Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CURB vs KRG vs WHLR vs SITC vs KIM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CURB
Curbline Properties Corp.

REIT - Retail

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.94B
5Y Perf.+14.5%
KRG
Kite Realty Group Trust

REIT - Retail

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.41B
5Y Perf.+0.3%
WHLR
Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.

REIT - Retail

Real EstateNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$413M
5Y Perf.-100.0%
SITC
SITE Centers Corp.

REIT - Retail

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$291M
5Y Perf.-69.2%
KIM
Kimco Realty Corporation

REIT - Retail

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$15.84B
5Y Perf.+1.2%

CURB vs KRG vs WHLR vs SITC vs KIM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CURB logoCURB
KRG logoKRG
WHLR logoWHLR
SITC logoSITC
KIM logoKIM
IndustryREIT - RetailREIT - RetailREIT - RetailREIT - RetailREIT - Retail
Market Cap$2.94B$5.41B$413M$291M$15.84B
Revenue (TTM)$203M$827M$99M$90M$2.16B
Net Income (TTM)$33M$286M$3M$176M$616M
Gross Margin49.6%52.3%51.4%-42.1%54.7%
Operating Margin16.4%23.0%37.0%-10.8%36.1%
Forward P/E137.0x83.4x1.6x30.0x
Total Debt$490M$3.37B$484M$74M$8.64B
Cash & Equiv.$290M$37M$24M$119M$213M

CURB vs KRG vs WHLR vs SITC vs KIMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CURB
KRG
WHLR
SITC
KIM
StockSep 24May 26Return
Curbline Properties… (CURB)100114.5+14.5%
Kite Realty Group T… (KRG)100100.3+0.3%
Wheeler Real Estate… (WHLR)1000.0-100.0%
SITE Centers Corp. (SITC)10030.8-69.2%
Kimco Realty Corpor… (KIM)100101.2+1.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CURB vs KRG vs WHLR vs SITC vs KIM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SITC leads in 5 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Curbline Properties Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CURB
Curbline Properties Corp.
The Real Estate Income Play

CURB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 51.3%, EPS growth 289.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.7%
  • 45.9% 10Y total return vs KRG's 30.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 25.6%, current ratio 5.11x
  • 51.3% FFO/revenue growth vs SITC's -55.6%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
KRG
Kite Realty Group Trust
The REIT Holding

KRG plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: real estate exposure
WHLR
Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.
The REIT Holding

WHLR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: real estate exposure
SITC
SITE Centers Corp.
The Real Estate Income Play

SITC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.06, yield 100.0%
  • Beta 1.06, yield 100.0%, current ratio 36.38x
  • Lower P/E (1.6x vs 30.0x)
  • 195.7% margin vs WHLR's 3.0%
Best for: income & stability and defensive
KIM
Kimco Realty Corporation
The REIT Holding

Among these 5 stocks, KIM doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: real estate exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCURB logoCURB51.3% FFO/revenue growth vs SITC's -55.6%
ValueSITC logoSITCLower P/E (1.6x vs 30.0x)
Quality / MarginsSITC logoSITC195.7% margin vs WHLR's 3.0%
Stability / SafetyCURB logoCURBBeta 0.47 vs WHLR's 2.09, lower leverage
DividendsSITC logoSITC100.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs KRG's 4.1%
Momentum (1Y)SITC logoSITC+29.0% vs WHLR's -99.8%
Efficiency (ROA)SITC logoSITC32.2% ROA vs WHLR's 0.5%, ROIC -0.2% vs 4.9%

CURB vs KRG vs WHLR vs SITC vs KIM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CURBCurbline Properties Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

KRGKite Realty Group Trust
FY 2025
Real Estate, Other
68.8%$9M
Management Service
31.2%$4M
WHLRWheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.
FY 2025
Base Rent
72.5%$69M
Tenant Reimbursements
25.6%$24M
Other Services
1.8%$2M
Lease Termination Fees
0.0%$34,000
SITCSITE Centers Corp.
FY 2025
Asset And Property Management Fees
98.0%$5M
Other
2.0%$100,000
KIMKimco Realty Corporation
FY 2018
Revenues from Rental Properties
75.8%$882M
Reimbursement Income
21.2%$246M
Other Rental Property Income
1.8%$21M
Management and Other Fee Incomes
1.3%$15M

CURB vs KRG vs WHLR vs SITC vs KIM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSITCLAGGINGKIM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — CURB and WHLR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

KIM is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.2B annually — 24.1x SITC's $90M. SITC is the more profitable business, keeping 195.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WHLR's 3.0%. On growth, CURB holds the edge at +50.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCURB logoCURBCurbline Properti…KRG logoKRGKite Realty Group…WHLR logoWHLRWheeler Real Esta…SITC logoSITCSITE Centers Corp.KIM logoKIMKimco Realty Corp…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$203M$827M$99M$90M$2.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$117M$553M$59M$28M$1.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$33M$286M$3M$176M$616M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$121M$255M$6M$8M$844M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+49.6%+52.3%+51.4%-42.1%+54.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+16.4%+23.0%+37.0%-10.8%+36.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+16.2%+34.6%+3.0%+195.7%+28.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+59.5%+30.9%+6.2%+9.2%+39.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+50.9%-9.5%-1.4%-78.3%+4.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-66.2%-45.5%+99.4%-70.2%+27.8%
Evenly matched — CURB and WHLR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SITC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 1.6x trailing earnings, SITC trades at a 98% valuation discount to CURB's 75.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SITC's 5.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CURB's 30.5x.

MetricCURB logoCURBCurbline Properti…KRG logoKRGKite Realty Group…WHLR logoWHLRWheeler Real Esta…SITC logoSITCSITE Centers Corp.KIM logoKIMKimco Realty Corp…
Market CapShares × price$2.9B$5.4B$413M$291M$15.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.1B$8.7B$873M$246M$24.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS75.35x19.30x-0.03x1.64x28.30x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.137.00x83.38x30.04x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.05x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple30.50x15.27x14.68x5.70x17.68x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue16.09x6.38x4.11x2.36x7.40x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.53x1.79x1.29x0.87x1.50x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF23.61x19.48x102.50x14.85x20.51x
SITC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SITC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

SITC delivers a 48.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $2 for CURB. SITC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WHLR's 5.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KRG scores 6/9 vs KIM's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricCURB logoCURBCurbline Properti…KRG logoKRGKite Realty Group…WHLR logoWHLRWheeler Real Esta…SITC logoSITCSITE Centers Corp.KIM logoKIMKimco Realty Corp…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+1.7%+8.9%+3.9%+48.0%+5.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.4%+4.3%+0.5%+32.2%+3.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+1.3%+2.3%+4.9%-0.2%+3.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+1.4%+3.0%+6.0%-0.3%+3.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–956665
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.26x1.06x5.11x0.22x0.82x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$200M$3.3B$460M-$45M$8.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$290M$37M$24M$119M$213M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$490M$3.4B$484M$74M$8.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense4.31x3.51x1.44x12.60x2.46x
SITC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CURB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in KRG five years ago would be worth $14,969 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for WHLR. Over the past 12 months, SITC leads with a +29.0% total return vs WHLR's -99.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CURB at 13.4% vs WHLR's -99.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCURB logoCURBCurbline Properti…KRG logoKRGKite Realty Group…WHLR logoWHLRWheeler Real Esta…SITC logoSITCSITE Centers Corp.KIM logoKIMKimco Realty Corp…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+21.3%+14.9%-93.3%-13.3%+18.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+21.6%+24.3%-99.8%+29.0%+18.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+45.9%+44.4%-100.0%-64.3%+43.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+45.9%+49.7%-100.0%-67.5%+31.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+45.9%+30.6%+100.2%-78.5%+11.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+13.4%+13.0%-99.0%-29.0%+12.8%
CURB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CURB and KRG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CURB is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WHLR's 2.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KRG currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs WHLR's 0.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCURB logoCURBCurbline Properti…KRG logoKRGKite Realty Group…WHLR logoWHLRWheeler Real Esta…SITC logoSITCSITE Centers Corp.KIM logoKIMKimco Realty Corp…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.47x0.54x2.09x1.06x0.54x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$28.94$26.82$904.50$13.10$24.31
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$21.62$20.86$1.03$5.24$19.76
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+96.3%+99.3%+0.1%+42.4%+96.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10052.165.522.452.352.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded733K1.7M216K780K4.9M
Evenly matched — CURB and KRG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — KRG and SITC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CURB as "Buy", KRG as "Hold", WHLR as "Buy", SITC as "Hold", KIM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 44.1% upside for SITC (target: $8) vs -4.9% for KRG (target: $25). For income investors, SITC offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs CURB's 2.64%.

MetricCURB logoCURBCurbline Properti…KRG logoKRGKite Realty Group…WHLR logoWHLRWheeler Real Esta…SITC logoSITCSITE Centers Corp.KIM logoKIMKimco Realty Corp…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$28.50$25.33$8.00$24.25
# AnalystsCovering analysts82553136
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.6%+4.1%+5.4%+100.0%+4.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises15141
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.73$1.10$0.06$6.78$1.06
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+4.6%0.0%0.0%+0.8%
Evenly matched — KRG and SITC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

SITC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CURB leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.

Best OverallSITE Centers Corp. (SITC)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CURB vs KRG vs WHLR vs SITC vs KIM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CURB or KRG or WHLR or SITC or KIM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Curbline Properties Corp.

(CURB) is the stronger pick with 51. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -55. 6% for SITE Centers Corp. (SITC). SITE Centers Corp. (SITC) offers the better valuation at 1. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Curbline Properties Corp. (CURB) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CURB or KRG or WHLR or SITC or KIM?

On trailing P/E, SITE Centers Corp.

(SITC) is the cheapest at 1. 6x versus Curbline Properties Corp. at 75. 4x. On forward P/E, Kimco Realty Corporation is actually cheaper at 30. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CURB or KRG or WHLR or SITC or KIM?

Over the past 5 years, Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) delivered a total return of +49.

7%, compared to -100. 0% for Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (WHLR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WHLR returned +100. 2% versus SITC's -78. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CURB or KRG or WHLR or SITC or KIM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Curbline Properties Corp.

(CURB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 47β versus Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. 's 2. 09β — meaning WHLR is approximately 341% more volatile than CURB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SITE Centers Corp. (SITC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 5% for Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CURB or KRG or WHLR or SITC or KIM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Curbline Properties Corp.

(CURB) is pulling ahead at 51. 3% versus -55. 6% for SITE Centers Corp. (SITC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kite Realty Group Trust grew EPS 73. 6% year-over-year, compared to -65. 3% for SITE Centers Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CURB leads at 35. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CURB or KRG or WHLR or SITC or KIM?

SITE Centers Corp.

(SITC) is the more profitable company, earning 144. 4% net margin versus 8. 7% for Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 144. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WHLR leads at 36. 4% versus -1. 3% for SITC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CURB leads at 74. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CURB or KRG or WHLR or SITC or KIM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) trades at 30.

0x forward P/E versus 137. 0x for Curbline Properties Corp. — 107. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SITC: 44. 1% to $8. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CURB or KRG or WHLR or SITC or KIM?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

SITE Centers Corp. (SITC) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 2. 6% for Curbline Properties Corp. (CURB).

09

Is CURB or KRG or WHLR or SITC or KIM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Curbline Properties Corp.

(CURB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 47), 2. 6% yield). Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (WHLR) carries a higher beta of 2. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CURB: +45. 9%, WHLR: +100. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CURB and KRG and WHLR and SITC and KIM?

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CURB is a small-cap high-growth stock; KRG is a small-cap income-oriented stock; WHLR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SITC is a small-cap deep-value stock; KIM is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CURB

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 25%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KRG

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 20%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WHLR

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 30%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.1%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SITC

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 117%
  • Dividend Yield > 40.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KIM

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 17%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.8%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CURB and KRG and WHLR and SITC and KIM on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CURB: 50.9% · KRG: -9.5%)
Net Margin>
%
(CURB: 16.2% · KRG: 34.6%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(CURB: 75.4x · KRG: 19.3x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.