Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GWRE vs NOW vs PEGA vs DDOG vs MSFT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
GWRE vs NOW vs PEGA vs DDOG vs MSFT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $11.80B | $96.96B | $6.21B | $67.18B | $3.13T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.34B | $13.96B | $1.70B | $3.67B | $318.27B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $189M | $1.76B | $341M | $136M | $125.22B |
| Gross Margin | 63.8% | 76.6% | 75.0% | 79.9% | 68.3% |
| Operating Margin | 6.8% | 13.4% | 10.2% | -0.7% | 46.8% |
| Forward P/E | 39.7x | 22.5x | 13.5x | 88.0x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $716M | $3.20B | $76M | $1.54B | $112.18B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $699M | $3.73B | $212M | $401M | $30.24B |
GWRE vs NOW vs PEGA vs DDOG vs MSFT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guidewire Software,… (GWRE) | 100 | 136.1 | +36.1% |
| ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW) | 100 | 24.1 | -75.9% |
| Pegasystems Inc. (PEGA) | 100 | 77.2 | -22.8% |
| Datadog, Inc. (DDOG) | 100 | 264.8 | +164.8% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 100 | 229.7 | +129.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GWRE vs NOW vs PEGA vs DDOG vs MSFT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GWRE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 22.6%, EPS growth 11.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.61, Low D/E 49.1%, current ratio 2.77x
- Beta 0.61 vs NOW's 1.46
NOW is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.32 vs MSFT's 1.35
PEGA has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and efficiency.
- Lower P/E (13.5x vs 25.3x)
- 23.5% ROA vs DDOG's 2.1%, ROIC 27.2% vs -0.8%
DDOG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 27.7% revenue growth vs MSFT's 14.9%
- +78.0% vs NOW's -90.5%
MSFT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 0.8%
- 7.9% 10Y total return vs DDOG's 402.6%
- Beta 0.89, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.35x
- 39.3% margin vs DDOG's 3.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.7% revenue growth vs MSFT's 14.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.5x vs 25.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 39.3% margin vs DDOG's 3.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.61 vs NOW's 1.46 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield, 19-year raise streak, vs PEGA's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +78.0% vs NOW's -90.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 23.5% ROA vs DDOG's 2.1%, ROIC 27.2% vs -0.8% |
GWRE vs NOW vs PEGA vs DDOG vs MSFT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GWRE vs NOW vs PEGA vs DDOG vs MSFT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PEGA leads in 2 of 6 categories
DDOG leads 1 • MSFT leads 1 • GWRE leads 0 • NOW leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — DDOG and MSFT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSFT is the larger business by revenue, generating $318.3B annually — 237.2x GWRE's $1.3B. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DDOG's 3.7%. On growth, DDOG holds the edge at +32.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $14.0B | $1.7B | $3.7B | $318.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $103M | $2.7B | $193M | $73M | $192.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $189M | $1.8B | $341M | $136M | $125.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $310M | $4.6B | $495M | $1.1B | $72.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.8% | +76.6% | +75.0% | +79.9% | +68.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +13.4% | +10.2% | -0.7% | +46.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.1% | +12.6% | +20.0% | +3.7% | +39.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.1% | +33.2% | +29.1% | +29.4% | +22.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.0% | +22.1% | -9.6% | +32.2% | +18.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.6% | +2.3% | -60.0% | +120.9% | +23.4% |
Valuation Metrics
PEGA leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.2x trailing earnings, PEGA trades at a 97% valuation discount to DDOG's 629.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NOW offers better value at 0.81x vs MSFT's 1.64x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11.8B | $97.0B | $6.2B | $67.2B | $3.13T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.8B | $96.4B | $6.1B | $68.3B | $3.21T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 172.32x | 56.04x | 17.24x | 629.10x | 30.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 39.70x | 22.51x | 13.52x | 87.97x | 25.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.81x | — | — | 1.64x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 182.26x | 37.64x | 21.01x | 874.03x | 19.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.81x | 7.30x | 3.56x | 19.60x | 11.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.23x | 7.56x | 8.62x | 18.38x | 9.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 39.98x | 21.19x | 12.65x | 67.14x | 43.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PEGA leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PEGA delivers a 50.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $50 in annual profit, vs $4 for DDOG. PEGA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GWRE's 0.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PEGA scores 8/9 vs NOW's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.9% | +15.0% | +50.2% | +3.8% | +33.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.2% | +7.5% | +23.5% | +2.1% | +19.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.3% | +12.4% | +27.2% | -0.8% | +24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.3% | +13.2% | +33.4% | -1.0% | +29.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.49x | 0.25x | 0.10x | 0.41x | 0.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $17M | -$523M | -$136M | $1.1B | $81.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $699M | $3.7B | $212M | $401M | $30.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $716M | $3.2B | $76M | $1.5B | $112.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 388.85x | 185.08x | 643.17x | 4.03x | 55.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DDOG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DDOG five years ago would be worth $24,418 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,935 for NOW. Over the past 12 months, DDOG leads with a +78.0% total return vs NOW's -90.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DDOG at 33.9% vs NOW's -40.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.6% | -36.5% | -34.4% | +41.1% | -10.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -34.5% | -90.5% | -20.8% | +78.0% | -2.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +79.6% | -78.7% | +68.5% | +140.3% | +39.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +41.4% | -80.6% | -38.3% | +144.2% | +72.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +151.9% | +38.8% | +188.8% | +402.6% | +787.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.6% | -40.3% | +19.0% | +33.9% | +11.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GWRE and DDOG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GWRE is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NOW's 1.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DDOG currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs NOW's 8.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.61x | 1.46x | 1.16x | 1.40x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $272.60 | $1057.39 | $68.10 | $201.69 | $555.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $115.57 | $81.24 | $34.34 | $98.01 | $356.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.2% | +8.9% | +53.9% | +93.6% | +75.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.6 | 41.5 | 38.8 | 66.5 | 54.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 21.2M | 2.2M | 5.0M | 32.5M |
Analyst Outlook
MSFT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GWRE as "Buy", NOW as "Buy", PEGA as "Buy", DDOG as "Buy", MSFT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 75.6% upside for GWRE (target: $245) vs -7.5% for DDOG (target: $175). For income investors, MSFT offers the higher dividend yield at 0.77% vs PEGA's 0.23%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $245.17 | $151.52 | $56.60 | $174.63 | $551.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 26 | 68 | 23 | 47 | 81 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.2% | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — | 19 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.08 | — | $3.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.9% | +8.3% | 0.0% | +0.6% |
PEGA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). DDOG leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
GWRE vs NOW vs PEGA vs DDOG vs MSFT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GWRE or NOW or PEGA or DDOG or MSFT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Datadog, Inc.
(DDOG) is the stronger pick with 27. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 14. 9% for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Pegasystems Inc. (PEGA) offers the better valuation at 17. 2x trailing P/E (13. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Guidewire Software, Inc. (GWRE) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GWRE or NOW or PEGA or DDOG or MSFT?
On trailing P/E, Pegasystems Inc.
(PEGA) is the cheapest at 17. 2x versus Datadog, Inc. at 629. 1x. On forward P/E, Pegasystems Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ServiceNow, Inc. wins at 0. 32x versus Microsoft Corporation's 1. 35x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GWRE or NOW or PEGA or DDOG or MSFT?
Over the past 5 years, Datadog, Inc.
(DDOG) delivered a total return of +144. 2%, compared to -80. 6% for ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSFT returned +787. 7% versus NOW's +38. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GWRE or NOW or PEGA or DDOG or MSFT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Guidewire Software, Inc.
(GWRE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 61β versus ServiceNow, Inc. 's 1. 46β — meaning NOW is approximately 139% more volatile than GWRE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pegasystems Inc. (PEGA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 49% for Guidewire Software, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GWRE or NOW or PEGA or DDOG or MSFT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Datadog, Inc.
(DDOG) is pulling ahead at 27. 7% versus 14. 9% for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Guidewire Software, Inc. grew EPS 1192% year-over-year, compared to -41. 2% for Datadog, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DDOG leads at 26. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GWRE or NOW or PEGA or DDOG or MSFT?
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.
1% net margin versus 3. 1% for Datadog, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus -1. 3% for DDOG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DDOG leads at 80. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GWRE or NOW or PEGA or DDOG or MSFT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 32x versus Microsoft Corporation's 1. 35x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Pegasystems Inc. (PEGA) trades at 13. 5x forward P/E versus 88. 0x for Datadog, Inc. — 74. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GWRE: 75. 6% to $245. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — GWRE or NOW or PEGA or DDOG or MSFT?
In this comparison, MSFT (0.
8% yield), PEGA (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. GWRE, NOW, DDOG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GWRE or NOW or PEGA or DDOG or MSFT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
89), 0. 8% yield, +787. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSFT: +787. 7%, NOW: +38. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GWRE and NOW and PEGA and DDOG and MSFT?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GWRE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; NOW is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PEGA is a small-cap high-growth stock; DDOG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. MSFT pays a dividend while GWRE, NOW, PEGA, DDOG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.