Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CRWS vs SNBR vs PRPL vs CULP vs LCUT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Apparel - Manufacturers
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
CRWS vs SNBR vs PRPL vs CULP vs LCUT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Apparel - Manufacturers | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances |
| Market Cap | $30M | $69M | $56M | $46M | $163M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $86M | $1M | $505M | $201M | $651M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-10M | $-132K | $-35M | $-7M | $-28M |
| Gross Margin | 23.8% | 59.0% | 40.9% | 13.0% | 37.5% |
| Operating Margin | -13.7% | -3.3% | -6.1% | 1.0% | -2.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | — | 14.7x |
| Total Debt | $32M | $354M | $204M | $18M | $244M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $521K | $2M | $24M | $6M | $4M |
CRWS vs SNBR vs PRPL vs CULP vs LCUT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crown Crafts, Inc. (CRWS) | 100 | 56.5 | -43.5% |
| Sleep Number Corpor… (SNBR) | 100 | 9.7 | -90.3% |
| Purple Innovation, … (PRPL) | 100 | 3.6 | -96.4% |
| Culp, Inc. (CULP) | 100 | 46.7 | -53.3% |
| Lifetime Brands, In… (LCUT) | 100 | 126.4 | +26.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CRWS vs SNBR vs PRPL vs CULP vs LCUT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CRWS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 11.4%
- Rev growth -0.4%, EPS growth -287.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.0%
- -22.3% 10Y total return vs LCUT's -49.0%
- Beta 0.74, yield 11.4%, current ratio 3.57x
SNBR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for efficiency.
- -0.0% ROA vs CRWS's -12.7%, ROIC -0.0% vs 4.5%
Among these 5 stocks, PRPL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CULP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 30.6%, current ratio 1.78x
- -3.6% margin vs CRWS's -11.5%
- Beta 0.71 vs SNBR's 2.70
LCUT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +123.7% vs SNBR's -56.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -0.4% revenue growth vs SNBR's -99.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | -3.6% margin vs CRWS's -11.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs SNBR's 2.70 | |
| Dividends | 11.4% yield, vs LCUT's 2.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +123.7% vs SNBR's -56.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.0% ROA vs CRWS's -12.7%, ROIC -0.0% vs 4.5% |
CRWS vs SNBR vs PRPL vs CULP vs LCUT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CRWS vs SNBR vs PRPL vs CULP vs LCUT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CRWS leads in 1 of 6 categories
CULP leads 1 • LCUT leads 1 • SNBR leads 0 • PRPL leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CRWS and CULP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LCUT is the larger business by revenue, generating $651M annually — 461.5x SNBR's $1M. CULP is the more profitable business, keeping -3.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRWS's -11.5%. On growth, PRPL holds the edge at +35.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $86M | $1M | $505M | $201M | $651M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$9M | $72M | -$12M | $3M | $3M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$10M | -$132,000 | -$35M | -$7M | -$28M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7M | -$21M | -$15M | -$11M | $18M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.8% | +59.0% | +40.9% | +13.0% | +37.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -13.7% | -3.3% | -6.1% | +1.0% | -2.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -11.5% | -9.4% | -7.0% | -3.6% | -4.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | -14.6% | -3.0% | -5.7% | +2.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.1% | -3.8% | +35.1% | -8.2% | +2.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.4% | -11.2% | -55.6% | +18.2% | -15.8% |
Valuation Metrics
CRWS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CRWS's 5.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LCUT's 8.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $30M | $69M | $56M | $46M | $163M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $61M | $422M | $236M | $58M | $402M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.08x | -0.53x | -1.07x | -2.35x | -5.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 14.67x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.78x | — | — | — | 8.62x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.34x | 49.07x | 0.12x | 0.21x | 0.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.73x | — | — | 0.78x | 0.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.04x | — | — | — | 50.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CULP leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CULP delivers a -13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-13 in annual profit, vs $-26 for CRWS. CULP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.31x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LCUT's 1.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PRPL scores 4/9 vs SNBR's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -25.7% | — | — | -13.3% | -14.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.7% | -0.0% | -12.1% | -5.9% | -4.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.5% | -0.0% | -15.8% | -9.6% | +4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.4% | — | -15.8% | -10.6% | +5.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.80x | — | — | 0.31x | 1.20x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $31M | $353M | $180M | $12M | $239M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $521,000 | $2M | $24M | $6M | $4M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $32M | $354M | $204M | $18M | $244M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.82x | -780.16x | -0.32x | -39.03x | -1.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LCUT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CRWS five years ago would be worth $6,020 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $169 for PRPL. Over the past 12 months, LCUT leads with a +123.7% total return vs SNBR's -56.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LCUT at 15.1% vs SNBR's -49.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.4% | -64.7% | -28.6% | +2.6% | +87.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.7% | -56.8% | -37.3% | -9.1% | +123.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.8% | -87.2% | -82.8% | -30.4% | +52.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.8% | -97.3% | -98.3% | -72.6% | -48.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.3% | -87.6% | -94.8% | -76.0% | -49.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.7% | -49.6% | -44.4% | -11.4% | +15.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CULP and LCUT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CULP is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SNBR's 2.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LCUT currently trades 87.7% from its 52-week high vs SNBR's 21.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 2.70x | 1.08x | 0.71x | 1.56x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.38 | $13.94 | $1.26 | $4.80 | $8.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.35 | $1.07 | $0.47 | $2.93 | $2.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.0% | +21.7% | +40.8% | +75.0% | +87.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.1 | 53.4 | 36.7 | 66.8 | 42.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 28K | 2.8M | 322K | 29K | 264K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CRWS and CULP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SNBR as "Hold", LCUT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 230.0% upside for SNBR (target: $10) vs -30.5% for LCUT (target: $5). For income investors, CRWS offers the higher dividend yield at 11.41% vs LCUT's 2.42%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | — | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $10.00 | — | — | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 | — | — | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +11.4% | — | — | — | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.32 | — | — | — | $0.17 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.8% | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% |
CRWS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). CULP leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
CRWS vs SNBR vs PRPL vs CULP vs LCUT: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CRWS or SNBR or PRPL or CULP or LCUT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Crown Crafts, Inc.
(CRWS) is the stronger pick with -0. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -99. 9% for Sleep Number Corporation (SNBR). Analysts rate Sleep Number Corporation (SNBR) a "Hold" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CRWS or SNBR or PRPL or CULP or LCUT?
Over the past 5 years, Crown Crafts, Inc.
(CRWS) delivered a total return of -39. 8%, compared to -98. 3% for Purple Innovation, Inc. (PRPL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CRWS returned -22. 3% versus PRPL's -94. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CRWS or SNBR or PRPL or CULP or LCUT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Culp, Inc.
(CULP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 71β versus Sleep Number Corporation's 2. 70β — meaning SNBR is approximately 278% more volatile than CULP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Culp, Inc. (CULP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 31% versus 120% for Lifetime Brands, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CRWS or SNBR or PRPL or CULP or LCUT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Crown Crafts, Inc.
(CRWS) is pulling ahead at -0. 4% versus -99. 9% for Sleep Number Corporation (SNBR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Purple Innovation, Inc. grew EPS 47. 3% year-over-year, compared to -541. 1% for Sleep Number Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CRWS leads at -0. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CRWS or SNBR or PRPL or CULP or LCUT?
Lifetime Brands, Inc.
(LCUT) is the more profitable company, earning -4. 2% net margin versus -11. 0% for Purple Innovation, Inc. — meaning it keeps -4. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CRWS leads at 5. 0% versus -6. 8% for PRPL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SNBR leads at 59. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CRWS or SNBR or PRPL or CULP or LCUT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SNBR: 230.
0% to $10. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — CRWS or SNBR or PRPL or CULP or LCUT?
In this comparison, CRWS (11.
4% yield), LCUT (2. 4% yield) pay a dividend. SNBR, PRPL, CULP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is CRWS or SNBR or PRPL or CULP or LCUT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Crown Crafts, Inc.
(CRWS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 11. 4% yield). Sleep Number Corporation (SNBR) carries a higher beta of 2. 70 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CRWS: -22. 3%, SNBR: -87. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CRWS and SNBR and PRPL and CULP and LCUT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CRWS is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SNBR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRPL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CULP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LCUT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CRWS, LCUT pay a dividend while SNBR, PRPL, CULP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.