REIT - Retail
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CURB vs KRG vs WHLR vs SITC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
CURB vs KRG vs WHLR vs SITC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $2.91B | $5.43B | $122M | $293M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $203M | $827M | $99M | $90M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $33M | $286M | $12M | $176M |
| Gross Margin | 49.6% | 52.3% | 66.8% | -42.1% |
| Operating Margin | 16.4% | 23.0% | 38.8% | -10.8% |
| Forward P/E | 137.0x | 83.4x | — | 1.6x |
| Total Debt | $490M | $3.37B | $484M | $74M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $290M | $37M | $24M | $119M |
CURB vs KRG vs WHLR vs SITC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Curbline Properties… (CURB) | 100 | 114.5 | +14.5% |
| Kite Realty Group T… (KRG) | 100 | 100.3 | +0.3% |
| Wheeler Real Estate… (WHLR) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| SITE Centers Corp. (SITC) | 100 | 30.8 | -69.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CURB vs KRG vs WHLR vs SITC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CURB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 51.3%, EPS growth 289.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.7%
- 44.4% 10Y total return vs KRG's 30.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 25.6%, current ratio 5.11x
- 51.3% FFO/revenue growth vs SITC's -55.6%
KRG plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
WHLR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SITC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.05, yield 100.0%
- Beta 1.05, yield 100.0%, current ratio 36.38x
- Better valuation composite
- 195.7% margin vs WHLR's 11.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 51.3% FFO/revenue growth vs SITC's -55.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 195.7% margin vs WHLR's 11.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs WHLR's 2.39, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs KRG's 4.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.3% vs WHLR's -99.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 32.2% ROA vs CURB's 1.4%, ROIC -0.2% vs 1.3% |
CURB vs KRG vs WHLR vs SITC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CURB vs KRG vs WHLR vs SITC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SITC leads in 2 of 6 categories
KRG leads 1 • CURB leads 0 • WHLR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — WHLR and SITC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KRG is the larger business by revenue, generating $827M annually — 9.2x SITC's $90M. SITC is the more profitable business, keeping 195.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WHLR's 11.9%. On growth, CURB holds the edge at +50.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $203M | $827M | $99M | $90M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $117M | $553M | $62M | $28M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $33M | $286M | $12M | $176M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $121M | $255M | $4M | $133M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.6% | +52.3% | +66.8% | -42.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.4% | +23.0% | +38.8% | -10.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.2% | +34.6% | +11.9% | +195.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +59.5% | +30.9% | +4.0% | +148.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +50.9% | -9.5% | -8.8% | -78.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -66.2% | -45.5% | -100.0% | -66.7% |
Valuation Metrics
SITC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.6x trailing earnings, SITC trades at a 98% valuation discount to CURB's 74.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SITC's 5.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CURB's 30.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.9B | $5.4B | $122M | $293M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $8.8B | $582M | $248M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 74.51x | 19.36x | -0.03x | 1.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 137.00x | 83.38x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.05x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 30.19x | 15.30x | 9.79x | 5.73x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 15.91x | 6.40x | 1.21x | 2.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.52x | 1.80x | 1.29x | 0.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 23.35x | 19.54x | 30.27x | 14.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SITC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SITC delivers a 48.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $2 for CURB. SITC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WHLR's 5.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KRG scores 6/9 vs CURB's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.7% | +8.9% | +12.5% | +48.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | +4.3% | +1.9% | +32.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.3% | +2.3% | +4.9% | -0.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.4% | +3.0% | +6.0% | -0.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.26x | 1.06x | 5.11x | 0.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $200M | $3.3B | $460M | -$45M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $290M | $37M | $24M | $119M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $490M | $3.4B | $484M | $74M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.31x | 3.51x | 1.44x | 12.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KRG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KRG five years ago would be worth $14,678 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for WHLR. Over the past 12 months, SITC leads with a +29.3% total return vs WHLR's -99.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KRG at 13.1% vs WHLR's -99.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.9% | +15.3% | -93.3% | -12.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.8% | +25.1% | -99.8% | +29.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.4% | +44.9% | -100.0% | -64.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.4% | +46.8% | -100.0% | -68.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.4% | +30.9% | +100.2% | -78.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.0% | +13.1% | -99.0% | -29.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CURB and KRG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CURB is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WHLR's 2.39 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KRG currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs WHLR's 0.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.47x | 0.54x | 2.09x | 1.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.94 | $26.82 | $904.50 | $13.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.62 | $20.86 | $1.03 | $5.24 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.3% | +99.6% | +0.1% | +42.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.2 | 64.6 | 22.9 | 54.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 730K | 1.8M | 219K | 777K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KRG and SITC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CURB as "Buy", KRG as "Hold", WHLR as "Buy", SITC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 43.4% upside for SITC (target: $8) vs -5.2% for KRG (target: $25). For income investors, SITC offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs CURB's 2.67%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.50 | $25.33 | — | $8.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 25 | 5 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | +4.1% | +5.4% | +100.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 5 | 1 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.73 | $1.10 | $0.06 | $6.78 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.6% | 0.0% | +0.0% |
SITC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). KRG leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
CURB vs KRG vs WHLR vs SITC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CURB or KRG or WHLR or SITC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Curbline Properties Corp.
(CURB) is the stronger pick with 51. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -55. 6% for SITE Centers Corp. (SITC). SITE Centers Corp. (SITC) offers the better valuation at 1. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Curbline Properties Corp. (CURB) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CURB or KRG or WHLR or SITC?
On trailing P/E, SITE Centers Corp.
(SITC) is the cheapest at 1. 6x versus Curbline Properties Corp. at 74. 5x. On forward P/E, Kite Realty Group Trust is actually cheaper at 83. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CURB or KRG or WHLR or SITC?
Over the past 5 years, Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) delivered a total return of +46.
8%, compared to -100. 0% for Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (WHLR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WHLR returned +100. 2% versus SITC's -78. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CURB or KRG or WHLR or SITC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Curbline Properties Corp.
(CURB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 47β versus Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. 's 2. 09β — meaning WHLR is approximately 341% more volatile than CURB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SITE Centers Corp. (SITC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 5% for Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CURB or KRG or WHLR or SITC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Curbline Properties Corp.
(CURB) is pulling ahead at 51. 3% versus -55. 6% for SITE Centers Corp. (SITC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kite Realty Group Trust grew EPS 73. 6% year-over-year, compared to -65. 3% for SITE Centers Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CURB leads at 35. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CURB or KRG or WHLR or SITC?
SITE Centers Corp.
(SITC) is the more profitable company, earning 144. 4% net margin versus 8. 7% for Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 144. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WHLR leads at 36. 4% versus -1. 3% for SITC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CURB leads at 74. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CURB or KRG or WHLR or SITC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) trades at 83.
4x forward P/E versus 137. 0x for Curbline Properties Corp. — 53. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SITC: 43. 4% to $8. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CURB or KRG or WHLR or SITC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
SITE Centers Corp. (SITC) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 2. 7% for Curbline Properties Corp. (CURB).
09Is CURB or KRG or WHLR or SITC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Curbline Properties Corp.
(CURB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 47), 2. 7% yield). Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (WHLR) carries a higher beta of 2. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CURB: +45. 9%, WHLR: +100. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CURB and KRG and WHLR and SITC?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CURB is a small-cap high-growth stock; KRG is a small-cap income-oriented stock; WHLR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SITC is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.