Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
EVCM vs DSGX vs SAIA vs MNDY vs XPO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Trucking
Software - Application
Integrated Freight & Logistics
EVCM vs DSGX vs SAIA vs MNDY vs XPO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Trucking | Software - Application | Integrated Freight & Logistics |
| Market Cap | $2.09B | $6.31B | $11.97B | $3.94B | $24.28B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $594M | $731M | $3.25B | $1.23B | $8.30B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $32M | $164M | $255M | $119M | $348M |
| Gross Margin | 77.5% | 71.4% | 18.4% | 89.2% | 12.2% |
| Operating Margin | 9.7% | 30.4% | 10.8% | -0.1% | 9.1% |
| Forward P/E | 16.7x | 39.3x | 42.3x | 19.0x | 43.9x |
| Total Debt | $537M | $8M | $418M | $312M | $4.70B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $130M | $354M | $20M | $1.50B | $310M |
EVCM vs DSGX vs SAIA vs MNDY vs XPO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| EverCommerce Inc. (EVCM) | 100 | 67.1 | -32.9% |
| The Descartes Syste… (DSGX) | 100 | 101.0 | +1.0% |
| Saia, Inc. (SAIA) | 100 | 198.6 | +98.6% |
| monday.com Ltd. (MNDY) | 100 | 34.5 | -65.5% |
| XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO) | 100 | 431.1 | +331.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EVCM vs DSGX vs SAIA vs MNDY vs XPO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EVCM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Lower P/E (16.7x vs 43.9x)
DSGX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.71
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 0.5%, current ratio 2.16x
- PEG 1.53 vs SAIA's 3.29
- Beta 0.71, current ratio 2.16x
Among these 5 stocks, SAIA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MNDY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 26.7%, EPS growth 261.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.4%
- 26.7% revenue growth vs EVCM's -15.7%
XPO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 21.5% 10Y total return vs SAIA's 15.7%
- +88.9% vs MNDY's -72.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.7% revenue growth vs EVCM's -15.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.7x vs 43.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.5% margin vs XPO's 4.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs SAIA's 1.90, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +88.9% vs MNDY's -72.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.2% ROA vs EVCM's 2.3%, ROIC 14.9% vs 3.9% |
EVCM vs DSGX vs SAIA vs MNDY vs XPO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
EVCM vs DSGX vs SAIA vs MNDY vs XPO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DSGX leads in 1 of 6 categories
XPO leads 1 • EVCM leads 0 • SAIA leads 0 • MNDY leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — DSGX and MNDY each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XPO is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.3B annually — 14.0x EVCM's $594M. DSGX is the more profitable business, keeping 22.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XPO's 4.2%. On growth, MNDY holds the edge at +24.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $594M | $731M | $3.3B | $1.2B | $8.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $122M | $310M | $602M | $12M | $1.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $32M | $164M | $255M | $119M | $348M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $85M | $261M | $261M | $321M | $457M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +77.5% | +71.4% | +18.4% | +89.2% | +12.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | +30.4% | +10.8% | -0.1% | +9.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | +22.5% | +7.8% | +9.6% | +4.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.3% | +35.8% | +8.0% | +26.0% | +5.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.6% | +17.2% | +2.4% | +24.6% | +7.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.0% | +23.3% | 0.0% | +2.3% | +49.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — EVCM and DSGX and MNDY each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 34.1x trailing earnings, MNDY trades at a 72% valuation discount to EVCM's 123.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), DSGX offers better value at 1.50x vs SAIA's 3.67x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.1B | $6.3B | $12.0B | $3.9B | $24.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.5B | $6.0B | $12.4B | $2.7B | $28.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 123.20x | 38.42x | 47.16x | 34.10x | 78.34x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.68x | 39.34x | 42.28x | 19.01x | 43.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.50x | 3.67x | — | 2.84x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.72x | 18.10x | 20.59x | 227.80x | 22.94x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.54x | 8.47x | 3.70x | 3.20x | 2.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.02x | 3.99x | 4.67x | 3.25x | 13.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.11x | 23.71x | 438.03x | 12.57x | 73.80x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DSGX leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
XPO delivers a 19.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $4 for EVCM. DSGX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to XPO's 2.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EVCM scores 7/9 vs XPO's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.5% | +10.7% | +10.0% | +9.5% | +19.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.3% | +9.2% | +7.3% | +5.6% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.9% | +14.9% | +9.4% | -2.4% | +9.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.6% | +15.6% | +11.5% | -0.1% | +11.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.75x | 0.01x | 0.16x | 0.25x | 2.53x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $407M | -$346M | $398M | -$1.2B | $4.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $130M | $354M | $20M | $1.5B | $310M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $537M | $8M | $418M | $312M | $4.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.19x | 229.22x | 23.88x | — | 3.21x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
XPO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in XPO five years ago would be worth $40,679 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,271 for MNDY. Over the past 12 months, XPO leads with a +88.9% total return vs MNDY's -72.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XPO at 62.2% vs MNDY's -15.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.1% | -13.8% | +33.1% | -46.7% | +49.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +16.5% | -31.7% | +72.7% | -72.3% | +88.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.2% | -5.1% | +56.0% | -38.6% | +326.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.0% | +19.7% | +83.3% | -57.3% | +306.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.0% | +295.4% | +1567.7% | -57.3% | +2145.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.4% | -1.7% | +16.0% | -15.0% | +62.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DSGX and SAIA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DSGX is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SAIA's 1.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SAIA currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs MNDY's 24.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.10x | 0.71x | 1.90x | 1.19x | 1.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.55 | $117.35 | $457.99 | $316.98 | $231.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.66 | $62.56 | $248.37 | $57.50 | $108.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.0% | +62.5% | +98.0% | +24.1% | +89.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.3 | 47.7 | 60.4 | 56.5 | 50.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 131K | 583K | 523K | 1.5M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EVCM as "Buy", DSGX as "Buy", SAIA as "Buy", MNDY as "Buy", XPO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 74.1% upside for MNDY (target: $133) vs -5.9% for SAIA (target: $423).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.25 | $103.50 | $422.67 | $133.00 | $209.07 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 14 | 32 | 25 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.1% | +0.0% | +0.1% | +3.4% | +0.5% |
DSGX leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). XPO leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
EVCM vs DSGX vs SAIA vs MNDY vs XPO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EVCM or DSGX or SAIA or MNDY or XPO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, monday.
com Ltd. (MNDY) is the stronger pick with 26. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 7% for EverCommerce Inc. (EVCM). monday. com Ltd. (MNDY) offers the better valuation at 34. 1x trailing P/E (19. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate EverCommerce Inc. (EVCM) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EVCM or DSGX or SAIA or MNDY or XPO?
On trailing P/E, monday.
com Ltd. (MNDY) is the cheapest at 34. 1x versus EverCommerce Inc. at 123. 2x. On forward P/E, EverCommerce Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Descartes Systems Group Inc. wins at 1. 53x versus Saia, Inc. 's 3. 29x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EVCM or DSGX or SAIA or MNDY or XPO?
Over the past 5 years, XPO Logistics, Inc.
(XPO) delivered a total return of +306. 8%, compared to -57. 3% for monday. com Ltd. (MNDY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XPO returned +21. 5% versus MNDY's -57. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EVCM or DSGX or SAIA or MNDY or XPO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Descartes Systems Group Inc.
(DSGX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 71β versus Saia, Inc. 's 1. 90β — meaning SAIA is approximately 168% more volatile than DSGX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Descartes Systems Group Inc. (DSGX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for XPO Logistics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EVCM or DSGX or SAIA or MNDY or XPO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), monday.
com Ltd. (MNDY) is pulling ahead at 26. 7% versus -15. 7% for EverCommerce Inc. (EVCM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: monday. com Ltd. grew EPS 261. 3% year-over-year, compared to -29. 6% for Saia, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MNDY leads at 33. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EVCM or DSGX or SAIA or MNDY or XPO?
The Descartes Systems Group Inc.
(DSGX) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 5% net margin versus 3. 0% for EverCommerce Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DSGX leads at 32. 3% versus -0. 1% for MNDY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MNDY leads at 89. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EVCM or DSGX or SAIA or MNDY or XPO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Descartes Systems Group Inc. (DSGX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 53x versus Saia, Inc. 's 3. 29x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, EverCommerce Inc. (EVCM) trades at 16. 7x forward P/E versus 43. 9x for XPO Logistics, Inc. — 27. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MNDY: 74. 1% to $133. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — EVCM or DSGX or SAIA or MNDY or XPO?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is EVCM or DSGX or SAIA or MNDY or XPO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Descartes Systems Group Inc.
(DSGX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 71), +295. 4% 10Y return). XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO) carries a higher beta of 1. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DSGX: +295. 4%, XPO: +21. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EVCM and DSGX and SAIA and MNDY and XPO?
These companies operate in different sectors (EVCM (Technology) and DSGX (Technology) and SAIA (Industrials) and MNDY (Technology) and XPO (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: EVCM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DSGX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SAIA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MNDY is a small-cap high-growth stock; XPO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.