Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BSVN vs BOKF vs FFIN vs HOMB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
BSVN vs BOKF vs FFIN vs HOMB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $416M | $10.28B | $4.61B | $5.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $137M | $3.36B | $739M | $1.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $43M | $537M | $243M | $458M |
| Gross Margin | 70.2% | 57.1% | 70.8% | 65.6% |
| Operating Margin | 41.4% | 19.8% | 36.8% | 36.0% |
| Forward P/E | 9.9x | 13.0x | 15.9x | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $4.45B | $197M | $1.20B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $245M | $1.43B | $763M | $910M |
BSVN vs BOKF vs FFIN vs HOMB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) | 100 | 430.9 | +330.9% |
| BOK Financial Corpo… (BOKF) | 100 | 262.0 | +162.0% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 105.7 | +5.7% |
| Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB) | 100 | 185.6 | +85.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BSVN vs BOKF vs FFIN vs HOMB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BSVN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency and bank quality.
- PEG 0.58 vs BOKF's 4.38
- NIM 4.5% vs BOKF's 2.4%
- Lower P/E (9.9x vs 15.9x), PEG 0.58 vs 3.05
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BOKF's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
BOKF is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 168.5% 10Y total return vs BSVN's 155.9%
- +44.8% vs FFIN's -3.2%
FFIN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 12.2%
- 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs BSVN's -3.9%
HOMB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 2.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, Low D/E 30.4%, current ratio 0.16x
- Beta 0.82, yield 2.8%, current ratio 0.16x
- Beta 0.82 vs BOKF's 1.03, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs BSVN's -3.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.9x vs 15.9x), PEG 0.58 vs 3.05 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BOKF's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs BOKF's 1.03, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs FFIN's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.8% vs FFIN's -3.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BOKF's 0.4% |
BSVN vs BOKF vs FFIN vs HOMB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BSVN vs BOKF vs FFIN vs HOMB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BSVN leads in 2 of 6 categories
HOMB leads 1 • BOKF leads 0 • FFIN leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BSVN leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BOKF is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.4B annually — 24.5x BSVN's $137M. BSVN is the more profitable business, keeping 31.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BOKF's 15.6%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $137M | $3.4B | $739M | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $58M | $797M | $310M | $601M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $43M | $537M | $243M | $458M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $36M | $1.5B | $290M | $354M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.2% | +57.1% | +70.8% | +65.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +41.4% | +19.8% | +36.8% | +36.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +31.4% | +15.6% | +30.2% | +27.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +33.6% | +42.6% | +39.6% | +29.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.4% | +1.8% | -7.7% | +26.0% |
Valuation Metrics
BSVN leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.8x trailing earnings, BSVN trades at a 53% valuation discount to FFIN's 20.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BSVN offers better value at 0.57x vs BOKF's 5.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $416M | $10.3B | $4.6B | $5.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $171M | $13.3B | $4.0B | $5.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.77x | 16.39x | 20.76x | 13.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.89x | 13.05x | 15.92x | 10.82x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.57x | 5.51x | 3.98x | 4.39x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.95x | 17.23x | 14.17x | 10.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.03x | 3.06x | 6.23x | 3.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.68x | 1.53x | 2.89x | 1.36x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.01x | 7.19x | 15.73x | 12.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — BSVN and FFIN each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BSVN delivers a 18.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $9 for BOKF. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BOKF's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HOMB scores 7/9 vs BSVN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.2% | +8.9% | +13.3% | +10.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.3% | +1.1% | +1.6% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.3% | +4.1% | +11.0% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.2% | +5.5% | +16.0% | +9.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.80x | 0.12x | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$245M | $3.0B | -$566M | $292M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $245M | $1.4B | $763M | $910M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $4.5B | $197M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.39x | 0.55x | 1.48x | 1.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — BSVN and BOKF each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BSVN five years ago would be worth $27,837 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,178 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, BOKF leads with a +44.8% total return vs FFIN's -3.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BSVN at 25.5% vs FFIN's 8.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.9% | +13.0% | +8.5% | -3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.0% | +44.8% | -3.2% | -1.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +97.5% | +79.4% | +29.1% | +42.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +178.4% | +59.4% | -28.2% | +6.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +155.9% | +168.5% | +145.4% | +58.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.5% | +21.5% | +8.9% | +12.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BOKF and HOMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOMB is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BOKF's 1.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BOKF currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs FFIN's 83.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.83x | 1.03x | 0.95x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $50.10 | $139.73 | $38.74 | $30.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $36.47 | $91.35 | $28.11 | $25.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.7% | +95.5% | +83.6% | +87.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.1 | 58.9 | 58.2 | 50.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 11K | 317K | 740K | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
HOMB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BSVN as "Buy", BOKF as "Hold", FFIN as "Hold", HOMB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 29.7% upside for BSVN (target: $57) vs -1.4% for BOKF (target: $132). For income investors, HOMB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.79% vs BOKF's 1.68%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $57.00 | $131.57 | $39.25 | $32.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 21 | 15 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | +1.7% | +2.2% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 11 | 11 | 21 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.98 | $2.24 | $0.72 | $0.75 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +0.9% | 0.0% | +1.6% |
BSVN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). HOMB leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 3 tied.
BSVN vs BOKF vs FFIN vs HOMB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BSVN or BOKF or FFIN or HOMB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger pick with 18. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 9% for Bank7 Corp. (BSVN). Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E (9. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BSVN or BOKF or FFIN or HOMB?
On trailing P/E, Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) is the cheapest at 9. 8x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 20. 8x. On forward P/E, Bank7 Corp. is actually cheaper at 9. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bank7 Corp. wins at 0. 58x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 38x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BSVN or BOKF or FFIN or HOMB?
Over the past 5 years, Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) delivered a total return of +178. 4%, compared to -28. 2% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BOKF returned +168. 5% versus HOMB's +58. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BSVN or BOKF or FFIN or HOMB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus BOK Financial Corporation's 1. 03β — meaning BOKF is approximately 26% more volatile than HOMB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 80% for BOK Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BSVN or BOKF or FFIN or HOMB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is pulling ahead at 18. 8% versus -3. 9% for Bank7 Corp. (BSVN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Financial Bankshares, Inc. grew EPS 12. 2% year-over-year, compared to -7. 0% for Bank7 Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BSVN or BOKF or FFIN or HOMB?
Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus 15. 6% for BOK Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BSVN leads at 41. 4% versus 19. 8% for BOKF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FFIN leads at 70. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BSVN or BOKF or FFIN or HOMB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 58x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 38x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) trades at 9. 9x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 6. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BSVN: 29. 7% to $57. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BSVN or BOKF or FFIN or HOMB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) offers the highest yield at 2. 8%, versus 1. 7% for BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF).
09Is BSVN or BOKF or FFIN or HOMB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 83), 2. 2% yield, +155. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BSVN: +155. 9%, BOKF: +168. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BSVN and BOKF and FFIN and HOMB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BSVN is a small-cap deep-value stock; BOKF is a mid-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.