Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FBP vs NBTB vs HBAN vs CFG vs V
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Financial - Credit Services
FBP vs NBTB vs HBAN vs CFG vs V — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $3.74B | $2.35B | $25.63B | $27.70B | $616.45B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.26B | $867M | $12.48B | $12.35B | $40.00B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $345M | $169M | $2.21B | $1.70B | $22.24B |
| Gross Margin | 72.9% | 72.1% | 61.7% | 57.6% | 80.4% |
| Operating Margin | 33.2% | 25.3% | 21.5% | 15.3% | 60.0% |
| Forward P/E | 10.7x | 10.9x | 11.1x | 12.3x | 24.3x |
| Total Debt | $364M | $327M | $18.48B | $12.40B | $25.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $657M | $185M | $1.78B | $11.24B | $20.15B |
FBP vs NBTB vs HBAN vs CFG vs V — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First BanCorp. (FBP) | 100 | 439.7 | +339.7% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 145.6 | +45.6% |
| Huntington Bancshar… (HBAN) | 100 | 181.3 | +81.3% |
| Citizens Financial … (CFG) | 100 | 264.4 | +164.4% |
| Visa Inc. (V) | 100 | 163.3 | +63.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FBP vs NBTB vs HBAN vs CFG vs V
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FBP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 6.4% 10Y total return vs V's 329.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.79, Low D/E 18.5%, current ratio 6.85x
- PEG 0.30 vs NBTB's 1.55
- Beta 0.79, yield 3.0%, current ratio 6.85x
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
HBAN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 3.7% yield, vs V's 0.7%
CFG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +73.3% vs V's -7.4%
V carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 11.3%, EPS growth 4.8%
- 11.3% NII/revenue growth vs CFG's 1.3%
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Beta 0.68 vs CFG's 1.33
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.3% NII/revenue growth vs CFG's 1.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.7x vs 24.3x), PEG 0.30 vs 1.53 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.68 vs CFG's 1.33 | |
| Dividends | 3.7% yield, vs V's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +73.3% vs V's -7.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
FBP vs NBTB vs HBAN vs CFG vs V — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FBP vs NBTB vs HBAN vs CFG vs V — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
V leads in 2 of 6 categories
FBP leads 1 • NBTB leads 0 • HBAN leads 0 • CFG leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
V leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
V is the larger business by revenue, generating $40.0B annually — 46.1x NBTB's $867M. V is the more profitable business, keeping 50.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CFG's 12.2%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $867M | $12.5B | $12.3B | $40.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $433M | $241M | $3.1B | $2.6B | $27.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $345M | $169M | $2.2B | $1.7B | $22.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $440M | $225M | $2.3B | $2.7B | $21.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.9% | +72.1% | +61.7% | +57.6% | +80.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +33.2% | +25.3% | +21.5% | +15.3% | +60.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +27.4% | +19.5% | +17.7% | +12.2% | +50.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +34.5% | +25.2% | +18.2% | +15.2% | +53.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.6% | +39.5% | -11.8% | +38.2% | +35.3% |
Valuation Metrics
FBP leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.2x trailing earnings, FBP trades at a 65% valuation discount to V's 31.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FBP offers better value at 0.31x vs V's 1.99x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.7B | $2.4B | $25.6B | $27.7B | $616.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.4B | $2.5B | $42.3B | $28.9B | $621.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.16x | 13.53x | 11.65x | 21.19x | 31.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.73x | 10.94x | 11.07x | 12.29x | 24.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.31x | 1.92x | 0.77x | — | 1.99x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.26x | 10.35x | 15.75x | 12.10x | 24.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.97x | 2.71x | 2.05x | 2.24x | 15.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.96x | 1.21x | 1.00x | 1.20x | 16.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.61x | 10.75x | 11.25x | 14.74x | 28.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
V leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
V delivers a 58.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $59 in annual profit, vs $7 for CFG. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HBAN's 0.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FBP scores 9/9 vs V's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.4% | +9.5% | +10.0% | +6.6% | +58.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.8% | +1.1% | +1.0% | +0.8% | +22.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.7% | +7.9% | +5.1% | +3.8% | +29.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.9% | +2.4% | +4.5% | +4.4% | +36.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | 0.17x | 0.76x | 0.51x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$293M | $142M | $16.7B | $1.2B | $5.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $657M | $185M | $1.8B | $11.2B | $20.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $364M | $327M | $18.5B | $12.4B | $25.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.64x | 1.05x | 0.62x | 0.55x | 26.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — FBP and CFG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FBP five years ago would be worth $20,466 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,203 for HBAN. Over the past 12 months, CFG leads with a +73.3% total return vs V's -7.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CFG at 39.1% vs V's 12.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.7% | +9.3% | -6.5% | +9.7% | -7.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.9% | +9.0% | +12.4% | +73.3% | -7.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +137.0% | +54.1% | +85.1% | +169.3% | +41.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +104.7% | +29.9% | +22.0% | +46.9% | +42.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +644.5% | +102.2% | +121.5% | +257.8% | +329.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.3% | +15.5% | +22.8% | +39.1% | +12.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FBP and V each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
V is the less volatile stock with a 0.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CFG's 1.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FBP currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs HBAN's 83.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.78x | 0.88x | 1.08x | 1.31x | 0.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.57 | $46.92 | $19.46 | $68.79 | $375.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.16 | $39.20 | $14.87 | $37.93 | $293.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.6% | +96.1% | +83.2% | +93.3% | +85.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.1 | 57.3 | 53.4 | 60.2 | 53.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 236K | 24.3M | 4.5M | 6.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HBAN and V each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FBP as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", HBAN as "Buy", CFG as "Buy", V as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.9% upside for HBAN (target: $20) vs 2.1% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, HBAN offers the higher dividend yield at 3.73% vs V's 0.73%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.50 | $46.00 | $20.38 | $72.42 | $362.45 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 10 | 48 | 38 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.0% | +3.2% | +3.7% | +2.6% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 9 | 12 | 0 | 3 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.72 | $1.43 | $0.60 | $1.70 | $2.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.1% | +0.4% | 0.0% | +4.9% | +2.2% |
V leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FBP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
FBP vs NBTB vs HBAN vs CFG vs V: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FBP or NBTB or HBAN or CFG or V a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Visa Inc.
(V) is the stronger pick with 11. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 3% for Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG). First BanCorp. (FBP) offers the better valuation at 11. 2x trailing P/E (10. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First BanCorp. (FBP) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FBP or NBTB or HBAN or CFG or V?
On trailing P/E, First BanCorp.
(FBP) is the cheapest at 11. 2x versus Visa Inc. at 31. 5x. On forward P/E, First BanCorp. is actually cheaper at 10. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First BanCorp. wins at 0. 30x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 55x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FBP or NBTB or HBAN or CFG or V?
Over the past 5 years, First BanCorp.
(FBP) delivered a total return of +104. 7%, compared to +22. 0% for Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (HBAN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FBP returned +646. 2% versus NBTB's +104. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FBP or NBTB or HBAN or CFG or V?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Visa Inc.
(V) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus Citizens Financial Group, Inc. 's 1. 31β — meaning CFG is approximately 103% more volatile than V relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 76% for Huntington Bancshares Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FBP or NBTB or HBAN or CFG or V?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Visa Inc.
(V) is pulling ahead at 11. 3% versus 1. 3% for Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First BanCorp. grew EPS 18. 8% year-over-year, compared to -3. 2% for Citizens Financial Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FBP or NBTB or HBAN or CFG or V?
Visa Inc.
(V) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 1% net margin versus 12. 2% for Citizens Financial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: V leads at 60. 0% versus 15. 3% for CFG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — V leads at 80. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FBP or NBTB or HBAN or CFG or V more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First BanCorp. (FBP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 30x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 55x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First BanCorp. (FBP) trades at 10. 7x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for Visa Inc. — 13. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HBAN: 25. 9% to $20. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — FBP or NBTB or HBAN or CFG or V?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (HBAN) offers the highest yield at 3. 7%, versus 0. 7% for Visa Inc. (V).
09Is FBP or NBTB or HBAN or CFG or V better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First BanCorp.
(FBP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 78), 3. 0% yield, +646. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FBP: +646. 2%, CFG: +255. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FBP and NBTB and HBAN and CFG and V?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FBP is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; HBAN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; CFG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; V is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.