Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BNTX vs MRNA vs PFE vs NVAX vs REGN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BNTX
BioNTech SE

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • DE
Market Cap$23.52B
5Y Perf.+87.8%
MRNA
Moderna, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$19.25B
5Y Perf.-21.1%
PFE
Pfizer Inc.

Drug Manufacturers - General

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$150.63B
5Y Perf.-26.9%
NVAX
Novavax, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.50B
5Y Perf.-80.0%
REGN
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$73.68B
5Y Perf.+15.7%

BNTX vs MRNA vs PFE vs NVAX vs REGN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BNTX logoBNTX
MRNA logoMRNA
PFE logoPFE
NVAX logoNVAX
REGN logoREGN
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyDrug Manufacturers - GeneralBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$23.52B$19.25B$150.63B$1.50B$73.68B
Revenue (TTM)$2.86B$2.23B$63.31B$596M$14.92B
Net Income (TTM)$-1.13B$-3.19B$7.49B$-88M$4.42B
Gross Margin77.7%-13.9%69.3%84.6%84.5%
Operating Margin-45.9%-153.3%23.4%-11.2%24.3%
Forward P/E8.9x3.6x15.3x
Total Debt$267M$1.92B$67.42B$249M$2.71B
Cash & Equiv.$7.67B$2.60B$1.14B$241M$3.12B

BNTX vs MRNA vs PFE vs NVAX vs REGNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BNTX
MRNA
PFE
NVAX
REGN
StockMay 20May 26Return
BioNTech SE (BNTX)100187.8+87.8%
Moderna, Inc. (MRNA)10078.9-21.1%
Pfizer Inc. (PFE)10073.1-26.9%
Novavax, Inc. (NVAX)10020.0-80.0%
Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN)100115.7+15.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BNTX vs MRNA vs PFE vs NVAX vs REGN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: PFE and NVAX are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Novavax, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. REGN and MRNA also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
BNTX
BioNTech SE
The Long-Run Compounder

BNTX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 5.7% 10Y total return vs REGN's 90.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.14, Low D/E 1.4%, current ratio 7.54x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
MRNA
Moderna, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

MRNA is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +101.7% vs BNTX's +0.2%
Best for: momentum
PFE
Pfizer Inc.
The Income Pick

PFE has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.54, yield 6.5%
  • Beta 0.54, yield 6.5%, current ratio 1.16x
  • Beta 0.54 vs NVAX's 2.11
  • 6.5% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs REGN's 0.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
NVAX
Novavax, Inc.
The Growth Play

NVAX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 64.7%, EPS growth 306.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -11.1%
  • 64.7% revenue growth vs MRNA's -39.2%
  • Lower P/E (3.6x vs 15.3x)
Best for: growth exposure
REGN
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Quality Compounder

REGN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and efficiency.

  • 29.6% margin vs MRNA's -143.6%
  • 11.1% ROA vs MRNA's -26.6%, ROIC 8.9% vs -26.1%
Best for: quality and efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNVAX logoNVAX64.7% revenue growth vs MRNA's -39.2%
ValueNVAX logoNVAXLower P/E (3.6x vs 15.3x)
Quality / MarginsREGN logoREGN29.6% margin vs MRNA's -143.6%
Stability / SafetyPFE logoPFEBeta 0.54 vs NVAX's 2.11
DividendsPFE logoPFE6.5% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs REGN's 0.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)MRNA logoMRNA+101.7% vs BNTX's +0.2%
Efficiency (ROA)REGN logoREGN11.1% ROA vs MRNA's -26.6%, ROIC 8.9% vs -26.1%

BNTX vs MRNA vs PFE vs NVAX vs REGN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BNTXBioNTech SE
FY 2025
Other Sales
100.0%$262M
MRNAModerna, Inc.
FY 2025
Product Sales
100.0%$3.3B
PFEPfizer Inc.
FY 2025
Biopharma Segment
97.8%$61.2B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
2.2%$1.4B
NVAXNovavax, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
50.0%$685M
Nuvaxovid Sales
45.6%$625M
Supply Sales
4.4%$60M
REGNRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
FY 2025
Collaboration Revenue
51.1%$7.3B
Product
44.0%$6.3B
Product and Service, Other
4.9%$703M

BNTX vs MRNA vs PFE vs NVAX vs REGN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPFELAGGINGNVAX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

REGN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

PFE is the larger business by revenue, generating $63.3B annually — 106.2x NVAX's $596M. REGN is the more profitable business, keeping 29.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MRNA's -143.6%. On growth, MRNA holds the edge at +2.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricBNTX logoBNTXBioNTech SEMRNA logoMRNAModerna, Inc.PFE logoPFEPfizer Inc.NVAX logoNVAXNovavax, Inc.REGN logoREGNRegeneron Pharmac…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.9B$2.2B$63.3B$596M$14.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$931M-$3.2B$21.0B-$47M$4.2B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$1.1B-$3.2B$7.5B-$88M$4.4B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$277M-$1.6B$9.5B-$96M$4.2B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+77.7%-13.9%+69.3%+84.6%+84.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-45.9%-153.3%+23.4%-11.2%+24.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-39.6%-143.6%+11.8%-14.7%+29.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+9.7%-71.1%+15.0%-16.1%+27.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-24.5%+2.6%+5.4%-79.1%+19.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-2.1%-34.9%-9.5%-102.0%-7.2%
REGN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — BNTX and PFE and NVAX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 3.6x trailing earnings, NVAX trades at a 81% valuation discount to PFE's 19.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NVAX's 2.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than REGN's 17.8x.

MetricBNTX logoBNTXBioNTech SEMRNA logoMRNAModerna, Inc.PFE logoPFEPfizer Inc.NVAX logoNVAXNovavax, Inc.REGN logoREGNRegeneron Pharmac…
Market CapShares × price$23.5B$19.3B$150.6B$1.5B$73.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$14.8B$18.6B$216.9B$1.5B$73.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-17.55x-6.69x19.47x3.63x17.09x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.94x15.35x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.70x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.66x2.56x17.78x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue7.26x9.90x2.41x1.34x5.14x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.00x2.18x1.74x2.46x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF74.19x16.60x18.06x
Evenly matched — BNTX and PFE and NVAX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

REGN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

REGN delivers a 14.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-37 for MRNA. BNTX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PFE's 0.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PFE scores 7/9 vs MRNA's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricBNTX logoBNTXBioNTech SEMRNA logoMRNAModerna, Inc.PFE logoPFEPfizer Inc.NVAX logoNVAXNovavax, Inc.REGN logoREGNRegeneron Pharmac…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-6.0%-36.7%+8.3%+14.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-5.3%-26.6%+3.6%-7.4%+11.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-4.3%-26.1%+7.5%+8.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-3.1%-27.6%+9.0%+100.4%+10.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–943755
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.22x0.78x0.09x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$7.4B-$679M$66.3B$8M-$412M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$7.7B$2.6B$1.1B$241M$3.1B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$267M$1.9B$67.4B$249M$2.7B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-62.15x-1803.00x4.02x-5.10x108.44x
REGN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — MRNA and NVAX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in REGN five years ago would be worth $14,365 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $524 for NVAX. Over the past 12 months, MRNA leads with a +101.7% total return vs BNTX's +0.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVAX at 7.4% vs MRNA's -28.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBNTX logoBNTXBioNTech SEMRNA logoMRNAModerna, Inc.PFE logoPFEPfizer Inc.NVAX logoNVAXNovavax, Inc.REGN logoREGNRegeneron Pharmac…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-3.8%+57.3%+6.9%+29.5%-8.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+0.2%+101.7%+23.7%+55.1%+27.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-13.9%-63.2%-18.4%+23.9%-5.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-48.2%-70.2%-13.3%-94.8%+43.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+568.1%+161.0%+29.6%-90.4%+90.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-4.9%-28.3%-6.6%+7.4%-1.7%
Evenly matched — MRNA and NVAX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

PFE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

PFE is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVAX's 2.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PFE currently trades 92.1% from its 52-week high vs BNTX's 75.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBNTX logoBNTXBioNTech SEMRNA logoMRNAModerna, Inc.PFE logoPFEPfizer Inc.NVAX logoNVAXNovavax, Inc.REGN logoREGNRegeneron Pharmac…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.14x1.82x0.54x2.11x0.81x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$124.00$59.55$28.75$11.97$821.11
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$79.52$22.28$21.97$5.80$476.49
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+75.0%+81.5%+92.1%+77.1%+86.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10043.347.044.264.444.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.2M6.9M33.3M4.4M631K
PFE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

PFE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: BNTX as "Buy", MRNA as "Hold", PFE as "Hold", NVAX as "Buy", REGN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 95.0% upside for NVAX (target: $18) vs -25.8% for MRNA (target: $36). For income investors, PFE offers the higher dividend yield at 6.49% vs REGN's 0.48%.

MetricBNTX logoBNTXBioNTech SEMRNA logoMRNAModerna, Inc.PFE logoPFEPfizer Inc.NVAX logoNVAXNovavax, Inc.REGN logoREGNRegeneron Pharmac…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$137.13$36.00$27.27$18.00$865.68
# AnalystsCovering analysts2427392348
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+6.5%+0.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises101511
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.72$3.41
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.3%+5.4%
PFE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

REGN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PFE leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.

Best OverallPfizer Inc. (PFE)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BNTX vs MRNA vs PFE vs NVAX vs REGN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BNTX or MRNA or PFE or NVAX or REGN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Novavax, Inc.

(NVAX) is the stronger pick with 64. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -39. 2% for Moderna, Inc. (MRNA). Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) offers the better valuation at 3. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BioNTech SE (BNTX) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BNTX or MRNA or PFE or NVAX or REGN?

On trailing P/E, Novavax, Inc.

(NVAX) is the cheapest at 3. 6x versus Pfizer Inc. at 19. 5x. On forward P/E, Pfizer Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BNTX or MRNA or PFE or NVAX or REGN?

Over the past 5 years, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(REGN) delivered a total return of +43. 6%, compared to -94. 8% for Novavax, Inc. (NVAX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BNTX returned +568. 1% versus NVAX's -90. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BNTX or MRNA or PFE or NVAX or REGN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pfizer Inc.

(PFE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 54β versus Novavax, Inc. 's 2. 11β — meaning NVAX is approximately 288% more volatile than PFE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BioNTech SE (BNTX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 78% for Pfizer Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BNTX or MRNA or PFE or NVAX or REGN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Novavax, Inc.

(NVAX) is pulling ahead at 64. 7% versus -39. 2% for Moderna, Inc. (MRNA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Novavax, Inc. grew EPS 306. 5% year-over-year, compared to -62. 8% for BioNTech SE. Over a 3-year CAGR, REGN leads at 5. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BNTX or MRNA or PFE or NVAX or REGN?

Novavax, Inc.

(NVAX) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 2% net margin versus -145. 2% for Moderna, Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVAX leads at 50. 1% versus -158. 1% for MRNA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVAX leads at 93. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BNTX or MRNA or PFE or NVAX or REGN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Pfizer Inc.

(PFE) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 15. 3x for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 6. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVAX: 95. 0% to $18. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BNTX or MRNA or PFE or NVAX or REGN?

In this comparison, PFE (6.

5% yield), REGN (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. BNTX, MRNA, NVAX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is BNTX or MRNA or PFE or NVAX or REGN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Pfizer Inc.

(PFE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 54), 6. 5% yield). Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) carries a higher beta of 2. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PFE: +29. 6%, NVAX: -90. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BNTX and MRNA and PFE and NVAX and REGN?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: BNTX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MRNA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PFE is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; NVAX is a small-cap high-growth stock; REGN is a mid-cap deep-value stock. PFE pays a dividend while BNTX, MRNA, NVAX, REGN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

BNTX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 46%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MRNA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 131%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PFE

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NVAX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 50%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

REGN

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BNTX and MRNA and PFE and NVAX and REGN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BNTX: -24.5% · MRNA: 263.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.