Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GTLB vs MSFT vs TEAM vs ESTC vs DDOG

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GTLB
GitLab Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.30B
5Y Perf.-76.9%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.13T
5Y Perf.+26.9%
TEAM
Atlassian Corporation

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • AU
Market Cap$24.26B
5Y Perf.-79.8%
ESTC
Elastic N.V.

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.45B
5Y Perf.-70.2%
DDOG
Datadog, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$67.18B
5Y Perf.+13.0%

GTLB vs MSFT vs TEAM vs ESTC vs DDOG — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GTLB logoGTLB
MSFT logoMSFT
TEAM logoTEAM
ESTC logoESTC
DDOG logoDDOG
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationSoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - ApplicationSoftware - ApplicationSoftware - Application
Market Cap$4.30B$3.13T$24.26B$5.45B$67.18B
Revenue (TTM)$957M$318.27B$6.19B$1.68B$3.67B
Net Income (TTM)$-56M$125.22B$-217M$-85M$136M
Gross Margin87.5%68.3%83.9%76.0%79.9%
Operating Margin-12.2%46.8%-3.7%-1.7%-0.7%
Forward P/E32.2x25.3x19.4x20.4x88.0x
Total Debt$0.00$112.18B$1.24B$595M$1.54B
Cash & Equiv.$230M$30.24B$2.51B$728M$401M

GTLB vs MSFT vs TEAM vs ESTC vs DDOGLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GTLB
MSFT
TEAM
ESTC
DDOG
StockOct 21May 26Return
GitLab Inc. (GTLB)10023.1-76.9%
Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT)100126.9+26.9%
Atlassian Corporati… (TEAM)10020.2-79.8%
Elastic N.V. (ESTC)10029.8-70.2%
Datadog, Inc. (DDOG)100113.0+13.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GTLB vs MSFT vs TEAM vs ESTC vs DDOG

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MSFT leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Datadog, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. TEAM also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
GTLB
GitLab Inc.
The Growth Angle

GTLB lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
The Income Pick

MSFT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 0.8%
  • 7.9% 10Y total return vs DDOG's 402.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 32.7%, current ratio 1.35x
  • Beta 0.89, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.35x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
TEAM
Atlassian Corporation
The Value Play

TEAM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Lower P/E (19.4x vs 88.0x)
Best for: value
ESTC
Elastic N.V.
The Quality Angle

Among these 5 stocks, ESTC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
DDOG
Datadog, Inc.
The Growth Play

DDOG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 27.7%, EPS growth -41.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.9%
  • 27.7% revenue growth vs MSFT's 14.9%
  • +78.0% vs TEAM's -55.1%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthDDOG logoDDOG27.7% revenue growth vs MSFT's 14.9%
ValueTEAM logoTEAMLower P/E (19.4x vs 88.0x)
Quality / MarginsMSFT logoMSFT39.3% margin vs GTLB's -5.8%
Stability / SafetyMSFT logoMSFTBeta 0.89 vs DDOG's 1.40, lower leverage
DividendsMSFT logoMSFT0.8% yield; 19-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)DDOG logoDDOG+78.0% vs TEAM's -55.1%
Efficiency (ROA)MSFT logoMSFT19.2% ROA vs TEAM's -3.7%, ROIC 24.9% vs -110.3%

GTLB vs MSFT vs TEAM vs ESTC vs DDOG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GTLBGitLab Inc.
FY 2025
Subscription and Circulation
60.4%$459M
Subscription, Software As A Service
28.5%$216M
License
9.0%$68M
Professional Services and Other
2.1%$16M
MSFTMicrosoft Corporation
FY 2025
Server Products And Cloud Services
34.9%$98.4B
Microsoft Three Six Five Commercial Products And Cloud Services
31.2%$87.8B
Gaming
8.3%$23.5B
Linked In Corporation
6.3%$17.8B
Windows
6.1%$17.3B
Search Advertising
4.9%$13.9B
Dynamics Products And Cloud Services
2.8%$7.8B
Other (3)
5.4%$15.2B
TEAMAtlassian Corporation
FY 2025
License and Service
94.5%$4.9B
Product and Service, Other
5.5%$285M
ESTCElastic N.V.
FY 2025
Subscription
93.3%$1.4B
Professional Services
6.7%$99M
DDOGDatadog, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

GTLB vs MSFT vs TEAM vs ESTC vs DDOG — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMSFTLAGGINGESTC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — MSFT and DDOG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

MSFT is the larger business by revenue, generating $318.3B annually — 332.6x GTLB's $957M. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GTLB's -5.8%. On growth, DDOG holds the edge at +32.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricGTLB logoGTLBGitLab Inc.MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…TEAM logoTEAMAtlassian Corpora…ESTC logoESTCElastic N.V.DDOG logoDDOGDatadog, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$957M$318.3B$6.2B$1.7B$3.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$104M$192.6B-$105M-$27M$73M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$56M$125.2B-$217M-$85M$136M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$222M$72.9B$1.2B$257M$1.1B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+87.5%+68.3%+83.9%+76.0%+79.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-12.2%+46.8%-3.7%-1.7%-0.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-5.8%+39.3%-3.5%-5.0%+3.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+23.2%+22.9%+19.5%+15.3%+29.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+23.9%+18.3%+31.7%+17.7%+32.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-133.3%+23.4%-40.7%+143.8%+120.9%
Evenly matched — MSFT and DDOG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TEAM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 30.9x trailing earnings, MSFT trades at a 95% valuation discount to DDOG's 629.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MSFT's 19.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DDOG's 874.0x.

MetricGTLB logoGTLBGitLab Inc.MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…TEAM logoTEAMAtlassian Corpora…ESTC logoESTCElastic N.V.DDOG logoDDOGDatadog, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$4.3B$3.13T$24.3B$5.4B$67.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4.1B$3.21T$23.0B$5.3B$68.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-74.06x30.86x-94.26x-49.63x629.10x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.32.24x25.34x19.42x20.44x87.97x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.64x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple19.72x874.03x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.49x11.10x4.65x3.67x19.60x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.15x9.15x17.97x5.77x18.38x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF19.36x43.66x17.14x20.81x67.14x
TEAM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MSFT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

MSFT delivers a 33.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-17 for TEAM. MSFT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.33x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TEAM's 0.92x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TEAM scores 7/9 vs GTLB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricGTLB logoGTLBGitLab Inc.MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…TEAM logoTEAMAtlassian Corpora…ESTC logoESTCElastic N.V.DDOG logoDDOGDatadog, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-5.9%+33.1%-16.7%-10.7%+3.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-3.6%+19.2%-3.7%-3.5%+2.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-12.5%+24.9%-110.3%-5.2%-0.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-12.1%+29.7%-4.8%-3.7%-1.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–946776
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.33x0.92x0.64x0.41x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$230M$81.9B-$1.3B-$133M$1.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$230M$30.2B$2.5B$728M$401M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$112.2B$1.2B$595M$1.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense55.65x-3.49x-2.17x4.03x
MSFT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

DDOG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in DDOG five years ago would be worth $24,418 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,495 for GTLB. Over the past 12 months, DDOG leads with a +78.0% total return vs TEAM's -55.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DDOG at 33.9% vs TEAM's -10.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGTLB logoGTLBGitLab Inc.MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…TEAM logoTEAMAtlassian Corpora…ESTC logoESTCElastic N.V.DDOG logoDDOGDatadog, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-28.4%-10.8%-40.3%-28.9%+41.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-44.9%-2.1%-55.1%-38.9%+78.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-14.2%+39.5%-29.0%-10.2%+140.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-75.1%+72.5%-57.9%-52.3%+144.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-75.1%+787.7%+338.0%-26.3%+402.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-5.0%+11.7%-10.8%-3.5%+33.9%
DDOG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MSFT and DDOG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MSFT is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DDOG's 1.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DDOG currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs TEAM's 39.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGTLB logoGTLBGitLab Inc.MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…TEAM logoTEAMAtlassian Corpora…ESTC logoESTCElastic N.V.DDOG logoDDOGDatadog, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.21x0.89x0.98x1.08x1.40x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$54.08$555.45$232.36$96.07$201.69
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$18.74$356.28$56.01$42.05$98.01
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+47.9%+75.8%+39.8%+53.7%+93.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10059.354.064.550.466.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded6.4M32.5M7.5M1.9M5.0M
Evenly matched — MSFT and DDOG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

MSFT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: GTLB as "Buy", MSFT as "Buy", TEAM as "Buy", ESTC as "Buy", DDOG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.5% upside for ESTC (target: $84) vs -7.5% for DDOG (target: $175). MSFT is the only dividend payer here at 0.77% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricGTLB logoGTLBGitLab Inc.MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…TEAM logoTEAMAtlassian Corpora…ESTC logoESTCElastic N.V.DDOG logoDDOGDatadog, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$36.13$551.75$137.79$84.38$174.63
# AnalystsCovering analysts3081423447
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises192
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$3.23
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.3%+0.6%+3.2%0.0%0.0%
MSFT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

MSFT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). TEAM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallMicrosoft Corporation (MSFT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GTLB vs MSFT vs TEAM vs ESTC vs DDOG: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GTLB or MSFT or TEAM or ESTC or DDOG a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Datadog, Inc.

(DDOG) is the stronger pick with 27. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 14. 9% for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) offers the better valuation at 30. 9x trailing P/E (25. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GitLab Inc. (GTLB) a "Buy" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — GTLB or MSFT or TEAM or ESTC or DDOG?

On trailing P/E, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the cheapest at 30.

9x versus Datadog, Inc. at 629. 1x. On forward P/E, Atlassian Corporation is actually cheaper at 19. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — GTLB or MSFT or TEAM or ESTC or DDOG?

Over the past 5 years, Datadog, Inc.

(DDOG) delivered a total return of +144. 2%, compared to -75. 1% for GitLab Inc. (GTLB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSFT returned +787. 7% versus GTLB's -75. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — GTLB or MSFT or TEAM or ESTC or DDOG?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

89β versus Datadog, Inc. 's 1. 40β — meaning DDOG is approximately 58% more volatile than MSFT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 33% versus 92% for Atlassian Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — GTLB or MSFT or TEAM or ESTC or DDOG?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Datadog, Inc.

(DDOG) is pulling ahead at 27. 7% versus 14. 9% for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Microsoft Corporation grew EPS 15. 6% year-over-year, compared to -775. 0% for GitLab Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GTLB leads at 31. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — GTLB or MSFT or TEAM or ESTC or DDOG?

Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.

1% net margin versus -7. 3% for Elastic N. V. — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus -12. 2% for GTLB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GTLB leads at 87. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is GTLB or MSFT or TEAM or ESTC or DDOG more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) trades at 19.

4x forward P/E versus 88. 0x for Datadog, Inc. — 68. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ESTC: 63. 5% to $84. 38.

08

Which pays a better dividend — GTLB or MSFT or TEAM or ESTC or DDOG?

In this comparison, MSFT (0.

8% yield) pays a dividend. GTLB, TEAM, ESTC, DDOG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is GTLB or MSFT or TEAM or ESTC or DDOG better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

89), 0. 8% yield, +787. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSFT: +787. 7%, GTLB: -75. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between GTLB and MSFT and TEAM and ESTC and DDOG?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: GTLB is a small-cap high-growth stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; TEAM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ESTC is a small-cap high-growth stock; DDOG is a mid-cap high-growth stock. MSFT pays a dividend while GTLB, TEAM, ESTC, DDOG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

GTLB

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Gross Margin > 52%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MSFT

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 23%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TEAM

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 15%
  • Gross Margin > 50%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ESTC

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Gross Margin > 45%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DDOG

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 16%
  • Gross Margin > 47%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform GTLB and MSFT and TEAM and ESTC and DDOG on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(GTLB: 23.9% · MSFT: 18.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.