Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GTLS vs FWRD vs FBIN vs ARCB vs ODFL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Integrated Freight & Logistics
Construction
Trucking
Trucking
GTLS vs FWRD vs FBIN vs ARCB vs ODFL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Construction | Trucking | Trucking |
| Market Cap | $9.93B | $547M | $4.68B | $2.72B | $41.28B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.26B | $2.46B | $3.36B | $4.04B | $5.50B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $40M | $-91M | $195M | $56M | $1.02B |
| Gross Margin | 32.6% | 23.1% | 45.6% | 4.1% | 32.2% |
| Operating Margin | 8.5% | 2.1% | 10.6% | 2.2% | 24.8% |
| Forward P/E | 16.4x | — | 11.6x | 23.5x | 37.7x |
| Total Debt | $3.74B | $2.16B | $2.54B | $669M | $141M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $366M | $106M | $264M | $102M | $120M |
GTLS vs FWRD vs FBIN vs ARCB vs ODFL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chart Industries, I… (GTLS) | 100 | 528.5 | +428.5% |
| Forward Air Corpora… (FWRD) | 100 | 19.9 | -80.1% |
| Fortune Brands Inno… (FBIN) | 100 | 72.8 | -27.2% |
| ArcBest Corporation (ARCB) | 100 | 540.3 | +440.3% |
| Old Dominion Freigh… (ODFL) | 100 | 231.8 | +131.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GTLS vs FWRD vs FBIN vs ARCB vs ODFL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GTLS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth and stability.
- 2.5% revenue growth vs ODFL's -5.5%
- Beta 0.56 vs FWRD's 2.28, lower leverage
FWRD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 0.8%, EPS growth 88.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.1%
FBIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 1.61, yield 2.5%, current ratio 1.84x
- Lower P/E (11.6x vs 37.7x)
- 2.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs ODFL's 0.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
ARCB is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +107.5% vs FBIN's -16.8%
ODFL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 1.38, yield 0.6%
- 8.4% 10Y total return vs GTLS's 7.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.38, Low D/E 3.3%, current ratio 1.44x
- 18.6% margin vs FWRD's -3.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.5% revenue growth vs ODFL's -5.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.6x vs 37.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.6% margin vs FWRD's -3.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs FWRD's 2.28, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs ODFL's 0.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +107.5% vs FBIN's -16.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.5% ROA vs FWRD's -3.3%, ROIC 23.6% vs 1.2% |
GTLS vs FWRD vs FBIN vs ARCB vs ODFL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GTLS vs FWRD vs FBIN vs ARCB vs ODFL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ODFL leads in 2 of 6 categories
FBIN leads 1 • GTLS leads 1 • FWRD leads 0 • ARCB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ODFL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ODFL is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.5B annually — 2.2x FWRD's $2.5B. ODFL is the more profitable business, keeping 18.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FWRD's -3.7%. On growth, ARCB holds the edge at +3.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.3B | $2.5B | $3.4B | $4.0B | $5.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $644M | $206M | $482M | $217M | $1.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $40M | -$91M | $195M | $56M | $1.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $203M | $38M | $420M | $169M | $955M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.6% | +23.1% | +45.6% | +4.1% | +32.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.5% | +2.1% | +10.6% | +2.2% | +24.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | -3.7% | +5.8% | +1.4% | +18.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +1.6% | +12.5% | +4.2% | +17.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.5% | -5.1% | -106.4% | +3.3% | -5.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -36.1% | +35.1% | -2.0% | -138.5% | -11.4% |
Valuation Metrics
FBIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.8x trailing earnings, FBIN trades at a 97% valuation discount to GTLS's 628.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FBIN's 10.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ODFL's 23.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.9B | $547M | $4.7B | $2.7B | $41.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.3B | $2.6B | $7.0B | $3.3B | $41.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 628.45x | -4.98x | 15.82x | 46.48x | 41.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.40x | — | 11.56x | 23.46x | 37.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 3.66x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.33x | 13.75x | 10.08x | 12.59x | 23.93x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.33x | 0.22x | 1.05x | 0.68x | 7.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.79x | 3.32x | 1.98x | 2.16x | 9.64x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 48.95x | 35.82x | 12.77x | 23.78x | 43.22x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ODFL leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ODFL delivers a 24.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-53 for FWRD. ODFL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FWRD's 13.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FBIN scores 7/9 vs ARCB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.2% | -52.6% | +8.3% | +4.3% | +24.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | -3.3% | +3.0% | +2.3% | +18.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.4% | +1.2% | +8.1% | +3.9% | +23.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.6% | +1.5% | +9.9% | +5.1% | +27.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.11x | 13.36x | 1.07x | 0.52x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.4B | $2.1B | $2.3B | $567M | $21M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $366M | $106M | $264M | $102M | $120M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.7B | $2.2B | $2.5B | $669M | $141M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.08x | 0.32x | 4.72x | 6.58x | 4601.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — GTLS and ARCB and ODFL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ODFL five years ago would be worth $15,002 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,978 for FWRD. Over the past 12 months, ARCB leads with a +107.5% total return vs FBIN's -16.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GTLS at 17.6% vs FWRD's -42.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.6% | -31.0% | -22.8% | +58.0% | +24.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +37.6% | +0.6% | -16.8% | +107.5% | +28.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.7% | -81.3% | -36.3% | +40.5% | +29.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.5% | -80.2% | -54.0% | +37.1% | +50.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +772.5% | -47.3% | -2.4% | +627.8% | +841.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.6% | -42.8% | -13.9% | +12.0% | +8.9% |
Risk & Volatility
GTLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GTLS is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FWRD's 2.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GTLS currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs FWRD's 53.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.49x | 2.18x | 1.61x | 1.85x | 1.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $208.51 | $32.47 | $64.84 | $135.10 | $233.79 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $140.50 | $14.81 | $36.07 | $58.16 | $126.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.5% | +53.4% | +60.3% | +90.1% | +84.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.2 | 42.4 | 46.8 | 60.5 | 45.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 733K | 2.6M | 307K | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FBIN and ODFL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GTLS as "Buy", FWRD as "Hold", FBIN as "Hold", ARCB as "Buy", ODFL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 113.5% upside for FWRD (target: $37) vs -6.5% for GTLS (target: $194). For income investors, FBIN offers the higher dividend yield at 2.55% vs GTLS's 0.29%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $193.81 | $37.00 | $56.43 | $117.14 | $208.19 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 37 | 21 | 27 | 24 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | — | +2.5% | +0.4% | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 10 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.60 | — | $1.00 | $0.48 | $1.12 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | +5.3% | +2.8% | +1.8% |
ODFL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FBIN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
GTLS vs FWRD vs FBIN vs ARCB vs ODFL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GTLS or FWRD or FBIN or ARCB or ODFL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the stronger pick with 2. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 5% for Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL). Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) offers the better valuation at 15. 8x trailing P/E (11. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GTLS or FWRD or FBIN or ARCB or ODFL?
On trailing P/E, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
(FBIN) is the cheapest at 15. 8x versus Chart Industries, Inc. at 628. 5x. On forward P/E, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GTLS or FWRD or FBIN or ARCB or ODFL?
Over the past 5 years, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.
(ODFL) delivered a total return of +50. 0%, compared to -80. 2% for Forward Air Corporation (FWRD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ODFL returned +843. 0% versus FWRD's -64. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GTLS or FWRD or FBIN or ARCB or ODFL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 49β versus Forward Air Corporation's 2. 18β — meaning FWRD is approximately 342% more volatile than GTLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 13% for Forward Air Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GTLS or FWRD or FBIN or ARCB or ODFL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is pulling ahead at 2. 5% versus -5. 5% for Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Forward Air Corporation grew EPS 88. 3% year-over-year, compared to -92. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GTLS leads at 38. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GTLS or FWRD or FBIN or ARCB or ODFL?
Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.
(ODFL) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 6% net margin versus -4. 3% for Forward Air Corporation — meaning it keeps 18. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ODFL leads at 24. 8% versus 1. 5% for FWRD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FBIN leads at 44. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GTLS or FWRD or FBIN or ARCB or ODFL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
(FBIN) trades at 11. 6x forward P/E versus 37. 7x for Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. — 26. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FWRD: 113. 5% to $37. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GTLS or FWRD or FBIN or ARCB or ODFL?
In this comparison, FBIN (2.
5% yield), ODFL (0. 6% yield), ARCB (0. 4% yield), GTLS (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. FWRD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GTLS or FWRD or FBIN or ARCB or ODFL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 49), +772. 7% 10Y return). Forward Air Corporation (FWRD) carries a higher beta of 2. 18 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GTLS: +772. 7%, FWRD: -64. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GTLS and FWRD and FBIN and ARCB and ODFL?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GTLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FWRD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FBIN is a small-cap deep-value stock; ARCB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ODFL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. FBIN, ODFL pay a dividend while GTLS, FWRD, ARCB do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.