Renewable Utilities
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CEG vs VST vs NRG vs TLN vs CWEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Independent Power Producers
Independent Power Producers
Independent Power Producers
Renewable Utilities
CEG vs VST vs NRG vs TLN vs CWEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Renewable Utilities | Independent Power Producers | Independent Power Producers | Independent Power Producers | Renewable Utilities |
| Market Cap | $97.23B | $52.15B | $30.41B | $17.85B | $7.84B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $25.53B | $17.20B | $32.38B | $3.02B | $1.43B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.32B | $2.19B | $239M | $-21M | $169M |
| Gross Margin | 75.8% | 6.5% | 14.5% | 35.2% | 50.3% |
| Operating Margin | 12.1% | 7.6% | 3.2% | 8.1% | 12.0% |
| Forward P/E | 26.8x | 18.0x | 15.5x | 17.8x | 26.9x |
| Total Debt | $8.99B | $20.39B | $16.77B | $6.81B | $10.20B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.75B | $816M | $4.74B | $752M | $818M |
CEG vs VST vs NRG vs TLN vs CWEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Constellation Energ… (CEG) | 100 | 340.0 | +240.0% |
| Vistra Corp. (VST) | 100 | 586.8 | +486.8% |
| NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG) | 100 | 379.1 | +279.1% |
| Talen Energy Corpor… (TLN) | 100 | 778.8 | +678.8% |
| Clearway Energy, In… (CWEN) | 100 | 133.5 | +33.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CEG vs VST vs NRG vs TLN vs CWEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CEG is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.44, Low D/E 60.5%, current ratio 1.53x
VST has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding.
- 9.4% 10Y total return vs TLN's 7.4%
- 12.7% margin vs TLN's -0.7%
- 7.4% ROA vs TLN's -0.2%, ROIC 4.3% vs -0.9%
NRG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 9.2%, EPS growth -19.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.9%
- 1.5% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs CWEN's 7.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
TLN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 21.8% revenue growth vs VST's -12.4%
- +68.8% vs VST's +11.1%
CWEN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.54, yield 7.9%
- PEG 0.59 vs VST's 1.60
- Beta 0.54, yield 7.9%, current ratio 1.13x
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.8% revenue growth vs VST's -12.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.7% margin vs TLN's -0.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs NRG's 1.84, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs CWEN's 7.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +68.8% vs VST's +11.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.4% ROA vs TLN's -0.2%, ROIC 4.3% vs -0.9% |
CEG vs VST vs NRG vs TLN vs CWEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CEG vs VST vs NRG vs TLN vs CWEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CEG leads in 1 of 6 categories
TLN leads 1 • CWEN leads 1 • VST leads 0 • NRG leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CEG and TLN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NRG is the larger business by revenue, generating $32.4B annually — 22.7x CWEN's $1.4B. VST is the more profitable business, keeping 12.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TLN's -0.7%. On growth, TLN holds the edge at +78.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $25.5B | $17.2B | $32.4B | $3.0B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.7B | $3.1B | $3.1B | $396M | $1.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.3B | $2.2B | $239M | -$21M | $169M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.3B | $2.0B | -$7.7B | -$2.8B | $268M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.8% | +6.5% | +14.5% | +35.2% | +50.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.1% | +7.6% | +3.2% | +8.1% | +12.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.1% | +12.7% | +0.7% | -0.7% | +11.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | +11.7% | -23.7% | -93.4% | +18.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.4% | +9.1% | +19.5% | +78.9% | +21.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -49.1% | +100.0% | -85.6% | +145.2% | -35.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NRG and CWEN each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.9x trailing earnings, CWEN trades at a 61% valuation discount to VST's 69.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CWEN offers better value at 0.59x vs VST's 6.23x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $97.2B | $52.2B | $30.4B | $17.8B | $7.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $102.5B | $71.7B | $42.4B | $23.9B | $17.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 42.06x | 69.70x | 35.34x | -81.53x | 26.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 26.83x | 17.95x | 15.46x | 17.76x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.29x | 6.23x | 2.50x | — | 0.59x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 25.17x | 16.74x | 11.15x | 114.93x | 16.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.81x | 3.07x | 0.99x | 7.07x | 5.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.58x | 10.24x | 16.78x | 16.33x | 0.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 75.49x | 404.28x | 39.70x | — | 21.24x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CEG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VST delivers a 57.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $58 in annual profit, vs $-2 for TLN. CEG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.61x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NRG's 9.97x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CEG scores 7/9 vs CWEN's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.6% | +57.8% | +8.8% | -1.7% | +3.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.1% | +7.4% | +0.8% | -0.2% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.9% | +4.3% | +10.6% | -0.9% | +0.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.5% | +4.5% | +10.2% | -0.9% | +1.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.61x | 3.99x | 9.97x | 6.23x | 1.72x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.2B | $19.6B | $12.0B | $6.1B | $9.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.7B | $816M | $4.7B | $752M | $818M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9.0B | $20.4B | $16.8B | $6.8B | $10.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.04x | 1.95x | 2.40x | 0.45x | 0.55x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TLN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VST five years ago would be worth $98,469 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,246 for CWEN. Over the past 12 months, TLN leads with a +68.8% total return vs VST's +11.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TLN at 103.3% vs CWEN's 12.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.9% | -6.6% | -14.1% | -1.6% | +13.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +16.7% | +11.1% | +21.0% | +68.8% | +39.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +300.9% | +570.1% | +369.0% | +739.9% | +43.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +653.2% | +884.7% | +330.5% | +739.9% | +72.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +653.2% | +942.3% | +870.6% | +739.9% | +237.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +58.9% | +88.5% | +67.4% | +103.3% | +12.8% |
Risk & Volatility
CWEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CWEN is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NRG's 1.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CWEN currently trades 91.8% from its 52-week high vs VST's 70.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.44x | 1.56x | 1.84x | 1.53x | 0.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $412.70 | $219.82 | $189.96 | $451.28 | $41.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $243.30 | $133.73 | $115.48 | $220.59 | $27.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.4% | +70.1% | +74.6% | +86.5% | +91.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.7 | 49.5 | 44.4 | 69.9 | 45.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.8M | 4.1M | 2.8M | 717K | 828K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NRG and CWEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CEG as "Buy", VST as "Buy", NRG as "Buy", TLN as "Buy", CWEN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 47.7% upside for VST (target: $228) vs 14.5% for CWEN (target: $44). For income investors, CWEN offers the higher dividend yield at 7.89% vs CEG's 0.50%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $405.33 | $227.60 | $194.00 | $475.80 | $43.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 21 | 26 | 12 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.5% | +0.6% | +1.5% | — | +7.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.55 | $0.90 | $2.07 | — | $3.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | +2.0% | +4.6% | +0.6% | 0.0% |
CEG leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). TLN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
CEG vs VST vs NRG vs TLN vs CWEN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CEG or VST or NRG or TLN or CWEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Talen Energy Corporation (TLN) is the stronger pick with 21.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 4% for Vistra Corp. (VST). Clearway Energy, Inc. (CWEN) offers the better valuation at 26. 9x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Constellation Energy Corporation (CEG) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CEG or VST or NRG or TLN or CWEN?
On trailing P/E, Clearway Energy, Inc.
(CWEN) is the cheapest at 26. 9x versus Vistra Corp. at 69. 7x. On forward P/E, NRG Energy, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Constellation Energy Corporation wins at 0. 82x versus Vistra Corp. 's 1. 60x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CEG or VST or NRG or TLN or CWEN?
Over the past 5 years, Vistra Corp.
(VST) delivered a total return of +884. 7%, compared to +72. 5% for Clearway Energy, Inc. (CWEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VST returned +942. 3% versus CWEN's +237. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CEG or VST or NRG or TLN or CWEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Clearway Energy, Inc.
(CWEN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 54β versus NRG Energy, Inc. 's 1. 84β — meaning NRG is approximately 241% more volatile than CWEN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Constellation Energy Corporation (CEG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 61% versus 10% for NRG Energy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CEG or VST or NRG or TLN or CWEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Talen Energy Corporation (TLN) is pulling ahead at 21.
8% versus -12. 4% for Vistra Corp. (VST). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Clearway Energy, Inc. grew EPS 89. 3% year-over-year, compared to -127. 1% for Talen Energy Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWEN leads at 6. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CEG or VST or NRG or TLN or CWEN?
Clearway Energy, Inc.
(CWEN) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 8% net margin versus -8. 7% for Talen Energy Corporation — meaning it keeps 11. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CWEN leads at 12. 3% versus -2. 8% for TLN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CEG leads at 75. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CEG or VST or NRG or TLN or CWEN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Constellation Energy Corporation (CEG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 82x versus Vistra Corp. 's 1. 60x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG) trades at 15. 5x forward P/E versus 26. 8x for Constellation Energy Corporation — 11. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VST: 47. 7% to $227. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — CEG or VST or NRG or TLN or CWEN?
In this comparison, CWEN (7.
9% yield), NRG (1. 5% yield), VST (0. 6% yield), CEG (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. TLN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CEG or VST or NRG or TLN or CWEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Clearway Energy, Inc.
(CWEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 54), 7. 9% yield, +237. 4% 10Y return). Talen Energy Corporation (TLN) carries a higher beta of 1. 53 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CWEN: +237. 4%, TLN: +739. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CEG and VST and NRG and TLN and CWEN?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CEG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; VST is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NRG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TLN is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CWEN is a small-cap income-oriented stock. VST, NRG, CWEN pay a dividend while CEG, TLN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.