Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CBU vs NTRS vs STT vs TRMK vs BK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
Banks - Regional
Asset Management
CBU vs NTRS vs STT vs TRMK vs BK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Asset Management | Asset Management | Banks - Regional | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $3.35B | $29.66B | $41.99B | $2.64B | $89.95B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $929M | $14.30B | $21.97B | $1.12B | $39.55B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $210M | $1.74B | $2.98B | $224M | $5.24B |
| Gross Margin | 73.4% | 56.5% | 58.5% | 71.0% | 46.0% |
| Operating Margin | 31.4% | 16.3% | 15.5% | 25.5% | 14.8% |
| Forward P/E | 13.5x | 14.8x | 12.0x | 11.5x | 14.9x |
| Total Debt | $747M | $16.43B | $36.79B | $1.12B | $45.44B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $302M | $61.13B | $116.10B | $668M | $101.94B |
CBU vs NTRS vs STT vs TRMK vs BK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Community Bank Syst… (CBU) | 100 | 107.4 | +7.4% |
| Northern Trust Corp… (NTRS) | 100 | 202.5 | +102.5% |
| State Street Corpor… (STT) | 100 | 244.1 | +144.1% |
| Trustmark Corporati… (TRMK) | 100 | 188.7 | +88.7% |
| The Bank of New Yor… (BK) | 100 | 351.6 | +251.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CBU vs NTRS vs STT vs TRMK vs BK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CBU ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.88, yield 2.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.88, Low D/E 37.2%, current ratio 1.49x
- Beta 0.88, yield 2.7%, current ratio 1.49x
- 2.7% yield, vs BK's 1.4%
NTRS is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +66.6% vs CBU's +17.5%
STT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 19.6%, EPS growth 47.1%
- PEG 1.36 vs BK's 2.89
TRMK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if bank quality is your priority.
- NIM 3.4% vs STT's 0.8%
- 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs NTRS's -9.9%
- Lower P/E (11.5x vs 14.9x), PEG 1.42 vs 2.89
BK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 267.1% 10Y total return vs STT's 186.8%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs TRMK's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Beta 0.83 vs STT's 1.19, lower leverage
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs TRMK's 0.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs NTRS's -9.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.5x vs 14.9x), PEG 1.42 vs 2.89 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs TRMK's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs STT's 1.19, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield, vs BK's 1.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +66.6% vs CBU's +17.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs TRMK's 0.5% |
CBU vs NTRS vs STT vs TRMK vs BK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CBU vs NTRS vs STT vs TRMK vs BK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CBU leads in 2 of 6 categories
TRMK leads 1 • BK leads 1 • NTRS leads 0 • STT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CBU leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BK is the larger business by revenue, generating $39.6B annually — 42.6x CBU's $929M. CBU is the more profitable business, keeping 22.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BK's 11.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $929M | $14.3B | $22.0B | $1.1B | $39.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $317M | $3.2B | $4.3B | $323M | $8.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $210M | $1.7B | $3.0B | $224M | $5.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $218M | $4.7B | -$6.1B | $230M | $1.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.4% | +56.5% | +58.5% | +71.0% | +46.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +31.4% | +16.3% | +15.5% | +25.5% | +14.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.7% | +12.1% | +12.2% | +20.0% | +11.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.1% | +38.2% | -64.3% | +20.7% | -2.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.7% | +7.1% | +23.0% | +5.4% | +25.3% |
Valuation Metrics
TRMK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.1x trailing earnings, TRMK trades at a 46% valuation discount to BK's 22.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TRMK offers better value at 1.50x vs BK's 4.37x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.4B | $29.7B | $42.0B | $2.6B | $89.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.8B | -$15.0B | -$37.3B | $3.1B | $33.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.03x | 18.31x | 18.12x | 12.13x | 22.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.53x | 14.80x | 11.99x | 11.50x | 14.92x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.05x | 1.86x | 2.05x | 1.50x | 4.37x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.97x | -4.68x | -9.33x | 9.49x | 4.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.61x | 2.07x | 1.91x | 2.36x | 2.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.78x | 2.33x | 1.78x | 1.28x | 2.34x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.37x | 5.43x | — | 11.39x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CBU leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NTRS delivers a 13.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $11 for TRMK. CBU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STT's 1.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRMK scores 7/9 vs STT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.0% | +13.4% | +10.8% | +10.8% | +11.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +1.0% | +0.8% | +1.2% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.9% | +6.0% | +4.6% | +7.1% | +5.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.0% | +9.0% | +4.6% | +3.2% | +6.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.37x | 1.27x | 1.45x | 0.53x | 1.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $445M | -$44.7B | -$79.3B | $448M | -$56.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $302M | $61.1B | $116.1B | $668M | $101.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $747M | $16.4B | $36.8B | $1.1B | $45.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.51x | 0.38x | 0.42x | 0.75x | 0.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BK five years ago would be worth $26,864 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,990 for CBU. Over the past 12 months, NTRS leads with a +66.6% total return vs CBU's +17.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BK at 48.7% vs CBU's 13.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.6% | +15.5% | +16.6% | +15.5% | +12.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +17.5% | +66.6% | +66.2% | +32.5% | +58.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.8% | +131.7% | +128.4% | +118.5% | +228.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.1% | +46.7% | +86.2% | +47.6% | +168.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +107.2% | +170.2% | +186.8% | +127.7% | +267.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.4% | +32.3% | +31.7% | +29.8% | +48.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TRMK and BK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BK is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STT's 1.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRMK currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs NTRS's 92.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.88x | 1.14x | 1.19x | 0.94x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $67.50 | $173.19 | $156.18 | $45.99 | $139.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $51.12 | $97.00 | $90.94 | $33.39 | $82.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.5% | +92.4% | +95.3% | +97.6% | +93.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.1 | 59.4 | 63.9 | 56.0 | 60.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 220K | 1.1M | 2.0M | 392K | 3.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CBU and BK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CBU as "Hold", NTRS as "Hold", STT as "Buy", TRMK as "Hold", BK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.8% upside for STT (target: $160) vs -3.9% for NTRS (target: $154). For income investors, CBU offers the higher dividend yield at 2.73% vs BK's 1.38%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $68.50 | $153.75 | $160.44 | $45.50 | $139.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 35 | 37 | 9 | 35 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | +2.0% | +2.3% | +2.2% | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.74 | $3.14 | $3.42 | $0.97 | $1.80 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +4.3% | +6.9% | +3.0% | +3.4% |
CBU leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TRMK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CBU vs NTRS vs STT vs TRMK vs BK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CBU or NTRS or STT or TRMK or BK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger pick with 34.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 9% for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS). Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate State Street Corporation (STT) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CBU or NTRS or STT or TRMK or BK?
On trailing P/E, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the cheapest at 12.
1x versus The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation at 22. 5x. On forward P/E, Trustmark Corporation is actually cheaper at 11. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: State Street Corporation wins at 1. 36x versus The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation's 2. 89x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CBU or NTRS or STT or TRMK or BK?
Over the past 5 years, The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BK) delivered a total return of +168.
6%, compared to -10. 1% for Community Bank System, Inc. (CBU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BK returned +267. 1% versus CBU's +107. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CBU or NTRS or STT or TRMK or BK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
83β versus State Street Corporation's 1. 19β — meaning STT is approximately 44% more volatile than BK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Community Bank System, Inc. (CBU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 145% for State Street Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CBU or NTRS or STT or TRMK or BK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is pulling ahead at 34.
8% versus -9. 9% for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation grew EPS 49. 1% year-over-year, compared to -10. 5% for Northern Trust Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CBU or NTRS or STT or TRMK or BK?
Community Bank System, Inc.
(CBU) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 7% net margin versus 11. 5% for The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation — meaning it keeps 22. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CBU leads at 31. 4% versus 14. 8% for BK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CBU leads at 73. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CBU or NTRS or STT or TRMK or BK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, State Street Corporation (STT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 36x versus The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation's 2. 89x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) trades at 11. 5x forward P/E versus 14. 9x for The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation — 3. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STT: 7. 8% to $160. 44.
08Which pays a better dividend — CBU or NTRS or STT or TRMK or BK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Community Bank System, Inc. (CBU) offers the highest yield at 2. 7%, versus 1. 4% for The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BK).
09Is CBU or NTRS or STT or TRMK or BK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
83), 1. 4% yield, +267. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BK: +267. 1%, STT: +186. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CBU and NTRS and STT and TRMK and BK?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CBU is a small-cap deep-value stock; NTRS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; STT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; TRMK is a small-cap high-growth stock; BK is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.