Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BFH vs SYF vs COF vs OMF vs ALLY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
BFH vs SYF vs COF vs OMF vs ALLY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $3.98B | $25.72B | $119.19B | $6.52B | $13.51B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.70B | $19.12B | $69.25B | $6.24B | $12.15B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $518M | $3.60B | $2.45B | $796M | $852M |
| Gross Margin | 63.3% | 51.0% | 47.3% | 47.6% | 52.0% |
| Operating Margin | 13.1% | 24.2% | 3.3% | 16.0% | 8.6% |
| Forward P/E | 7.8x | 8.0x | 9.8x | 7.5x | 8.2x |
| Total Debt | $4.39B | $15.18B | $51.00B | $22.69B | $21.77B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.60B | $14.97B | $57.43B | $914M | $10.03B |
BFH vs SYF vs COF vs OMF vs ALLY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bread Financial Hol… (BFH) | 100 | 234.0 | +134.0% |
| Synchrony Financial (SYF) | 100 | 363.3 | +263.3% |
| Capital One Financi… (COF) | 100 | 283.0 | +183.0% |
| OneMain Holdings, I… (OMF) | 100 | 238.7 | +138.7% |
| Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY) | 100 | 251.1 | +151.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BFH vs SYF vs COF vs OMF vs ALLY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BFH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for bank quality.
- NIM 17.9% vs ALLY's 2.7%
- +79.6% vs COF's +4.7%
SYF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.25 vs OMF's 1.92
- Lower P/E (8.0x vs 9.8x)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BFH's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BFH's 0.5%
COF is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 28.4% NII/revenue growth vs ALLY's -25.7%
OMF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.30, yield 4.7%
- Rev growth 9.1%, EPS growth 54.7%
- Beta 1.30, yield 4.7%
- Beta 1.30 vs COF's 1.58
ALLY is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 209.6% 10Y total return vs COF's 205.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.42, current ratio 0.90x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.4% NII/revenue growth vs ALLY's -25.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.0x vs 9.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BFH's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.30 vs COF's 1.58 | |
| Dividends | 4.7% yield, vs SYF's 1.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +79.6% vs COF's +4.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BFH's 0.5% |
BFH vs SYF vs COF vs OMF vs ALLY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BFH vs SYF vs COF vs OMF vs ALLY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SYF leads in 2 of 6 categories
BFH leads 2 • COF leads 0 • OMF leads 0 • ALLY leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SYF leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COF is the larger business by revenue, generating $69.3B annually — 14.7x BFH's $4.7B. SYF is the more profitable business, keeping 18.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COF's 3.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.7B | $19.1B | $69.3B | $6.2B | $12.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $694M | $4.9B | $7.5B | $943M | $2.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $518M | $3.6B | $2.5B | $796M | $852M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.1B | $9.8B | $27.7B | $3.2B | -$295M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.3% | +51.0% | +47.3% | +47.6% | +52.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.1% | +24.2% | +3.3% | +16.0% | +8.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.0% | +18.6% | +3.5% | +12.5% | +7.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +44.5% | +51.5% | +37.7% | +50.1% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.3% | +20.1% | +22.1% | +8.4% | +2.7% |
Valuation Metrics
BFH leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.9x trailing earnings, BFH trades at a 83% valuation discount to COF's 47.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SYF offers better value at 0.24x vs OMF's 2.16x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.0B | $25.7B | $119.2B | $6.5B | $13.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.8B | $25.9B | $112.8B | $28.3B | $25.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.89x | 7.97x | 47.77x | 8.49x | 18.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.83x | 7.99x | 9.76x | 7.54x | 8.21x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.40x | 0.24x | — | 2.16x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.87x | 5.05x | 14.95x | 21.98x | 12.84x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.85x | 1.35x | 1.72x | 1.05x | 1.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.20x | 1.58x | 0.92x | 1.95x | 0.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.90x | 2.61x | 4.56x | 2.08x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SYF leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OMF delivers a 23.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $2 for COF. COF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.45x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OMF's 6.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BFH scores 7/9 vs ALLY's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.1% | +21.4% | +2.4% | +23.6% | +5.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.3% | +3.0% | +0.4% | +2.9% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.6% | +10.8% | +1.3% | +3.0% | +2.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.3% | +12.3% | +1.4% | +3.8% | +3.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.32x | 0.91x | 0.45x | 6.67x | 1.40x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $789M | $209M | -$6.4B | $21.8B | $11.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.6B | $15.0B | $57.4B | $914M | $10.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.4B | $15.2B | $51.0B | $22.7B | $21.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.72x | 1.13x | 0.14x | 0.57x | 0.22x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BFH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SYF five years ago would be worth $17,222 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,100 for BFH. Over the past 12 months, BFH leads with a +79.6% total return vs COF's +4.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BFH at 52.4% vs OMF's 23.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.2% | -11.9% | -22.0% | -17.9% | -3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +79.6% | +39.9% | +4.7% | +22.9% | +38.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +254.2% | +181.9% | +124.7% | +87.3% | +89.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.0% | +72.2% | +30.2% | +36.4% | -8.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.7% | +176.3% | +205.6% | +189.2% | +209.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +52.4% | +41.3% | +31.0% | +23.3% | +23.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OMF and ALLY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OMF is the less volatile stock with a 1.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COF's 1.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALLY currently trades 92.6% from its 52-week high vs COF's 74.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.52x | 1.52x | 1.58x | 1.30x | 1.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $98.39 | $88.77 | $259.64 | $71.93 | $47.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $48.15 | $53.23 | $174.98 | $45.78 | $32.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.9% | +83.4% | +74.2% | +77.4% | +92.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.5 | 54.3 | 50.3 | 45.9 | 58.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 641K | 3.6M | 4.6M | 1.4M | 3.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SYF and OMF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BFH as "Hold", SYF as "Buy", COF as "Buy", OMF as "Buy", ALLY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.8% upside for COF (target: $267) vs 5.6% for BFH (target: $91). For income investors, OMF offers the higher dividend yield at 4.65% vs BFH's 1.06%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $91.33 | $90.55 | $267.18 | $69.71 | $53.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 37 | 41 | 56 | 31 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +1.6% | +1.7% | +4.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.91 | $1.19 | $3.27 | $2.59 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.9% | +11.4% | +3.4% | +2.4% | 0.0% |
SYF leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BFH leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
BFH vs SYF vs COF vs OMF vs ALLY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BFH or SYF or COF or OMF or ALLY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Capital One Financial Corporation (COF) is the stronger pick with 28.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -25. 7% for Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY). Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (BFH) offers the better valuation at 7. 9x trailing P/E (7. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Synchrony Financial (SYF) a "Buy" — based on 41 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BFH or SYF or COF or OMF or ALLY?
On trailing P/E, Bread Financial Holdings, Inc.
(BFH) is the cheapest at 7. 9x versus Capital One Financial Corporation at 47. 8x. On forward P/E, OneMain Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Synchrony Financial wins at 0. 25x versus OneMain Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 92x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BFH or SYF or COF or OMF or ALLY?
Over the past 5 years, Synchrony Financial (SYF) delivered a total return of +72.
2%, compared to -9. 0% for Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (BFH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALLY returned +209. 6% versus BFH's -39. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BFH or SYF or COF or OMF or ALLY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), OneMain Holdings, Inc.
(OMF) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 30β versus Capital One Financial Corporation's 1. 58β — meaning COF is approximately 21% more volatile than OMF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Capital One Financial Corporation (COF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 45% versus 7% for OneMain Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BFH or SYF or COF or OMF or ALLY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Capital One Financial Corporation (COF) is pulling ahead at 28.
4% versus -25. 7% for Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 99. 3% year-over-year, compared to -65. 2% for Capital One Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BFH or SYF or COF or OMF or ALLY?
Synchrony Financial (SYF) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
6% net margin versus 3. 5% for Capital One Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 18. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SYF leads at 24. 2% versus 3. 3% for COF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BFH leads at 63. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BFH or SYF or COF or OMF or ALLY more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Synchrony Financial (SYF) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 25x versus OneMain Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 92x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 9. 8x for Capital One Financial Corporation — 2. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COF: 38. 8% to $267. 18.
08Which pays a better dividend — BFH or SYF or COF or OMF or ALLY?
In this comparison, OMF (4.
7% yield), COF (1. 7% yield), SYF (1. 6% yield), BFH (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. ALLY does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BFH or SYF or COF or OMF or ALLY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, OneMain Holdings, Inc.
(OMF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (4. 7% yield, +189. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OMF: +189. 2%, ALLY: +209. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BFH and SYF and COF and OMF and ALLY?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BFH is a small-cap deep-value stock; SYF is a mid-cap deep-value stock; COF is a mid-cap high-growth stock; OMF is a small-cap deep-value stock; ALLY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. BFH, SYF, COF, OMF pay a dividend while ALLY does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.