GHLD vs LOAN vs UWMC vs RKT

For growth investors, UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) is the stronger pick with 65.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 27. 4% for Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT). Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. (LOAN) offers the better valuation at 8. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Guild Holdings Company (GHLD) a "Hold" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.

(LOAN) is the cheapest at 8. 6x versus UWM Holdings Corporation at 28. 2x. On forward P/E, UWM Holdings Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Guild Holdings Company (GHLD) delivered a total return of +65.

7%, compared to -22. 7% for UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LOAN returned +102. 8% versus UWMC's -41. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Guild Holdings Company (GHLD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

04β versus Rocket Companies, Inc. 's 1. 77β — meaning RKT is approximately 4121% more volatile than GHLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. (LOAN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 52% versus 9% for UWM Holdings Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) is pulling ahead at 65.

8% versus 27. 4% for Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Guild Holdings Company grew EPS 343. 8% year-over-year, compared to -123. 8% for Rocket Companies, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.

(LOAN) is the more profitable company, earning 57. 7% net margin versus -1. 0% for Rocket Companies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 57. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LOAN leads at 81. 6% versus 8. 7% for RKT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RKT leads at 91. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) trades at 8.

0x forward P/E versus 19. 3x for Rocket Companies, Inc. — 11. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UWMC: 76. 9% to $5. 98.

In this comparison, UWMC (100.

0% yield), LOAN (10. 8% yield), GHLD (2. 5% yield) pay a dividend. RKT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Guild Holdings Company (GHLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

04), 2. 5% yield). Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GHLD: +58. 4%, RKT: -20. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (GHLD (Financial Services) and LOAN (Real Estate) and UWMC (Financial Services) and RKT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

GHLD, LOAN, UWMC pay a dividend while RKT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.