Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FLYW vs EVTC vs PAYO vs CWAN vs ALKT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Application
Software - Application
FLYW vs EVTC vs PAYO vs CWAN vs ALKT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $2.06B | $1.48B | $1.78B | $7.22B | $1.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $188.60B | $951M | $1.07B | $826M | $472M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $12.54B | $133M | $72M | $-48M | $-50M |
| Gross Margin | 0.2% | 46.4% | 61.9% | 66.0% | 57.4% |
| Operating Margin | 5.7% | 19.1% | 11.7% | 1.4% | -9.3% |
| Forward P/E | 41.5x | 6.1x | 20.3x | 34.7x | 23.0x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $1.13B | $72M | $883M | $354M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $330M | $306M | $416M | $91M | $63M |
FLYW vs EVTC vs PAYO vs CWAN vs ALKT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flywire Corporation (FLYW) | 100 | 39.3 | -60.7% |
| EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) | 100 | 52.5 | -47.5% |
| Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) | 100 | 60.4 | -39.6% |
| Clearwater Analytic… (CWAN) | 100 | 95.1 | -4.9% |
| Alkami Technology, … (ALKT) | 100 | 72.8 | -27.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FLYW vs EVTC vs PAYO vs CWAN vs ALKT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FLYW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +54.9% vs ALKT's -39.0%
EVTC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.77, yield 0.8%
- 94.4% 10Y total return vs CWAN's -4.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.77, current ratio 2.07x
- Beta 0.77, yield 0.8%, current ratio 2.07x
PAYO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CWAN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 61.9%, EPS growth -108.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 34.1%
- 61.9% revenue growth vs PAYO's 7.7%
Among these 5 stocks, ALKT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 61.9% revenue growth vs PAYO's 7.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.1x vs 23.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.9% margin vs ALKT's -10.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.77 vs PAYO's 1.64 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +54.9% vs ALKT's -39.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.1% ROA vs ALKT's -5.9%, ROIC 10.2% vs -8.6% |
FLYW vs EVTC vs PAYO vs CWAN vs ALKT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FLYW vs EVTC vs PAYO vs CWAN vs ALKT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EVTC leads in 1 of 6 categories
PAYO leads 1 • CWAN leads 1 • FLYW leads 0 • ALKT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FLYW and EVTC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLYW is the larger business by revenue, generating $188.6B annually — 399.6x ALKT's $472M. EVTC is the more profitable business, keeping 13.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALKT's -10.6%. On growth, FLYW holds the edge at +1408.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $188.6B | $951M | $1.1B | $826M | $472M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $10.8B | $316M | $208M | $94M | -$12M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $12.5B | $133M | $72M | -$48M | -$50M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15.8B | $165M | $215M | $152M | $44M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +0.2% | +46.4% | +61.9% | +66.0% | +57.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | +19.1% | +11.7% | +1.4% | -9.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.6% | +13.9% | +6.8% | -5.8% | -10.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.4% | +17.4% | +20.2% | +18.5% | +9.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1408.6% | +8.4% | +6.1% | +74.4% | +28.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.0% | -24.0% | +20.0% | -137.9% | -22.7% |
Valuation Metrics
EVTC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.9x trailing earnings, EVTC trades at a 93% valuation discount to FLYW's 156.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EVTC's 7.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CWAN's 70.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.1B | $1.5B | $1.8B | $7.2B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.7B | $2.3B | $1.4B | $8.0B | $2.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 156.64x | 10.91x | 27.16x | -173.93x | -39.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 41.52x | 6.14x | 20.27x | 34.68x | 22.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.21x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 46.20x | 7.47x | 7.55x | 70.55x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.30x | 1.59x | 1.69x | 9.88x | 4.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.64x | 2.17x | 2.76x | 3.25x | 5.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.81x | 10.92x | 8.61x | 43.96x | 46.49x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PAYO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EVTC delivers a 18.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-14 for ALKT. PAYO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EVTC's 1.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EVTC scores 7/9 vs CWAN's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.9% | +18.7% | +10.0% | -2.4% | -14.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.3% | +6.1% | +0.9% | -1.6% | -5.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.1% | +10.2% | +30.7% | +1.1% | -8.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.3% | +10.5% | +14.9% | +1.4% | -9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.58x | 0.10x | 0.43x | 0.98x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$330M | $824M | -$343M | $792M | $290M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $330M | $306M | $416M | $91M | $63M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $1.1B | $72M | $883M | $354M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.84x | 3.10x | 17.23x | 0.22x | -3.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CWAN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CWAN five years ago would be worth $9,598 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,617 for ALKT. Over the past 12 months, FLYW leads with a +54.9% total return vs ALKT's -39.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CWAN at 18.4% vs FLYW's -16.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.0% | -16.1% | -5.1% | +1.0% | -20.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +54.9% | -31.8% | -18.5% | +6.1% | -39.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.8% | -29.9% | -7.2% | +66.1% | +45.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.9% | -41.8% | -48.6% | -4.0% | -53.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.9% | +94.4% | -46.7% | -4.0% | -58.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.5% | -11.2% | -2.5% | +18.4% | +13.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EVTC and CWAN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EVTC is the less volatile stock with a 0.77 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PAYO's 1.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CWAN currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs ALKT's 56.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 0.77x | 1.64x | 0.79x | 1.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.05 | $38.56 | $7.67 | $25.07 | $31.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.97 | $21.82 | $4.08 | $15.74 | $14.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.5% | +62.3% | +67.3% | +97.1% | +56.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 83.6 | 21.5 | 52.7 | 70.8 | 56.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.9M | 453K | 3.5M | 4.0M | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FLYW as "Buy", EVTC as "Buy", PAYO as "Buy", CWAN as "Hold", ALKT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 55.0% upside for PAYO (target: $8) vs 2.5% for CWAN (target: $25). EVTC is the only dividend payer here at 0.83% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.75 | $34.00 | $8.00 | $24.96 | $22.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 18 | 10 | 13 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.20 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.8% | +4.7% | +9.8% | +0.2% | 0.0% |
EVTC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). PAYO leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
FLYW vs EVTC vs PAYO vs CWAN vs ALKT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FLYW or EVTC or PAYO or CWAN or ALKT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.
(CWAN) is the stronger pick with 61. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 7% for Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO). EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) offers the better valuation at 10. 9x trailing P/E (6. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Flywire Corporation (FLYW) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FLYW or EVTC or PAYO or CWAN or ALKT?
On trailing P/E, EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is the cheapest at 10. 9x versus Flywire Corporation at 156. 6x. On forward P/E, EVERTEC, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FLYW or EVTC or PAYO or CWAN or ALKT?
Over the past 5 years, Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.
(CWAN) delivered a total return of -4. 0%, compared to -53. 8% for Alkami Technology, Inc. (ALKT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EVTC returned +94. 4% versus ALKT's -58. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FLYW or EVTC or PAYO or CWAN or ALKT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 77β versus Payoneer Global Inc. 's 1. 64β — meaning PAYO is approximately 113% more volatile than EVTC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 158% for EVERTEC, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FLYW or EVTC or PAYO or CWAN or ALKT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.
(CWAN) is pulling ahead at 61. 9% versus 7. 7% for Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flywire Corporation grew EPS 391. 1% year-over-year, compared to -108. 3% for Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWAN leads at 34. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FLYW or EVTC or PAYO or CWAN or ALKT?
EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus -10. 7% for Alkami Technology, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EVTC leads at 20. 0% versus -12. 1% for ALKT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PAYO leads at 78. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FLYW or EVTC or PAYO or CWAN or ALKT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) trades at 6. 1x forward P/E versus 41. 5x for Flywire Corporation — 35. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PAYO: 55. 0% to $8. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FLYW or EVTC or PAYO or CWAN or ALKT?
In this comparison, EVTC (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. FLYW, PAYO, CWAN, ALKT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FLYW or EVTC or PAYO or CWAN or ALKT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 77), 0. 8% yield). Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) carries a higher beta of 1. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EVTC: +94. 4%, PAYO: -46. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FLYW and EVTC and PAYO and CWAN and ALKT?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FLYW is a small-cap high-growth stock; EVTC is a small-cap deep-value stock; PAYO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CWAN is a small-cap high-growth stock; ALKT is a small-cap high-growth stock. EVTC pays a dividend while FLYW, PAYO, CWAN, ALKT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.