Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FARM vs USFD vs SYY vs PFGC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Food Distribution
Food Distribution
Food Distribution
FARM vs USFD vs SYY vs PFGC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Food Distribution | Food Distribution | Food Distribution |
| Market Cap | $28M | $19.16B | $34.91B | $14.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $338M | $39.68B | $83.57B | $66.75B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-19M | $677M | $1.74B | $329M |
| Gross Margin | 40.7% | 17.4% | 18.5% | 11.9% |
| Operating Margin | -1.8% | 3.1% | 3.6% | 1.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 18.2x | 15.9x | 19.9x |
| Total Debt | $53M | $5.72B | $14.49B | $8.00B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $41M | $1.07B | $79M |
FARM vs USFD vs SYY vs PFGC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Farmer Bros. Co. (FARM) | 100 | 16.6 | -83.4% |
| US Foods Holding Co… (USFD) | 100 | 488.5 | +388.5% |
| Sysco Corporation (SYY) | 100 | 135.4 | +35.4% |
| Performance Food Gr… (PFGC) | 100 | 339.8 | +239.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FARM vs USFD vs SYY vs PFGC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FARM lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
USFD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +25.7% vs FARM's -28.9%
SYY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 2.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, current ratio 1.21x
- Beta 0.47, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.21x
- Lower P/E (15.9x vs 19.9x)
PFGC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 8.6%, EPS growth -21.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.5%
- 249.2% 10Y total return vs USFD's 248.8%
- 8.6% revenue growth vs FARM's 0.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.6% revenue growth vs FARM's 0.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.9x vs 19.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.1% margin vs FARM's -5.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs FARM's 0.79 | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield; 37-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +25.7% vs FARM's -28.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs FARM's -11.7%, ROIC 15.7% vs -1.2% |
FARM vs USFD vs SYY vs PFGC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FARM vs USFD vs SYY vs PFGC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SYY leads in 3 of 6 categories
FARM leads 1 • USFD leads 1 • PFGC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SYY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SYY is the larger business by revenue, generating $83.6B annually — 247.4x FARM's $338M. SYY is the more profitable business, keeping 2.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FARM's -5.5%. On growth, PFGC holds the edge at +6.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $338M | $39.7B | $83.6B | $66.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | $1.6B | $4.0B | $1.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$19M | $677M | $1.7B | $329M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $848M | $2.0B | $1.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.7% | +17.4% | +18.5% | +11.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.8% | +3.1% | +3.6% | +1.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.5% | +1.7% | +2.1% | +0.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.8% | +2.1% | +2.4% | +1.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.2% | +2.8% | +4.7% | +6.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +6.1% | -13.4% | -27.0% |
Valuation Metrics
FARM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.5x trailing earnings, SYY trades at a 54% valuation discount to PFGC's 42.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FARM's 7.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than USFD's 14.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $28M | $19.2B | $34.9B | $14.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $75M | $24.8B | $48.3B | $22.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.88x | 29.55x | 19.54x | 42.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 18.20x | 15.88x | 19.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.36x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.48x | 14.67x | 11.58x | 14.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.08x | 0.49x | 0.43x | 0.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.63x | 4.64x | 19.23x | 3.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.32x | 19.98x | 19.60x | 20.69x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SYY leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SYY delivers a 80.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $81 in annual profit, vs $-48 for FARM. FARM carries lower financial leverage with a 1.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SYY's 7.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), USFD scores 7/9 vs PFGC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -47.6% | +15.3% | +80.7% | +7.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.7% | +4.8% | +6.4% | +1.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.2% | +9.3% | +15.7% | +5.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.5% | +12.0% | +19.0% | +7.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.23x | 1.33x | 7.81x | 1.79x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $47M | $5.7B | $13.4B | $7.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $41M | $1.1B | $79M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $53M | $5.7B | $14.5B | $8.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.88x | 3.94x | 4.35x | 1.69x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
USFD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in USFD five years ago would be worth $21,415 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,379 for FARM. Over the past 12 months, USFD leads with a +25.7% total return vs FARM's -28.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors USFD at 31.2% vs FARM's -21.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.5% | +16.4% | +1.9% | +5.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -28.9% | +25.7% | +6.4% | +11.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.2% | +125.7% | +4.0% | +51.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.2% | +114.1% | -3.9% | +69.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.8% | +248.8% | +82.2% | +249.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.8% | +31.2% | +1.3% | +14.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — USFD and SYY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SYY is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FARM's 0.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. USFD currently trades 85.1% from its 52-week high vs FARM's 51.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.79x | 0.50x | 0.47x | 0.60x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.48 | $102.13 | $91.69 | $109.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.21 | $66.89 | $68.19 | $77.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.6% | +85.1% | +79.5% | +85.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.1 | 51.0 | 41.7 | 59.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 283K | 2.2M | 4.7M | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
SYY leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: USFD as "Buy", SYY as "Buy", PFGC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.7% upside for USFD (target: $108) vs 20.5% for PFGC (target: $112). SYY is the only dividend payer here at 2.80% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $108.33 | $90.44 | $111.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 25 | 30 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 37 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.04 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.1% | +3.6% | +0.5% |
SYY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FARM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
FARM vs USFD vs SYY vs PFGC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FARM or USFD or SYY or PFGC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Performance Food Group Company (PFGC) is the stronger pick with 8.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 3% for Farmer Bros. Co. (FARM). Sysco Corporation (SYY) offers the better valuation at 19. 5x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate US Foods Holding Corp. (USFD) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FARM or USFD or SYY or PFGC?
On trailing P/E, Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the cheapest at 19.
5x versus Performance Food Group Company at 42. 5x. On forward P/E, Sysco Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FARM or USFD or SYY or PFGC?
Over the past 5 years, US Foods Holding Corp.
(USFD) delivered a total return of +114. 1%, compared to -86. 2% for Farmer Bros. Co. (FARM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PFGC returned +249. 2% versus FARM's -95. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FARM or USFD or SYY or PFGC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
47β versus Farmer Bros. Co. 's 0. 79β — meaning FARM is approximately 68% more volatile than SYY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Farmer Bros. Co. (FARM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 123% versus 8% for Sysco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FARM or USFD or SYY or PFGC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Performance Food Group Company (PFGC) is pulling ahead at 8.
6% versus 0. 3% for Farmer Bros. Co. (FARM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: US Foods Holding Corp. grew EPS 45. 5% year-over-year, compared to -257. 9% for Farmer Bros. Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PFGC leads at 7. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FARM or USFD or SYY or PFGC?
Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the more profitable company, earning 2.
2% net margin versus -4. 2% for Farmer Bros. Co. — meaning it keeps 2. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SYY leads at 3. 8% versus -0. 4% for FARM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FARM leads at 43. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FARM or USFD or SYY or PFGC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sysco Corporation (SYY) trades at 15.
9x forward P/E versus 19. 9x for Performance Food Group Company — 4. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for USFD: 24. 7% to $108. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — FARM or USFD or SYY or PFGC?
In this comparison, SYY (2.
8% yield) pays a dividend. FARM, USFD, PFGC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FARM or USFD or SYY or PFGC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
47), 2. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SYY: +82. 2%, FARM: -95. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FARM and USFD and SYY and PFGC?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
SYY pays a dividend while FARM, USFD, PFGC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.