Luxury Goods
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BRLT vs CPRI vs REAL vs WRBY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Luxury Goods
Luxury Goods
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
BRLT vs CPRI vs REAL vs WRBY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Luxury Goods | Luxury Goods | Luxury Goods | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $223M | $2.23B | $3.59B | $3.34B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $443M | $3.71B | $723M | $891M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $-504M | $-65M | $1M |
| Gross Margin | 56.5% | 61.4% | 73.3% | 53.4% |
| Operating Margin | -2.4% | -1.8% | -1.9% | -0.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.4x | 307.7x | 56.7x |
| Total Debt | $38M | $3.10B | $463M | $233M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $79M | $166M | $151M | $286M |
BRLT vs CPRI vs REAL vs WRBY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brilliant Earth Gro… (BRLT) | 100 | 10.5 | -89.5% |
| Capri Holdings Limi… (CPRI) | 100 | 38.6 | -61.4% |
| The RealReal, Inc. (REAL) | 100 | 94.1 | -5.9% |
| Warby Parker Inc. (WRBY) | 100 | 51.3 | -48.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BRLT vs CPRI vs REAL vs WRBY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BRLT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.20, yield 1.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.20, Low D/E 47.8%, current ratio 1.61x
- Beta 1.20, yield 1.8%, current ratio 1.61x
- Beta 1.20 vs REAL's 2.95
CPRI is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (13.4x vs 56.7x)
REAL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 15.4%, EPS growth 45.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.7%
- 15.4% revenue growth vs CPRI's -7.7%
- +75.9% vs BRLT's +6.4%
WRBY is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -50.1% 10Y total return vs REAL's -57.1%
- 0.2% margin vs CPRI's -13.6%
- 0.2% ROA vs REAL's -17.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.4% revenue growth vs CPRI's -7.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.4x vs 56.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.2% margin vs CPRI's -13.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.20 vs REAL's 2.95 | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +75.9% vs BRLT's +6.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.2% ROA vs REAL's -17.3% |
BRLT vs CPRI vs REAL vs WRBY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BRLT vs CPRI vs REAL vs WRBY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CPRI leads in 1 of 6 categories
WRBY leads 1 • REAL leads 1 • BRLT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CPRI and REAL and WRBY each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CPRI is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.7B annually — 8.4x BRLT's $443M. WRBY is the more profitable business, keeping 0.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CPRI's -13.6%. On growth, REAL holds the edge at +18.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $443M | $3.7B | $723M | $891M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | $72M | $11M | $32M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | -$504M | -$65M | $1M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | $491M | $13M | $39M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +56.5% | +61.4% | +73.3% | +53.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | -1.8% | -1.9% | -0.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | -13.6% | -9.0% | +0.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.3% | +13.2% | +1.7% | +4.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.0% | -18.7% | +18.5% | +8.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.3% | +120.8% | -150.0% | +7.5% |
Valuation Metrics
CPRI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, WRBY's 73.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than REAL's 430.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $223M | $2.2B | $3.6B | $3.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $182M | $5.2B | $3.9B | $3.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.64x | -1.87x | -18.24x | 2076.34x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.36x | 307.69x | 56.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 120.80x | — | 430.51x | 73.08x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.51x | 0.50x | 5.19x | 3.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.61x | 5.94x | — | 9.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 38.76x | 14.55x | 195.62x | 76.32x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WRBY leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WRBY delivers a 0.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $0 in annual profit, vs $-5 for CPRI. BRLT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.48x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CPRI's 8.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WRBY scores 6/9 vs CPRI's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -14.0% | -4.7% | — | +0.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.5% | -15.1% | -17.3% | +0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.7% | -13.6% | — | -1.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.4% | -17.0% | -15.0% | -1.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.48x | 8.34x | — | 0.63x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$41M | $2.9B | $312M | -$53M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $79M | $166M | $151M | $286M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $38M | $3.1B | $463M | $233M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 51.57x | — | -5.83x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
REAL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in REAL five years ago would be worth $5,439 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $970 for BRLT. Over the past 12 months, REAL leads with a +75.9% total return vs BRLT's +6.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors REAL at 108.4% vs BRLT's -25.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -21.2% | -23.4% | -21.5% | +20.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.4% | +18.4% | +75.9% | +68.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.2% | -50.5% | +805.1% | +125.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.3% | -68.6% | -45.6% | -50.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.3% | -63.1% | -57.1% | -50.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -25.2% | -20.9% | +108.4% | +31.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BRLT and WRBY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BRLT is the less volatile stock with a 1.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than REAL's 2.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WRBY currently trades 87.7% from its 52-week high vs BRLT's 45.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.20x | 2.03x | 2.95x | 2.22x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.10 | $28.27 | $17.39 | $31.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.21 | $15.37 | $4.70 | $14.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +45.5% | +66.1% | +71.3% | +87.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.2 | 47.3 | 66.3 | 46.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 56K | 2.5M | 3.3M | 2.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CPRI as "Hold", REAL as "Buy", WRBY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 46.5% upside for REAL (target: $18) vs 7.8% for WRBY (target: $29). BRLT is the only dividend payer here at 1.82% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $25.33 | $18.17 | $29.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 53 | 25 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.8% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.03 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CPRI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). WRBY leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
BRLT vs CPRI vs REAL vs WRBY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BRLT or CPRI or REAL or WRBY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The RealReal, Inc.
(REAL) is the stronger pick with 15. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 6% for Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. (BRLT). Warby Parker Inc. (WRBY) offers the better valuation at 2076. 3x trailing P/E (56. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The RealReal, Inc. (REAL) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BRLT or CPRI or REAL or WRBY?
On forward P/E, Capri Holdings Limited is actually cheaper at 13.
4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BRLT or CPRI or REAL or WRBY?
Over the past 5 years, The RealReal, Inc.
(REAL) delivered a total return of -45. 6%, compared to -90. 3% for Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. (BRLT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WRBY returned -50. 1% versus BRLT's -90. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BRLT or CPRI or REAL or WRBY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Brilliant Earth Group, Inc.
(BRLT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 20β versus The RealReal, Inc. 's 2. 95β — meaning REAL is approximately 146% more volatile than BRLT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. (BRLT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 48% versus 8% for Capri Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BRLT or CPRI or REAL or WRBY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The RealReal, Inc.
(REAL) is pulling ahead at 15. 4% versus 3. 6% for Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. (BRLT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Warby Parker Inc. grew EPS 107. 7% year-over-year, compared to -888. 6% for Brilliant Earth Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WRBY leads at 13. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BRLT or CPRI or REAL or WRBY?
Warby Parker Inc.
(WRBY) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 2% net margin versus -26. 6% for Capri Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 0. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WRBY leads at -0. 6% versus -16. 9% for CPRI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — REAL leads at 69. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BRLT or CPRI or REAL or WRBY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Capri Holdings Limited (CPRI) trades at 13.
4x forward P/E versus 307. 7x for The RealReal, Inc. — 294. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for REAL: 46. 5% to $18. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — BRLT or CPRI or REAL or WRBY?
In this comparison, BRLT (1.
8% yield) pays a dividend. CPRI, REAL, WRBY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BRLT or CPRI or REAL or WRBY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Brilliant Earth Group, Inc.
(BRLT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 20), 1. 8% yield). Capri Holdings Limited (CPRI) carries a higher beta of 2. 03 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BRLT: -90. 3%, CPRI: -63. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BRLT and CPRI and REAL and WRBY?
These companies operate in different sectors (BRLT (Consumer Cyclical) and CPRI (Consumer Cyclical) and REAL (Consumer Cyclical) and WRBY (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BRLT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CPRI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; REAL is a small-cap high-growth stock; WRBY is a small-cap quality compounder stock. BRLT pays a dividend while CPRI, REAL, WRBY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.