Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CURB vs PECO vs KIM vs WHLR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CURB
Curbline Properties Corp.

REIT - Retail

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.91B
5Y Perf.+13.2%
PECO
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.

REIT - Retail

Real EstateNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.04B
5Y Perf.+6.2%
KIM
Kimco Realty Corporation

REIT - Retail

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$15.87B
5Y Perf.+1.3%
WHLR
Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.

REIT - Retail

Real EstateNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$122M
5Y Perf.-100.0%

CURB vs PECO vs KIM vs WHLR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CURB logoCURB
PECO logoPECO
KIM logoKIM
WHLR logoWHLR
IndustryREIT - RetailREIT - RetailREIT - RetailREIT - Retail
Market Cap$2.91B$5.04B$15.87B$122M
Revenue (TTM)$203M$739M$2.16B$99M
Net Income (TTM)$33M$115M$616M$12M
Gross Margin49.6%71.1%54.7%66.8%
Operating Margin16.4%37.6%36.1%38.8%
Forward P/E126.1x53.8x30.5x
Total Debt$490M$2.49B$8.64B$484M
Cash & Equiv.$290M$4M$213M$24M

CURB vs PECO vs KIM vs WHLRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CURB
PECO
KIM
WHLR
StockSep 24May 26Return
Curbline Properties… (CURB)100113.2+13.2%
Phillips Edison & C… (PECO)100106.2+6.2%
Kimco Realty Corpor… (KIM)100101.3+1.3%
Wheeler Real Estate… (WHLR)1000.0-100.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CURB vs PECO vs KIM vs WHLR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: KIM leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Curbline Properties Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. PECO and WHLR also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CURB
Curbline Properties Corp.
The Real Estate Income Play

CURB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Rev growth 51.3%, EPS growth 289.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 25.6%, current ratio 5.11x
  • 51.3% FFO/revenue growth vs WHLR's -4.0%
  • +20.8% vs WHLR's -99.8%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
PECO
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

PECO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 2.8%
  • 6.9% 10Y total return vs CURB's 44.4%
  • Beta 0.27 vs WHLR's 2.39, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
KIM
Kimco Realty Corporation
The Real Estate Income Play

KIM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.

  • Better valuation composite
  • 28.5% margin vs WHLR's 11.9%
  • 3.1% ROA vs CURB's 1.4%, ROIC 3.0% vs 1.3%
Best for: value and quality
WHLR
Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

WHLR is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.

  • Beta 2.39, yield 5.4%, current ratio 8.91x
  • 5.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PECO's 2.8%
Best for: defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCURB logoCURB51.3% FFO/revenue growth vs WHLR's -4.0%
ValueKIM logoKIMBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsKIM logoKIM28.5% margin vs WHLR's 11.9%
Stability / SafetyPECO logoPECOBeta 0.27 vs WHLR's 2.39, lower leverage
DividendsWHLR logoWHLR5.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PECO's 2.8%
Momentum (1Y)CURB logoCURB+20.8% vs WHLR's -99.8%
Efficiency (ROA)KIM logoKIM3.1% ROA vs CURB's 1.4%, ROIC 3.0% vs 1.3%

CURB vs PECO vs KIM vs WHLR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CURBCurbline Properties Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

PECOPhillips Edison & Company, Inc.
FY 2017
Owned Real Estate
97.4%$303M
Investment Management
2.6%$8M
KIMKimco Realty Corporation
FY 2018
Revenues from Rental Properties
75.8%$882M
Reimbursement Income
21.2%$246M
Other Rental Property Income
1.8%$21M
Management and Other Fee Incomes
1.3%$15M
WHLRWheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.
FY 2025
Base Rent
72.5%$69M
Tenant Reimbursements
25.6%$24M
Other Services
1.8%$2M
Lease Termination Fees
0.0%$34,000

CURB vs PECO vs KIM vs WHLR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLWHLRLAGGINGKIM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — CURB and KIM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

KIM is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.2B annually — 21.7x WHLR's $99M. KIM is the more profitable business, keeping 28.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WHLR's 11.9%. On growth, CURB holds the edge at +50.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCURB logoCURBCurbline Properti…PECO logoPECOPhillips Edison &…KIM logoKIMKimco Realty Corp…WHLR logoWHLRWheeler Real Esta…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$203M$739M$2.2B$99M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$117M$542M$1.4B$62M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$33M$115M$616M$12M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$121M$207M$844M$4M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+49.6%+71.1%+54.7%+66.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+16.4%+37.6%+36.1%+38.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+16.2%+15.6%+28.5%+11.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+59.5%+28.0%+39.0%+4.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+50.9%+7.0%+4.0%-8.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-66.2%+14.3%+27.8%-100.0%
Evenly matched — CURB and KIM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

WHLR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 28.3x trailing earnings, KIM trades at a 62% valuation discount to CURB's 74.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WHLR's 9.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CURB's 30.2x.

MetricCURB logoCURBCurbline Properti…PECO logoPECOPhillips Edison &…KIM logoKIMKimco Realty Corp…WHLR logoWHLRWheeler Real Esta…
Market CapShares × price$2.9B$5.0B$15.9B$122M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.1B$7.5B$24.3B$582M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS74.51x45.00x28.35x-0.03x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.126.06x53.84x30.48x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.57x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple30.19x16.20x17.70x9.79x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue15.91x6.89x7.41x1.21x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.52x2.15x1.50x1.29x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF23.35x23.80x20.54x30.27x
WHLR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

WHLR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

WHLR delivers a 12.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $2 for CURB. CURB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.26x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WHLR's 5.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WHLR scores 6/9 vs KIM's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricCURB logoCURBCurbline Properti…PECO logoPECOPhillips Edison &…KIM logoKIMKimco Realty Corp…WHLR logoWHLRWheeler Real Esta…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+1.7%+4.5%+5.8%+12.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.4%+2.0%+3.1%+1.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital+1.3%+3.0%+3.0%+4.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+1.4%+4.0%+3.9%+6.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–95556
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.26x0.96x0.82x5.11x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$200M$2.5B$8.4B$460M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$290M$4M$213M$24M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$490M$2.5B$8.6B$484M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense4.31x2.17x2.46x1.44x
WHLR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CURB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PECO five years ago would be worth $74,018 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for WHLR. Over the past 12 months, CURB leads with a +20.8% total return vs WHLR's -99.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CURB at 13.0% vs WHLR's -99.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCURB logoCURBCurbline Properti…PECO logoPECOPhillips Edison &…KIM logoKIMKimco Realty Corp…WHLR logoWHLRWheeler Real Esta…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+19.9%+14.8%+18.6%-93.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+20.8%+16.4%+18.9%-99.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+44.4%+44.0%+43.6%-100.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+44.4%+640.2%+31.1%-100.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+44.4%+693.0%+11.1%+100.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+13.0%+12.9%+12.8%-99.0%
CURB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

PECO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

PECO is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WHLR's 2.39 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PECO currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs WHLR's 0.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCURB logoCURBCurbline Properti…PECO logoPECOPhillips Edison &…KIM logoKIMKimco Realty Corp…WHLR logoWHLRWheeler Real Esta…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.47x0.27x0.54x2.39x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$28.94$40.71$24.31$904.50
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$21.62$32.84$19.76$1.03
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+95.3%+98.4%+96.8%+0.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10053.263.058.422.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded730K822K5.0M219K
PECO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

WHLR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: CURB as "Buy", PECO as "Buy", KIM as "Hold", WHLR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 3.4% upside for CURB (target: $29) vs -1.1% for PECO (target: $40). For income investors, WHLR offers the higher dividend yield at 5.38% vs CURB's 2.67%.

MetricCURB logoCURBCurbline Properti…PECO logoPECOPhillips Edison &…KIM logoKIMKimco Realty Corp…WHLR logoWHLRWheeler Real Esta…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$28.50$39.60$24.25
# AnalystsCovering analysts714365
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.7%+2.8%+4.5%+5.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1111
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.73$1.13$1.06$0.06
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.8%0.0%
WHLR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

WHLR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CURB leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallWheeler Real Estate Investm… (WHLR)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CURB vs PECO vs KIM vs WHLR: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CURB or PECO or KIM or WHLR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Curbline Properties Corp.

(CURB) is the stronger pick with 51. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 0% for Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (WHLR). Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) offers the better valuation at 28. 3x trailing P/E (30. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Curbline Properties Corp. (CURB) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CURB or PECO or KIM or WHLR?

On trailing P/E, Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) is the cheapest at 28.

3x versus Curbline Properties Corp. at 74. 5x. On forward P/E, Kimco Realty Corporation is actually cheaper at 30. 5x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CURB or PECO or KIM or WHLR?

Over the past 5 years, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.

(PECO) delivered a total return of +640. 2%, compared to -100. 0% for Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (WHLR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PECO returned +693. 0% versus KIM's +11. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CURB or PECO or KIM or WHLR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.

(PECO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 27β versus Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. 's 2. 39β — meaning WHLR is approximately 777% more volatile than PECO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Curbline Properties Corp. (CURB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 26% versus 5% for Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CURB or PECO or KIM or WHLR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Curbline Properties Corp.

(CURB) is pulling ahead at 51. 3% versus -4. 0% for Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (WHLR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Curbline Properties Corp. grew EPS 289. 5% year-over-year, compared to 50. 9% for Kimco Realty Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CURB leads at 35. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CURB or PECO or KIM or WHLR?

Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus 8. 7% for Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WHLR leads at 36. 4% versus 16. 7% for CURB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CURB leads at 74. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CURB or PECO or KIM or WHLR more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) trades at 30.

5x forward P/E versus 126. 1x for Curbline Properties Corp. — 95. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CURB: 3. 4% to $28. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CURB or PECO or KIM or WHLR?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (WHLR) offers the highest yield at 5. 4%, versus 2. 7% for Curbline Properties Corp. (CURB).

09

Is CURB or PECO or KIM or WHLR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.

(PECO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 27), 2. 8% yield, +693. 0% 10Y return). Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (WHLR) carries a higher beta of 2. 39 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PECO: +693. 0%, WHLR: +100. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CURB and PECO and KIM and WHLR?

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CURB is a small-cap high-growth stock; PECO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KIM is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; WHLR is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CURB

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 25%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PECO

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KIM

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 17%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WHLR

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.1%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CURB and PECO and KIM and WHLR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CURB: 50.9% · PECO: 7.0%)
Net Margin>
%
(CURB: 16.2% · PECO: 15.6%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(CURB: 74.5x · PECO: 45.0x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.