Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GALT vs CRNX vs HALO vs RARE vs ARWR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GALT
Galectin Therapeutics Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$136M
5Y Perf.-30.4%
CRNX
Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.55B
5Y Perf.+166.1%
HALO
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.68B
5Y Perf.+168.6%
RARE
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.57B
5Y Perf.-61.8%
ARWR
Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$10.92B
5Y Perf.+141.8%

GALT vs CRNX vs HALO vs RARE vs ARWR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GALT logoGALT
CRNX logoCRNX
HALO logoHALO
RARE logoRARE
ARWR logoARWR
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$136M$4.55B$7.68B$2.57B$10.92B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$16M$1.40B$669M$622M
Net Income (TTM)$-37M$-496M$317M$-609M$-301M
Gross Margin101.6%81.9%83.6%85.1%
Operating Margin-34.6%58.4%-83.9%-35.7%
Forward P/E8.1x
Total Debt$106M$49M$0.00$1.28B$366M
Cash & Equiv.$15M$102M$134M$434M$227M

GALT vs CRNX vs HALO vs RARE vs ARWRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GALT
CRNX
HALO
RARE
ARWR
StockMay 20May 26Return
Galectin Therapeuti… (GALT)10069.6-30.4%
Crinetics Pharmaceu… (CRNX)100266.1+166.1%
Halozyme Therapeuti… (HALO)100268.6+168.6%
Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE)10038.2-61.8%
Arrowhead Pharmaceu… (ARWR)100241.8+141.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GALT vs CRNX vs HALO vs RARE vs ARWR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HALO leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. GALT also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
GALT
Galectin Therapeutics Inc.
The Income Pick

GALT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.

  • 0.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: dividends
CRNX
Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

CRNX is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.36, Low D/E 4.9%, current ratio 12.32x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
HALO
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

HALO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for defensive.

  • Beta 0.56, current ratio 4.66x
  • Better valuation composite
  • 22.7% margin vs CRNX's -31.4%
  • Beta 0.56 vs ARWR's 1.81
Best for: defensive
RARE
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
The Income Pick

RARE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.42
Best for: income & stability
ARWR
Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Growth Play

ARWR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 232.6%, EPS growth 99.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 50.5%
  • 12.5% 10Y total return vs HALO's 5.7%
  • 232.6% revenue growth vs GALT's -59.9%
  • +496.9% vs RARE's -21.8%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthARWR logoARWR232.6% revenue growth vs GALT's -59.9%
ValueHALO logoHALOBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsHALO logoHALO22.7% margin vs CRNX's -31.4%
Stability / SafetyHALO logoHALOBeta 0.56 vs ARWR's 1.81
DividendsGALT logoGALT0.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ARWR logoARWR+496.9% vs RARE's -21.8%
Efficiency (ROA)HALO logoHALO12.5% ROA vs GALT's -290.0%

GALT vs CRNX vs HALO vs RARE vs ARWR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GALTGalectin Therapeutics Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CRNXCrinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
70.4%$5M
License and Service
29.6%$2M
HALOHalozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
FY 2025
Royalty
53.6%$868M
Product
23.3%$376M
Collaborative Agreements
9.4%$152M
Bulk rHuPH20
8.2%$133M
Sales-based milestone
4.3%$70M
Upfront Fees
1.1%$18M
RAREUltragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
FY 2025
Product
54.8%$369M
Royalty
45.2%$304M
ARWRArrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

GALT vs CRNX vs HALO vs RARE vs ARWR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHALOLAGGINGCRNX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HALO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

HALO and GALT operate at a comparable scale, with $1.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. HALO is the more profitable business, keeping 22.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRNX's -31.4%. On growth, CRNX holds the edge at +28.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricGALT logoGALTGalectin Therapeu…CRNX logoCRNXCrinetics Pharmac…HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…ARWR logoARWRArrowhead Pharmac…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$16M$1.4B$669M$622M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$31M-$543M$945M-$536M-$203M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$37M-$496M$317M-$609M-$301M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$31M-$420M$645M-$487M-$51M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+101.6%+81.9%+83.6%+85.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-34.6%+58.4%-83.9%-35.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-31.4%+22.7%-91.0%-48.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-26.6%+46.2%-72.8%-8.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+28.7%+51.6%-2.4%-86.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+27.8%-18.3%-2.1%-17.2%-133.8%
HALO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

HALO leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, HALO's 8.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ARWR's 90.4x.

MetricGALT logoGALTGalectin Therapeu…CRNX logoCRNXCrinetics Pharmac…HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…ARWR logoARWRArrowhead Pharmac…
Market CapShares × price$136M$4.6B$7.7B$2.6B$10.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$227M$4.5B$7.5B$3.4B$11.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-2.78x-8.78x25.46x-4.48x-6389.34x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.09x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.11x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.34x90.41x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue591.48x5.50x3.82x13.16x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.12x165.47x20.71x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.91x69.58x
HALO leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HALO leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

HALO delivers a 6.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. CRNX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARWR's 0.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARWR scores 6/9 vs GALT's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricGALT logoGALTGalectin Therapeu…CRNX logoCRNXCrinetics Pharmac…HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…ARWR logoARWRArrowhead Pharmac…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-44.0%+6.5%-6.1%-55.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-2.9%-39.5%+12.5%-45.8%-18.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-37.8%+73.4%-89.4%+9.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-42.6%+38.2%-46.4%+8.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–912546
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.05x0.73x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$91M-$53M-$134M$842M$140M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$15M$102M$134M$434M$227M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$106M$49M$0$1.3B$366M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-4.24x46.08x-14.49x-1.03x
HALO leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ARWR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CRNX five years ago would be worth $25,634 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,281 for RARE. Over the past 12 months, ARWR leads with a +496.9% total return vs RARE's -21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HALO at 29.1% vs RARE's -17.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGALT logoGALTGalectin Therapeu…CRNX logoCRNXCrinetics Pharmac…HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…ARWR logoARWRArrowhead Pharmac…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-47.9%-7.0%-7.3%+10.7%+15.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+34.4%+38.5%-7.1%-21.8%+496.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+12.2%+97.3%+115.3%-44.5%+92.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-47.2%+156.3%+37.0%-77.2%+17.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+67.4%+77.4%+570.7%-59.4%+1253.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+3.9%+25.4%+29.1%-17.8%+24.4%
ARWR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — HALO and ARWR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

HALO is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARWR's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ARWR currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs GALT's 29.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGALT logoGALTGalectin Therapeu…CRNX logoCRNXCrinetics Pharmac…HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…ARWR logoARWRArrowhead Pharmac…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.70x1.36x0.56x1.42x1.81x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$7.13$57.99$82.22$42.37$79.48
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.21$25.83$47.50$18.29$12.44
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+29.6%+75.0%+79.3%+61.7%+98.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10041.962.652.466.669.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded347K1.1M1.4M1.8M1.9M
Evenly matched — HALO and ARWR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

RARE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: GALT as "Buy", CRNX as "Buy", HALO as "Buy", RARE as "Buy", ARWR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 421.3% upside for GALT (target: $11) vs 4.2% for ARWR (target: $81).

MetricGALT logoGALTGalectin Therapeu…CRNX logoCRNXCrinetics Pharmac…HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…ARWR logoARWRArrowhead Pharmac…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$11.00$86.60$78.33$51.50$81.22
# AnalystsCovering analysts1118273320
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.00
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+4.5%0.0%0.0%
RARE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

HALO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ARWR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallHalozyme Therapeutics, Inc. (HALO)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GALT vs CRNX vs HALO vs RARE vs ARWR: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GALT or CRNX or HALO or RARE or ARWR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(ARWR) is the stronger pick with 232. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 20. 1% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. (HALO) offers the better valuation at 25. 5x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Galectin Therapeutics Inc. (GALT) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — GALT or CRNX or HALO or RARE or ARWR?

Over the past 5 years, Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(CRNX) delivered a total return of +156. 3%, compared to -77. 2% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARWR returned +1253% versus RARE's -59. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — GALT or CRNX or HALO or RARE or ARWR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

(HALO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 56β versus Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 1. 81β — meaning ARWR is approximately 225% more volatile than HALO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (CRNX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 73% for Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — GALT or CRNX or HALO or RARE or ARWR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(ARWR) is pulling ahead at 232. 6% versus 20. 1% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 99. 8% year-over-year, compared to -34. 1% for Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARWR leads at 50. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — GALT or CRNX or HALO or RARE or ARWR?

Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

(HALO) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 7% net margin versus -60. 5% for Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HALO leads at 58. 4% versus -67. 1% for CRNX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARWR leads at 97. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is GALT or CRNX or HALO or RARE or ARWR more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GALT: 421.

3% to $11. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — GALT or CRNX or HALO or RARE or ARWR?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is GALT or CRNX or HALO or RARE or ARWR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

(HALO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 56), +570. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HALO: +570. 7%, RARE: -59. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between GALT and CRNX and HALO and RARE and ARWR?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: GALT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CRNX is a small-cap high-growth stock; HALO is a small-cap high-growth stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock; ARWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

GALT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CRNX

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 1436%
  • Gross Margin > 60%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HALO

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 25%
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RARE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 50%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ARWR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 51%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.