Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CBU vs NTRS vs STT vs TRMK vs BK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CBU
Community Bank System, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.35B
5Y Perf.+7.4%
NTRS
Northern Trust Corporation

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$29.66B
5Y Perf.+102.5%
STT
State Street Corporation

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$41.99B
5Y Perf.+144.1%
TRMK
Trustmark Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.64B
5Y Perf.+88.7%
BK
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$89.95B
5Y Perf.+251.6%

CBU vs NTRS vs STT vs TRMK vs BK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CBU logoCBU
NTRS logoNTRS
STT logoSTT
TRMK logoTRMK
BK logoBK
IndustryBanks - RegionalAsset ManagementAsset ManagementBanks - RegionalAsset Management
Market Cap$3.35B$29.66B$41.99B$2.64B$89.95B
Revenue (TTM)$929M$14.30B$21.97B$1.12B$39.55B
Net Income (TTM)$210M$1.74B$2.98B$224M$5.24B
Gross Margin73.4%56.5%58.5%71.0%46.0%
Operating Margin31.4%16.3%15.5%25.5%14.8%
Forward P/E13.5x14.8x12.0x11.5x14.9x
Total Debt$747M$16.43B$36.79B$1.12B$45.44B
Cash & Equiv.$302M$61.13B$116.10B$668M$101.94B

CBU vs NTRS vs STT vs TRMK vs BKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CBU
NTRS
STT
TRMK
BK
StockMay 20May 26Return
Community Bank Syst… (CBU)100107.4+7.4%
Northern Trust Corp… (NTRS)100202.5+102.5%
State Street Corpor… (STT)100244.1+144.1%
Trustmark Corporati… (TRMK)100188.7+88.7%
The Bank of New Yor… (BK)100351.6+251.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CBU vs NTRS vs STT vs TRMK vs BK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BK leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Trustmark Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. CBU and NTRS also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CBU
Community Bank System, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CBU ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.88, yield 2.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.88, Low D/E 37.2%, current ratio 1.49x
  • Beta 0.88, yield 2.7%, current ratio 1.49x
  • 2.7% yield, vs BK's 1.4%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
NTRS
Northern Trust Corporation
The Banking Pick

NTRS is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +66.6% vs CBU's +17.5%
Best for: momentum
STT
State Street Corporation
The Banking Pick

STT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.

  • Rev growth 19.6%, EPS growth 47.1%
  • PEG 1.36 vs BK's 2.89
Best for: growth exposure and valuation efficiency
TRMK
Trustmark Corporation
The Banking Pick

TRMK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if bank quality is your priority.

  • NIM 3.4% vs STT's 0.8%
  • 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs NTRS's -9.9%
  • Lower P/E (11.5x vs 14.9x), PEG 1.42 vs 2.89
Best for: bank quality
BK
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation
The Banking Pick

BK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • 267.1% 10Y total return vs STT's 186.8%
  • Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs TRMK's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
  • Beta 0.83 vs STT's 1.19, lower leverage
  • Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs TRMK's 0.5%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTRMK logoTRMK34.8% NII/revenue growth vs NTRS's -9.9%
ValueTRMK logoTRMKLower P/E (11.5x vs 14.9x), PEG 1.42 vs 2.89
Quality / MarginsBK logoBKEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs TRMK's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyBK logoBKBeta 0.83 vs STT's 1.19, lower leverage
DividendsCBU logoCBU2.7% yield, vs BK's 1.4%
Momentum (1Y)NTRS logoNTRS+66.6% vs CBU's +17.5%
Efficiency (ROA)BK logoBKEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs TRMK's 0.5%

CBU vs NTRS vs STT vs TRMK vs BK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CBUCommunity Bank System, Inc.
FY 2025
Insurance Services
58.0%$54M
Wealth Management Services
42.0%$39M
NTRSNorthern Trust Corporation
FY 2025
Corporate and Institutional Service
58.5%$4.8B
Wealth Management
41.5%$3.4B
STTState Street Corporation
FY 2024
Investment Servicing
82.0%$10.7B
Investment Management
18.0%$2.3B
TRMKTrustmark Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

BKThe Bank of New York Mellon Corporation
FY 2024
Financial Service
73.9%$9.3B
Investment Advisory, Management and Administrative Service
24.9%$3.1B
Distribution and Shareholder Service
1.2%$158M

CBU vs NTRS vs STT vs TRMK vs BK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCBULAGGINGSTT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CBU leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

BK is the larger business by revenue, generating $39.6B annually — 42.6x CBU's $929M. CBU is the more profitable business, keeping 22.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BK's 11.5%.

MetricCBU logoCBUCommunity Bank Sy…NTRS logoNTRSNorthern Trust Co…STT logoSTTState Street Corp…TRMK logoTRMKTrustmark Corpora…BK logoBKThe Bank of New Y…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$929M$14.3B$22.0B$1.1B$39.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$317M$3.2B$4.3B$323M$8.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$210M$1.7B$3.0B$224M$5.2B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$218M$4.7B-$6.1B$230M$1.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+73.4%+56.5%+58.5%+71.0%+46.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+31.4%+16.3%+15.5%+25.5%+14.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+22.7%+12.1%+12.2%+20.0%+11.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+25.1%+38.2%-64.3%+20.7%-2.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+9.7%+7.1%+23.0%+5.4%+25.3%
CBU leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TRMK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 12.1x trailing earnings, TRMK trades at a 46% valuation discount to BK's 22.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TRMK offers better value at 1.50x vs BK's 4.37x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricCBU logoCBUCommunity Bank Sy…NTRS logoNTRSNorthern Trust Co…STT logoSTTState Street Corp…TRMK logoTRMKTrustmark Corpora…BK logoBKThe Bank of New Y…
Market CapShares × price$3.4B$29.7B$42.0B$2.6B$89.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.8B-$15.0B-$37.3B$3.1B$33.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS16.03x18.31x18.12x12.13x22.53x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.13.53x14.80x11.99x11.50x14.92x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate3.05x1.86x2.05x1.50x4.37x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.97x-4.68x-9.33x9.49x4.37x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.61x2.07x1.91x2.36x2.27x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.78x2.33x1.78x1.28x2.34x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF14.37x5.43x11.39x
TRMK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CBU leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

NTRS delivers a 13.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $11 for TRMK. CBU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STT's 1.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRMK scores 7/9 vs STT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCBU logoCBUCommunity Bank Sy…NTRS logoNTRSNorthern Trust Co…STT logoSTTState Street Corp…TRMK logoTRMKTrustmark Corpora…BK logoBKThe Bank of New Y…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+11.0%+13.4%+10.8%+10.8%+11.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.2%+1.0%+0.8%+1.2%+1.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.9%+6.0%+4.6%+7.1%+5.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+3.0%+9.0%+4.6%+3.2%+6.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–966476
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.37x1.27x1.45x0.53x1.09x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$445M-$44.7B-$79.3B$448M-$56.5B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$302M$61.1B$116.1B$668M$101.9B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$747M$16.4B$36.8B$1.1B$45.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.51x0.38x0.42x0.75x0.32x
CBU leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BK five years ago would be worth $26,864 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,990 for CBU. Over the past 12 months, NTRS leads with a +66.6% total return vs CBU's +17.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BK at 48.7% vs CBU's 13.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCBU logoCBUCommunity Bank Sy…NTRS logoNTRSNorthern Trust Co…STT logoSTTState Street Corp…TRMK logoTRMKTrustmark Corpora…BK logoBKThe Bank of New Y…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+10.6%+15.5%+16.6%+15.5%+12.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+17.5%+66.6%+66.2%+32.5%+58.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+45.8%+131.7%+128.4%+118.5%+228.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-10.1%+46.7%+86.2%+47.6%+168.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+107.2%+170.2%+186.8%+127.7%+267.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+13.4%+32.3%+31.7%+29.8%+48.7%
BK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — TRMK and BK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

BK is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STT's 1.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRMK currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs NTRS's 92.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCBU logoCBUCommunity Bank Sy…NTRS logoNTRSNorthern Trust Co…STT logoSTTState Street Corp…TRMK logoTRMKTrustmark Corpora…BK logoBKThe Bank of New Y…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.88x1.14x1.19x0.94x0.83x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$67.50$173.19$156.18$45.99$139.15
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$51.12$97.00$90.94$33.39$82.91
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+94.5%+92.4%+95.3%+97.6%+93.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10061.159.463.956.060.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded220K1.1M2.0M392K3.3M
Evenly matched — TRMK and BK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — CBU and BK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CBU as "Hold", NTRS as "Hold", STT as "Buy", TRMK as "Hold", BK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.8% upside for STT (target: $160) vs -3.9% for NTRS (target: $154). For income investors, CBU offers the higher dividend yield at 2.73% vs BK's 1.38%.

MetricCBU logoCBUCommunity Bank Sy…NTRS logoNTRSNorthern Trust Co…STT logoSTTState Street Corp…TRMK logoTRMKTrustmark Corpora…BK logoBKThe Bank of New Y…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$68.50$153.75$160.44$45.50$139.86
# AnalystsCovering analysts123537935
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.7%+2.0%+2.3%+2.2%+1.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises013114
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.74$3.14$3.42$0.97$1.80
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.3%+4.3%+6.9%+3.0%+3.4%
Evenly matched — CBU and BK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CBU leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TRMK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallCommunity Bank System, Inc. (CBU)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CBU vs NTRS vs STT vs TRMK vs BK: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CBU or NTRS or STT or TRMK or BK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger pick with 34.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 9% for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS). Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate State Street Corporation (STT) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CBU or NTRS or STT or TRMK or BK?

On trailing P/E, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the cheapest at 12.

1x versus The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation at 22. 5x. On forward P/E, Trustmark Corporation is actually cheaper at 11. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: State Street Corporation wins at 1. 36x versus The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation's 2. 89x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CBU or NTRS or STT or TRMK or BK?

Over the past 5 years, The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BK) delivered a total return of +168.

6%, compared to -10. 1% for Community Bank System, Inc. (CBU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BK returned +267. 1% versus CBU's +107. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CBU or NTRS or STT or TRMK or BK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

83β versus State Street Corporation's 1. 19β — meaning STT is approximately 44% more volatile than BK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Community Bank System, Inc. (CBU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 145% for State Street Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CBU or NTRS or STT or TRMK or BK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is pulling ahead at 34.

8% versus -9. 9% for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation grew EPS 49. 1% year-over-year, compared to -10. 5% for Northern Trust Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CBU or NTRS or STT or TRMK or BK?

Community Bank System, Inc.

(CBU) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 7% net margin versus 11. 5% for The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation — meaning it keeps 22. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CBU leads at 31. 4% versus 14. 8% for BK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CBU leads at 73. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CBU or NTRS or STT or TRMK or BK more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, State Street Corporation (STT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 36x versus The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation's 2. 89x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) trades at 11. 5x forward P/E versus 14. 9x for The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation — 3. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STT: 7. 8% to $160. 44.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CBU or NTRS or STT or TRMK or BK?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Community Bank System, Inc. (CBU) offers the highest yield at 2. 7%, versus 1. 4% for The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BK).

09

Is CBU or NTRS or STT or TRMK or BK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

83), 1. 4% yield, +267. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BK: +267. 1%, STT: +186. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CBU and NTRS and STT and TRMK and BK?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CBU is a small-cap deep-value stock; NTRS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; STT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; TRMK is a small-cap high-growth stock; BK is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CBU

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 13%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NTRS

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

STT

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TRMK

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 17%
  • Net Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BK

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CBU and NTRS and STT and TRMK and BK on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CBU: -1.3% · NTRS: -9.9%)
Net Margin>
%
(CBU: 22.7% · NTRS: 12.1%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(CBU: 16.0x · NTRS: 18.3x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.