Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FLYW vs CWAN vs ALKT vs NCNO vs FIS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FLYW
Flywire Corporation

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.12B
5Y Perf.-59.6%
CWAN
Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$7.21B
5Y Perf.-5.2%
ALKT
Alkami Technology, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.87B
5Y Perf.-29.4%
NCNO
nCino, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.11B
5Y Perf.-75.0%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$24.47B
5Y Perf.-61.2%

FLYW vs CWAN vs ALKT vs NCNO vs FIS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FLYW logoFLYW
CWAN logoCWAN
ALKT logoALKT
NCNO logoNCNO
FIS logoFIS
IndustryInformation Technology ServicesSoftware - ApplicationSoftware - ApplicationSoftware - ApplicationInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$2.12B$7.21B$1.87B$2.11B$24.47B
Revenue (TTM)$188.60B$826M$472M$586M$10.89B
Net Income (TTM)$12.54B$-48M$-50M$-22M$382M
Gross Margin0.2%66.0%57.4%60.1%38.1%
Operating Margin5.7%1.4%-9.3%-0.8%17.5%
Forward P/E49.5x34.6x21.7x19.6x7.5x
Total Debt$0.00$883M$354M$237M$4.01B
Cash & Equiv.$330M$91M$63M$121M$599M

FLYW vs CWAN vs ALKT vs NCNO vs FISLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FLYW
CWAN
ALKT
NCNO
FIS
StockSep 21May 26Return
Flywire Corporation (FLYW)10040.4-59.6%
Clearwater Analytic… (CWAN)10094.8-5.2%
Alkami Technology, … (ALKT)10070.6-29.4%
nCino, Inc. (NCNO)10025.0-75.0%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10038.8-61.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FLYW vs CWAN vs ALKT vs NCNO vs FIS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FLYW and FIS are tied at the top with 3 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. CWAN also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FLYW
Flywire Corporation
The Quality Compounder

FLYW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.

  • 6.6% margin vs ALKT's -10.6%
  • +62.7% vs ALKT's -37.8%
  • 4.3% ROA vs ALKT's -5.9%, ROIC 2.1% vs -8.6%
Best for: quality and momentum
CWAN
Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.
The Income Pick

CWAN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.80
  • Rev growth 61.9%, EPS growth -108.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 34.1%
  • -4.3% 10Y total return vs FLYW's -49.5%
  • Beta 0.80, current ratio 1.83x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
ALKT
Alkami Technology, Inc.
The Growth Angle

ALKT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
NCNO
nCino, Inc.
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, NCNO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

FIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 28.9%, current ratio 0.59x
  • Lower P/E (7.5x vs 19.6x)
  • Beta 0.76 vs FLYW's 1.32
  • 3.5% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCWAN logoCWAN61.9% revenue growth vs FIS's 5.4%
ValueFIS logoFISLower P/E (7.5x vs 19.6x)
Quality / MarginsFLYW logoFLYW6.6% margin vs ALKT's -10.6%
Stability / SafetyFIS logoFISBeta 0.76 vs FLYW's 1.32
DividendsFIS logoFIS3.5% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)FLYW logoFLYW+62.7% vs ALKT's -37.8%
Efficiency (ROA)FLYW logoFLYW4.3% ROA vs ALKT's -5.9%, ROIC 2.1% vs -8.6%

FLYW vs CWAN vs ALKT vs NCNO vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FLYWFlywire Corporation
FY 2025
Transactions
100.0%$503M
CWANClearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$731M
ALKTAlkami Technology, Inc.
FY 2025
SaaS Subscription Services
95.0%$422M
Implementation Services
2.8%$13M
Service, Other
2.1%$9M
NCNOnCino, Inc.
FY 2025
License and Service
86.8%$469M
Professional Services
13.2%$71M
FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B

FLYW vs CWAN vs ALKT vs NCNO vs FIS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFLYWLAGGINGNCNO

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FLYW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

FLYW is the larger business by revenue, generating $188.6B annually — 399.6x ALKT's $472M. FLYW is the more profitable business, keeping 6.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALKT's -10.6%. On growth, FLYW holds the edge at +1408.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFLYW logoFLYWFlywire Corporati…CWAN logoCWANClearwater Analyt…ALKT logoALKTAlkami Technology…NCNO logoNCNOnCino, Inc.FIS logoFISFidelity National…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$188.6B$826M$472M$586M$10.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$10.8B$94M-$12M$27M$3.8B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$12.5B-$48M-$50M-$22M$382M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$15.8B$152M$44M$60M$2.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+0.2%+66.0%+57.4%+60.1%+38.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+5.7%+1.4%-9.3%-0.8%+17.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+6.6%-5.8%-10.6%-3.7%+3.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-8.4%+18.5%+9.4%+10.2%+26.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+1408.6%+74.4%+28.9%+9.6%+8.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.0%-137.9%-22.7%+2.3%+92.3%
FLYW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FIS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 63.0x trailing earnings, FIS trades at a 61% valuation discount to FLYW's 161.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FIS's 7.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NCNO's 122.0x.

MetricFLYW logoFLYWFlywire Corporati…CWAN logoCWANClearwater Analyt…ALKT logoALKTAlkami Technology…NCNO logoNCNOnCino, Inc.FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Market CapShares × price$2.1B$7.2B$1.9B$2.1B$24.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.8B$8.0B$2.2B$2.2B$27.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS161.18x-173.50x-37.89x-53.88x63.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.49.50x34.60x21.69x19.64x7.54x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.58x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple47.80x70.39x121.97x7.66x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.40x9.85x4.20x3.89x2.29x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.71x3.24x5.00x1.87x1.76x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF21.41x43.85x45.09x39.45x9.97x
FIS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FLYW leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

FLYW delivers a 5.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-14 for ALKT. NCNO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALKT's 0.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLYW scores 6/9 vs CWAN's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricFLYW logoFLYWFlywire Corporati…CWAN logoCWANClearwater Analyt…ALKT logoALKTAlkami Technology…NCNO logoNCNOnCino, Inc.FIS logoFISFidelity National…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+5.9%-2.4%-14.0%-2.1%+2.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+4.3%-1.6%-5.9%-1.4%+1.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+2.1%+1.1%-8.6%-1.2%+6.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+1.3%+1.4%-9.3%-1.5%+6.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–962356
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.43x0.98x0.22x0.29x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$330M$792M$290M$116M$3.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$330M$91M$63M$121M$599M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$883M$354M$237M$4.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.84x0.07x-3.73x-0.51x4.64x
FLYW leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CWAN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CWAN five years ago would be worth $9,574 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,144 for NCNO. Over the past 12 months, FLYW leads with a +62.7% total return vs ALKT's -37.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CWAN at 18.3% vs FLYW's -15.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFLYW logoFLYWFlywire Corporati…CWAN logoCWANClearwater Analyt…ALKT logoALKTAlkami Technology…NCNO logoNCNOnCino, Inc.FIS logoFISFidelity National…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+27.6%+0.7%-23.1%-27.9%-27.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+62.7%+6.1%-37.8%-22.1%-35.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-40.1%+65.7%+41.1%-21.0%-6.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-49.5%-4.3%-54.9%-68.6%-63.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-49.5%-4.3%-59.5%-80.6%-13.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-15.7%+18.3%+12.2%-7.6%-2.2%
CWAN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FLYW and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

FIS is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FLYW's 1.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLYW currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs NCNO's 52.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFLYW logoFLYWFlywire Corporati…CWAN logoCWANClearwater Analyt…ALKT logoALKTAlkami Technology…NCNO logoNCNOnCino, Inc.FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.32x0.80x1.30x1.18x0.76x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$18.05$25.07$31.66$33.92$82.74
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$9.79$15.74$14.11$13.80$43.30
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+98.2%+96.9%+55.1%+52.4%+57.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10083.069.950.950.143.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.9M4.0M1.9M2.7M5.5M
Evenly matched — FLYW and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: FLYW as "Buy", CWAN as "Hold", ALKT as "Buy", NCNO as "Buy", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 81.8% upside for NCNO (target: $32) vs -1.3% for FLYW (target: $18). FIS is the only dividend payer here at 3.45% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricFLYW logoFLYWFlywire Corporati…CWAN logoCWANClearwater Analyt…ALKT logoALKTAlkami Technology…NCNO logoNCNOnCino, Inc.FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$17.50$24.96$22.00$32.33$67.38
# AnalystsCovering analysts1913122337
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises111
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.63
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+3.7%+0.3%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

FLYW leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FIS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallFlywire Corporation (FLYW)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FLYW vs CWAN vs ALKT vs NCNO vs FIS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FLYW or CWAN or ALKT or NCNO or FIS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.

(CWAN) is the stronger pick with 61. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 4% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the better valuation at 63. 0x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Flywire Corporation (FLYW) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FLYW or CWAN or ALKT or NCNO or FIS?

On trailing P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

(FIS) is the cheapest at 63. 0x versus Flywire Corporation at 161. 2x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FLYW or CWAN or ALKT or NCNO or FIS?

Over the past 5 years, Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.

(CWAN) delivered a total return of -4. 3%, compared to -68. 6% for nCino, Inc. (NCNO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CWAN returned -4. 3% versus NCNO's -80. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FLYW or CWAN or ALKT or NCNO or FIS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

(FIS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus Flywire Corporation's 1. 32β — meaning FLYW is approximately 74% more volatile than FIS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, nCino, Inc. (NCNO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 98% for Alkami Technology, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FLYW or CWAN or ALKT or NCNO or FIS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.

(CWAN) is pulling ahead at 61. 9% versus 5. 4% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flywire Corporation grew EPS 391. 1% year-over-year, compared to -108. 3% for Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWAN leads at 34. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FLYW or CWAN or ALKT or NCNO or FIS?

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

(FIS) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 6% net margin versus -10. 7% for Alkami Technology, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FIS leads at 16. 5% versus -12. 1% for ALKT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CWAN leads at 67. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FLYW or CWAN or ALKT or NCNO or FIS more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

(FIS) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 49. 5x for Flywire Corporation — 42. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NCNO: 81. 8% to $32. 33.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FLYW or CWAN or ALKT or NCNO or FIS?

In this comparison, FIS (3.

5% yield) pays a dividend. FLYW, CWAN, ALKT, NCNO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is FLYW or CWAN or ALKT or NCNO or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

(FIS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76), 3. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FIS: -13. 2%, FLYW: -49. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FLYW and CWAN and ALKT and NCNO and FIS?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FLYW is a small-cap high-growth stock; CWAN is a small-cap high-growth stock; ALKT is a small-cap high-growth stock; NCNO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. FIS pays a dividend while FLYW, CWAN, ALKT, NCNO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

FLYW

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 70429%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CWAN

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 37%
  • Gross Margin > 39%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ALKT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Gross Margin > 34%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NCNO

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 36%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FIS

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FLYW and CWAN and ALKT and NCNO and FIS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FLYW: 140858.5% · CWAN: 74.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.