Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ELAN vs NEOG vs NVAX vs IDXX vs ZTS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
ELAN vs NEOG vs NVAX vs IDXX vs ZTS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic |
| Market Cap | $11.99B | $2.01B | $1.50B | $45.45B | $36.86B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.89B | $880M | $596M | $4.45B | $9.51B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-242M | $-603M | $-88M | $1.10B | $2.64B |
| Gross Margin | 49.4% | 38.0% | 84.6% | 62.1% | 70.8% |
| Operating Margin | 9.0% | -2.0% | -11.2% | 31.6% | 37.9% |
| Forward P/E | 23.3x | 25.9x | 3.6x | 39.5x | 12.4x |
| Total Debt | $4.02B | $913M | $249M | $1.08B | $9.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $545M | $129M | $241M | $180M | $2.31B |
ELAN vs NEOG vs NVAX vs IDXX vs ZTS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elanco Animal Healt… (ELAN) | 100 | 112.1 | +12.1% |
| Neogen Corporation (NEOG) | 100 | 26.0 | -74.0% |
| Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) | 100 | 20.0 | -80.0% |
| IDEXX Laboratories,… (IDXX) | 100 | 185.2 | +85.2% |
| Zoetis Inc. (ZTS) | 100 | 62.6 | -37.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ELAN vs NEOG vs NVAX vs IDXX vs ZTS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ELAN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +99.9% vs ZTS's -42.7%
Among these 5 stocks, NEOG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NVAX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 64.7%, EPS growth 306.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -11.1%
- 64.7% revenue growth vs NEOG's -3.2%
IDXX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 5.6% 10Y total return vs ZTS's 107.3%
- 32.6% ROA vs NEOG's -17.9%, ROIC 42.5% vs 0.2%
ZTS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.90, yield 2.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.90, current ratio 3.03x
- PEG 1.04 vs IDXX's 2.76
- Beta 0.90, yield 2.3%, current ratio 3.03x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 64.7% revenue growth vs NEOG's -3.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.4x vs 39.5x), PEG 1.04 vs 2.76 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs NEOG's -68.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.90 vs NVAX's 2.11 | |
| Dividends | 2.3% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +99.9% vs ZTS's -42.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 32.6% ROA vs NEOG's -17.9%, ROIC 42.5% vs 0.2% |
ELAN vs NEOG vs NVAX vs IDXX vs ZTS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ELAN vs NEOG vs NVAX vs IDXX vs ZTS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ZTS leads in 3 of 6 categories
IDXX leads 1 • ELAN leads 1 • NEOG leads 0 • NVAX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ZTS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ZTS is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.5B annually — 15.9x NVAX's $596M. ZTS is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NEOG's -68.5%. On growth, ELAN holds the edge at +14.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.9B | $880M | $596M | $4.4B | $9.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $957M | $100M | -$47M | $1.5B | $4.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$242M | -$603M | -$88M | $1.1B | $2.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $315M | $17M | -$96M | $845M | $2.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.4% | +38.0% | +84.6% | +62.1% | +70.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.0% | -2.0% | -11.2% | +31.6% | +37.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.9% | -68.5% | -14.7% | +24.6% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | +2.0% | -16.1% | +19.0% | +22.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.9% | -2.8% | -79.1% | +14.3% | +1.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.4% | +96.5% | -102.0% | +16.6% | +0.7% |
Valuation Metrics
ZTS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.6x trailing earnings, NVAX trades at a 92% valuation discount to IDXX's 43.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ZTS offers better value at 1.21x vs IDXX's 3.06x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.0B | $2.0B | $1.5B | $45.4B | $36.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $15.5B | $2.8B | $1.5B | $46.3B | $44.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -51.07x | -1.84x | 3.63x | 43.75x | 14.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 23.29x | 25.87x | — | 39.45x | 12.43x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 3.06x | 1.21x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.59x | 20.70x | 2.56x | 31.60x | 10.78x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.54x | 2.25x | 1.34x | 10.56x | 3.89x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.82x | 0.97x | — | 28.75x | 11.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 42.21x | — | — | 43.14x | 16.14x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IDXX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IDXX delivers a 70.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $71 in annual profit, vs $-29 for NEOG. NEOG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ZTS's 2.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IDXX scores 7/9 vs NEOG's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.6% | -28.6% | — | +70.9% | +62.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.8% | -17.9% | -7.4% | +32.6% | +17.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.9% | +0.2% | — | +42.5% | +26.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | +0.2% | +100.4% | +61.4% | +29.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.61x | 0.44x | — | 0.67x | 2.85x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.5B | $784M | $8M | $897M | $7.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $545M | $129M | $241M | $180M | $2.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.0B | $913M | $249M | $1.1B | $9.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.26x | -8.33x | -5.10x | 35.55x | 11.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ELAN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IDXX five years ago would be worth $10,513 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $524 for NVAX. Over the past 12 months, ELAN leads with a +99.9% total return vs ZTS's -42.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ELAN at 36.9% vs ZTS's -20.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.6% | +32.1% | +29.5% | -14.6% | -29.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +99.9% | +56.0% | +55.1% | +17.6% | -42.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +156.5% | -46.1% | +23.9% | +17.9% | -49.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.0% | -80.6% | -94.8% | +5.1% | -44.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.3% | -49.8% | -90.4% | +556.2% | +107.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +36.9% | -18.6% | +7.4% | +5.6% | -20.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ELAN and ZTS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ZTS is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVAX's 2.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ELAN currently trades 86.6% from its 52-week high vs ZTS's 50.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.42x | 1.83x | 2.11x | 1.35x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.72 | $11.43 | $11.97 | $769.98 | $172.23 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.75 | $4.53 | $5.80 | $471.74 | $85.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.6% | +80.9% | +77.1% | +74.3% | +50.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.9 | 46.2 | 64.4 | 52.1 | 34.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.6M | 2.5M | 4.4M | 533K | 3.7M |
Analyst Outlook
ZTS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ELAN as "Buy", NEOG as "Hold", NVAX as "Buy", IDXX as "Buy", ZTS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 95.0% upside for NVAX (target: $18) vs 16.1% for ELAN (target: $28). ZTS is the only dividend payer here at 2.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.88 | $11.00 | $18.00 | $773.13 | $143.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 11 | 23 | 22 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +2.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $2.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.3% | +2.7% | +8.8% |
ZTS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). IDXX leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
ELAN vs NEOG vs NVAX vs IDXX vs ZTS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ELAN or NEOG or NVAX or IDXX or ZTS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Novavax, Inc.
(NVAX) is the stronger pick with 64. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for Neogen Corporation (NEOG). Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) offers the better valuation at 3. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Elanco Animal Health Incorporated (ELAN) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ELAN or NEOG or NVAX or IDXX or ZTS?
On trailing P/E, Novavax, Inc.
(NVAX) is the cheapest at 3. 6x versus IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. at 43. 7x. On forward P/E, Zoetis Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Zoetis Inc. wins at 1. 04x versus IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. 's 2. 76x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ELAN or NEOG or NVAX or IDXX or ZTS?
Over the past 5 years, IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.
(IDXX) delivered a total return of +5. 1%, compared to -94. 8% for Novavax, Inc. (NVAX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IDXX returned +556. 2% versus NVAX's -90. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ELAN or NEOG or NVAX or IDXX or ZTS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Zoetis Inc.
(ZTS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 90β versus Novavax, Inc. 's 2. 11β — meaning NVAX is approximately 133% more volatile than ZTS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Neogen Corporation (NEOG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 3% for Zoetis Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ELAN or NEOG or NVAX or IDXX or ZTS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Novavax, Inc.
(NVAX) is pulling ahead at 64. 7% versus -3. 2% for Neogen Corporation (NEOG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Novavax, Inc. grew EPS 306. 5% year-over-year, compared to -114. 6% for Neogen Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NEOG leads at 19. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ELAN or NEOG or NVAX or IDXX or ZTS?
Novavax, Inc.
(NVAX) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 2% net margin versus -122. 1% for Neogen Corporation — meaning it keeps 39. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVAX leads at 50. 1% versus 1. 1% for NEOG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVAX leads at 93. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ELAN or NEOG or NVAX or IDXX or ZTS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Zoetis Inc. (ZTS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 04x versus IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. 's 2. 76x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Zoetis Inc. (ZTS) trades at 12. 4x forward P/E versus 39. 5x for IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. — 27. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVAX: 95. 0% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ELAN or NEOG or NVAX or IDXX or ZTS?
In this comparison, ZTS (2.
3% yield) pays a dividend. ELAN, NEOG, NVAX, IDXX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ELAN or NEOG or NVAX or IDXX or ZTS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Zoetis Inc.
(ZTS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 90), 2. 3% yield, +107. 3% 10Y return). Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) carries a higher beta of 2. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ZTS: +107. 3%, NVAX: -90. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ELAN and NEOG and NVAX and IDXX and ZTS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ELAN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NEOG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVAX is a small-cap high-growth stock; IDXX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ZTS is a mid-cap deep-value stock. ZTS pays a dividend while ELAN, NEOG, NVAX, IDXX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.