23.1B$14.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-3.54x0.75x1.47x0.96x0.87x
UWMC leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — BETR and GHLD and PFSI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PFSI five years ago would be worth $15,907 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $813 for BETR. Over the past 12 months, BETR leads with a +218.6% total return vs PFSI's -8.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GHLD at 30.4% vs BETR's -56.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBETR logoBETRBetter Home & Fin…UWMC logoUWMCUWM Holdings Corp…GHLD logoGHLDGuild Holdings Co…PFSI logoPFSIPennyMac Financia…RKT logoRKTRocket Companies,…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+22.9%-18.6%-33.7%-26.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+218.6%-4.4%+63.3%-8.0%+27.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-91.6%-19.8%+121.6%+56.3%+83.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-91.9%-23.6%+58.4%+59.1%-13.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-91.5%-39.9%+58.4%+624.6%-18.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-56.2%-7.1%+30.4%+16.0%+22.4%
Evenly matched — BETR and GHLD and PFSI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

GHLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

GHLD is the less volatile stock with a 0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BETR's 1.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GHLD currently trades 84.9% from its 52-week high vs BETR's 45.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBETR logoBETRBetter Home & Fin…UWMC logoUWMCUWM Holdings Corp…GHLD logoGHLDGuild Holdings Co…PFSI logoPFSIPennyMac Financia…RKT logoRKTRocket Companies,…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.93x1.50x0.04x0.93x1.77x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$94.06$7.14$23.57$160.36$24.36
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$10.81$3.38$11.99$82.67$11.08
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+45.4%+48.9%+84.9%+54.2%+60.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10054.739.243.741.539.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded499K16.4M152K609K25.1M
GHLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — UWMC and PFSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: BETR as "Hold", UWMC as "Hold", GHLD as "Hold", PFSI as "Buy", RKT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 71.3% upside for UWMC (target: $6) vs -11.9% for GHLD (target: $18). For income investors, UWMC offers the higher dividend yield at 97.12% vs PFSI's 1.34%.

MetricBETR logoBETRBetter Home & Fin…UWMC logoUWMCUWM Holdings Corp…GHLD logoGHLDGuild Holdings Co…PFSI logoPFSIPennyMac Financia…RKT logoRKTRocket Companies,…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldHoldBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$40.00$5.98$17.63$143.00$21.63
# AnalystsCovering analysts11362025
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+97.1%+2.5%+1.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1021
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$3.39$0.49$1.16
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.3%+0.1%0.0%
Evenly matched — UWMC and PFSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

UWMC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). PFSI leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.

Best OverallUWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BETR vs UWMC vs GHLD vs PFSI vs RKT: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BETR or UWMC or GHLD or PFSI or RKT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.

(PFSI) is the stronger pick with 173. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 34. 8% for Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT). PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI) offers the better valuation at 9. 3x trailing P/E (7. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BETR or UWMC or GHLD or PFSI or RKT?

On trailing P/E, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.

(PFSI) is the cheapest at 9. 3x versus Rocket Companies, Inc. at 69. 8x. On forward P/E, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BETR or UWMC or GHLD or PFSI or RKT?

Over the past 5 years, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.

(PFSI) delivered a total return of +59. 1%, compared to -91. 9% for Better Home & Finance Holding Company (BETR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PFSI returned +624. 6% versus BETR's -91. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BETR or UWMC or GHLD or PFSI or RKT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Guild Holdings Company (GHLD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

04β versus Better Home & Finance Holding Company's 1. 93β — meaning BETR is approximately 4498% more volatile than GHLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 155% versus 17% for Better Home & Finance Holding Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BETR or UWMC or GHLD or PFSI or RKT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.

(PFSI) is pulling ahead at 173. 8% versus 34. 8% for Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Guild Holdings Company grew EPS 343. 8% year-over-year, compared to -7. 7% for UWM Holdings Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BETR or UWMC or GHLD or PFSI or RKT?

PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.

(PFSI) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 5% net margin versus -86. 7% for Better Home & Finance Holding Company — meaning it keeps 11. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UWMC leads at 58. 0% versus -64. 3% for BETR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PFSI leads at 91. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BETR or UWMC or GHLD or PFSI or RKT more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.

(PFSI) trades at 7. 0x forward P/E versus 20. 0x for Rocket Companies, Inc. — 13. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UWMC: 71. 3% to $5. 98.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BETR or UWMC or GHLD or PFSI or RKT?

In this comparison, UWMC (97.

1% yield), GHLD (2. 5% yield), PFSI (1. 3% yield) pay a dividend. BETR, RKT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is BETR or UWMC or GHLD or PFSI or RKT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Guild Holdings Company (GHLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

04), 2. 5% yield). Better Home & Finance Holding Company (BETR) carries a higher beta of 1. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GHLD: +58. 4%, BETR: -91. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BETR and UWMC and GHLD and PFSI and RKT?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

UWMC, GHLD, PFSI pay a dividend while BETR, RKT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

BETR

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 29%
  • Gross Margin > 46%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

UWMC

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 32%
  • Gross Margin > 51%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GHLD

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 30%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PFSI

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 86%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RKT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 17%
  • Gross Margin > 54%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BETR and UWMC and GHLD and PFSI and RKT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BETR: 59.4% · UWMC: 65.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.