Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CCG vs QFIN vs FINV vs BIDU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Internet Content & Information
CCG vs QFIN vs FINV vs BIDU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $58M | $3.75B | $2.90B | $48.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.18B | $17.17B | $13.07B | $130.46B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-32M | $6.89B | $2.80B | $9.00B |
| Gross Margin | 5.0% | 61.8% | 79.3% | 44.7% |
| Operating Margin | -1.1% | 43.9% | 19.4% | -2.6% |
| Forward P/E | 59.5x | 0.5x | 0.6x | 2.6x |
| Total Debt | $35M | $1.65B | $34M | $79.32B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $117M | $4.45B | $4.67B | $24.83B |
CCG vs QFIN vs FINV vs BIDU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cheche Group Inc. (CCG) | 100 | 6.2 | -93.8% |
| Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) | 100 | 86.0 | -14.0% |
| FinVolution Group (FINV) | 100 | 102.8 | +2.8% |
| Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) | 100 | 104.1 | +4.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CCG vs QFIN vs FINV vs BIDU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CCG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 5.2%, EPS growth 96.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.0%
- Beta 0.49 vs BIDU's 1.41, lower leverage
QFIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 16.1% 10Y total return vs FINV's -47.5%
- PEG 0.02 vs FINV's 0.19
- 5.4% NII/revenue growth vs BIDU's -1.1%
- Lower P/E (0.5x vs 2.6x), PEG 0.02 vs 0.04
FINV is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.12, yield 4.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 4.31x
- Beta 1.12, yield 4.8%, current ratio 4.31x
BIDU is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +61.3% vs QFIN's -63.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.4% NII/revenue growth vs BIDU's -1.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.5x vs 2.6x), PEG 0.02 vs 0.04 | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.5% margin vs CCG's -1.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.49 vs BIDU's 1.41, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 9.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FINV's 4.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +61.3% vs QFIN's -63.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.2% ROA vs CCG's -2.5%, ROIC 23.1% vs -22.8% |
CCG vs QFIN vs FINV vs BIDU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CCG vs QFIN vs FINV vs BIDU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
QFIN leads in 3 of 6 categories
FINV leads 1 • CCG leads 0 • BIDU leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BIDU is the larger business by revenue, generating $130.5B annually — 41.0x CCG's $3.2B. QFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 36.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CCG's -1.0%. On growth, BIDU holds the edge at -7.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.2B | $17.2B | $13.1B | $130.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$32M | $8.0B | $3.3B | $4.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$32M | $6.9B | $2.8B | $9.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9M | $10.8B | $1.5B | -$15.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | +61.8% | +79.3% | +44.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.1% | +43.9% | +19.4% | -2.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.0% | +36.5% | +18.2% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.3% | +53.5% | +21.9% | -12.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.8% | — | — | -7.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +48.4% | -9.7% | -2.1% | -2.6% |
Valuation Metrics
QFIN leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.1x trailing earnings, QFIN trades at a 85% valuation discount to BIDU's 14.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), QFIN offers better value at 0.11x vs FINV's 1.13x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $58M | $3.8B | $2.9B | $48.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $46M | $3.3B | $2.2B | $56.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.39x | 2.15x | 3.85x | 14.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 59.54x | 0.47x | 0.65x | 2.58x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.11x | 1.13x | 0.24x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 2.99x | 5.76x | 10.79x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.11x | 1.49x | 1.51x | 2.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.10x | 0.56x | 0.59x | 1.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 2.78x | 6.89x | 25.41x |
Profitability & Efficiency
QFIN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QFIN delivers a 28.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $-9 for CCG. FINV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BIDU's 0.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), QFIN scores 7/9 vs CCG's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.4% | +28.8% | +17.4% | +3.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.5% | +12.2% | +11.2% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -22.8% | +23.1% | +12.9% | +4.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -16.6% | +35.6% | +13.8% | +6.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.07x | 0.00x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$82M | -$2.8B | -$4.6B | $54.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $117M | $4.5B | $4.7B | $24.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $35M | $1.7B | $34M | $79.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -83.35x | — | — | 9.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FINV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FINV five years ago would be worth $9,769 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $206 for CCG. Over the past 12 months, BIDU leads with a +61.3% total return vs QFIN's -63.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FINV at 13.2% vs CCG's -72.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -17.7% | -22.5% | +3.6% | -6.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -21.5% | -63.6% | -35.3% | +61.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.9% | +0.6% | +45.1% | +14.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.9% | -19.1% | -2.3% | -27.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.9% | +16.1% | -47.5% | -17.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -72.6% | +0.2% | +13.2% | +4.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CCG and BIDU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CCG is the less volatile stock with a 0.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BIDU's 1.41 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BIDU currently trades 84.6% from its 52-week high vs QFIN's 28.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.49x | 1.20x | 1.12x | 1.41x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.54 | $47.00 | $10.90 | $165.30 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.65 | $12.30 | $4.50 | $81.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.3% | +28.1% | +47.0% | +84.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.3 | 53.7 | 58.4 | 69.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 92K | 1.4M | 1.3M | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — QFIN and FINV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CCG as "Buy", QFIN as "Buy", FINV as "Buy", BIDU as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 113.1% upside for QFIN (target: $28) vs 10.6% for BIDU (target: $155). For income investors, QFIN offers the higher dividend yield at 9.26% vs FINV's 4.80%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $28.15 | $5.94 | $154.70 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 4 | 4 | 53 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +9.3% | +4.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 4 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $8.32 | $1.67 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +11.6% | +3.3% | +1.9% |
QFIN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). FINV leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
CCG vs QFIN vs FINV vs BIDU: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CCG or QFIN or FINV or BIDU a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Qfin Holdings, Inc.
(QFIN) is the stronger pick with 5. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 1% for Baidu, Inc. (BIDU). Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) offers the better valuation at 2. 1x trailing P/E (0. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cheche Group Inc. (CCG) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CCG or QFIN or FINV or BIDU?
On trailing P/E, Qfin Holdings, Inc.
(QFIN) is the cheapest at 2. 1x versus Baidu, Inc. at 14. 4x. On forward P/E, Qfin Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 0. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Qfin Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 02x versus FinVolution Group's 0. 19x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CCG or QFIN or FINV or BIDU?
Over the past 5 years, FinVolution Group (FINV) delivered a total return of -2.
3%, compared to -97. 9% for Cheche Group Inc. (CCG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: QFIN returned +16. 1% versus CCG's -97. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CCG or QFIN or FINV or BIDU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cheche Group Inc.
(CCG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 49β versus Baidu, Inc. 's 1. 41β — meaning BIDU is approximately 189% more volatile than CCG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FinVolution Group (FINV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 28% for Baidu, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CCG or QFIN or FINV or BIDU?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Qfin Holdings, Inc.
(QFIN) is pulling ahead at 5. 4% versus -1. 1% for Baidu, Inc. (BIDU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cheche Group Inc. grew EPS 96. 5% year-over-year, compared to 8. 4% for FinVolution Group. Over a 3-year CAGR, CCG leads at 26. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CCG or QFIN or FINV or BIDU?
Qfin Holdings, Inc.
(QFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus -1. 8% for Cheche Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QFIN leads at 43. 9% versus -1. 9% for CCG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FINV leads at 79. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CCG or QFIN or FINV or BIDU more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 02x versus FinVolution Group's 0. 19x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) trades at 0. 5x forward P/E versus 59. 5x for Cheche Group Inc. — 59. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for QFIN: 113. 1% to $28. 15.
08Which pays a better dividend — CCG or QFIN or FINV or BIDU?
In this comparison, QFIN (9.
3% yield), FINV (4. 8% yield) pay a dividend. CCG, BIDU do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CCG or QFIN or FINV or BIDU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cheche Group Inc.
(CCG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 49)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CCG: -97. 9%, BIDU: -17. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CCG and QFIN and FINV and BIDU?
These companies operate in different sectors (CCG (Communication Services) and QFIN (Financial Services) and FINV (Financial Services) and BIDU (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CCG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; QFIN is a small-cap deep-value stock; FINV is a small-cap deep-value stock; BIDU is a mid-cap deep-value stock. QFIN, FINV pay a dividend while CCG, BIDU do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.