Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CXDO vs BAND vs TWLO vs LPSN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Internet Content & Information
Software - Application
CXDO vs BAND vs TWLO vs LPSN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Software - Infrastructure | Internet Content & Information | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $317M | $1.56B | $29.86B | $32M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $73M | $209.36B | $5.30B | $244M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $4.11B | $104M | $-67M |
| Gross Margin | 71.5% | 37.3% | 48.8% | 62.2% |
| Operating Margin | 5.5% | -2.2% | 4.7% | -9.6% |
| Forward P/E | 26.0x | 27.4x | 36.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $1M | $701M | $1.08B | $392M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $31M | $103M | $682M | $95M |
CXDO vs BAND vs TWLO vs LPSN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crexendo, Inc. (CXDO) | 100 | 164.4 | +64.4% |
| Bandwidth Inc. (BAND) | 100 | 43.9 | -56.1% |
| Twilio Inc. (TWLO) | 100 | 99.7 | -0.3% |
| LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN) | 100 | 0.5 | -99.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CXDO vs BAND vs TWLO vs LPSN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CXDO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 12.0%, EPS growth 186.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.0%
- 6.4% 10Y total return vs TWLO's 5.8%
- Better valuation composite
- 6.1% margin vs LPSN's -27.6%
BAND is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.86
- +253.6% vs LPSN's -77.1%
TWLO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.51, Low D/E 13.8%, current ratio 4.03x
- Beta 1.51, current ratio 4.03x
- 13.7% revenue growth vs LPSN's -22.0%
- Beta 1.51 vs LPSN's 2.05
LPSN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.7% revenue growth vs LPSN's -22.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.1% margin vs LPSN's -27.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.51 vs LPSN's 2.05 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +253.6% vs LPSN's -77.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.7% ROA vs LPSN's -12.4%, ROIC 10.2% vs -6.6% |
CXDO vs BAND vs TWLO vs LPSN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CXDO vs BAND vs TWLO vs LPSN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CXDO leads in 3 of 6 categories
BAND leads 2 • TWLO leads 0 • LPSN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CXDO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BAND is the larger business by revenue, generating $209.4B annually — 2875.1x CXDO's $73M. CXDO is the more profitable business, keeping 6.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LPSN's -27.6%. On growth, BAND holds the edge at +1197.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $73M | $209.4B | $5.3B | $244M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7M | -$4.6B | $415M | -$562,000 |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | $4.1B | $104M | -$67M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | $1.8B | $1.0B | -$43M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.5% | +37.3% | +48.8% | +62.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | -2.2% | +4.7% | -9.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | +2.0% | +2.0% | -27.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.8% | +0.8% | +19.0% | -17.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.0% | +1197.2% | +20.0% | -19.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -46.9% | +39.8% | +3.8% | +79.4% |
Valuation Metrics
BAND leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 61.1x trailing earnings, CXDO trades at a 93% valuation discount to TWLO's 938.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CXDO's 35.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TWLO's 77.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $317M | $1.6B | $29.9B | $32M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $287M | $2.2B | $30.3B | $329M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 61.13x | -113.15x | 938.43x | -0.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.96x | 27.36x | 36.33x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 35.91x | 50.39x | 77.16x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.65x | 2.07x | 5.89x | 0.13x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.85x | 3.65x | 4.03x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 34.17x | 0.02x | 28.91x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CXDO leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CXDO delivers a 7.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $1 for TWLO. CXDO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BAND's 1.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CXDO scores 7/9 vs BAND's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.0% | +4.0% | +1.3% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.7% | +1.7% | +1.1% | -12.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.2% | -1.2% | +1.6% | -6.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.9% | -1.6% | +1.9% | -5.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 1.75x | 0.14x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$30M | $598M | $399M | $297M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $31M | $103M | $682M | $95M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $701M | $1.1B | $392M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 283.68x | -10.30x | — | 0.20x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CXDO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CXDO five years ago would be worth $18,242 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $35 for LPSN. Over the past 12 months, BAND leads with a +253.6% total return vs LPSN's -77.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CXDO at 84.4% vs LPSN's -65.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +47.5% | +242.2% | +42.4% | -31.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +86.3% | +253.6% | +90.3% | -77.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +526.9% | +330.6% | +259.4% | -95.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +82.4% | -61.3% | -35.8% | -99.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +636.8% | +143.3% | +584.5% | -97.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +84.4% | +62.7% | +53.2% | -65.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CXDO and TWLO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TWLO is the less volatile stock with a 1.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LPSN's 2.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CXDO currently trades 99.4% from its 52-week high vs LPSN's 12.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.86x | 1.86x | 1.51x | 2.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.84 | $49.25 | $201.39 | $21.60 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.07 | $12.57 | $91.84 | $2.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.4% | +98.8% | +97.9% | +12.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 84.3 | 90.4 | 78.4 | 40.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 243K | 670K | 2.2M | 148K |
Analyst Outlook
BAND leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CXDO as "Buy", BAND as "Buy", TWLO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 2.2% upside for CXDO (target: $10) vs -6.0% for TWLO (target: $185).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.00 | $46.00 | $185.17 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 15 | 52 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.9% | 0.0% |
CXDO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BAND leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
CXDO vs BAND vs TWLO vs LPSN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CXDO or BAND or TWLO or LPSN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Twilio Inc.
(TWLO) is the stronger pick with 13. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 0% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). Crexendo, Inc. (CXDO) offers the better valuation at 61. 1x trailing P/E (26. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Crexendo, Inc. (CXDO) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CXDO or BAND or TWLO or LPSN?
On trailing P/E, Crexendo, Inc.
(CXDO) is the cheapest at 61. 1x versus Twilio Inc. at 938. 4x. On forward P/E, Crexendo, Inc. is actually cheaper at 26. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CXDO or BAND or TWLO or LPSN?
Over the past 5 years, Crexendo, Inc.
(CXDO) delivered a total return of +82. 4%, compared to -99. 7% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CXDO returned +636. 8% versus LPSN's -97. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CXDO or BAND or TWLO or LPSN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Twilio Inc.
(TWLO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 51β versus LivePerson, Inc. 's 2. 05β — meaning LPSN is approximately 36% more volatile than TWLO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Crexendo, Inc. (CXDO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 175% for Bandwidth Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CXDO or BAND or TWLO or LPSN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Twilio Inc.
(TWLO) is pulling ahead at 13. 7% versus -22. 0% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Crexendo, Inc. grew EPS 186. 2% year-over-year, compared to -79. 2% for Bandwidth Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CXDO leads at 22. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CXDO or BAND or TWLO or LPSN?
Crexendo, Inc.
(CXDO) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 4% net margin versus -27. 6% for LivePerson, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CXDO leads at 6. 9% versus -9. 6% for LPSN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CXDO leads at 62. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CXDO or BAND or TWLO or LPSN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Crexendo, Inc.
(CXDO) trades at 26. 0x forward P/E versus 36. 3x for Twilio Inc. — 10. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CXDO: 2. 2% to $10. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CXDO or BAND or TWLO or LPSN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CXDO or BAND or TWLO or LPSN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Twilio Inc.
(TWLO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+584. 5% 10Y return). LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN) carries a higher beta of 2. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TWLO: +584. 5%, LPSN: -97. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CXDO and BAND and TWLO and LPSN?
These companies operate in different sectors (CXDO (Communication Services) and BAND (Technology) and TWLO (Communication Services) and LPSN (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 9%
- Gross Margin > 29%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.