Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FMBH vs MGEE vs OTTR vs MBWM vs NWE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Diversified Utilities
Diversified Utilities
Banks - Regional
Diversified Utilities
FMBH vs MGEE vs OTTR vs MBWM vs NWE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Diversified Utilities | Diversified Utilities | Banks - Regional | Diversified Utilities |
| Market Cap | $1.16B | $2.74B | $3.69B | $898M | $4.45B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $466M | $767M | $1.31B | $372M | $1.64B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $92M | $143M | $280M | $89M | $168M |
| Gross Margin | 72.8% | 97.1% | 34.9% | 64.0% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | 25.1% | 22.3% | 26.4% | 27.5% | 19.2% |
| Forward P/E | 10.0x | 18.7x | 15.5x | 9.6x | 19.3x |
| Total Debt | $564M | $936M | $1.10B | $826M | $3.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $257M | $7M | $386M | $473M | $9M |
FMBH vs MGEE vs OTTR vs MBWM vs NWE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Mid Bancshare… (FMBH) | 100 | 172.6 | +72.6% |
| MGE Energy, Inc. (MGEE) | 100 | 108.5 | +8.5% |
| Otter Tail Corporat… (OTTR) | 100 | 205.2 | +105.2% |
| Mercantile Bank Cor… (MBWM) | 100 | 227.2 | +127.2% |
| Northwestern Energy… (NWE) | 100 | 120.4 | +20.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FMBH vs MGEE vs OTTR vs MBWM vs NWE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FMBH is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 3.2% vs MBWM's 2.9%
MGEE has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 9.9%, EPS growth 11.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.16, Low D/E 71.8%, current ratio 0.77x
- Beta 0.16, yield 2.5%, current ratio 0.77x
- 9.9% revenue growth vs OTTR's -2.0%
OTTR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 241.8% 10Y total return vs MBWM's 178.2%
- 7.1% ROA vs FMBH's 1.2%, ROIC 10.4% vs 6.0%
MBWM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.64 vs MGEE's 2.52
- Lower P/E (9.6x vs 19.3x)
- 23.9% margin vs NWE's 10.2%
NWE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 20 yrs, beta 0.24, yield 3.6%
- 3.6% yield, 20-year raise streak, vs MGEE's 2.5%
- +30.2% vs MGEE's -16.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.9% revenue growth vs OTTR's -2.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.6x vs 19.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.9% margin vs NWE's 10.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.16 vs FMBH's 0.92 | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 20-year raise streak, vs MGEE's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +30.2% vs MGEE's -16.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.1% ROA vs FMBH's 1.2%, ROIC 10.4% vs 6.0% |
FMBH vs MGEE vs OTTR vs MBWM vs NWE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FMBH vs MGEE vs OTTR vs MBWM vs NWE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MBWM leads in 1 of 6 categories
OTTR leads 1 • FMBH leads 0 • MGEE leads 0 • NWE leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FMBH and MGEE and MBWM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NWE is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.6B annually — 4.4x MBWM's $372M. MBWM is the more profitable business, keeping 23.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NWE's 10.2%. On growth, MGEE holds the edge at +10.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $466M | $767M | $1.3B | $372M | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $132M | $286M | $466M | $107M | $569M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $92M | $143M | $280M | $89M | $168M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $124M | -$131M | $2M | $11M | -$148M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.8% | +97.1% | +34.9% | +64.0% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.1% | +22.3% | +26.4% | +27.5% | +19.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.7% | +18.6% | +21.3% | +23.9% | +10.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +26.6% | -17.0% | +0.1% | +3.0% | -9.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +10.8% | +2.9% | — | +6.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.8% | +15.8% | +6.8% | +14.8% | -17.6% |
Valuation Metrics
MBWM leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.5x trailing earnings, MBWM trades at a 61% valuation discount to NWE's 24.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), OTTR offers better value at 0.59x vs MGEE's 2.70x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $2.7B | $3.7B | $898M | $4.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $3.7B | $4.4B | $1.3B | $7.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.41x | 20.07x | 13.41x | 9.53x | 24.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.04x | 18.69x | 15.48x | 9.56x | 19.29x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.58x | 2.70x | 0.59x | 0.63x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.57x | 12.89x | 9.49x | 11.75x | 13.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.50x | 3.69x | 2.83x | 2.42x | 2.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.09x | 2.09x | 1.99x | 1.17x | 1.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.38x | — | 37.64x | 80.15x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
OTTR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OTTR delivers a 15.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $6 for NWE. FMBH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.59x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NWE's 1.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FMBH scores 6/9 vs MBWM's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.0% | +10.9% | +15.2% | +13.5% | +5.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +4.7% | +7.1% | +1.4% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.0% | +6.1% | +10.4% | +5.5% | +4.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.9% | +6.1% | +9.9% | +8.0% | +4.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.59x | 0.72x | 0.59x | 1.14x | 1.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $308M | $929M | $718M | $353M | $3.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $257M | $7M | $386M | $473M | $9M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $564M | $936M | $1.1B | $826M | $3.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.00x | 5.63x | 7.32x | 0.79x | 2.25x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — OTTR and MBWM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OTTR five years ago would be worth $19,807 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,015 for FMBH. Over the past 12 months, NWE leads with a +30.2% total return vs MGEE's -16.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MBWM at 31.5% vs MGEE's 1.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.8% | -4.2% | +8.6% | +10.1% | +12.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.7% | -16.9% | +17.9% | +23.6% | +30.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +101.7% | +3.0% | +19.4% | +127.3% | +34.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.2% | +11.2% | +98.1% | +78.4% | +25.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +107.3% | +73.2% | +241.8% | +178.2% | +65.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.3% | +1.0% | +6.1% | +31.5% | +10.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FMBH and MGEE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MGEE is the less volatile stock with a 0.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FMBH's 0.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FMBH currently trades 97.5% from its 52-week high vs MGEE's 79.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.88x | 0.18x | 0.36x | 0.86x | 0.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $44.85 | $94.00 | $92.24 | $55.77 | $75.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.67 | $72.16 | $74.15 | $42.17 | $50.46 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.5% | +79.4% | +95.2% | +93.3% | +96.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.3 | 57.1 | 51.4 | 53.1 | 51.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 111K | 231K | 277K | 112K | 462K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MGEE and NWE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FMBH as "Hold", MGEE as "Hold", OTTR as "Hold", MBWM as "Buy", NWE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 14.4% upside for FMBH (target: $50) vs -8.4% for NWE (target: $66). For income investors, NWE offers the higher dividend yield at 3.63% vs FMBH's 2.23%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $50.00 | $73.00 | $81.00 | $57.00 | $66.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | +2.5% | +2.4% | +2.8% | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 30 | 11 | 6 | 20 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.98 | $1.85 | $2.09 | $1.47 | $2.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MBWM leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). OTTR leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 4 tied.
FMBH vs MGEE vs OTTR vs MBWM vs NWE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FMBH or MGEE or OTTR or MBWM or NWE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MGE Energy, Inc.
(MGEE) is the stronger pick with 9. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 0% for Otter Tail Corporation (OTTR). Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FMBH or MGEE or OTTR or MBWM or NWE?
On trailing P/E, Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) is the cheapest at 9.
5x versus Northwestern Energy Group Inc at 24. 6x. On forward P/E, Mercantile Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Mercantile Bank Corporation wins at 0. 64x versus MGE Energy, Inc. 's 2. 52x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FMBH or MGEE or OTTR or MBWM or NWE?
Over the past 5 years, Otter Tail Corporation (OTTR) delivered a total return of +98.
1%, compared to +10. 2% for First Mid Bancshares, Inc. (FMBH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OTTR returned +242. 5% versus NWE's +65. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FMBH or MGEE or OTTR or MBWM or NWE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MGE Energy, Inc.
(MGEE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 18β versus First Mid Bancshares, Inc. 's 0. 88β — meaning FMBH is approximately 381% more volatile than MGEE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Mid Bancshares, Inc. (FMBH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 59% versus 114% for Northwestern Energy Group Inc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FMBH or MGEE or OTTR or MBWM or NWE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MGE Energy, Inc.
(MGEE) is pulling ahead at 9. 9% versus -2. 0% for Otter Tail Corporation (OTTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Mid Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 16. 1% year-over-year, compared to -19. 5% for Northwestern Energy Group Inc. Over a 3-year CAGR, NWE leads at 2. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FMBH or MGEE or OTTR or MBWM or NWE?
Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) is the more profitable company, earning 23.
9% net margin versus 11. 2% for Northwestern Energy Group Inc — meaning it keeps 23. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MBWM leads at 27. 5% versus 20. 2% for NWE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MGEE leads at 97. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FMBH or MGEE or OTTR or MBWM or NWE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 64x versus MGE Energy, Inc. 's 2. 52x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 19. 3x for Northwestern Energy Group Inc — 9. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FMBH: 14. 4% to $50. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FMBH or MGEE or OTTR or MBWM or NWE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Northwestern Energy Group Inc (NWE) offers the highest yield at 3. 6%, versus 2. 2% for First Mid Bancshares, Inc. (FMBH).
09Is FMBH or MGEE or OTTR or MBWM or NWE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MGE Energy, Inc.
(MGEE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 18), 2. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MGEE: +71. 3%, FMBH: +108. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FMBH and MGEE and OTTR and MBWM and NWE?
These companies operate in different sectors (FMBH (Financial Services) and MGEE (Utilities) and OTTR (Utilities) and MBWM (Financial Services) and NWE (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FMBH is a small-cap deep-value stock; MGEE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OTTR is a small-cap deep-value stock; MBWM is a small-cap deep-value stock; NWE is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.