Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BZUN vs CANG vs BABA vs CPNG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Dealerships
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
BZUN vs CANG vs BABA vs CPNG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Auto - Dealerships | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $165M | $250M | $340.44B | $30.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9.77B | $3.46B | $1.01T | $28.65B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-204M | $-178M | $123.35B | $-165M |
| Gross Margin | 49.2% | 13.6% | 41.2% | 12.7% |
| Operating Margin | -0.5% | 7.3% | 10.9% | 0.3% |
| Forward P/E | 1.0x | 5.7x | 4.1x | 292.4x |
| Total Debt | $2.52B | $170M | $248.49B | $4.63B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.64B | $1.29B | $181.73B | $6.32B |
BZUN vs CANG vs BABA vs CPNG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baozun Inc. (BZUN) | 100 | 7.2 | -92.8% |
| Cango Inc. (CANG) | 100 | 12.8 | -87.2% |
| Alibaba Group Holdi… (BABA) | 100 | 62.2 | -37.8% |
| Coupang, Inc. (CPNG) | 100 | 34.9 | -65.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BZUN vs CANG vs BABA vs CPNG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BZUN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Lower P/E (1.0x vs 292.4x)
CANG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
BABA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.21, yield 1.3%
- 83.4% 10Y total return vs CANG's -44.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.21, Low D/E 22.8%, current ratio 1.54x
- Beta 1.21, yield 1.3%, current ratio 1.54x
CPNG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 14.1%, EPS growth 30.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.8%
- 14.1% revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.1% revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.0x vs 292.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs CANG's -5.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.21 vs CANG's 2.25 | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs BZUN's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +16.0% vs CANG's -73.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.7% ROA vs CANG's -2.3%, ROIC 9.6% vs 4.6% |
BZUN vs CANG vs BABA vs CPNG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BZUN vs CANG vs BABA vs CPNG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BABA leads in 3 of 6 categories
BZUN leads 1 • CANG leads 0 • CPNG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CANG and BABA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BABA is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.01T annually — 292.5x CANG's $3.5B. BABA is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CANG's -5.2%. On growth, CANG holds the edge at +58.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9.8B | $3.5B | $1.01T | $28.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | $333M | $114.6B | -$45M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$204M | -$178M | $123.4B | -$165M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $0 | $2.6B | $279M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.2% | +13.6% | +41.2% | +12.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.5% | +7.3% | +10.9% | +0.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | -5.2% | +12.2% | -0.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.1% | -154.0% | +0.3% | +1.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.8% | +58.3% | +4.8% | -74.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -29.2% | +3.6% | -52.0% | -3.5% |
Valuation Metrics
BZUN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.7x trailing earnings, CANG trades at a 96% valuation discount to CPNG's 156.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CANG's 3.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CPNG's 42.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $165M | $250M | $340.4B | $30.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $294M | $85M | $350.3B | $29.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.08x | 5.66x | 17.90x | 156.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.95x | — | 4.13x | 292.36x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.40x | 3.13x | 13.55x | 42.79x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.12x | 2.12x | 2.33x | 0.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.19x | 0.42x | 2.12x | 6.91x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 29.64x | 59.22x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BABA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BABA delivers a 11.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-4 for CANG. CANG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CPNG's 1.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BABA scores 7/9 vs CANG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.7% | -4.1% | +11.2% | -3.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.1% | -2.3% | +6.7% | -0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.3% | +4.6% | +9.6% | +14.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.7% | +4.5% | +10.4% | +5.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.44x | 0.04x | 0.23x | 1.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $879M | -$1.1B | $66.8B | -$1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.6B | $1.3B | $181.7B | $6.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.5B | $170M | $248.5B | $4.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.78x | -1.87x | 15.74x | 8.88x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BABA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CANG five years ago would be worth $8,579 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $838 for BZUN. Over the past 12 months, BABA leads with a +16.0% total return vs CANG's -73.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BABA at 20.5% vs BZUN's -15.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.8% | -62.0% | -9.5% | -26.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -15.9% | -73.7% | +16.0% | -35.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.4% | +1.2% | +74.8% | -3.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.6% | -14.2% | -35.4% | -55.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.3% | -44.9% | +83.4% | -65.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -15.8% | +0.4% | +20.5% | -1.1% |
Risk & Volatility
BABA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BABA is the less volatile stock with a 1.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CANG's 2.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BABA currently trades 73.2% from its 52-week high vs CANG's 18.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 2.25x | 1.21x | 1.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.88 | $2.88 | $192.67 | $34.08 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.07 | $0.33 | $103.71 | $16.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +56.6% | +18.6% | +73.2% | +50.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.8 | 58.6 | 61.8 | 33.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 376K | 1.3M | 10.4M | 21.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CANG and BABA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BZUN as "Buy", CANG as "Buy", BABA as "Buy", CPNG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 459.2% upside for CANG (target: $3) vs 37.8% for BABA (target: $194). BABA is the only dividend payer here at 1.27% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.35 | $3.00 | $194.23 | $26.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 2 | 59 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | — | +1.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.02 | — | $12.14 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.5% | +5.3% | +3.8% | +0.8% |
BABA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). BZUN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
BZUN vs CANG vs BABA vs CPNG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BZUN or CANG or BABA or CPNG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Coupang, Inc.
(CPNG) is the stronger pick with 14. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). Cango Inc. (CANG) offers the better valuation at 5. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Baozun Inc. (BZUN) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BZUN or CANG or BABA or CPNG?
On trailing P/E, Cango Inc.
(CANG) is the cheapest at 5. 7x versus Coupang, Inc. at 156. 5x. On forward P/E, Baozun Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BZUN or CANG or BABA or CPNG?
Over the past 5 years, Cango Inc.
(CANG) delivered a total return of -14. 2%, compared to -91. 6% for Baozun Inc. (BZUN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BABA returned +83. 4% versus CPNG's -65. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BZUN or CANG or BABA or CPNG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
21β versus Cango Inc. 's 2. 25β — meaning CANG is approximately 86% more volatile than BABA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cango Inc. (CANG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 100% for Coupang, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BZUN or CANG or BABA or CPNG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coupang, Inc.
(CPNG) is pulling ahead at 14. 1% versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cango Inc. grew EPS 960. 0% year-over-year, compared to 30. 5% for Coupang, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CPNG leads at 18. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BZUN or CANG or BABA or CPNG?
Cango Inc.
(CANG) is the more profitable company, earning 37. 3% net margin versus -2. 0% for Baozun Inc. — meaning it keeps 37. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CANG leads at 22. 2% versus -1. 2% for BZUN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CANG leads at 55. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BZUN or CANG or BABA or CPNG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Baozun Inc.
(BZUN) trades at 1. 0x forward P/E versus 292. 4x for Coupang, Inc. — 291. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CANG: 459. 2% to $3. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BZUN or CANG or BABA or CPNG?
In this comparison, BABA (1.
3% yield) pays a dividend. BZUN, CANG, CPNG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BZUN or CANG or BABA or CPNG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
21), 1. 3% yield). Cango Inc. (CANG) carries a higher beta of 2. 25 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BABA: +83. 4%, CANG: -44. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BZUN and CANG and BABA and CPNG?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BZUN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CANG is a small-cap deep-value stock; BABA is a large-cap deep-value stock; CPNG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. BABA pays a dividend while BZUN, CANG, CPNG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.