Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GDOT vs SOFI vs LC vs UPST vs AFRM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GDOT
Green Dot Corporation

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$716M
5Y Perf.-74.8%
SOFI
SoFi Technologies, Inc.

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$20.40B
5Y Perf.-36.4%
LC
LendingClub Corporation

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.92B
5Y Perf.+53.8%
UPST
Upstart Holdings, Inc.

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.78B
5Y Perf.-53.4%
AFRM
Affirm Holdings, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$22.44B
5Y Perf.-32.4%

GDOT vs SOFI vs LC vs UPST vs AFRM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GDOT logoGDOT
SOFI logoSOFI
LC logoLC
UPST logoUPST
AFRM logoAFRM
IndustryFinancial - Credit ServicesFinancial - Credit ServicesFinancial - Credit ServicesFinancial - Credit ServicesSoftware - Infrastructure
Market Cap$716M$20.40B$1.92B$2.78B$22.44B
Revenue (TTM)$2.08B$4.77B$1.33B$1.08B$3.20B
Net Income (TTM)$-99M$481M$136M$49M$382M
Gross Margin24.5%75.1%64.7%95.2%62.6%
Operating Margin2.7%11.0%25.0%5.1%10.2%
Forward P/E8.5x26.5x9.6x14.7x62.5x
Total Debt$65M$1.82B$16M$1.85B$7.85B
Cash & Equiv.$1.42B$4.93B$918M$657M$1.35B

GDOT vs SOFI vs LC vs UPST vs AFRMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GDOT
SOFI
LC
UPST
AFRM
StockJan 21May 26Return
Green Dot Corporati… (GDOT)10025.2-74.8%
SoFi Technologies, … (SOFI)10063.6-36.4%
LendingClub Corpora… (LC)100153.8+53.8%
Upstart Holdings, I… (UPST)10046.6-53.4%
Affirm Holdings, In… (AFRM)10067.6-32.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GDOT vs SOFI vs LC vs UPST vs AFRM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: GDOT and AFRM are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Affirm Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. LC and UPST also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
GDOT
Green Dot Corporation
The Banking Pick

GDOT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and stability.

  • Lower P/E (8.5x vs 62.5x)
  • Beta 1.13 vs UPST's 2.96, lower leverage
Best for: value and stability
SOFI
SoFi Technologies, Inc.
The Banking Pick

SOFI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 52.7% 10Y total return vs LC's -27.7%
Best for: long-term compounding
LC
LendingClub Corporation
The Banking Pick

LC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.36
  • Lower volatility, beta 2.36, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 466.38x
  • Beta 2.36, current ratio 466.38x
  • NIM 5.4% vs SOFI's 4.4%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
UPST
Upstart Holdings, Inc.
The Banking Pick

UPST is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 58.9%, EPS growth 131.3%
  • 58.9% NII/revenue growth vs LC's 15.0%
Best for: growth exposure
AFRM
Affirm Holdings, Inc.
The Quality Compounder

AFRM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.

  • 11.9% margin vs GDOT's -4.8%
  • 3.1% ROA vs GDOT's -1.7%, ROIC -0.7% vs 4.4%
Best for: quality and efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthUPST logoUPST58.9% NII/revenue growth vs LC's 15.0%
ValueGDOT logoGDOTLower P/E (8.5x vs 62.5x)
Quality / MarginsAFRM logoAFRM11.9% margin vs GDOT's -4.8%
Stability / SafetyGDOT logoGDOTBeta 1.13 vs UPST's 2.96, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)LC logoLC+62.4% vs UPST's -37.6%
Efficiency (ROA)AFRM logoAFRM3.1% ROA vs GDOT's -1.7%, ROIC -0.7% vs 4.4%

GDOT vs SOFI vs LC vs UPST vs AFRM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GDOTGreen Dot Corporation
FY 2025
Card Revenues And Other Fees
78.7%$1.6B
Processing And Settlement Service
12.1%$240M
Interchange Revenues
9.3%$185M
SOFISoFi Technologies, Inc.
FY 2025
Lending Segment
48.1%$1.8B
Financial Services Segment
40.1%$1.5B
Technology Platform Segment
11.7%$450M
LCLendingClub Corporation
FY 2025
Financial Service
86.3%$373M
Servicing Fees
13.7%$59M
UPSTUpstart Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Servicing Fees, Net
51.7%$157M
Servicing Fees
33.0%$100M
Borrower Fees
9.7%$29M
Collection Agency Fees
4.8%$14M
Other Fees
0.9%$3M
AFRMAffirm Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Merchant Network
79.2%$883M
Virtual Card Network
20.8%$231M

GDOT vs SOFI vs LC vs UPST vs AFRM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLGDOTLAGGINGUPST

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — LC and AFRM each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

SOFI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.8B annually — 4.4x UPST's $1.1B. AFRM is the more profitable business, keeping 11.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GDOT's -4.8%.

MetricGDOT logoGDOTGreen Dot Corpora…SOFI logoSOFISoFi Technologies…LC logoLCLendingClub Corpo…UPST logoUPSTUpstart Holdings,…AFRM logoAFRMAffirm Holdings, …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.1B$4.8B$1.3B$1.1B$3.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$141M$760M$287M$68M$533M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$99M$481M$136M$49M$382M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$60M-$2.6B-$2.9B-$146M$787M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+24.5%+75.1%+64.7%+95.2%+62.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+2.7%+11.0%+25.0%+5.1%+10.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-4.8%+10.1%+10.2%+5.0%+11.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+3.2%-83.5%-2.1%-15.4%+24.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-65.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-9.9%-56.7%+3.2%-169.2%
Evenly matched — LC and AFRM each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

GDOT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 14.5x trailing earnings, LC trades at a 97% valuation discount to AFRM's 449.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LC's 2.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AFRM's 210.0x.

MetricGDOT logoGDOTGreen Dot Corpora…SOFI logoSOFISoFi Technologies…LC logoLCLendingClub Corpo…UPST logoUPSTUpstart Holdings,…AFRM logoAFRMAffirm Holdings, …
Market CapShares × price$716M$20.4B$1.9B$2.8B$22.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$640M$17.3B$1.0B$4.0B$28.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-7.06x41.03x14.51x64.44x449.07x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.50x26.45x9.56x14.69x62.49x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate4.49x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple-4.55x22.75x2.57x50.13x209.99x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.34x4.28x1.44x2.58x6.96x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.78x1.91x1.32x3.90x7.48x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.85x37.29x
GDOT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

LC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

AFRM delivers a 11.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-11 for GDOT. LC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AFRM's 2.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LC scores 6/9 vs SOFI's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricGDOT logoGDOTGreen Dot Corpora…SOFI logoSOFISoFi Technologies…LC logoLCLendingClub Corpo…UPST logoUPSTUpstart Holdings,…AFRM logoAFRMAffirm Holdings, …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-10.8%+5.9%+9.5%+6.6%+11.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-1.7%+1.1%+1.2%+1.7%+3.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.4%+3.6%+17.3%+1.7%-0.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+5.9%+1.2%+3.3%+2.4%-0.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–943656
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.07x0.17x0.01x2.32x2.56x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$1.4B-$3.1B-$902M$1.2B$6.5B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1.4B$4.9B$918M$657M$1.4B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$65M$1.8B$16M$1.9B$7.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense12.01x0.45x0.67x1.66x1.88x
LC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AFRM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AFRM five years ago would be worth $12,474 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,822 for GDOT. Over the past 12 months, LC leads with a +62.4% total return vs UPST's -37.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AFRM at 78.0% vs GDOT's -10.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGDOT logoGDOTGreen Dot Corpora…SOFI logoSOFISoFi Technologies…LC logoLCLendingClub Corpo…UPST logoUPSTUpstart Holdings,…AFRM logoAFRMAffirm Holdings, …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+0.3%-41.7%-12.7%-36.7%-9.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+47.8%+23.0%+62.4%-37.6%+30.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-27.8%+192.5%+142.9%+116.7%+464.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-71.8%-3.1%+15.1%-69.8%+24.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-45.7%+52.7%-27.7%-1.6%-30.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-10.3%+43.0%+34.4%+29.4%+78.0%
AFRM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

GDOT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

GDOT is the less volatile stock with a 1.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UPST's 2.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GDOT currently trades 82.0% from its 52-week high vs UPST's 33.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGDOT logoGDOTGreen Dot Corpora…SOFI logoSOFISoFi Technologies…LC logoLCLendingClub Corpo…UPST logoUPSTUpstart Holdings,…AFRM logoAFRMAffirm Holdings, …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.13x2.54x2.36x2.96x2.72x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$15.41$32.73$21.67$87.30$100.00
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$8.05$12.56$9.70$23.96$42.09
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+82.0%+48.9%+77.0%+33.2%+67.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10066.541.957.442.763.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded497K65.8M2.1M4.8M5.3M
GDOT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

LC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: GDOT as "Hold", SOFI as "Hold", LC as "Buy", UPST as "Buy", AFRM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 55.8% upside for UPST (target: $45) vs 19.9% for AFRM (target: $81).

MetricGDOT logoGDOTGreen Dot Corpora…SOFI logoSOFISoFi Technologies…LC logoLCLendingClub Corpo…UPST logoUPSTUpstart Holdings,…AFRM logoAFRMAffirm Holdings, …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$16.13$20.89$22.75$45.17$80.77
# AnalystsCovering analysts3927292233
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.3%0.0%0.0%+1.1%
LC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

GDOT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). LC leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallGreen Dot Corporation (GDOT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GDOT vs SOFI vs LC vs UPST vs AFRM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GDOT or SOFI or LC or UPST or AFRM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Upstart Holdings, Inc.

(UPST) is the stronger pick with 58. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 15. 0% for LendingClub Corporation (LC). LendingClub Corporation (LC) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LendingClub Corporation (LC) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — GDOT or SOFI or LC or UPST or AFRM?

On trailing P/E, LendingClub Corporation (LC) is the cheapest at 14.

5x versus Affirm Holdings, Inc. at 449. 1x. On forward P/E, Green Dot Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — GDOT or SOFI or LC or UPST or AFRM?

Over the past 5 years, Affirm Holdings, Inc.

(AFRM) delivered a total return of +24. 7%, compared to -71. 8% for Green Dot Corporation (GDOT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SOFI returned +52. 7% versus GDOT's -45. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — GDOT or SOFI or LC or UPST or AFRM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Green Dot Corporation (GDOT) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

13β versus Upstart Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 96β — meaning UPST is approximately 161% more volatile than GDOT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LendingClub Corporation (LC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for Affirm Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — GDOT or SOFI or LC or UPST or AFRM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Upstart Holdings, Inc.

(UPST) is pulling ahead at 58. 9% versus 15. 0% for LendingClub Corporation (LC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LendingClub Corporation grew EPS 155. 6% year-over-year, compared to -258. 0% for Green Dot Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — GDOT or SOFI or LC or UPST or AFRM?

LendingClub Corporation (LC) is the more profitable company, earning 10.

2% net margin versus -4. 8% for Green Dot Corporation — meaning it keeps 10. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LC leads at 25. 0% versus -2. 7% for AFRM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UPST leads at 95. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is GDOT or SOFI or LC or UPST or AFRM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Green Dot Corporation (GDOT) trades at 8.

5x forward P/E versus 62. 5x for Affirm Holdings, Inc. — 54. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UPST: 55. 8% to $45. 17.

08

Which pays a better dividend — GDOT or SOFI or LC or UPST or AFRM?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is GDOT or SOFI or LC or UPST or AFRM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Green Dot Corporation (GDOT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

13)). Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) carries a higher beta of 2. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GDOT: -45. 7%, AFRM: -30. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between GDOT and SOFI and LC and UPST and AFRM?

These companies operate in different sectors (GDOT (Financial Services) and SOFI (Financial Services) and LC (Financial Services) and UPST (Financial Services) and AFRM (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: GDOT is a small-cap high-growth stock; SOFI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; LC is a small-cap deep-value stock; UPST is a small-cap high-growth stock; AFRM is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

GDOT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Gross Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SOFI

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LC

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

UPST

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 29%
  • Gross Margin > 57%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AFRM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform GDOT and SOFI and LC and UPST and AFRM on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(GDOT: 20.7% · SOFI: 28.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.