Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CBU vs NTRS vs STT vs TRMK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
Banks - Regional
CBU vs NTRS vs STT vs TRMK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Asset Management | Asset Management | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $3.35B | $29.66B | $41.99B | $2.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $929M | $14.30B | $21.97B | $1.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $210M | $1.74B | $2.98B | $224M |
| Gross Margin | 73.4% | 56.5% | 58.5% | 71.0% |
| Operating Margin | 31.4% | 16.3% | 15.5% | 25.5% |
| Forward P/E | 13.5x | 14.8x | 12.0x | 11.5x |
| Total Debt | $747M | $16.43B | $36.79B | $1.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $302M | $61.13B | $116.10B | $668M |
CBU vs NTRS vs STT vs TRMK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Community Bank Syst… (CBU) | 100 | 107.4 | +7.4% |
| Northern Trust Corp… (NTRS) | 100 | 202.5 | +102.5% |
| State Street Corpor… (STT) | 100 | 244.1 | +144.1% |
| Trustmark Corporati… (TRMK) | 100 | 188.7 | +88.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CBU vs NTRS vs STT vs TRMK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CBU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.88, yield 2.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.88, Low D/E 37.2%, current ratio 1.49x
- Beta 0.88, yield 2.7%, current ratio 1.49x
- Beta 0.88 vs STT's 1.19, lower leverage
NTRS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs TRMK's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- +66.6% vs CBU's +17.5%
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs TRMK's 0.5%
STT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 19.6%, EPS growth 47.1%
- 186.8% 10Y total return vs NTRS's 170.2%
- PEG 1.36 vs CBU's 2.57
TRMK is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 3.4% vs STT's 0.8%
- 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs NTRS's -9.9%
- Lower P/E (11.5x vs 13.5x), PEG 1.42 vs 2.57
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs NTRS's -9.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.5x vs 13.5x), PEG 1.42 vs 2.57 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs TRMK's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.88 vs STT's 1.19, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield, vs STT's 2.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +66.6% vs CBU's +17.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs TRMK's 0.5% |
CBU vs NTRS vs STT vs TRMK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CBU vs NTRS vs STT vs TRMK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CBU leads in 2 of 6 categories
TRMK leads 1 • NTRS leads 0 • STT leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CBU leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STT is the larger business by revenue, generating $22.0B annually — 23.7x CBU's $929M. CBU is the more profitable business, keeping 22.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NTRS's 12.1%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $929M | $14.3B | $22.0B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $317M | $3.2B | $4.3B | $323M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $210M | $1.7B | $3.0B | $224M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $218M | $4.7B | -$6.1B | $230M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.4% | +56.5% | +58.5% | +71.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +31.4% | +16.3% | +15.5% | +25.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.7% | +12.1% | +12.2% | +20.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.1% | +38.2% | -64.3% | +20.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.7% | +7.1% | +23.0% | +5.4% |
Valuation Metrics
TRMK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.1x trailing earnings, TRMK trades at a 34% valuation discount to NTRS's 18.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TRMK offers better value at 1.50x vs CBU's 3.05x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.4B | $29.7B | $42.0B | $2.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.8B | -$15.0B | -$37.3B | $3.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.03x | 18.31x | 18.12x | 12.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.53x | 14.80x | 11.99x | 11.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.05x | 1.86x | 2.05x | 1.50x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.97x | -4.68x | -9.33x | 9.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.61x | 2.07x | 1.91x | 2.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.78x | 2.33x | 1.78x | 1.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.37x | 5.43x | — | 11.39x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CBU leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NTRS delivers a 13.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $11 for TRMK. CBU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STT's 1.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRMK scores 7/9 vs STT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.0% | +13.4% | +10.8% | +10.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +1.0% | +0.8% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.9% | +6.0% | +4.6% | +7.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.0% | +9.0% | +4.6% | +3.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.37x | 1.27x | 1.45x | 0.53x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $445M | -$44.7B | -$79.3B | $448M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $302M | $61.1B | $116.1B | $668M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $747M | $16.4B | $36.8B | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.51x | 0.38x | 0.42x | 0.75x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — NTRS and STT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STT five years ago would be worth $18,620 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,990 for CBU. Over the past 12 months, NTRS leads with a +66.6% total return vs CBU's +17.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTRS at 32.3% vs CBU's 13.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.6% | +15.5% | +16.6% | +15.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +17.5% | +66.6% | +66.2% | +32.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.8% | +131.7% | +128.4% | +118.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.1% | +46.7% | +86.2% | +47.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +107.2% | +170.2% | +186.8% | +127.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.4% | +32.3% | +31.7% | +29.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CBU and TRMK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CBU is the less volatile stock with a 0.88 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STT's 1.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRMK currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs NTRS's 92.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.88x | 1.14x | 1.19x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $67.50 | $173.19 | $156.18 | $45.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $51.12 | $97.00 | $90.94 | $33.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.5% | +92.4% | +95.3% | +97.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.1 | 59.4 | 63.9 | 56.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 220K | 1.1M | 2.0M | 392K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CBU and STT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CBU as "Hold", NTRS as "Hold", STT as "Buy", TRMK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 7.8% upside for STT (target: $160) vs -3.9% for NTRS (target: $154). For income investors, CBU offers the higher dividend yield at 2.73% vs NTRS's 1.96%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $68.50 | $153.75 | $160.44 | $45.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 35 | 37 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | +2.0% | +2.3% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.74 | $3.14 | $3.42 | $0.97 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +4.3% | +6.9% | +3.0% |
CBU leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TRMK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
CBU vs NTRS vs STT vs TRMK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CBU or NTRS or STT or TRMK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger pick with 34.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 9% for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS). Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate State Street Corporation (STT) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CBU or NTRS or STT or TRMK?
On trailing P/E, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the cheapest at 12.
1x versus Northern Trust Corporation at 18. 3x. On forward P/E, Trustmark Corporation is actually cheaper at 11. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: State Street Corporation wins at 1. 36x versus Community Bank System, Inc. 's 2. 57x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CBU or NTRS or STT or TRMK?
Over the past 5 years, State Street Corporation (STT) delivered a total return of +86.
2%, compared to -10. 1% for Community Bank System, Inc. (CBU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STT returned +186. 8% versus CBU's +107. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CBU or NTRS or STT or TRMK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Community Bank System, Inc.
(CBU) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 88β versus State Street Corporation's 1. 19β — meaning STT is approximately 36% more volatile than CBU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Community Bank System, Inc. (CBU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 145% for State Street Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CBU or NTRS or STT or TRMK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is pulling ahead at 34.
8% versus -9. 9% for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: State Street Corporation grew EPS 47. 1% year-over-year, compared to -10. 5% for Northern Trust Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CBU or NTRS or STT or TRMK?
Community Bank System, Inc.
(CBU) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 7% net margin versus 12. 1% for Northern Trust Corporation — meaning it keeps 22. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CBU leads at 31. 4% versus 15. 5% for STT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CBU leads at 73. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CBU or NTRS or STT or TRMK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, State Street Corporation (STT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 36x versus Community Bank System, Inc. 's 2. 57x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) trades at 11. 5x forward P/E versus 14. 8x for Northern Trust Corporation — 3. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STT: 7. 8% to $160. 44.
08Which pays a better dividend — CBU or NTRS or STT or TRMK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Community Bank System, Inc. (CBU) offers the highest yield at 2. 7%, versus 2. 0% for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS).
09Is CBU or NTRS or STT or TRMK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Community Bank System, Inc.
(CBU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 88), 2. 7% yield, +107. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CBU: +107. 2%, STT: +186. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CBU and NTRS and STT and TRMK?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CBU is a small-cap deep-value stock; NTRS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; STT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; TRMK is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.