Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FLYW vs CWAN vs ALKT vs NCNO vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Application
Information Technology Services
FLYW vs CWAN vs ALKT vs NCNO vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $2.12B | $7.21B | $1.87B | $2.11B | $24.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $188.60B | $826M | $472M | $586M | $10.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $12.54B | $-48M | $-50M | $-22M | $382M |
| Gross Margin | 0.2% | 66.0% | 57.4% | 60.1% | 38.1% |
| Operating Margin | 5.7% | 1.4% | -9.3% | -0.8% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | 49.5x | 34.6x | 21.7x | 19.6x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $883M | $354M | $237M | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $330M | $91M | $63M | $121M | $599M |
FLYW vs CWAN vs ALKT vs NCNO vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flywire Corporation (FLYW) | 100 | 40.4 | -59.6% |
| Clearwater Analytic… (CWAN) | 100 | 94.8 | -5.2% |
| Alkami Technology, … (ALKT) | 100 | 70.6 | -29.4% |
| nCino, Inc. (NCNO) | 100 | 25.0 | -75.0% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 38.8 | -61.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FLYW vs CWAN vs ALKT vs NCNO vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FLYW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- 6.6% margin vs ALKT's -10.6%
- +62.7% vs ALKT's -37.8%
- 4.3% ROA vs ALKT's -5.9%, ROIC 2.1% vs -8.6%
CWAN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.80
- Rev growth 61.9%, EPS growth -108.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 34.1%
- -4.3% 10Y total return vs FLYW's -49.5%
- Beta 0.80, current ratio 1.83x
ALKT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, NCNO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 28.9%, current ratio 0.59x
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 19.6x)
- Beta 0.76 vs FLYW's 1.32
- 3.5% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 61.9% revenue growth vs FIS's 5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 19.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.6% margin vs ALKT's -10.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs FLYW's 1.32 | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +62.7% vs ALKT's -37.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.3% ROA vs ALKT's -5.9%, ROIC 2.1% vs -8.6% |
FLYW vs CWAN vs ALKT vs NCNO vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FLYW vs CWAN vs ALKT vs NCNO vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FLYW leads in 2 of 6 categories
FIS leads 1 • CWAN leads 1 • ALKT leads 0 • NCNO leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLYW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLYW is the larger business by revenue, generating $188.6B annually — 399.6x ALKT's $472M. FLYW is the more profitable business, keeping 6.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALKT's -10.6%. On growth, FLYW holds the edge at +1408.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $188.6B | $826M | $472M | $586M | $10.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $10.8B | $94M | -$12M | $27M | $3.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $12.5B | -$48M | -$50M | -$22M | $382M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15.8B | $152M | $44M | $60M | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +0.2% | +66.0% | +57.4% | +60.1% | +38.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | +1.4% | -9.3% | -0.8% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.6% | -5.8% | -10.6% | -3.7% | +3.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.4% | +18.5% | +9.4% | +10.2% | +26.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1408.6% | +74.4% | +28.9% | +9.6% | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.0% | -137.9% | -22.7% | +2.3% | +92.3% |
Valuation Metrics
FIS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 63.0x trailing earnings, FIS trades at a 61% valuation discount to FLYW's 161.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FIS's 7.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NCNO's 122.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.1B | $7.2B | $1.9B | $2.1B | $24.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $8.0B | $2.2B | $2.2B | $27.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 161.18x | -173.50x | -37.89x | -53.88x | 63.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 49.50x | 34.60x | 21.69x | 19.64x | 7.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 2.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 47.80x | 70.39x | — | 121.97x | 7.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.40x | 9.85x | 4.20x | 3.89x | 2.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.71x | 3.24x | 5.00x | 1.87x | 1.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.41x | 43.85x | 45.09x | 39.45x | 9.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FLYW leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FLYW delivers a 5.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-14 for ALKT. NCNO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALKT's 0.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLYW scores 6/9 vs CWAN's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.9% | -2.4% | -14.0% | -2.1% | +2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.3% | -1.6% | -5.9% | -1.4% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.1% | +1.1% | -8.6% | -1.2% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.3% | +1.4% | -9.3% | -1.5% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.43x | 0.98x | 0.22x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$330M | $792M | $290M | $116M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $330M | $91M | $63M | $121M | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $883M | $354M | $237M | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.84x | 0.07x | -3.73x | -0.51x | 4.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CWAN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CWAN five years ago would be worth $9,574 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,144 for NCNO. Over the past 12 months, FLYW leads with a +62.7% total return vs ALKT's -37.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CWAN at 18.3% vs FLYW's -15.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.6% | +0.7% | -23.1% | -27.9% | -27.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +62.7% | +6.1% | -37.8% | -22.1% | -35.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.1% | +65.7% | +41.1% | -21.0% | -6.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.5% | -4.3% | -54.9% | -68.6% | -63.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.5% | -4.3% | -59.5% | -80.6% | -13.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -15.7% | +18.3% | +12.2% | -7.6% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FLYW and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FIS is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FLYW's 1.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLYW currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs NCNO's 52.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.32x | 0.80x | 1.30x | 1.18x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.05 | $25.07 | $31.66 | $33.92 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.79 | $15.74 | $14.11 | $13.80 | $43.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.2% | +96.9% | +55.1% | +52.4% | +57.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 83.0 | 69.9 | 50.9 | 50.1 | 43.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.9M | 4.0M | 1.9M | 2.7M | 5.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FLYW as "Buy", CWAN as "Hold", ALKT as "Buy", NCNO as "Buy", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 81.8% upside for NCNO (target: $32) vs -1.3% for FLYW (target: $18). FIS is the only dividend payer here at 3.45% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.50 | $24.96 | $22.00 | $32.33 | $67.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 13 | 12 | 23 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.7% | +0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FLYW leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FIS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
FLYW vs CWAN vs ALKT vs NCNO vs FIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FLYW or CWAN or ALKT or NCNO or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.
(CWAN) is the stronger pick with 61. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 4% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the better valuation at 63. 0x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Flywire Corporation (FLYW) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FLYW or CWAN or ALKT or NCNO or FIS?
On trailing P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is the cheapest at 63. 0x versus Flywire Corporation at 161. 2x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FLYW or CWAN or ALKT or NCNO or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.
(CWAN) delivered a total return of -4. 3%, compared to -68. 6% for nCino, Inc. (NCNO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CWAN returned -4. 3% versus NCNO's -80. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FLYW or CWAN or ALKT or NCNO or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus Flywire Corporation's 1. 32β — meaning FLYW is approximately 74% more volatile than FIS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, nCino, Inc. (NCNO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 98% for Alkami Technology, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FLYW or CWAN or ALKT or NCNO or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.
(CWAN) is pulling ahead at 61. 9% versus 5. 4% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flywire Corporation grew EPS 391. 1% year-over-year, compared to -108. 3% for Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWAN leads at 34. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FLYW or CWAN or ALKT or NCNO or FIS?
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 6% net margin versus -10. 7% for Alkami Technology, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FIS leads at 16. 5% versus -12. 1% for ALKT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CWAN leads at 67. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FLYW or CWAN or ALKT or NCNO or FIS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 49. 5x for Flywire Corporation — 42. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NCNO: 81. 8% to $32. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — FLYW or CWAN or ALKT or NCNO or FIS?
In this comparison, FIS (3.
5% yield) pays a dividend. FLYW, CWAN, ALKT, NCNO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FLYW or CWAN or ALKT or NCNO or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76), 3. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FIS: -13. 2%, FLYW: -49. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FLYW and CWAN and ALKT and NCNO and FIS?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FLYW is a small-cap high-growth stock; CWAN is a small-cap high-growth stock; ALKT is a small-cap high-growth stock; NCNO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. FIS pays a dividend while FLYW, CWAN, ALKT, NCNO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.