REIT - Industrial
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CUBE vs PLD vs PSA vs EXR vs SPG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Retail
CUBE vs PLD vs PSA vs EXR vs SPG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $9.18B | $132.16B | $54.30B | $30.26B | $65.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.13B | $8.74B | $4.86B | $3.38B | $6.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $327M | $3.21B | $1.90B | $974M | $4.61B |
| Gross Margin | 5.8% | 67.7% | 60.6% | 28.4% | 85.7% |
| Operating Margin | 29.5% | 47.0% | 50.8% | 44.1% | 49.9% |
| Forward P/E | 28.4x | 41.4x | 32.4x | 30.8x | 30.3x |
| Total Debt | $3.53B | $31.49B | $10.25B | $14.97B | $29.94B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $1.32B | $318M | $139M | $823M |
CUBE vs PLD vs PSA vs EXR vs SPG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CubeSmart (CUBE) | 100 | 141.4 | +41.4% |
| Prologis, Inc. (PLD) | 100 | 155.5 | +55.5% |
| Public Storage (PSA) | 100 | 152.6 | +52.6% |
| Extra Space Storage… (EXR) | 100 | 148.1 | +48.1% |
| Simon Property Grou… (SPG) | 100 | 349.1 | +249.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CUBE vs PLD vs PSA vs EXR vs SPG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CUBE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 5.2%
- Lower P/E (28.4x vs 30.8x), PEG 2.49 vs 7.09
- 5.2% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs PLD's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
PLD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 259.1% 10Y total return vs EXR's 104.4%
- +39.4% vs CUBE's +0.4%
PSA is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.51 vs PLD's 0.73
EXR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, current ratio 1.28x
- Beta 0.52, yield 4.5%, current ratio 1.28x
SPG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 6.7%, EPS growth 94.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.3%
- PEG 0.96 vs EXR's 7.09
- 6.7% FFO/revenue growth vs EXR's 1.2%
- 72.5% margin vs EXR's 28.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.7% FFO/revenue growth vs EXR's 1.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (28.4x vs 30.8x), PEG 2.49 vs 7.09 | |
| Quality / Margins | 72.5% margin vs EXR's 28.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.51 vs PLD's 0.73 | |
| Dividends | 5.2% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs PLD's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.4% vs CUBE's +0.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.4% ROA vs PLD's 3.3%, ROIC 7.6% vs 3.8% |
CUBE vs PLD vs PSA vs EXR vs SPG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CUBE vs PLD vs PSA vs EXR vs SPG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SPG leads in 2 of 6 categories
CUBE leads 2 • PSA leads 2 • PLD leads 0 • EXR leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLD is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.7B annually — 7.7x CUBE's $1.1B. SPG is the more profitable business, keeping 72.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EXR's 28.8%. On growth, SPG holds the edge at +13.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $8.7B | $4.9B | $3.4B | $6.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $597M | $6.7B | $3.6B | $2.2B | $4.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $327M | $3.2B | $1.9B | $974M | $4.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $611M | $5.2B | $3.1B | $1.8B | $2.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | +67.7% | +60.6% | +28.4% | +85.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.5% | +47.0% | +50.8% | +44.1% | +49.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +28.9% | +36.7% | +39.2% | +28.8% | +72.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +54.0% | +59.3% | +63.1% | +54.6% | +35.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.3% | +8.7% | +2.9% | +9.3% | +13.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.7% | -24.1% | +33.1% | +4.8% | +3.6% |
Valuation Metrics
CUBE leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.2x trailing earnings, SPG trades at a 60% valuation discount to PLD's 35.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SPG offers better value at 0.45x vs EXR's 7.18x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.2B | $132.2B | $54.3B | $30.3B | $65.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.7B | $162.3B | $64.2B | $45.1B | $94.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.57x | 35.49x | 34.33x | 31.21x | 14.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 28.42x | 41.39x | 32.39x | 30.82x | 30.29x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.41x | 3.28x | 4.61x | 7.18x | 0.45x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.97x | 23.20x | 18.86x | 20.46x | 20.31x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.17x | 16.11x | 11.26x | 8.96x | 10.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.32x | 2.32x | 5.82x | 2.12x | 9.79x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.19x | 26.90x | 18.74x | 16.54x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PSA leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SPG delivers a 68.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $69 in annual profit, vs $6 for PLD. PLD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.54x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SPG's 4.47x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PLD scores 5/9 vs CUBE's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.7% | +5.6% | +20.3% | +6.7% | +68.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.9% | +3.3% | +9.4% | +3.3% | +11.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.5% | +3.8% | +8.9% | +3.9% | +7.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.3% | +4.8% | +11.6% | +5.4% | +9.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.27x | 0.54x | 1.10x | 1.05x | 4.47x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.5B | $30.2B | $9.9B | $14.8B | $29.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $1.3B | $318M | $139M | $823M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.5B | $31.5B | $10.3B | $15.0B | $29.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.90x | 5.27x | 6.88x | 2.68x | 3.26x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SPG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SPG five years ago would be worth $19,142 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,804 for CUBE. Over the past 12 months, PLD leads with a +39.4% total return vs CUBE's +0.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SPG at 27.9% vs CUBE's 0.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.7% | +11.1% | +20.8% | +10.6% | +10.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.4% | +39.4% | +7.1% | +1.7% | +30.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.0% | +20.8% | +16.1% | +3.7% | +109.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.0% | +37.7% | +35.4% | +18.1% | +91.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +74.2% | +259.1% | +56.8% | +104.4% | +28.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | 0.0% | +6.5% | +5.1% | +1.2% | +27.9% |
Risk & Volatility
PSA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PSA is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLD's 0.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PSA currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs CUBE's 91.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.53x | 0.73x | 0.51x | 0.52x | 0.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $44.13 | $145.44 | $313.51 | $155.19 | $208.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.09 | $103.02 | $256.54 | $125.71 | $155.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.2% | +97.8% | +98.7% | +92.3% | +96.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.3 | 58.4 | 59.2 | 57.1 | 61.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.2M | 3.1M | 1.1M | 1.1M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
CUBE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CUBE as "Hold", PLD as "Buy", PSA as "Hold", EXR as "Hold", SPG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 4.1% upside for EXR (target: $149) vs -2.2% for SPG (target: $197). For income investors, CUBE offers the higher dividend yield at 5.16% vs PLD's 2.63%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $41.50 | $144.43 | $304.82 | $149.13 | $197.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 42 | 36 | 28 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.2% | +2.6% | +4.2% | +4.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 16 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.08 | $3.74 | $13.09 | $6.49 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | +0.0% | 0.0% | +0.5% | 0.0% |
SPG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). CUBE leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
CUBE vs PLD vs PSA vs EXR vs SPG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CUBE or PLD or PSA or EXR or SPG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Simon Property Group, Inc.
(SPG) is the stronger pick with 6. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 2% for Extra Space Storage Inc. (EXR). Simon Property Group, Inc. (SPG) offers the better valuation at 14. 2x trailing P/E (30. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Prologis, Inc. (PLD) a "Buy" — based on 42 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CUBE or PLD or PSA or EXR or SPG?
On trailing P/E, Simon Property Group, Inc.
(SPG) is the cheapest at 14. 2x versus Prologis, Inc. at 35. 5x. On forward P/E, CubeSmart is actually cheaper at 28. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Simon Property Group, Inc. wins at 0. 96x versus Extra Space Storage Inc. 's 7. 09x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CUBE or PLD or PSA or EXR or SPG?
Over the past 5 years, Simon Property Group, Inc.
(SPG) delivered a total return of +91. 4%, compared to +18. 0% for CubeSmart (CUBE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLD returned +259. 1% versus SPG's +28. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CUBE or PLD or PSA or EXR or SPG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Public Storage (PSA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
51β versus Prologis, Inc. 's 0. 73β — meaning PLD is approximately 43% more volatile than PSA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Prologis, Inc. (PLD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 4% for Simon Property Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CUBE or PLD or PSA or EXR or SPG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Simon Property Group, Inc.
(SPG) is pulling ahead at 6. 7% versus 1. 2% for Extra Space Storage Inc. (EXR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Simon Property Group, Inc. grew EPS 94. 8% year-over-year, compared to -15. 3% for Public Storage. Over a 3-year CAGR, PLD leads at 19. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CUBE or PLD or PSA or EXR or SPG?
Simon Property Group, Inc.
(SPG) is the more profitable company, earning 72. 5% net margin versus 28. 8% for Extra Space Storage Inc. — meaning it keeps 72. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLD leads at 53. 8% versus 40. 0% for CUBE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPG leads at 85. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CUBE or PLD or PSA or EXR or SPG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Simon Property Group, Inc. (SPG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 96x versus Extra Space Storage Inc. 's 7. 09x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, CubeSmart (CUBE) trades at 28. 4x forward P/E versus 41. 4x for Prologis, Inc. — 13. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EXR: 4. 1% to $149. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — CUBE or PLD or PSA or EXR or SPG?
In this comparison, CUBE (5.
2% yield), EXR (4. 5% yield), PSA (4. 2% yield), PLD (2. 6% yield) pay a dividend. SPG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CUBE or PLD or PSA or EXR or SPG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Extra Space Storage Inc.
(EXR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 52), 4. 5% yield, +104. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXR: +104. 4%, SPG: +28. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CUBE and PLD and PSA and EXR and SPG?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CUBE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PLD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PSA is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; EXR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; SPG is a mid-cap deep-value stock. CUBE, PLD, PSA, EXR pay a dividend while SPG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.