Auto - Manufacturers
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BLBD vs WNC vs PCAR vs OSK vs CMI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural - Machinery
Agricultural - Machinery
Agricultural - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
BLBD vs WNC vs PCAR vs OSK vs CMI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Manufacturers | Agricultural - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $2.24B | $317M | $60.02B | $9.70B | $94.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.49B | $1.47B | $27.24B | $10.80B | $33.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $133M | $-65M | $2.48B | $731M | $2.67B |
| Gross Margin | 21.0% | 2.0% | 15.1% | 17.5% | 25.4% |
| Operating Margin | 11.9% | -3.1% | 9.7% | 9.5% | 11.2% |
| Forward P/E | 15.6x | 1.5x | 19.9x | 13.7x | 25.9x |
| Total Debt | $90M | $443M | $0.00 | $1.10B | $8.11B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $229M | $32M | $9.25B | $480M | $2.85B |
BLBD vs WNC vs PCAR vs OSK vs CMI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blue Bird Corporati… (BLBD) | 100 | 493.7 | +393.7% |
| Wabash National Cor… (WNC) | 100 | 81.7 | -18.3% |
| PACCAR Inc (PCAR) | 100 | 231.6 | +131.6% |
| Oshkosh Corporation (OSK) | 100 | 213.5 | +113.5% |
| Cummins Inc. (CMI) | 100 | 402.4 | +302.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BLBD vs WNC vs PCAR vs OSK vs CMI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BLBD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 9.9%, EPS growth 22.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.7%
- 5.6% 10Y total return vs CMI's 5.6%
- PEG 0.24 vs OSK's 2.86
- 9.9% revenue growth vs WNC's -20.8%
WNC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 4.2% yield, vs CMI's 1.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
PCAR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.01, yield 3.8%
- Beta 1.01, yield 3.8%, current ratio 1.70x
- 9.1% margin vs WNC's -4.4%
- Beta 1.01 vs WNC's 1.93
OSK is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.49, Low D/E 24.3%, current ratio 1.94x
CMI is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +131.7% vs WNC's +0.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.9% revenue growth vs WNC's -20.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.6x vs 25.9x), PEG 0.24 vs 2.30 | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.1% margin vs WNC's -4.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.01 vs WNC's 1.93 | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, vs CMI's 1.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +131.7% vs WNC's +0.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.0% ROA vs WNC's -5.0%, ROIC 102.6% vs 37.4% |
BLBD vs WNC vs PCAR vs OSK vs CMI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BLBD vs WNC vs PCAR vs OSK vs CMI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BLBD leads in 2 of 6 categories
WNC leads 1 • PCAR leads 0 • OSK leads 0 • CMI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PCAR and OSK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CMI is the larger business by revenue, generating $33.9B annually — 23.1x WNC's $1.5B. PCAR is the more profitable business, keeping 9.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WNC's -4.4%. On growth, OSK holds the edge at +3.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $1.5B | $27.2B | $10.8B | $33.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $185M | -$2M | $3.3B | $1.2B | $4.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $133M | -$65M | $2.5B | $731M | $2.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $197M | -$38M | $3.4B | $1.5B | $2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.0% | +2.0% | +15.1% | +17.5% | +25.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | -3.1% | +9.7% | +9.5% | +11.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.9% | -4.4% | +9.1% | +6.8% | +7.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | -2.6% | +12.5% | +13.9% | +7.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.7% | -20.4% | -16.2% | +3.5% | +2.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.9% | -120.7% | +19.8% | -9.9% | -21.0% |
Valuation Metrics
WNC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.5x trailing earnings, WNC trades at a 95% valuation discount to CMI's 33.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BLBD offers better value at 0.29x vs OSK's 3.19x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.2B | $317M | $60.0B | $9.7B | $94.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.1B | $728M | $50.8B | $10.3B | $99.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.26x | 1.54x | 25.29x | 15.31x | 33.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.59x | — | 19.90x | 13.74x | 25.92x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.29x | — | 2.00x | 3.19x | 2.95x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.49x | 1.92x | 13.40x | 8.83x | 20.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.51x | 0.21x | 2.11x | 0.93x | 2.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.12x | 0.88x | 3.12x | 12.65x | 7.06x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.59x | — | 19.81x | 15.70x | 39.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BLBD leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BLBD delivers a 50.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $51 in annual profit, vs $-17 for WNC. OSK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WNC's 1.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BLBD scores 7/9 vs PCAR's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +50.8% | -17.3% | +17.2% | +16.1% | +20.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +21.0% | -5.0% | +6.6% | +7.3% | +7.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +102.6% | +37.4% | +12.2% | +14.1% | +16.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +49.4% | +32.6% | +8.9% | +13.7% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.35x | 1.20x | — | 0.24x | 0.61x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$139M | $411M | -$9.3B | $621M | $5.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $229M | $32M | $9.3B | $480M | $2.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $90M | $443M | $0 | $1.1B | $8.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 394.69x | -0.97x | 129.28x | 8.69x | 12.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BLBD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CMI five years ago would be worth $26,872 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,154 for WNC. Over the past 12 months, CMI leads with a +131.7% total return vs WNC's +0.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BLBD at 53.1% vs WNC's -28.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +51.5% | -11.0% | +2.5% | +16.4% | +31.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +87.7% | +0.4% | +31.6% | +75.4% | +131.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +258.7% | -63.9% | +71.7% | +109.2% | +214.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +167.3% | -48.5% | +105.3% | +20.9% | +168.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +557.8% | -22.6% | +269.8% | +268.2% | +557.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +53.1% | -28.8% | +19.7% | +27.9% | +46.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PCAR and CMI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PCAR is the less volatile stock with a 1.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WNC's 1.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CMI currently trades 95.0% from its 52-week high vs WNC's 60.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.15x | 1.93x | 1.01x | 1.49x | 1.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $81.51 | $12.94 | $131.88 | $180.49 | $718.08 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $36.01 | $7.10 | $88.43 | $87.70 | $296.59 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.9% | +60.3% | +86.5% | +85.0% | +95.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.0 | 37.7 | 41.6 | 56.3 | 75.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 357K | 598K | 2.7M | 581K | 794K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WNC and CMI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BLBD as "Buy", WNC as "Hold", PCAR as "Hold", OSK as "Buy", CMI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 124.4% upside for WNC (target: $18) vs -9.0% for CMI (target: $621). For income investors, WNC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.23% vs OSK's 0.23%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $69.67 | $17.50 | $124.50 | $168.00 | $621.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 18 | 45 | 37 | 51 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.2% | +3.8% | +0.2% | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 21 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.33 | $4.30 | $0.35 | $7.61 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.2% | +10.6% | +0.1% | +2.9% | 0.0% |
BLBD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). WNC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
BLBD vs WNC vs PCAR vs OSK vs CMI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BLBD or WNC or PCAR or OSK or CMI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Blue Bird Corporation (BLBD) is the stronger pick with 9.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -20. 8% for Wabash National Corporation (WNC). Wabash National Corporation (WNC) offers the better valuation at 1. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Blue Bird Corporation (BLBD) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BLBD or WNC or PCAR or OSK or CMI?
On trailing P/E, Wabash National Corporation (WNC) is the cheapest at 1.
5x versus Cummins Inc. at 33. 3x. On forward P/E, Oshkosh Corporation is actually cheaper at 13. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Blue Bird Corporation wins at 0. 24x versus Oshkosh Corporation's 2. 86x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BLBD or WNC or PCAR or OSK or CMI?
Over the past 5 years, Cummins Inc.
(CMI) delivered a total return of +168. 7%, compared to -48. 5% for Wabash National Corporation (WNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BLBD returned +557. 8% versus WNC's -22. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BLBD or WNC or PCAR or OSK or CMI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PACCAR Inc (PCAR) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
01β versus Wabash National Corporation's 1. 93β — meaning WNC is approximately 91% more volatile than PCAR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Oshkosh Corporation (OSK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 120% for Wabash National Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BLBD or WNC or PCAR or OSK or CMI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Blue Bird Corporation (BLBD) is pulling ahead at 9.
9% versus -20. 8% for Wabash National Corporation (WNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Wabash National Corporation grew EPS 179. 2% year-over-year, compared to -42. 9% for PACCAR Inc. Over a 3-year CAGR, BLBD leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BLBD or WNC or PCAR or OSK or CMI?
Wabash National Corporation (WNC) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
7% net margin versus 6. 2% for Oshkosh Corporation — meaning it keeps 13. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WNC leads at 20. 8% versus 9. 1% for OSK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CMI leads at 25. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BLBD or WNC or PCAR or OSK or CMI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Blue Bird Corporation (BLBD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 24x versus Oshkosh Corporation's 2. 86x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Oshkosh Corporation (OSK) trades at 13. 7x forward P/E versus 25. 9x for Cummins Inc. — 12. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WNC: 124. 4% to $17. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — BLBD or WNC or PCAR or OSK or CMI?
In this comparison, WNC (4.
2% yield), PCAR (3. 8% yield), CMI (1. 1% yield), OSK (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. BLBD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BLBD or WNC or PCAR or OSK or CMI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PACCAR Inc (PCAR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
01), 3. 8% yield, +269. 8% 10Y return). Wabash National Corporation (WNC) carries a higher beta of 1. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PCAR: +269. 8%, WNC: -22. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BLBD and WNC and PCAR and OSK and CMI?
These companies operate in different sectors (BLBD (Consumer Cyclical) and WNC (Industrials) and PCAR (Industrials) and OSK (Industrials) and CMI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BLBD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WNC is a small-cap deep-value stock; PCAR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; OSK is a small-cap deep-value stock; CMI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. WNC, PCAR, CMI pay a dividend while BLBD, OSK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.