Drug Manufacturers - General
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BIIB vs BMRN vs RARE vs IONS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
BIIB vs BMRN vs RARE vs IONS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - General | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $28.15B | $10.50B | $2.55B | $12.70B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9.86B | $3.24B | $669M | $1.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.37B | $269M | $-609M | $-327M |
| Gross Margin | 69.8% | 75.9% | 83.6% | 98.3% |
| Operating Margin | 15.6% | 13.8% | -83.9% | -33.3% |
| Forward P/E | 13.0x | 12.7x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $6.95B | $643M | $1.28B | $2.61B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.01B | $1.31B | $434M | $372M |
BIIB vs BMRN vs RARE vs IONS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Biogen Inc. (BIIB) | 100 | 62.1 | -37.9% |
| BioMarin Pharmaceut… (BMRN) | 100 | 51.2 | -48.8% |
| Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE) | 100 | 37.9 | -62.1% |
| Ionis Pharmaceutica… (IONS) | 100 | 136.7 | +36.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BIIB vs BMRN vs RARE vs IONS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BIIB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.64
- 13.9% margin vs RARE's -91.0%
- 4.7% ROA vs RARE's -45.8%, ROIC 6.5% vs -89.4%
BMRN is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
RARE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
IONS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 33.9%, EPS growth 21.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.1%
- 126.0% 10Y total return vs BIIB's -27.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.55, current ratio 3.83x
- Beta 0.55, current ratio 3.83x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 33.9% revenue growth vs BIIB's 1.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.9% margin vs RARE's -91.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.55 vs RARE's 1.42 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +141.2% vs RARE's -26.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs RARE's -45.8%, ROIC 6.5% vs -89.4% |
BIIB vs BMRN vs RARE vs IONS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BIIB vs BMRN vs RARE vs IONS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BIIB leads in 1 of 6 categories
BMRN leads 1 • IONS leads 1 • RARE leads 1 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — BIIB and IONS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BIIB is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.9B annually — 14.7x RARE's $669M. BIIB is the more profitable business, keeping 13.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RARE's -91.0%. On growth, IONS holds the edge at +87.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9.9B | $3.2B | $669M | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.4B | $521M | -$536M | $4.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.4B | $269M | -$609M | -$327M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.6B | $767M | -$487M | -$971M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.8% | +75.9% | +83.6% | +98.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.6% | +13.8% | -83.9% | -33.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.9% | +8.3% | -91.0% | -30.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +26.6% | +23.7% | -72.8% | -91.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.9% | +2.8% | -2.4% | +87.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +31.1% | -43.2% | -17.2% | +39.8% |
Valuation Metrics
BIIB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.6x trailing earnings, BIIB trades at a 29% valuation discount to BMRN's 30.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BIIB's 11.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BMRN's 16.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $28.2B | $10.5B | $2.5B | $12.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $32.1B | $9.8B | $3.4B | $14.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.59x | 30.33x | -4.45x | -32.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.00x | 12.71x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.41x | 16.04x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.87x | 3.26x | 3.79x | 13.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.53x | 1.77x | — | 25.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.73x | 14.48x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BMRN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BIIB delivers a 7.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. BMRN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IONS's 5.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BIIB scores 5/9 vs IONS's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.5% | +4.4% | -6.1% | -58.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.7% | +3.4% | -45.8% | -10.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.5% | +7.4% | -89.4% | -12.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.7% | +8.1% | -46.4% | -14.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.38x | 0.11x | — | 5.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.9B | -$669M | $842M | $2.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.0B | $1.3B | $434M | $372M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6.9B | $643M | $1.3B | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.91x | 16.96x | -14.49x | -3.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IONS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IONS five years ago would be worth $20,587 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,241 for RARE. Over the past 12 months, IONS leads with a +141.2% total return vs RARE's -26.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IONS at 29.8% vs RARE's -18.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.2% | -8.2% | +9.9% | -3.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +63.2% | -8.5% | -26.0% | +141.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.3% | -43.1% | -44.9% | +118.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -29.9% | -30.5% | -77.6% | +105.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.7% | -32.4% | -58.9% | +126.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -15.4% | -17.1% | -18.0% | +29.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BIIB and IONS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IONS is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RARE's 1.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BIIB currently trades 94.2% from its 52-week high vs RARE's 61.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.64x | 0.65x | 1.42x | 0.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $202.41 | $66.28 | $42.37 | $86.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $115.25 | $50.76 | $18.29 | $31.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.2% | +82.4% | +61.2% | +88.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.1 | 41.9 | 61.0 | 52.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 1.8M | 1.8M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
RARE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BIIB as "Buy", BMRN as "Buy", RARE as "Buy", IONS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 98.6% upside for RARE (target: $52) vs 10.9% for BIIB (target: $211).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $211.42 | $89.64 | $51.50 | $107.27 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 48 | 41 | 33 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BIIB leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). BMRN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
BIIB vs BMRN vs RARE vs IONS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BIIB or BMRN or RARE or IONS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) is the stronger pick with 33. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 4% for Biogen Inc. (BIIB). Biogen Inc. (BIIB) offers the better valuation at 21. 6x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Biogen Inc. (BIIB) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BIIB or BMRN or RARE or IONS?
On trailing P/E, Biogen Inc.
(BIIB) is the cheapest at 21. 6x versus BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. at 30. 3x. On forward P/E, BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BIIB or BMRN or RARE or IONS?
Over the past 5 years, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) delivered a total return of +105. 9%, compared to -77. 6% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IONS returned +126. 0% versus RARE's -58. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BIIB or BMRN or RARE or IONS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 55β versus Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. 's 1. 42β — meaning RARE is approximately 160% more volatile than IONS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. (BMRN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 5% for Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BIIB or BMRN or RARE or IONS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) is pulling ahead at 33. 9% versus 1. 4% for Biogen Inc. (BIIB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 21. 7% year-over-year, compared to -21. 1% for Biogen Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RARE leads at 22. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BIIB or BMRN or RARE or IONS?
Biogen Inc.
(BIIB) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 2% net margin versus -85. 4% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BIIB leads at 19. 1% versus -79. 5% for RARE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IONS leads at 98. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BIIB or BMRN or RARE or IONS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.
(BMRN) trades at 12. 7x forward P/E versus 13. 0x for Biogen Inc. — 0. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RARE: 98. 6% to $51. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — BIIB or BMRN or RARE or IONS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is BIIB or BMRN or RARE or IONS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 55), +126. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IONS: +126. 0%, RARE: -58. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BIIB and BMRN and RARE and IONS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BIIB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BMRN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock; IONS is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.