Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CARV vs NTRS vs STT vs MGYR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
Banks - Regional
CARV vs NTRS vs STT vs MGYR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Asset Management | Asset Management | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $9M | $29.66B | $41.99B | $115M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $37M | $14.30B | $21.97B | $58M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-13M | $1.74B | $2.98B | $11M |
| Gross Margin | 56.3% | 56.5% | 58.5% | 60.3% |
| Operating Margin | -36.8% | 16.3% | 15.5% | 23.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 14.8x | 12.0x | 11.3x |
| Total Debt | $29M | $16.43B | $36.79B | $49M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $50M | $61.13B | $116.10B | $7M |
CARV vs NTRS vs STT vs MGYR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carver Bancorp, Inc. (CARV) | 100 | 93.8 | -6.2% |
| Northern Trust Corp… (NTRS) | 100 | 202.5 | +102.5% |
| State Street Corpor… (STT) | 100 | 244.1 | +144.1% |
| Magyar Bancorp, Inc. (MGYR) | 100 | 242.5 | +142.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CARV vs NTRS vs STT vs MGYR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CARV is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.08 vs STT's 1.19, lower leverage
NTRS is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +66.6% vs CARV's +18.4%
STT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.19, yield 2.3%
- Rev growth 19.6%, EPS growth 47.1%
- 186.8% 10Y total return vs NTRS's 170.2%
- 19.6% NII/revenue growth vs NTRS's -9.9%
MGYR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 41.3%, current ratio 13.39x
- PEG 0.35 vs NTRS's 1.50
- Beta 0.28, yield 1.7%, current ratio 13.39x
- NIM 3.2% vs STT's 0.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.6% NII/revenue growth vs NTRS's -9.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.3x vs 12.0x), PEG 0.35 vs 1.36 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CARV's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.08 vs STT's 1.19, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.3% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs NTRS's 2.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +66.6% vs CARV's +18.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CARV's 0.9% |
CARV vs NTRS vs STT vs MGYR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CARV vs NTRS vs STT vs MGYR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MGYR leads in 2 of 6 categories
CARV leads 1 • NTRS leads 1 • STT leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MGYR leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STT is the larger business by revenue, generating $22.0B annually — 588.0x CARV's $37M. MGYR is the more profitable business, keeping 16.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CARV's -36.8%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $37M | $14.3B | $22.0B | $58M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | $3.2B | $4.3B | $16M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$13M | $1.7B | $3.0B | $11M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9M | $4.7B | -$6.1B | $11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +56.3% | +56.5% | +58.5% | +60.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -36.8% | +16.3% | +15.5% | +23.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -36.8% | +12.1% | +12.2% | +16.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -34.6% | +38.2% | -64.3% | +16.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.2% | +7.1% | +23.0% | +51.5% |
Valuation Metrics
CARV leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.3x trailing earnings, MGYR trades at a 38% valuation discount to NTRS's 18.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MGYR offers better value at 0.35x vs STT's 2.05x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9M | $29.7B | $42.0B | $115M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$12M | -$15.0B | -$37.3B | $156M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.63x | 18.31x | 18.12x | 11.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.80x | 11.99x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.86x | 2.05x | 0.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | -4.68x | -9.33x | 10.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.24x | 2.07x | 1.91x | 1.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.29x | 2.33x | 1.78x | 0.93x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 5.43x | — | 11.67x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MGYR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NTRS delivers a 13.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-48 for CARV. MGYR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.41x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STT's 1.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MGYR scores 7/9 vs CARV's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -48.4% | +13.4% | +10.8% | +9.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.9% | +1.0% | +0.8% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -13.0% | +6.0% | +4.6% | +6.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -15.4% | +9.0% | +4.6% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.98x | 1.27x | 1.45x | 0.41x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$21M | -$44.7B | -$79.3B | $42M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $50M | $61.1B | $116.1B | $7M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $29M | $16.4B | $36.8B | $49M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.71x | 0.38x | 0.42x | 0.66x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NTRS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STT five years ago would be worth $18,620 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,074 for CARV. Over the past 12 months, NTRS leads with a +66.6% total return vs CARV's +18.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTRS at 32.3% vs CARV's -27.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.3% | +15.5% | +16.6% | +1.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.4% | +66.6% | +66.2% | +25.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -61.3% | +131.7% | +128.4% | +85.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.3% | +46.7% | +86.2% | +73.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.6% | +170.2% | +186.8% | +125.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -27.2% | +32.3% | +31.7% | +22.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CARV and STT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CARV is the less volatile stock with a 0.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STT's 1.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. STT currently trades 95.3% from its 52-week high vs CARV's 43.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.08x | 1.14x | 1.19x | 0.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.85 | $173.19 | $156.18 | $20.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.07 | $97.00 | $90.94 | $14.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.4% | +92.4% | +95.3% | +88.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.2 | 59.4 | 63.9 | 47.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4K | 1.1M | 2.0M | 6K |
Analyst Outlook
STT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NTRS as "Hold", STT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.8% upside for STT (target: $160) vs -3.9% for NTRS (target: $154). For income investors, STT offers the higher dividend yield at 2.30% vs MGYR's 1.65%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $153.75 | $160.44 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 35 | 37 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.0% | +2.3% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.14 | $3.42 | $0.29 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.3% | +6.9% | +0.7% |
MGYR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CARV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
CARV vs NTRS vs STT vs MGYR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CARV or NTRS or STT or MGYR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, State Street Corporation (STT) is the stronger pick with 19.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 9% for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS). Magyar Bancorp, Inc. (MGYR) offers the better valuation at 11. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate State Street Corporation (STT) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CARV or NTRS or STT or MGYR?
On trailing P/E, Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) is the cheapest at 11. 3x versus Northern Trust Corporation at 18. 3x. On forward P/E, State Street Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: State Street Corporation wins at 1. 36x versus Northern Trust Corporation's 1. 50x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CARV or NTRS or STT or MGYR?
Over the past 5 years, State Street Corporation (STT) delivered a total return of +86.
2%, compared to -79. 3% for Carver Bancorp, Inc. (CARV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STT returned +186. 8% versus CARV's -53. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CARV or NTRS or STT or MGYR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Carver Bancorp, Inc.
(CARV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 08β versus State Street Corporation's 1. 19β — meaning STT is approximately 1447% more volatile than CARV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Magyar Bancorp, Inc. (MGYR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 41% versus 145% for State Street Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CARV or NTRS or STT or MGYR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), State Street Corporation (STT) is pulling ahead at 19.
6% versus -9. 9% for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: State Street Corporation grew EPS 47. 1% year-over-year, compared to -334. 4% for Carver Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CARV or NTRS or STT or MGYR?
Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 7% net margin versus -36. 8% for Carver Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MGYR leads at 23. 6% versus -36. 8% for CARV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MGYR leads at 60. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CARV or NTRS or STT or MGYR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, State Street Corporation (STT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 36x versus Northern Trust Corporation's 1. 50x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, State Street Corporation (STT) trades at 12. 0x forward P/E versus 14. 8x for Northern Trust Corporation — 2. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STT: 7. 8% to $160. 44.
08Which pays a better dividend — CARV or NTRS or STT or MGYR?
In this comparison, STT (2.
3% yield), NTRS (2. 0% yield), MGYR (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. CARV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CARV or NTRS or STT or MGYR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 1. 7% yield, +125. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MGYR: +125. 8%, STT: +186. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CARV and NTRS and STT and MGYR?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CARV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NTRS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; STT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MGYR is a small-cap deep-value stock. NTRS, STT, MGYR pay a dividend while CARV does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.