Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BFST vs SFBS vs FFIN vs HOMB vs IBOC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
BFST vs SFBS vs FFIN vs HOMB vs IBOC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $905M | $4.34B | $4.59B | $5.27B | $4.56B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $512M | $1.02B | $739M | $1.45B | $1.05B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $88M | $277M | $243M | $458M | $418M |
| Gross Margin | 60.9% | 51.8% | 70.8% | 65.6% | 78.3% |
| Operating Margin | 22.2% | 33.6% | 36.8% | 36.0% | 49.4% |
| Forward P/E | 9.3x | 12.4x | 15.9x | 10.8x | 10.9x |
| Total Debt | $551M | $1.51B | $197M | $1.20B | $705M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $411M | $95M | $763M | $910M | $536M |
BFST vs SFBS vs FFIN vs HOMB vs IBOC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business First Banc… (BFST) | 100 | 191.0 | +91.0% |
| ServisFirst Bancsha… (SFBS) | 100 | 227.9 | +127.9% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 105.3 | +5.3% |
| Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
| International Bancs… (IBOC) | 100 | 238.0 | +138.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BFST vs SFBS vs FFIN vs HOMB vs IBOC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BFST has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 11.8%, EPS growth 23.0%
- Lower P/E (9.3x vs 10.8x), PEG 0.83 vs 3.55
- +18.1% vs FFIN's -5.3%
SFBS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BFST's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BFST's 0.4%
FFIN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs IBOC's 1.0%
HOMB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.81, yield 2.8%
- Beta 0.81, yield 2.8%, current ratio 0.16x
- Beta 0.81 vs SFBS's 1.20, lower leverage
- 2.8% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs FFIN's 2.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
IBOC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 229.3% 10Y total return vs SFBS's 255.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.81, Low D/E 21.7%, current ratio 1.04x
- PEG 0.53 vs HOMB's 3.55
- NIM 4.0% vs SFBS's 3.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs IBOC's 1.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.3x vs 10.8x), PEG 0.83 vs 3.55 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BFST's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.81 vs SFBS's 1.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs FFIN's 2.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +18.1% vs FFIN's -5.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BFST's 0.4% |
BFST vs SFBS vs FFIN vs HOMB vs IBOC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BFST vs SFBS vs FFIN vs HOMB vs IBOC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BFST leads in 2 of 6 categories
IBOC leads 1 • FFIN leads 1 • HOMB leads 1 • SFBS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IBOC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOMB is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 2.8x BFST's $512M. IBOC is the more profitable business, keeping 39.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BFST's 17.2%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $512M | $1.0B | $739M | $1.5B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $119M | $346M | $310M | $601M | $553M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $88M | $277M | $243M | $458M | $418M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $88M | $256M | $290M | $354M | $477M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +60.9% | +51.8% | +70.8% | +65.6% | +78.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.2% | +33.6% | +36.8% | +36.0% | +49.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.2% | +27.2% | +30.2% | +27.7% | +39.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | — | +39.6% | +29.1% | +47.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +39.2% | +32.8% | -7.7% | +26.0% | -100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
BFST leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.0x trailing earnings, BFST trades at a 52% valuation discount to FFIN's 20.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IBOC offers better value at 0.54x vs HOMB's 4.37x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $905M | $4.3B | $4.6B | $5.3B | $4.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.0B | $5.8B | $4.0B | $5.6B | $4.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.96x | 15.71x | 20.68x | 13.31x | 11.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.26x | 12.44x | 15.85x | 10.83x | 10.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.89x | 1.56x | 3.97x | 4.37x | 0.54x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.78x | 16.81x | 14.10x | 10.08x | 8.69x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.77x | 4.27x | 6.21x | 3.63x | 4.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.92x | 2.35x | 2.88x | 1.35x | 1.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.83x | — | 15.67x | 12.48x | 9.21x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SFBS delivers a 14.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $10 for BFST. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SFBS's 0.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BFST scores 7/9 vs IBOC's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.2% | +14.9% | +13.3% | +10.9% | +13.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +1.6% | +1.6% | +2.0% | +2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.2% | +7.3% | +11.0% | +7.2% | +10.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.9% | +4.5% | +16.0% | +9.8% | +5.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.61x | 0.81x | 0.12x | 0.30x | 0.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $140M | $1.4B | -$566M | $292M | $168M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $411M | $95M | $763M | $910M | $536M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $551M | $1.5B | $197M | $1.2B | $705M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.59x | 0.75x | 1.48x | 1.44x | 2.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BFST leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IBOC five years ago would be worth $16,265 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,184 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, BFST leads with a +18.1% total return vs FFIN's -5.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BFST at 26.5% vs FFIN's 8.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.5% | +11.7% | +8.1% | -3.4% | +10.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.1% | +8.3% | -5.3% | -3.9% | +17.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +102.5% | +78.7% | +28.6% | +41.5% | +88.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +30.5% | +29.0% | -28.2% | +8.6% | +62.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.4% | +255.4% | +144.5% | +57.7% | +229.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.5% | +21.3% | +8.8% | +12.3% | +23.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HOMB and IBOC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOMB is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SFBS's 1.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IBOC currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs FFIN's 83.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 1.20x | 0.94x | 0.81x | 0.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.32 | $90.64 | $38.74 | $30.83 | $75.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.52 | $67.20 | $28.11 | $25.68 | $61.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.3% | +87.7% | +83.3% | +86.8% | +97.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.9 | 55.1 | 56.1 | 48.1 | 62.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 171K | 311K | 736K | 1.5M | 372K |
Analyst Outlook
HOMB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BFST as "Buy", SFBS as "Buy", FFIN as "Hold", HOMB as "Hold", IBOC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 21.7% upside for FFIN (target: $39) vs 13.2% for SFBS (target: $90). For income investors, HOMB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.80% vs IBOC's 1.91%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $32.33 | $90.00 | $39.25 | $32.00 | $85.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 6 | 15 | 19 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | — | +2.2% | +2.8% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 10 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.57 | — | $0.72 | $0.75 | $1.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.6% | +0.1% |
BFST leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). IBOC leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
BFST vs SFBS vs FFIN vs HOMB vs IBOC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BFST or SFBS or FFIN or HOMB or IBOC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger pick with 18. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC). Business First Bancshares, Inc. (BFST) offers the better valuation at 10. 0x trailing P/E (9. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Business First Bancshares, Inc. (BFST) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BFST or SFBS or FFIN or HOMB or IBOC?
On trailing P/E, Business First Bancshares, Inc.
(BFST) is the cheapest at 10. 0x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 20. 7x. On forward P/E, Business First Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: International Bancshares Corporation wins at 0. 53x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 3. 55x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BFST or SFBS or FFIN or HOMB or IBOC?
Over the past 5 years, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) delivered a total return of +62.
7%, compared to -28. 2% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SFBS returned +255. 4% versus BFST's +24. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BFST or SFBS or FFIN or HOMB or IBOC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 20β — meaning SFBS is approximately 49% more volatile than HOMB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 81% for ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BFST or SFBS or FFIN or HOMB or IBOC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is pulling ahead at 18. 8% versus 1. 0% for International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Business First Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 23. 0% year-over-year, compared to 0. 8% for International Bancshares Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BFST or SFBS or FFIN or HOMB or IBOC?
International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the more profitable company, earning 39.
1% net margin versus 17. 2% for Business First Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBOC leads at 49. 4% versus 22. 2% for BFST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBOC leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BFST or SFBS or FFIN or HOMB or IBOC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 53x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 3. 55x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Business First Bancshares, Inc. (BFST) trades at 9. 3x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 6. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIN: 21. 7% to $39. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — BFST or SFBS or FFIN or HOMB or IBOC?
In this comparison, HOMB (2.
8% yield), FFIN (2. 2% yield), BFST (2. 1% yield), IBOC (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. SFBS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BFST or SFBS or FFIN or HOMB or IBOC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
81), 1. 9% yield, +229. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBOC: +229. 3%, SFBS: +255. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BFST and SFBS and FFIN and HOMB and IBOC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BFST is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFBS is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock; IBOC is a small-cap deep-value stock. BFST, FFIN, HOMB, IBOC pay a dividend while SFBS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.