Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
EVTC vs PAYO vs CASS vs FIS vs FISV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Specialty Business Services
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
EVTC vs PAYO vs CASS vs FIS vs FISV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Specialty Business Services | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $1.44B | $1.74B | $615M | $24.47B | $30.38B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $951M | $1.07B | $204M | $10.89B | $21.09B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $133M | $72M | $35M | $382M | $3.20B |
| Gross Margin | 46.4% | 61.9% | 88.6% | 38.1% | 60.8% |
| Operating Margin | 19.1% | 11.7% | 19.0% | 17.5% | 24.4% |
| Forward P/E | 6.0x | 20.4x | 15.9x | 7.5x | 7.0x |
| Total Debt | $1.13B | $72M | $5M | $4.01B | $29.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $306M | $416M | $392M | $599M | $798M |
EVTC vs PAYO vs CASS vs FIS vs FISV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) | 100 | 70.2 | -29.8% |
| Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) | 100 | 52.7 | -47.3% |
| Cass Information Sy… (CASS) | 100 | 121.4 | +21.4% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 37.9 | -62.1% |
| Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) | 100 | 59.5 | -40.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EVTC vs PAYO vs CASS vs FIS vs FISV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EVTC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 10.2%, EPS growth 27.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.6%
- 89.5% 10Y total return vs CASS's 57.2%
- 10.2% revenue growth vs CASS's -13.1%
- 6.1% ROA vs PAYO's 0.9%, ROIC 10.2% vs 30.7%
Among these 5 stocks, PAYO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CASS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 2.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 1.9%, current ratio 1.10x
- Beta 0.74, yield 2.6%, current ratio 1.10x
- 17.3% margin vs FIS's 3.5%
FIS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs CASS's 2.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
FISV is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.20 vs CASS's 1.85
- Lower P/E (7.0x vs 7.5x), PEG 0.20 vs 0.31
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.2% revenue growth vs CASS's -13.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.0x vs 7.5x), PEG 0.20 vs 0.31 | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.3% margin vs FIS's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs PAYO's 1.65, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs CASS's 2.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +17.2% vs FISV's -68.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.1% ROA vs PAYO's 0.9%, ROIC 10.2% vs 30.7% |
EVTC vs PAYO vs CASS vs FIS vs FISV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
EVTC vs PAYO vs CASS vs FIS vs FISV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CASS leads in 3 of 6 categories
FISV leads 1 • EVTC leads 0 • PAYO leads 0 • FIS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CASS and FIS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FISV is the larger business by revenue, generating $21.1B annually — 103.6x CASS's $204M. CASS is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIS's 3.5%. On growth, EVTC holds the edge at +8.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $951M | $1.1B | $204M | $10.9B | $21.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $316M | $208M | $44M | $3.8B | $7.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $133M | $72M | $35M | $382M | $3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $145M | $215M | $32M | $2.8B | $4.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +46.4% | +61.9% | +88.6% | +38.1% | +60.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.1% | +11.7% | +19.0% | +17.5% | +24.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.9% | +6.8% | +17.3% | +3.5% | +15.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.2% | +20.2% | +15.6% | +26.1% | +19.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.4% | +6.1% | -10.1% | +8.2% | -2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -24.0% | +20.0% | +87.9% | +92.3% | -29.1% |
Valuation Metrics
FISV leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.0x trailing earnings, FISV trades at a 86% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FISV offers better value at 0.25x vs FIS's 2.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $1.7B | $615M | $24.5B | $30.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.3B | $1.4B | $227M | $27.9B | $58.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.62x | 26.63x | 18.25x | 63.00x | 8.96x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 5.97x | 20.42x | 15.87x | 7.54x | 7.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.18x | — | 2.13x | 2.58x | 0.25x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.34x | 7.36x | 5.86x | 7.66x | 6.63x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.54x | 1.66x | 3.22x | 2.29x | 1.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.11x | 2.71x | 2.64x | 1.76x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.62x | 8.44x | 19.35x | 9.97x | 7.00x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CASS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EVTC delivers a 18.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $3 for FIS. CASS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EVTC's 1.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CASS scores 8/9 vs FISV's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.7% | +10.0% | +14.6% | +2.7% | +12.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.1% | +0.9% | +1.4% | +1.1% | +4.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.2% | +30.7% | — | +6.0% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.5% | +14.9% | +4.4% | +6.6% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.58x | 0.10x | 0.02x | 0.29x | 1.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $824M | -$343M | -$388M | $3.4B | $28.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $306M | $416M | $392M | $599M | $798M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $72M | $5M | $4.0B | $29.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.10x | 17.23x | — | 4.64x | 6.39x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CASS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CASS five years ago would be worth $11,562 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, CASS leads with a +17.2% total return vs FISV's -68.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CASS at 11.2% vs FISV's -22.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -18.4% | -7.0% | +18.1% | -27.3% | -13.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -31.9% | -17.9% | +17.2% | -35.3% | -68.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.7% | -9.0% | +37.5% | -6.6% | -52.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.3% | -49.8% | +15.6% | -63.2% | -51.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +89.5% | -47.7% | +57.2% | -13.2% | +9.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.9% | -3.1% | +11.2% | -2.2% | -22.0% |
Risk & Volatility
CASS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CASS is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PAYO's 1.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CASS currently trades 90.8% from its 52-week high vs FISV's 29.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 1.65x | 0.74x | 0.76x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $38.56 | $7.67 | $52.45 | $82.74 | $191.91 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.83 | $4.08 | $36.07 | $43.30 | $52.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +60.6% | +66.0% | +90.8% | +57.1% | +29.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.6 | 45.1 | 52.5 | 43.3 | 36.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 431K | 3.5M | 74K | 5.5M | 5.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CASS and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EVTC as "Buy", PAYO as "Buy", CASS as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", FISV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 58.4% upside for EVTC (target: $37) vs 5.0% for CASS (target: $50). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.45% vs EVTC's 0.85%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $37.00 | $7.50 | $50.00 | $67.38 | $74.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 10 | 2 | 37 | 60 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | — | +2.6% | +3.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 21 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.20 | — | $1.23 | $1.63 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.8% | +10.0% | +4.2% | 0.0% | +19.4% |
CASS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). FISV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
EVTC vs PAYO vs CASS vs FIS vs FISV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EVTC or PAYO or CASS or FIS or FISV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is the stronger pick with 10. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 1% for Cass Information Systems, Inc. (CASS). Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) offers the better valuation at 9. 0x trailing P/E (7. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EVTC or PAYO or CASS or FIS or FISV?
On trailing P/E, Fiserv, Inc.
(FISV) is the cheapest at 9. 0x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, EVERTEC, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fiserv, Inc. wins at 0. 20x versus Cass Information Systems, Inc. 's 1. 85x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EVTC or PAYO or CASS or FIS or FISV?
Over the past 5 years, Cass Information Systems, Inc.
(CASS) delivered a total return of +15. 6%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EVTC returned +89. 5% versus PAYO's -47. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EVTC or PAYO or CASS or FIS or FISV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cass Information Systems, Inc.
(CASS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus Payoneer Global Inc. 's 1. 65β — meaning PAYO is approximately 122% more volatile than CASS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cass Information Systems, Inc. (CASS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 158% for EVERTEC, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EVTC or PAYO or CASS or FIS or FISV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is pulling ahead at 10. 2% versus -13. 1% for Cass Information Systems, Inc. (CASS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cass Information Systems, Inc. grew EPS 87. 8% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PAYO leads at 18. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EVTC or PAYO or CASS or FIS or FISV?
Cass Information Systems, Inc.
(CASS) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 4% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FISV leads at 26. 9% versus 11. 8% for PAYO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CASS leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EVTC or PAYO or CASS or FIS or FISV more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 20x versus Cass Information Systems, Inc. 's 1. 85x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) trades at 6. 0x forward P/E versus 20. 4x for Payoneer Global Inc. — 14. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EVTC: 58. 4% to $37. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — EVTC or PAYO or CASS or FIS or FISV?
In this comparison, FIS (3.
5% yield), CASS (2. 6% yield), EVTC (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. PAYO, FISV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is EVTC or PAYO or CASS or FIS or FISV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76), 0. 8% yield). Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) carries a higher beta of 1. 65 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EVTC: +89. 5%, PAYO: -47. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EVTC and PAYO and CASS and FIS and FISV?
These companies operate in different sectors (EVTC (Technology) and PAYO (Technology) and CASS (Industrials) and FIS (Technology) and FISV (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: EVTC is a small-cap deep-value stock; PAYO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CASS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; FISV is a mid-cap deep-value stock. EVTC, CASS, FIS pay a dividend while PAYO, FISV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.