Restaurants
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CMG vs MCD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
CMG vs MCD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $42.60B | $202.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12.14B | $26.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.45B | $8.41B |
| Gross Margin | 36.1% | 57.4% |
| Operating Margin | 15.8% | 46.1% |
| Forward P/E | 28.8x | 21.5x |
| Total Debt | $9.85B | $51.95B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $351M | $1.08B |
CMG vs MCD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chipotle Mexican Gr… (CMG) | 100 | 162.9 | +62.9% |
| McDonald's Corporat… (MCD) | 100 | 152.5 | +52.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CMG vs MCD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CMG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 5.4%, EPS growth 2.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.4%
- 276.8% 10Y total return vs MCD's 158.5%
- PEG 0.81 vs MCD's 2.82
MCD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 26 yrs, beta 0.11, yield 2.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.11, current ratio 1.19x
- Beta 0.11, yield 2.4%, current ratio 1.19x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.4% revenue growth vs MCD's 1.7% | |
| Value | PEG 0.81 vs 2.82 | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.0% margin vs CMG's 12.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.11 vs CMG's 1.11 | |
| Dividends | 2.4% yield; 26-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -8.0% vs CMG's -35.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.0% ROA vs MCD's 13.9%, ROIC 15.3% vs 19.3% |
CMG vs MCD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CMG vs MCD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCD is the larger business by revenue, generating $26.3B annually — 2.2x CMG's $12.1B. MCD is the more profitable business, keeping 32.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CMG's 12.0%. On growth, CMG holds the edge at +7.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12.1B | $26.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.3B | $14.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.5B | $8.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.5B | $7.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.1% | +57.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | +46.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.0% | +32.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.4% | +28.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.4% | +3.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -17.9% | +1.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CMG and MCD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.9x trailing earnings, MCD trades at a 13% valuation discount to CMG's 28.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CMG offers better value at 0.81x vs MCD's 3.26x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $42.6B | $202.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $52.1B | $253.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 28.69x | 24.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 28.79x | 21.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.81x | 3.26x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.94x | 18.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.57x | 7.81x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 15.51x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 29.43x | 30.32x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CMG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MCD scores 7/9 vs CMG's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +48.4% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +16.0% | +13.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.3% | +19.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +25.4% | +23.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.48x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $9.5B | $50.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $351M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9.8B | $51.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 7.88x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MCD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MCD five years ago would be worth $13,445 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,585 for CMG. Over the past 12 months, MCD leads with a -8.0% total return vs CMG's -35.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MCD at 0.9% vs CMG's -7.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.8% | -5.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -35.1% | -8.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.6% | +2.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.9% | +34.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +276.8% | +158.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.0% | +0.9% |
Risk & Volatility
MCD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MCD is the less volatile stock with a 0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMG's 1.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MCD currently trades 83.1% from its 52-week high vs CMG's 56.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.11x | 0.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $58.42 | $341.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.75 | $282.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +56.0% | +83.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.1 | 31.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 14.5M | 2.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CMG as "Buy" and MCD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 33.7% upside for CMG (target: $44) vs 24.0% for MCD (target: $352). MCD is the only dividend payer here at 2.37% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $43.72 | $352.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 67 | 62 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 26 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $6.75 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.7% | +1.4% |
MCD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). CMG leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
CMG vs MCD: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CMG or MCD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
(CMG) is the stronger pick with 5. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 7% for McDonald's Corporation (MCD). McDonald's Corporation (MCD) offers the better valuation at 24. 9x trailing P/E (21. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) a "Buy" — based on 67 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CMG or MCD?
On trailing P/E, McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the cheapest at 24.
9x versus Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. at 28. 7x. On forward P/E, McDonald's Corporation is actually cheaper at 21. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. wins at 0. 81x versus McDonald's Corporation's 2. 82x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CMG or MCD?
Over the past 5 years, McDonald's Corporation (MCD) delivered a total return of +34.
4%, compared to +15. 9% for Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CMG returned +276. 8% versus MCD's +158. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CMG or MCD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
11β versus Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. 's 1. 11β — meaning CMG is approximately 900% more volatile than MCD relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — CMG or MCD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
(CMG) is pulling ahead at 5. 4% versus 1. 7% for McDonald's Corporation (MCD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. grew EPS 2. 7% year-over-year, compared to -1. 5% for McDonald's Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CMG leads at 11. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CMG or MCD?
McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the more profitable company, earning 31.
7% net margin versus 12. 9% for Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MCD leads at 45. 2% versus 16. 9% for CMG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MCD leads at 56. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CMG or MCD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus McDonald's Corporation's 2. 82x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, McDonald's Corporation (MCD) trades at 21. 5x forward P/E versus 28. 8x for Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. — 7. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CMG: 33. 7% to $43. 72.
08Which pays a better dividend — CMG or MCD?
In this comparison, MCD (2.
4% yield) pays a dividend. CMG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CMG or MCD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
11), 2. 4% yield, +158. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MCD: +158. 5%, CMG: +276. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CMG and MCD?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
MCD pays a dividend while CMG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.