Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FRME vs WTFC vs IBCP vs FULT vs NBTB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
FRME vs WTFC vs IBCP vs FULT vs NBTB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $2.57B | $10.13B | $699M | $4.13B | $2.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.05B | $4.23B | $315M | $1.89B | $867M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $226M | $824M | $69M | $392M | $169M |
| Gross Margin | 61.0% | 62.2% | 69.6% | 67.4% | 72.1% |
| Operating Margin | 24.7% | 26.4% | 25.8% | 25.7% | 25.3% |
| Forward P/E | 11.1x | 11.6x | 9.6x | 10.6x | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $1000M | $4.48B | $117M | $1.30B | $327M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $84M | $468M | $52M | $271M | $185M |
FRME vs WTFC vs IBCP vs FULT vs NBTB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Merchants Cor… (FRME) | 100 | 144.4 | +44.4% |
| Wintrust Financial … (WTFC) | 100 | 356.9 | +256.9% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 245.7 | +145.7% |
| Fulton Financial Co… (FULT) | 100 | 191.3 | +91.3% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FRME vs WTFC vs IBCP vs FULT vs NBTB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FRME is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.95, yield 3.5%
- Better valuation composite
WTFC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 224.8% 10Y total return vs IBCP's 184.6%
- PEG 0.59 vs IBCP's 1.82
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- +34.0% vs NBTB's +9.0%
IBCP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 370.62x
- Beta 0.83, yield 3.0%, current ratio 370.62x
- NIM 3.3% vs FRME's 2.8%
- Beta 0.83 vs WTFC's 1.16, lower leverage
FULT is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 3.6% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs FRME's 3.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs FRME's -0.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs FRME's -0.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs WTFC's 1.16, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs FRME's 3.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.0% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
FRME vs WTFC vs IBCP vs FULT vs NBTB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FRME vs WTFC vs IBCP vs FULT vs NBTB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IBCP leads in 1 of 6 categories
WTFC leads 1 • FRME leads 0 • FULT leads 0 • NBTB leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FRME and WTFC and IBCP and FULT and NBTB each lead in 1 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WTFC is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.2B annually — 13.4x IBCP's $315M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 21.7% (IBCP) to 19.5% (WTFC).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $4.2B | $315M | $1.9B | $867M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $289M | $1.2B | $89M | $529M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $226M | $824M | $69M | $392M | $169M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $284M | $915M | $70M | $267M | $225M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.0% | +62.2% | +69.6% | +67.4% | +72.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.7% | +26.4% | +25.8% | +25.7% | +25.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.5% | +19.5% | +21.7% | +20.7% | +19.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +27.0% | +21.5% | +22.2% | +15.0% | +25.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.0% | +25.5% | +2.3% | +47.2% | +39.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FRME and IBCP and FULT each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.3x trailing earnings, FULT trades at a 24% valuation discount to NBTB's 13.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WTFC offers better value at 0.66x vs IBCP's 1.97x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.6B | $10.1B | $699M | $4.1B | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.5B | $14.1B | $764M | $5.2B | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.44x | 13.08x | 10.38x | 10.31x | 13.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.10x | 11.62x | 9.56x | 10.61x | 10.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.45x | 0.66x | 1.97x | 0.74x | 1.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.06x | 11.71x | 9.39x | 9.74x | 10.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.44x | 2.39x | 2.22x | 2.18x | 2.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.95x | 1.41x | 1.41x | 1.13x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.04x | 11.12x | 9.96x | 14.52x | 10.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $9 for FRME. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WTFC's 0.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FRME scores 8/9 vs FULT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.5% | +11.3% | +14.2% | +11.6% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +1.2% | +1.3% | +1.2% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.6% | +7.5% | +10.2% | +7.5% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.5% | +6.4% | +2.6% | +9.5% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.41x | 0.62x | 0.23x | 0.37x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $916M | $4.0B | $65M | $1.0B | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $84M | $468M | $52M | $271M | $185M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1000M | $4.5B | $117M | $1.3B | $327M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.67x | 0.74x | 0.91x | 0.84x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WTFC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WTFC five years ago would be worth $20,287 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,817 for FRME. Over the past 12 months, WTFC leads with a +34.0% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WTFC at 35.3% vs NBTB's 15.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.0% | +6.4% | +7.2% | +11.1% | +9.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +12.9% | +34.0% | +12.6% | +29.6% | +9.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +71.8% | +147.6% | +130.6% | +130.4% | +54.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.8% | +102.9% | +63.7% | +41.4% | +29.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +106.2% | +224.8% | +184.6% | +106.1% | +102.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.8% | +35.3% | +32.1% | +32.1% | +15.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IBCP and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IBCP is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WTFC's 1.16 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs IBCP's 90.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 1.16x | 0.83x | 1.13x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $43.23 | $162.96 | $37.39 | $22.99 | $46.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $34.66 | $113.75 | $29.63 | $16.60 | $39.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.7% | +92.8% | +90.8% | +93.3% | +96.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.3 | 63.5 | 50.6 | 55.8 | 57.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 378K | 438K | 176K | 2.0M | 236K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FRME and FULT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FRME as "Buy", WTFC as "Buy", IBCP as "Hold", FULT as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.0% upside for FRME (target: $49) vs 2.1% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, FULT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.59% vs IBCP's 3.05%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $49.00 | $174.57 | $38.00 | $24.00 | $46.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 22 | 7 | 20 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.5% | — | +3.0% | +3.6% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 14 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.44 | — | $1.03 | $0.77 | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.8% | 0.0% | +1.8% | +1.6% | +0.4% |
IBCP leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). WTFC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
FRME vs WTFC vs IBCP vs FULT vs NBTB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FRME or WTFC or IBCP or FULT or NBTB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 3% for First Merchants Corporation (FRME). Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E (10. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Merchants Corporation (FRME) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FRME or WTFC or IBCP or FULT or NBTB?
On trailing P/E, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is the cheapest at 10.
3x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. at 13. 5x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Wintrust Financial Corporation wins at 0. 59x versus Independent Bank Corporation's 1. 82x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FRME or WTFC or IBCP or FULT or NBTB?
Over the past 5 years, Wintrust Financial Corporation (WTFC) delivered a total return of +102.
9%, compared to -1. 8% for First Merchants Corporation (FRME). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WTFC returned +224. 8% versus NBTB's +102. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FRME or WTFC or IBCP or FULT or NBTB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
83β versus Wintrust Financial Corporation's 1. 16β — meaning WTFC is approximately 41% more volatile than IBCP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 62% for Wintrust Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FRME or WTFC or IBCP or FULT or NBTB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -0. 3% for First Merchants Corporation (FRME). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fulton Financial Corporation grew EPS 32. 5% year-over-year, compared to 3. 5% for Independent Bank Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FRME or WTFC or IBCP or FULT or NBTB?
Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
7% net margin versus 19. 5% for Wintrust Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 21. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WTFC leads at 26. 4% versus 24. 7% for FRME. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FRME or WTFC or IBCP or FULT or NBTB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Wintrust Financial Corporation (WTFC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 59x versus Independent Bank Corporation's 1. 82x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 11. 6x for Wintrust Financial Corporation — 2. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FRME: 21. 0% to $49. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FRME or WTFC or IBCP or FULT or NBTB?
In this comparison, FULT (3.
6% yield), FRME (3. 5% yield), NBTB (3. 2% yield), IBCP (3. 0% yield) pay a dividend. WTFC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FRME or WTFC or IBCP or FULT or NBTB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
83), 3. 0% yield, +184. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBCP: +184. 6%, WTFC: +224. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FRME and WTFC and IBCP and FULT and NBTB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
FRME, IBCP, FULT, NBTB pay a dividend while WTFC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.