Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BSVN vs FFIN vs BOKF vs SFNC vs IBCP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
BSVN vs FFIN vs BOKF vs SFNC vs IBCP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $416M | $4.61B | $10.28B | $3.09B | $699M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $137M | $739M | $3.36B | $627M | $315M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $43M | $243M | $537M | $-398M | $69M |
| Gross Margin | 70.2% | 70.8% | 57.1% | 5.8% | 69.6% |
| Operating Margin | 41.4% | 36.8% | 19.8% | -84.2% | 25.8% |
| Forward P/E | 9.9x | 15.9x | 13.0x | 10.3x | 9.6x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $197M | $4.45B | $641M | $117M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $245M | $763M | $1.43B | $380M | $52M |
BSVN vs FFIN vs BOKF vs SFNC vs IBCP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) | 100 | 430.9 | +330.9% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 105.7 | +5.7% |
| BOK Financial Corpo… (BOKF) | 100 | 262.0 | +162.0% |
| Simmons First Natio… (SFNC) | 100 | 124.5 | +24.5% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 245.7 | +145.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BSVN vs FFIN vs BOKF vs SFNC vs IBCP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BSVN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency and bank quality.
- PEG 0.58 vs BOKF's 4.38
- NIM 4.5% vs BOKF's 2.4%
- Lower P/E (9.9x vs 13.0x), PEG 0.58 vs 4.38
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner)
FFIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 12.2%
- 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
BOKF ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +44.8% vs FFIN's -3.2%
SFNC is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 4.0% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs IBCP's 3.0%
IBCP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 3.0%
- 184.6% 10Y total return vs BSVN's 155.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 370.62x
- Beta 0.83, yield 3.0%, current ratio 370.62x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.9x vs 13.0x), PEG 0.58 vs 4.38 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs BOKF's 1.03, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs IBCP's 3.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.8% vs FFIN's -3.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% |
BSVN vs FFIN vs BOKF vs SFNC vs IBCP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BSVN vs FFIN vs BOKF vs SFNC vs IBCP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SFNC leads in 1 of 6 categories
IBCP leads 1 • BSVN leads 0 • FFIN leads 0 • BOKF leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — BSVN and SFNC each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BOKF is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.4B annually — 24.5x BSVN's $137M. BSVN is the more profitable business, keeping 31.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -63.4%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $137M | $739M | $3.4B | $627M | $315M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $58M | $310M | $797M | -$497M | $89M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $43M | $243M | $537M | -$398M | $69M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $36M | $290M | $1.5B | $755M | $70M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.2% | +70.8% | +57.1% | +5.8% | +69.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +41.4% | +36.8% | +19.8% | -84.2% | +25.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +31.4% | +30.2% | +15.6% | -63.4% | +21.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +33.6% | +39.6% | +42.6% | +71.7% | +22.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.4% | -7.7% | +1.8% | +42.1% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
SFNC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.8x trailing earnings, BSVN trades at a 53% valuation discount to FFIN's 20.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BSVN offers better value at 0.57x vs BOKF's 5.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $416M | $4.6B | $10.3B | $3.1B | $699M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $171M | $4.0B | $13.3B | $3.4B | $764M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.77x | 20.76x | 16.39x | -7.24x | 10.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.89x | 15.92x | 13.05x | 10.35x | 9.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.57x | 3.98x | 5.51x | — | 1.97x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.95x | 14.17x | 17.23x | — | 9.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.03x | 6.23x | 3.06x | 4.93x | 2.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.68x | 2.89x | 1.53x | 0.84x | 1.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.01x | 15.73x | 7.19x | 6.88x | 9.96x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — BSVN and FFIN each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BSVN delivers a 18.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-12 for SFNC. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BOKF's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.2% | +13.3% | +8.9% | -11.6% | +14.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.3% | +1.6% | +1.1% | -1.6% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.3% | +11.0% | +4.1% | -9.1% | +10.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.2% | +16.0% | +5.5% | -4.2% | +2.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.12x | 0.80x | 0.19x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$245M | -$566M | $3.0B | $261M | $65M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $245M | $763M | $1.4B | $380M | $52M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $197M | $4.5B | $641M | $117M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.39x | 1.48x | 0.55x | -1.01x | 0.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IBCP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BSVN five years ago would be worth $27,837 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,178 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, BOKF leads with a +44.8% total return vs FFIN's -3.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBCP at 32.1% vs FFIN's 8.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.9% | +8.5% | +13.0% | +14.6% | +7.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.0% | -3.2% | +44.8% | +16.7% | +12.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +97.5% | +29.1% | +79.4% | +53.4% | +130.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +178.4% | -28.2% | +59.4% | -15.4% | +63.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +155.9% | +145.4% | +168.5% | +25.2% | +184.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.5% | +8.9% | +21.5% | +15.3% | +32.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SFNC and IBCP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IBCP is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BOKF's 1.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SFNC currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs FFIN's 83.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.83x | 0.95x | 1.03x | 1.02x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $50.10 | $38.74 | $139.73 | $22.18 | $37.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $36.47 | $28.11 | $91.35 | $17.00 | $29.63 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.7% | +83.6% | +95.5% | +96.3% | +90.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.1 | 58.2 | 58.9 | 62.3 | 50.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 11K | 740K | 317K | 1.2M | 176K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FFIN and BOKF and SFNC and IBCP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BSVN as "Buy", FFIN as "Hold", BOKF as "Hold", SFNC as "Buy", IBCP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 29.7% upside for BSVN (target: $57) vs -1.4% for BOKF (target: $132). For income investors, SFNC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.00% vs BOKF's 1.68%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $57.00 | $39.25 | $131.57 | $22.67 | $38.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 15 | 21 | 9 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | +2.2% | +1.7% | +4.0% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 11 | 11 | 6 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.98 | $0.72 | $2.24 | $0.85 | $1.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% | +0.9% | 0.0% | +1.8% |
SFNC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). IBCP leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
BSVN vs FFIN vs BOKF vs SFNC vs IBCP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BSVN or FFIN or BOKF or SFNC or IBCP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger pick with 18. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E (9. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BSVN or FFIN or BOKF or SFNC or IBCP?
On trailing P/E, Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) is the cheapest at 9. 8x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 20. 8x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bank7 Corp. wins at 0. 58x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 38x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BSVN or FFIN or BOKF or SFNC or IBCP?
Over the past 5 years, Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) delivered a total return of +178. 4%, compared to -28. 2% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBCP returned +184. 6% versus SFNC's +25. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BSVN or FFIN or BOKF or SFNC or IBCP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
83β versus BOK Financial Corporation's 1. 03β — meaning BOKF is approximately 25% more volatile than IBCP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 80% for BOK Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BSVN or FFIN or BOKF or SFNC or IBCP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is pulling ahead at 18. 8% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Financial Bankshares, Inc. grew EPS 12. 2% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BSVN or FFIN or BOKF or SFNC or IBCP?
Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BSVN leads at 41. 4% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FFIN leads at 70. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BSVN or FFIN or BOKF or SFNC or IBCP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 58x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 38x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 6. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BSVN: 29. 7% to $57. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BSVN or FFIN or BOKF or SFNC or IBCP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 1. 7% for BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF).
09Is BSVN or FFIN or BOKF or SFNC or IBCP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
83), 3. 0% yield, +184. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBCP: +184. 6%, SFNC: +25. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BSVN and FFIN and BOKF and SFNC and IBCP?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BSVN is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; BOKF is a mid-cap deep-value stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.