Diversified Utilities
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BKH vs MGEE vs NWE vs OTTR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Diversified Utilities
Diversified Utilities
Diversified Utilities
BKH vs MGEE vs NWE vs OTTR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Diversified Utilities | Diversified Utilities | Diversified Utilities | Diversified Utilities |
| Market Cap | $5.72B | $2.74B | $4.45B | $3.69B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.29B | $767M | $1.64B | $1.31B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $155M | $143M | $168M | $280M |
| Gross Margin | 26.1% | 97.1% | 61.9% | 34.9% |
| Operating Margin | 23.4% | 22.3% | 19.2% | 26.4% |
| Forward P/E | 17.3x | 18.7x | 19.3x | 15.5x |
| Total Debt | $4.70B | $936M | $3.29B | $1.10B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $183M | $7M | $9M | $386M |
BKH vs MGEE vs NWE vs OTTR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Black Hills Corpora… (BKH) | 100 | 121.9 | +21.9% |
| MGE Energy, Inc. (MGEE) | 100 | 108.5 | +8.5% |
| Northwestern Energy… (NWE) | 100 | 120.4 | +20.4% |
| Otter Tail Corporat… (OTTR) | 100 | 205.2 | +105.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BKH vs MGEE vs NWE vs OTTR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BKH is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.21, yield 3.6%, current ratio 1.35x
MGEE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 30 yrs, beta 0.16, yield 2.5%
- Rev growth 9.9%, EPS growth 11.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.16, Low D/E 71.8%, current ratio 0.77x
- 9.9% revenue growth vs OTTR's -2.0%
NWE is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends and momentum.
- 3.6% yield, 20-year raise streak, vs MGEE's 2.5%
- +30.2% vs MGEE's -16.9%
OTTR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 241.8% 10Y total return vs MGEE's 73.2%
- PEG 0.68 vs BKH's 9.90
- Lower P/E (15.5x vs 19.3x)
- 21.3% margin vs BKH's 6.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.9% revenue growth vs OTTR's -2.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.5x vs 19.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.3% margin vs BKH's 6.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.16 vs OTTR's 0.42 | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 20-year raise streak, vs MGEE's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +30.2% vs MGEE's -16.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.1% ROA vs BKH's 2.0%, ROIC 10.4% vs 4.9% |
BKH vs MGEE vs NWE vs OTTR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BKH vs MGEE vs NWE vs OTTR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
OTTR leads in 2 of 6 categories
NWE leads 1 • BKH leads 0 • MGEE leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MGEE and OTTR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKH is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.3B annually — 3.0x MGEE's $767M. OTTR is the more profitable business, keeping 21.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BKH's 6.8%. On growth, MGEE holds the edge at +10.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.3B | $767M | $1.6B | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $822M | $286M | $569M | $466M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $155M | $143M | $168M | $280M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$45M | -$131M | -$148M | $2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.1% | +97.1% | +61.9% | +34.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.4% | +22.3% | +19.2% | +26.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +18.6% | +10.2% | +21.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | -17.0% | -9.0% | +0.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.0% | +10.8% | +6.6% | +2.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.5% | +15.8% | -17.6% | +6.8% |
Valuation Metrics
OTTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.4x trailing earnings, OTTR trades at a 46% valuation discount to NWE's 24.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), OTTR offers better value at 0.59x vs BKH's 10.82x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.7B | $2.7B | $4.5B | $3.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.2B | $3.7B | $7.7B | $4.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.89x | 20.07x | 24.63x | 13.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.29x | 18.69x | 19.29x | 15.48x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 10.82x | 2.70x | — | 0.59x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.46x | 12.89x | 13.44x | 9.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.48x | 3.69x | 2.77x | 2.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.41x | 2.09x | 1.54x | 1.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 37.64x |
Profitability & Efficiency
OTTR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OTTR delivers a 15.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $5 for BKH. OTTR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.59x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BKH's 1.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BKH scores 7/9 vs OTTR's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.4% | +10.9% | +5.8% | +15.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +4.7% | +2.0% | +7.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.9% | +6.1% | +4.0% | +10.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.5% | +6.1% | +4.4% | +9.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.20x | 0.72x | 1.14x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.5B | $929M | $3.3B | $718M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $183M | $7M | $9M | $386M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.7B | $936M | $3.3B | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.63x | 5.63x | 2.25x | 7.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NWE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OTTR five years ago would be worth $19,807 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,116 for MGEE. Over the past 12 months, NWE leads with a +30.2% total return vs MGEE's -16.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NWE at 10.4% vs MGEE's 1.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.0% | -4.2% | +12.9% | +8.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +26.2% | -16.9% | +30.2% | +17.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.7% | +3.0% | +34.7% | +19.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.0% | +11.2% | +25.9% | +98.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +60.6% | +73.2% | +65.7% | +241.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.9% | +1.0% | +10.4% | +6.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MGEE and NWE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MGEE is the less volatile stock with a 0.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OTTR's 0.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NWE currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs MGEE's 79.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.21x | 0.18x | 0.23x | 0.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $78.69 | $94.00 | $75.18 | $92.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $55.49 | $72.16 | $50.46 | $74.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.6% | +79.4% | +96.3% | +95.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.8 | 57.1 | 51.8 | 51.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 889K | 231K | 462K | 277K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MGEE and NWE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BKH as "Hold", MGEE as "Hold", NWE as "Hold", OTTR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.0% upside for BKH (target: $91) vs -8.4% for NWE (target: $66). For income investors, NWE offers the higher dividend yield at 3.63% vs OTTR's 2.38%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $91.00 | $73.00 | $66.33 | $81.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 4 | 18 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.6% | +2.5% | +3.6% | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 10 | 30 | 20 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.70 | $1.85 | $2.63 | $2.09 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
OTTR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). NWE leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
BKH vs MGEE vs NWE vs OTTR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BKH or MGEE or NWE or OTTR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MGE Energy, Inc.
(MGEE) is the stronger pick with 9. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 0% for Otter Tail Corporation (OTTR). Otter Tail Corporation (OTTR) offers the better valuation at 13. 4x trailing P/E (15. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Black Hills Corporation (BKH) a "Hold" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BKH or MGEE or NWE or OTTR?
On trailing P/E, Otter Tail Corporation (OTTR) is the cheapest at 13.
4x versus Northwestern Energy Group Inc at 24. 6x. On forward P/E, Otter Tail Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Otter Tail Corporation wins at 0. 68x versus Black Hills Corporation's 9. 90x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BKH or MGEE or NWE or OTTR?
Over the past 5 years, Otter Tail Corporation (OTTR) delivered a total return of +98.
1%, compared to +11. 2% for MGE Energy, Inc. (MGEE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OTTR returned +242. 5% versus BKH's +60. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BKH or MGEE or NWE or OTTR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MGE Energy, Inc.
(MGEE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 18β versus Otter Tail Corporation's 0. 36β — meaning OTTR is approximately 95% more volatile than MGEE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Otter Tail Corporation (OTTR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 59% versus 120% for Black Hills Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BKH or MGEE or NWE or OTTR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MGE Energy, Inc.
(MGEE) is pulling ahead at 9. 9% versus -2. 0% for Otter Tail Corporation (OTTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MGE Energy, Inc. grew EPS 11. 7% year-over-year, compared to -19. 5% for Northwestern Energy Group Inc. Over a 3-year CAGR, NWE leads at 2. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BKH or MGEE or NWE or OTTR?
Otter Tail Corporation (OTTR) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
2% net margin versus 11. 2% for Northwestern Energy Group Inc — meaning it keeps 21. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OTTR leads at 26. 5% versus 20. 2% for NWE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MGEE leads at 97. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BKH or MGEE or NWE or OTTR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Otter Tail Corporation (OTTR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 68x versus Black Hills Corporation's 9. 90x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Otter Tail Corporation (OTTR) trades at 15. 5x forward P/E versus 19. 3x for Northwestern Energy Group Inc — 3. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BKH: 21. 0% to $91. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BKH or MGEE or NWE or OTTR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Northwestern Energy Group Inc (NWE) offers the highest yield at 3. 6%, versus 2. 4% for Otter Tail Corporation (OTTR).
09Is BKH or MGEE or NWE or OTTR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MGE Energy, Inc.
(MGEE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 18), 2. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MGEE: +71. 3%, NWE: +65. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BKH and MGEE and NWE and OTTR?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BKH is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MGEE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NWE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; OTTR is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.